Microbiological Profile and Clinical Features of Septic Arthritis of the Shoulder: A 10-Year Cohort Single-Centre Study.

Introduction  Septic arthritis (SA) constitutes a pressing orthopedic emergency characterized by acute, non-traumatic joint pain. Timely diagnosis and intervention are imperative to avert complications such as chondrolysis and systemic sepsis. The etiology is predominantly hematogenous, necessitating an integrated approach involving surgical and microbiological modalities. Shoulder aspiration and microbiological analysis play pivotal roles in guiding treatment, especially when positive findings prompt more aggressive therapeutic strategies. This study aims to elucidate the nuanced clinical and epidemiological characteristics of septic arthritis in both native and prosthetic joints within a singular institutional cohort over a decade. Methods  This retrospective case series analysis spanned a 10-year period, focusing on non-prosthetic shoulder joints from January 2012 to July 2021. In this timeframe, only 183 aspirations were performed and sent to the microbiology department for analysis, including cultures, microscopy, and antibiotic sensitivity tests for positive cultures. The study delved into the microbiological profile of infections, encompassing gram stain, culture positivity rates, identification of microorganisms, and antibiotic susceptibility patterns. Additionally, the incidence of primary joint infections with resistant strains, particularly methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), was scrutinized. Statistical analysis utilized the SPSS program version 20.0 (IBM Inc., Armonk, New York), with a significance level set at 5%. The project, registered with the trust's clinical audit department (Reg #5372), adhered to the Declaration of Helsinki and good clinical practice guidelines. Data collection involved extracting non-identifiable patient modifiers from the laboratory database bank into Excel spreadsheets. Results  The study included 183 patients, with 108 (59%) females and 75 (41%) males. The average age was 76.2±16.5 years. Among them, 138 (75.4%) reported pain, and 15 (8.2%) had a body temperature over 37.8°C. Lab results showed a mean white blood cell count of 11.6±4.5 and an average C-reactive protein level of 121.7±102.1. Leucocytosis (>11,000 WBC) was seen in 82 (44.8%) cases. Elevated C-reactive protein (CRP; >10 mg/dl) was found in 136 (74.3%) patients. Synovial fluid analysis revealed no crystals in 91.3% of cases. Microbial resistance analysis showed 19 strains resistant to co-trimoxazole and 11 to erythromycin. Among co-trimoxazole-resistant strains, 73.7% were Staphylococcus aureus, a statistically significant association (p<0.001). Conclusion The evolving sensitivity patterns of microbes in septic arthritis underscore the necessity to reassess empirical antibiotic therapy. Subsequent joint damage resulting from infection can result in substantial disability.

Expediting the Management of Suspected Cauda Equina Syndrome (CES) in the Emergency Department Through Clinical Pathway Design at a District General Hospital: A Quality Improvement Project.

BACKGROUND: Cauda equina syndrome (CES) is an uncommon condition that occurs due to compression of the terminal portion of the spinal cord. Early recognition and intervention in CES are crucial for an improved prognosis. Delayed diagnosis and action may lead to irreversible adverse effects, i.e., permanent disability, and in some circumstances can lead to litigation. AIM:  The aim of this quality improvement project (QIP) was to identify areas for improvement and expedite the management of suspected CES patients presenting to the hospital. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was a retrospective study in which patients admitted to the Poole district hospital were analyzed in three groups with more than 50 patients in each subset group. The first group was audited from 1st October 2020 to 27th November 2020; a re-audit on the second group of patients was done from 1st June 2021 to 16th July 2021; the third group was re-audited from 1st of January 2022 to 31st of March 2022. RESULTS: There were a total of 168 patients in all audit groups, of whom 71% were female. The mean time from getting triaged to having an MRI improved from 13hrs 54mins to 10hrs 39mins. The total inpatient length of stay (LOS) of less than 24 hours was 28% in the first cycle and improved to 54.4% by the third cycle of the audit. Eight patients exhibited a diagnosis of cauda equina syndrome (CES) and were sent to the tertiary care center. CONCLUSIONS: This quality improvement project identified delays in requesting the MRI for the diagnosis of CES and was addressed by ED booking the scans directly. This, in turn, reduced the length of stay in the hospital for patients who did not have cauda equina syndrome.

A Clinical Audit of Orthopaedic Operation Note Documentation and Digitalization of the Operative Note Template: A Quality Improvement Project.

Background Good communication between a surgical team and other colleagues is vital, and the medium of communication is often the operative note. It is essential to ensure continuity of care between the operating team and other colleagues; also, it provides a medicolegal record of patient care. It checks all the four main domains of good surgical practice guidelines set by the Royal College of Surgeons (RCS) of England. The aims of this project were to evaluate the quality of operation notes against the set parameters by the RCS and to improve quality of the operative notes using information technology (IT) service software update to provide operative note digitalization. Methods This was a retrospective and prospective closed-loop audit, in which the operative notes were analysed for the Trauma and Orthopaedics speciality. Three separate cycles of audits were completed. In the the first cycle, data were collected retrospectively from all the operative notes, from June 1, 2020, to June 15, 2020; then, data were collected prospectively after making interventions to establish digitalization of the operative notes. The second cycle was completed from February 14 to 21, 2021, and from March 1 to 7, 2021. The third cycle was completed from August 1 to 31, 2021. All data were collected in Excel using a checklist that evaluated 34 parameters. These parameters were based on the recommendations of RCS Good Surgical Practice guidelines. All trauma and orthopaedic patients were included regardless of the type of procedure. There were no exclusion criteria in place. Results An overall increase from 9.5% to 66.7% in typed operative notes was achieved with the introduction of the templated operative note documentation service. There was a 40% reduction in the use of handwritten operative notes. Concerns regarding legibility were reduced in view of the digitalization of the operative notes. The first cycle of the audit, in terms of the parameters yielded, found that the operative notes were missing 10 important parameters, independent of the author grade; these were recorded in less than 10% of the operative notes. The second cycle, in terms of the parameters yielded, found that the operative notes were missing four important parameters, independent of the author grade; these were recorded in less than 10% of the operative notes. The third cycle of the audit, in terms of the parameters yielded, found that the operative notes were missing three important parameters. Specific documentation for 12 different parameters improved over the course of the three Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles. Conclusion Royal College of Surgeons guidelines and integration with IT services significantly improved the quality and legibility of operative notes that were being documented in the trauma and orthopaedics department. Structured document standards and good integration with a computer-based IT service help prompt surgeons to document in a better and easy way, thereby leading to improved clinical documentation.