ABSTRACT
Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is one of the most frequent chronic diseases, and comorbid obesity occurs in more than 60% of cases. Variations in body weight influence both OSA severity and OSA-related symptoms. We prospectively assessed the impact of a weight-loss program using the Berlin score to reflect OSA risk, and we also used the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) to assess daytime sleepiness. DietSleep was a prospective multicentric cohort study investigating OSA risk and daytime sleepiness before and after weight-loss intervention. One hundred and twenty-seven patients were included (initial OSA risk 36%), most of whom were women (85.8%) with a median body mass index (BMI) of 29.7 kg/m2, and the interquartile range was (27.6; 34). The diet-based weight-loss program induced a median decrease in BMI of 3.7 kg/m2 (−5; −2.9) (body weight~12.1% (−16.0; −8.8)) over a period of 171 days (114; 269). Changes in anthropometric values were similar regarding OSA risk after adjusting for initial values. Berlin scores significantly improved from 3 (1; 5) to 1 (0; 2), p < 0.01; the proportion of patients with a Berlin score ≥2 decreased from 36% to 7% after the intervention. The proportion of patients with ESS ≥11 decreased from 13% to 2%. These results confirm that a weight-loss program produces clinically relevant weight loss and a significant improvement in both OSA and subjective daytime sleepiness.
ABSTRACT
The aim of this study was to assess the impact of the nationwide total lockdown (LD) in France on weight loss and body composition modifications in subjects participating in a weight loss program and to evaluate the impact of remote consultations on participants' adherence to the weight loss program. The CO-RNPC study was a prospective multicentre cohort study including participants undergoing a two to six months program. The rate of weight loss in kg/week was computed before (15 days), during (99 days) and after LD (15 days). In the 1550 completing participants, body weight decreased from 87.1 kg [IQR 77.0; 100.2] to 82.3 kg [72.1; 94.3] resulting in a difference of -4.79 kg [-4.48; -5.10] (p < 0.01), with a corresponding reduction in waist circumference by 4 cm ([0; 9], p < 0.01). The median weight loss was 4.4 kg [0.5; 9.4] in those who used remote consultations, and 1.4 kg [0.8; 5.7] in the no remote consultation group (p < 0.01). In this large prospective cohort, we observed that the rate of weight loss was reduced during LD. This reduction was counterbalanced in participants involved in a remote consultation follow-up with a dose-effect response based on the number of remote consultations.