ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Without highly qualified nurse anesthesia educators and administrators, the health care system will be threatened by the inadequate supply of certified registered nurse anesthetists (CRNAs). PURPOSE: American Association of Nurse Anesthesiologists' Faculty Stabilization Task Force (FSTF) analyzed reasons for high faculty turnover and developed recommendations to support nurse anesthesia faculty and administrators. METHODS: A survey evaluated participants' current role, leadership development opportunities, mentorship experiences, and resource needs. RESULTS: Of 109 respondents, 87 (80%) were program administrators or assistant administrators with less than 5 years of experience in their role. Despite academic experience, 51% felt adequately prepared for their role. CONCLUSIONS: The FSTF provided 2 recommendations: to create a robust faculty development program for all faculty at all levels of CRNA education and a repository of information needed for program administrators and faculty to oversee and educate students in a high-quality CRNA program.
Subject(s)
Faculty, Nursing , Needs Assessment , Nurse Anesthetists , Nursing Education Research , Humans , Faculty, Nursing/statistics & numerical data , Faculty, Nursing/psychology , Nurse Anesthetists/education , Surveys and Questionnaires , Nursing Evaluation Research , Internet , United StatesABSTRACT
Simulation is an integral part of the healthcare educational landscape and a key element in the future of graduate professional education. For the past three decades, simulation-based educational methodology has been gaining popularity in nurse anesthesia educational programs (NAEP). There is currently limited objective evidence documenting modalities used or educational outcomes addressed through simulation in NAEPs. In 2018, the American Association of Nurse Anesthesiology (AANA) established a Simulation Subcommittee of the AANA Education Committee and tasked the group with two primary goals: 1) to gain a better understanding of the current state of simulation education and 2) to review responses with regard to how NAEPs could best incorporate simulation elements within their curriculum to meet requirements while adhering to the guidelines of the Council on Accreditation of Nurse Anesthesia Educational Programs. A survey tool was developed and distributed to all programs to assess the utilization of simulation, available simulation resources, ongoing faculty development efforts, and barriers to use of this educational approach. Survey results indicated that simulation is valued as an effective method within NAEPs for a variety of teaching and learning activities and is utilized to support achievement of both technical and nontechnical learning outcomes for student registered nurse anesthetists.
