Evaluation of left ventricular filling pressure by echocardiography in patients with atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Echocardiography is widely used to evaluate left ventricular (LV) diastolic function in patients suspected of heart failure. For patients in sinus rhythm, a combination of several echocardiographic parameters can differentiate between normal and elevated LV filling pressure with good accuracy. However, there is no established echocardiographic approach for the evaluation of LV filling pressure in patients with atrial fibrillation. The objective of the present study was to determine if a combination of several echocardiographic and clinical parameters may be used to evaluate LV filling pressure in patients with atrial fibrillation. RESULTS: In a multicentre study of 148 atrial fibrillation patients, several echocardiographic parameters were tested against invasively measured LV filling pressure as the reference method. No single parameter had sufficiently strong association with LV filling pressure to be recommended for clinical use. Based on univariate regression analysis in the present study, and evidence from existing literature, we developed a two-step algorithm for differentiation between normal and elevated LV filling pressure, defining values ≥ 15 mmHg as elevated. The parameters in the first step included the ratio between mitral early flow velocity and septal mitral annular velocity (septal E/e'), mitral E velocity, deceleration time of E, and peak tricuspid regurgitation velocity. Patients who could not be classified in the first step were tested in a second step by applying supplementary parameters, which included left atrial reservoir strain, pulmonary venous systolic/diastolic velocity ratio, and body mass index. This two-step algorithm classified patients as having either normal or elevated LV filling pressure with 75% accuracy and with 85% feasibility. Accuracy in EF ≥ 50% and EF < 50% was similar (75% and 76%). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with atrial fibrillation, no single echocardiographic parameter was sufficiently reliable to be used clinically to identify elevated LV filling pressure. An algorithm that combined several echocardiographic parameters and body mass index, however, was able to classify patients as having normal or elevated LV filling pressure with moderate accuracy and high feasibility.

Characterization of Tricuspid Valve Anatomy and Coaptation Gap in Subjects Receiving Tricuspid Transcatheter Edge-To-Edge Repair: Observations From the bRIGHT TriClip Study.

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) for the treatment of tricuspid regurgitation (TR) has experienced fast adoption following commercial approval. Defining the appropriate target population for TEER therapy is important to guide patient selection. The aim of this study was to characterize tricuspid valve anatomy and coaptation gap in subjects receiving TEER for the treatment of TR in a contemporary postmarket setting. METHODS: The bRIGHT study is a prospective, multicenter, single-arm, postmarket study evaluating the safety and effectiveness of the TriClip device. Procedural outcomes included implant success, acute procedural success, TR severity, major adverse events, single-leaflet device attachment, and embolization through 30 postprocedure days. Tricuspid valve characteristics, including morphology, annulus size, and leaflet mobility, were assessed via two-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography from the screening visit by an independent echo core lab to characterize subject variability. Coaptation gap measurements were taken in both the transgastric short-axis (TG SAX) and RV inflow/outflow views. RESULTS: The independent echo core lab performed a detailed assessment of the tricuspid valve on 135 consecutive subjects with available TG SAX views from 24 sites. Tricuspid valve morphologies included 2 to 5 leaflets, with a non-trileaflet valve in 28% of subjects and ≥4 leaflets in 21% of subjects. The etiology of TR was functional in 91% (96/105), mixed in 7% (7/105), and lead induced in 2% (2/105) of subjects. Leaflet mobility was mildly restricted in 69% (78/113) and moderately restricted in 7% (8/113) of subjects. Annulus diameter averaged 4.7 ± 0.7 cm with a range of 2.5 to 6.2 cm. From the TG SAX view, the coaptation gap measured 8.1 ± 3.1 and 5.2 ± 2.3 mm in the central and mid regions of the anterior-septal coaptation line and 6.6 ± 3.2 and 3.8 ± 2.1 mm in the central and mid regions of the septal-posterior coaptation line, respectively. From the right ventricular inflow/outflow view, the coaptation gap measured 4.7 ± 2.4, 5.2 ± 2.4, and 4.6 ± 3.0 mm in the anterior, mid, and posterior regions of the tricuspid valve, respectively. Thirty-day TR reduction (by number of grades) was similar among subjects with coaptation gaps of <7 mm, 7 to 10 mm, and >10 mm. CONCLUSION: A broad range of anatomies was observed in this postmarket population. Characterization of the tricuspid valve and coaptation gap will help to better understand and better define the target patient population for tricuspid TEER therapy.

Acute and Chronic Changes in Myocardial Work Parameters in Patients with Severe Primary Mitral Regurgitation Undergoing Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair.

BACKGROUND: The noninvasive assessment of myocardial work (MW) allows for the evaluation of left ventricular (LV) performance by considering the effect of LV afterload. This study aims to evaluate the acute and chronic impact of transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) on MW parameters and LV remodeling in patients with severe primary mitral regurgitation (PMR). METHODS: A total of 71 patients (age: 77 ± 9 years, females: 44%) with moderate-to-severe or severe PMR (effective regurgitant orifice: 0.57 ± 0.31 cm2; regurgitant volume: 80 ± 34 mL; LV end-systolic diameter: 42 ± 12 mm) underwent TEER after a global assessment by the heart team. MW indices were evaluated before the procedure, at hospital discharge, and at 1-year follow-up. LV remodeling was described as the percentage variation in LVEDV between baseline and 1-year follow-up. RESULTS: TEER caused an acute reduction in LVEF, global longitudinal strain (GLS), global MW index (GWI), work efficiency (GWE), and mechanical dispersion (MD) and a significant increase in wasted work (GWW). One year after the procedure, GLS, GWI, GWE, and MD recovered, whereas GWW remained significantly impaired. Baseline GWW (ß = -0.29, p = 0.03) was an independent predictor of LV reverse remodeling at 1-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with severe PMR undergoing TEER, the acute reduction in LV preload causes significant impairment to all the parameters of LV performance. Baseline GWW was the only independent predictor of LV reverse remodeling, suggesting that a lower myocardial energetic efficiency in the context of chronic preload increase might impact the left ventricular response to mitral regurgitation correction.

How myocardial work could be relevant in patients with an aortic valve stenosis?

AIMS: Myocardial work (MW) calculation is an attractive method to assess left ventricular (LV) myocardial function. In case of aortic stenosis (AS), assessment of work indices is challenging because it requires an accurate evaluation of LV-pressure curves. We sought to evaluate the performances of two distinct methods and to provide a quantitative comparison with invasive data. METHODS AND RESULTS: Model-based and template-based methods were defined and applied for the evaluation of LV-pressures on 67 AS-patient. Global Constructive (GCW), Wasted (GWW), Positive (GPW), Negative (GNW) MW and Global Work Efficiency (GWE), and Index (GWI) parameters were calculated using the available software computing the indices using brachial blood-pressure and trans-aortic mean pressure gradient (MPG) for estimating the LV-pressures vs. using a model-based and homemade software. A complete comparison was performed with invasive measurements. Patients were characterized by MPG of 49.8 ± 14.8 mmHg, the global longitudinal strain (GLS) was -15.0 ± 4.04%, GCW was 2107 ± 800 mmHg.% (model-based) and 2483 ± 1068 mmHg.% (template-based). The root mean square error (RMSE) and correlation were calculated for each patient and pressure estimation methods. The mean RMSE are 33.9 mmHg and 40.4 mmHg and the mean correlation coefficients are 0.81 and 0.72 for the model-based and template-based methods, respectively. The two methods present correlation coefficient r2 >0.75 for all the indices. CONCLUSION: The two non-invasive methods of LV pressure estimation and work indices computation correlate with invasive measurements. Although the model-based approach requires less information and is associated with slightly better performances, the implementation of template-based method is easier and is appropriate for clinical practice.

Interaction between mitral valve apparatus and left ventricle. Functional mitral regurgitation: A brief state-of-the-art overview.

In this overview, we described the mitral valve anatomy, focusing on its anatomical and functional relationships with the left ventricle (LV), and how an impaired coordination between the two can lead to valvular dysfunction with serious clinical consequences. In the 1st part of this overview, we sought to describe the anatomy of the mitral valve apparatus. In the 2nd part, we sought to analyze the interactions of the LV with the mitral valve, the possible etiologies that cause mitral regurgitation (MR), and therapeutic strategies that can be utilized nowadays in the effort to reinstate normal valvular function. The comprehension of these mechanisms makes it possible to implement appropriate therapeutic solutions in order to alleviate the burden of mitral valve disease.

Langerhans cell histiocytosis mimicking aggressive periodontitis: Challenges in diagnosis and management.

OBJECTIVE: Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH) is a rare disorder characterized by clonal proliferation of Langerhans cells that affects various organs. Oral involvement may simulate periodontal disease and cause significant diagnostic and management difficulties. Here, we present an interesting LCH case with severe periodontal destruction in a young woman in order to facilitate early recognition of this aggressive disease and successful participation of the general practitioner in the management of such patients. CASE PRESENTATION: A 21-year-old woman was referred for evaluation of recurrent episodes of dull pain in the gingiva for the last 9 months, which had not been successfully managed by her general practitioner. Clinical and radiographic examination showed extensive alveolar bone loss. Histopathologic examination revealed diffuse aggregates of Langerhans cells, while a complete work-up did not demonstrate evidence of systemic involvement. A diagnosis of LCH limited to the oral cavity was established. The patient received systemic chemotherapy in combination with appropriate dental care including gingival debridement and tooth immobilization. Following chemotherapy completion, comparative clinical, radiographic, and microscopic evaluation showed complete remission. During an 18-month follow-up period, frequent oral examinations and appropriate dental interventions confirmed the lack of LCH recurrence and guaranteed the stabilization of periodontal tissues. CONCLUSIONS: Oral soft and hard tissue involvement may be the only manifestation of LCH. The present case exemplifies the importance of close collaboration between general dentistry and its disciplines (periodontology, restorative dentistry, oral medicine, oral and maxillofacial pathology, and oral radiology), and hematology-oncology for diagnosis, management, treatment monitoring, and decision-making.

Changes of volatile sulphur compounds during therapy of a case series of patients with chronic periodontitis and halitosis.

AIM: To assess the effect of different stages of intervention on volatile sulphur compounds (VSCs) of periodontitis patients with halitosis, before and after non-surgical periodontal therapy. MATERIAL & METHODS: This clinical trial included 18 adults with chronic periodontitis and halitosis. After initial examination, patients received oral hygiene (OH) instructions and tongue cleaner. One week later, non-surgical periodontal therapy was completed within 48 h. Measurements were at baseline, 1 week after OH, 1 and 6 weeks post therapy. These included simplified plaque index (sPlI), probing pocket depth (PPD), bleeding on probing (BoP), Winkel Tongue Coating Index (WTCI), organoleptic scores (OLSs) of nose and mouth air and VSCs. RESULTS: sPlI, BoP, WTCI, OLS of the mouth air and VSCs showed significant differences (p < 0.05), even after 1 week of OH. A further significant decrease was determined 1 week after non-surgical therapy for WTCI, OLS (nose and mouth air) and methyl mercaptan concentration. A significant decrease, 6 weeks post therapy, was observed for sPlI, BoP, WTCI, PPD, OLS of the nose and mouth air and VSCs (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Oral hygiene and tongue cleaning improve the OLSs of the mouth air and reduce VSCs. Periodontal therapy further improves the OLSs and reduces the concentration of VSCs.