Investigating distinct and common abnormalities of resting-state functional connectivity in depression, anxiety, and their comorbid states.

Depression and anxiety disorders are highly comorbid and share neurobiological characteristics. However, this is usually not explicitly addressed in studies on intrinsic brain functioning in these disorders. Contrary to previous resting-state reports on small, monodiagnostic subsets of the current sample, we investigated resting-state functional connectivity (RSFC) in medication-free patients with depression, anxiety, comorbid depression and anxiety, and a healthy control group. RSFC was investigated in 140 medication-free subjects: 37 major depressive disorder patients (MDD), 30 patients with one or more anxiety disorders (ANX), 25 patients with MDD and one or more anxiety disorders (COM), and 48 healthy controls (HC). RSFC networks were calculated using a probabilistic independent component analysis. Using a dual regression approach, individuals׳ timecourses were extracted and regressed to obtain subjects-specific spatial maps, which were used for group comparisons in four networks of interest (limbic, default mode, salience and sensory-motor networks). When compared to HC, the COM group showed increased RSFC of the limbic network with a cluster containing the bilateral precuneus, intracalcarine cortex, lingual gyrus, and posterior cingulate, and with a cluster including the right precentral gyrus, inferior frontal gyrus, and middle frontal gyrus. This effect was specific for comorbid depression and anxiety. No abnormal RSFC of other networks or in the MDD and ANX groups was observed. No association was found between strength of RSFC and symptom severity. These results indicate that altered RSFC of cortical regions with a limbic network could be specific for comorbid depression and anxiety.

Neuroimaging resilience to stress: a review.

There is a high degree of intra-individual variation in how individuals respond to stress. This becomes evident when exploring the development of posttraumatic symptoms or stress-related disorders after exposure to trauma. Whether or not an individual develops posttraumatic symptoms after experiencing a traumatic event is partly dependent on a person's resilience. Resilience can be broadly defined as the dynamic process encompassing positive adaptation within the context of significant adversity. Even though research into the neurobiological basis of resilience is still in its early stages, these insights can have important implications for the prevention and treatment of stress-related disorders. Neuroimaging studies contribute to our knowledge of intra-individual variability in resilience and the development of posttraumatic symptoms or other stress-related disorders. This review provides an overview of neuroimaging findings related to resilience. Structural, resting-state, and task-related neuroimaging results associated with resilience are discussed. There are a limited number of studies available and neuroimaging research of resilience is still in its infancy. The available studies point at brain circuitries involved in stress and emotion regulation, with more efficient processing and regulation associated with resilience.

Resting-state functional connectivity in adults with childhood emotional maltreatment.

BACKGROUND: Childhood emotional maltreatment (CEM) has been associated with disturbances in emotional and behavioral functioning, and with changes in regional brain morphology. However, whether CEM has any effect on the intrinsic organization of the brain is not known. In this study, we investigated the effects of CEM on resting-state functional connectivity (RSFC) using seeds in the limbic network, the default-mode network (DMN) and the salience network, and the left dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (dmPFC). Method Using 3-T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), resting-state functional MRI (RS-fMRI) scans were obtained. We defined seeds in the bilateral amygdala, the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC), the posterior cingulate cortex (PCC) and the left dmPFC, and used these to examine whether individuals reporting CEM (n=44) differed from individuals reporting no CEM (n=44) in RSFC with other brain regions. The two groups were matched for age, gender, handedness and the presence of psychopathology. RESULTS: CEM was associated with decreased RSFC between the right amygdala and the bilateral precuneus and a cluster extending from the left insula to the hippocampus and putamen. In addition, CEM was associated with decreased RSFC between the dACC and the precuneus and also frontal regions of the brain. CONCLUSIONS: We found that CEM has a profound effect on RSFC in the limbic network and the salience network. Regions that show aberrant connectivity are related to episodic memory encoding, retrieval and self-processing operations.