ABSTRACT
AIM: The aim of this study was to investigate the interaction between the endothelin-1 (ET-1) and inducible NO synthase (iNOS) in anastomotic healing. METHODS: The expression of ET-1 and iNOS were investigated by immunohistochemistry in a rat end-to-end arterial anastomotic model. The aorta of 50 male Wistar rats was exposed, then transversely divided and re-anastomosed. The animals were sacrificed immediately after the operation (group A, control group), after 24 h (group B), on 7th postoperative day (group C), on 30th day (group D) and at 6 months (group E). Intima and media thickness and their ratio of the anastomotic segments in each group were calculated from computer digitized images of the individual sections. ET-1 and iNOS expression were measured on a semiquantitative scale ranging from 0 to 3. RESULTS: ET-1 was expressed from endothelial and smooth muscle cells (SMCs), while iNOs was expressed from SMCs and inflammatory cells. An intense expression of ET-1 was demonstrated mainly at 1 week and to a lesser degree at 1 month. Yet, at 6 months this expression was significantly weakened (P<0.001). In contrast, an intense iNOS expression was identified at 24 h, substantially regressing at statistical significant lower levels after 1 week (P<0.001). Bivariate correlation test showed a positive correlation between ET-1 and iNOS expression. CONCLUSION: ET-1 appears to play an important role in intimal thickening during anastomotic healing, especially in the late period of the process. Although there is a positive correlation between ET-1 and iNOS production, the activity of the latter is relatively limited after the first postanastomosis week.
Subject(s)
Aorta/surgery , Endothelin-1/metabolism , Nitric Oxide Synthase Type II/metabolism , Vascular Surgical Procedures , Wound Healing , Anastomosis, Surgical , Animals , Aorta/enzymology , Aorta/physiopathology , Endothelium, Vascular/enzymology , Immunohistochemistry , Male , Models, Animal , Muscle, Smooth, Vascular/enzymology , Rats , Rats, Wistar , Time FactorsABSTRACT
Clinicians, epidemiologists, and public health specialists tend to examine breast and ovarian cancer separately. Although this seems fairly rational and expected, both malignancies are estrogen related and thus share many risk factors. In this review, we investigate the common familial, reproductive, anthropometric, nutritional, and lifestyle risk factors of breast and ovarian cancer. We believe that the parallel examination of the two cancer types could significantly contribute to an improved prevention of "gynecological cancer" as a whole.
