ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the relationship between the attitude towards orthodontic treatment and the objective level of orthodontic need, and variables like gender, socioeconomic status and geographical context, among 6- to 16-year-old children. METHODS: The attitude of 2284 Italian children towards orthodontics was assessed using the Child Orthodontic Attitude Survey (COAS) questionnaire, previously validated for Italian-speaking children. The level of orthodontic need was evaluated by using the Risk of Malocclusion Assessment (ROMA) Index while socioeconomic status (SES) was based on parental job activities. The univariate analysis was performed using chi-square tests to find differences between groups for categorical variables, while multivariate analyses were conducted using logistic regression models. RESULTS: Individuals with a higher SES had a statistically significant lower need of orthodontic treatment (P = 0.003). Children with a very high SES were from northern (20.8%) and central Italy (65.9%), while only 13.3% lived in southern Italy (P < 0.001). Logistic regression showed that females, older children, in-treatment subjects and children from the region of Puglia were more likely to have orthodontics (OR = 2.09; 95% CI: 1.66-2.64, OR = 1.08; 95% CI: 1.01-1.15, OR = 1.48, 95% CI: 1.11-1.97, OR = 1.43; 95% CI: 1.05-1.95, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The orthodontic treatment attitude largely depends on age, gender and geographical context but is not influenced by the real level of orthodontic therapy need.
Subject(s)
Attitude to Health , Health Services Needs and Demand , Orthodontics, Corrective , Adolescent , Age Factors , Chi-Square Distribution , Child , Female , Humans , Italy , Logistic Models , Male , Sex Factors , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
PURPOSES: The purposes of the study are: (1) to establish if cephalometry and upper airway examination may provide tools for detecting facioscapulohumeral (FSHD) patients at risk for obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS); and (2) to correlate cephalometry and otorhinolaryngologic evaluation with clinical and polysomnographic features of FHSD patients with OSAS. METHODS: Patients were 13 adults affected by genetically confirmed FSHD and OSAS, 11 men, with mean age 47.1 ± 12.8 years (range, 33-72 years). All underwent clinical evaluation, Manual Muscle Test, Clinical Severity Scale for FSHD, Epworth Sleepiness Scale, polysomnography, otorhinolaryngologic evaluation, and cephalometry. RESULTS: Cephalometric evidence of pharyngeal narrowing [posterior airways space (PAS) < 10 mm] was present in only one patient. The mandibular planus and hyoid (MP-H) distance ranged from 6.5 to 33.1 mm (mean, 17.5 ± 7.8 mm). The mean length of soft palate (PNS-P) was 31.9 ± 4.8 mm (range, 22.2 to 39.7 mm). No patient presented an ANB angle > 7°. There was no significant correlation between cephalometric measures, clinical scores, and PSG indexes. PAS and MP-H were not related to the severity of the disease. CONCLUSIONS: Upper airway morphological evaluation is of poor utility in the clinical assessment of FSHD patients and do not allow to predict the occurrence of sleep-related upper airway obstruction. This suggests that the pathogenesis of OSAS in FSHD is dependent on the muscular impairment, rather than to the anatomy of upper airways.
