Diagnostic accuracy of serum protein induced by vitamin K absence (PIVKA-II), serum a-fetoprotein and their combination for hepatocellular carcinoma among Caucasian cirrhotic patients with diagnostic or non-diagnostic serum a-fetoprotein levels.

AIM: The aim of our study was to evaluate the accuracy of serum biomarkers (AFP/PIVKA-II) and their combination in HCC diagnosis among Caucasian cirrhotic patients. METHODS: Serum AFP/PIVKA-II levels were evaluated in 218 cirrhotics (163 males, 118 CTP-A, 66 ALBI-I, 111 with varices, 63 with diabetes) with (n = 90) or without (n = 128) HCC. Patients with HCC were categorized to BCLC Stage 0/A (n = 12), B (n = 21), C (n = 48), and D (n = 9). RESULTS: The two groups were comparable for all baseline parameters except for age, platelets, and diabetes presence. Median levels of AFP (239.1 vs. 4.0 ng/mL) and PIVKA-II (4082.7 vs. 45.8 mAU/mL) were both significantly higher in HCC group compared to controls (p < 0.001). AUROC and cutoff value for HCC diagnosis were 88%/12.35 ng/mL (AFP) and 84.4%/677.13 mAU/mL (PIVKA-II), whereas their combination showed better diagnostic accuracy (AUROC = 90.2%). The diagnostic accuracy of each biomarker separately was moderate or good in BCLC-0/A/B and was excellent only for BCLC-C patients (AFP: AUROC = 94.3%, cutoff = 12.35 ng/mL and PIVKA-II: 91.3%, 253.51 mAU/mL) whereas their combination presented quite acceptable results in BCLC-B (AUROC = 92.4%) and BCLC-C (AUROC = 95.7%). Excluding HCC patients with high AFP (above 400 ng/mL), the diagnostic accuracy of each biomarker separately and their combination was moderate/good in all groups, except for their combination in BCLC-C (AUROC = 90.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Each biomarker separately showed acceptable accuracy for detecting HCC in cirrhotic patients and excellent for those in BCLC-C stage. The combination of the biomarkers presented excellent results in BCLC-B/C patients. The diagnostic accuracy of PIVKA-II and the combination of the two biomarkers in patients expressing low/non-diagnostic AFP levels was good in BCLC-B and excellent in BCLC-C patients.

A Case Report on a Giant Hepatic Inflammatory Adenoma in a Young Female That Presented as Spontaneous Intrahepatic Hematoma.

Among the extensive variety of disorders that can cause acute abdominal pain are hepatocellular adenomas (HCAs), pathological entities that otherwise are asymptomatic. Here, we describe a 33-year-old female who presented in the emergency department with acute abdominal pain and a history of liver focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) diagnosed 10 years ago. An abdominal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed that the cause of the pain was an intrahepatic hematoma. The mass was surgically removed, and the biopsy revealed inflammatory adenomas, a subtype of HCA. Hepatic adenoma diagnosis remains challenging by clinical and imaging techniques, and usually, a biopsy is the main diagnostic tool. HCA should be differentiated from hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), FNH, hepatic angioleiomyoma, and hepatic hemangioma. In our case, HCA was misdiagnosed in the past as FNH. HCA rarely may present as acute right abdomen pain, and a potential catastrophic hemorrhage or rupture must be excluded.

HERACLIS-HDV cohort for the factors of underdiagnosis and prevalence of hepatitis D virus infection in HBsAg-positive patients.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Hepatitis D virus (HDV) underdiagnosis remains common. We assessed the HDV screening and prevalence rates in HBsAg-positive patients seen at tertiary liver centres throughout Greece as well as factors affecting HDV diagnosis. METHODS: All adult HBsAg-positive patients seen within the last 5 years were included. Non-screened patients who visited or could be recalled to the clinics over a 6-month period were prospectively tested for anti-HDV. RESULTS: Of 5079 HBsAg-positive patients, 53% had anti-HDV screening (41% before and 12% after study initiation). Pre-study (8%-88%) and total screening rates (14%-100%) varied widely among centres. Screening rates were associated with older age, known risk group, elevated ALT, centre location and size and period of first visit. Anti-HDV prevalence was 5.8% without significant difference in patients screened before (6.1%) or after study initiation (4.7%, p = 0.240). Anti-HDV positivity was associated with younger age, parenteral drug use, born abroad, advanced liver disease and centre location. Overall, HDV RNA detectability rate was 71.6% being more frequent in anti-HDV-positive patients with elevated ALT, advanced liver disease and hepatitis B therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Anti-HDV screening rates and recall capabilities vary widely among Greek liver clinics being higher in HBsAg-positive patients of known risk group with active/advanced liver disease seen at smaller centres, while non-medical factors are also important. Anti-HDV prevalence varies throughout Greece being higher in patients born abroad with younger age, parenteral drug use and advanced liver disease. Viremia is more frequently but not exclusively detected in anti-HDV-positive patients with elevated ALT and advanced liver disease.