The patient journey in chronic myeloid leukemia patients on tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapies: qualitative insights using a global ethnographic approach.

BACKGROUND: The advent and approval of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have dramatically improved the life expectancy of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), which has been transformed into a chronically manageable disease. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to qualitatively assess the effects of diagnosis and treatment on patients with CML to offer recommendations for health-care providers (HCPs) for the better support of patients. METHODS: By use of an ethnographic approach based on in-home interviews, photo journals, and an optional telephone debriefing interview, this study included 50 patients with CML from Brazil, France, Germany, Russia, and Spain, including patients within 18 months of diagnosis and receiving frontline TKI therapy (n = 20), patients between >18 months and 7 years from diagnosis and receiving ongoing frontline therapy (n = 20), and patients who switched to second- or third-line TKI therapy (n = 10). In-home interviews were designed to address patient perceptions and experiences regarding such issues as adherence, disease knowledge, disease management, and relationships with HCPs. Transcripts from these interviews and other data were analyzed to identify similar patterns and themes experienced by patients with CML. RESULTS: The investigation generated a five-stage, patient-centered model of the experience of the patient throughout diagnosis, treatment, and management of CML: crisis, hope, adaptation, new normal, and uncertainty. Patients proceeded through these stages in the course of their disease management. The stages were affected by the patients' emotional and social experiences, their knowledge about CML, their positive experiences with their HCPs and/or treatment, and their optimism about their long-term prognosis. CONCLUSIONS: We identified five common stages experienced by patients with CML and suggest several recommendations for HCPs on the management of patients through their disease journey. By providing support, education, and reassurance, HCPs can help patients as they move through the early stages of crisis and hope. When patients are in the adaptation and new-normal stages, HCPs can help patients achieve and maintain a new normality by setting expectations for the risks/benefits of long-term chronic drug therapy and disease monitoring and by continuing to support patient adherence.

Cost-effectiveness of 3-years of adjuvant imatinib in gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Recent clinical trial data have demonstrated that 3 years vs 1 year of adjuvant imatinib therapy for patients with surgically resected Kit+ Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GIST) leads to a significant improvement in recurrence-free survival and overall survival. This study assesses the cost-effectiveness of treating patients with 3 years vs 1 year of imatinib from a US payer's perspective. METHODS: A Markov model was developed to predict GIST recurrence and treatment costs. Patients enter the model after surgery and transition among three health states: free of recurrence, recurrence, and death. Recurrence, mortality, costs, and utilities were derived from clinical trial and published literature. Expected costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were estimated and discounted at 3%/year. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted. RESULTS: Patients receiving 3 years of imatinib had higher QALYs (8.53 vs 7.18) than those receiving 1 year of imatinib. Total lifetime per-patient cost was $302,100 for 3 years vs $217,800 for 1 year of imatinib. Incremental cost effectiveness ratio of 3 years vs 1 year of imatinib was $62,600/QALY. Model results were sensitive to long-term rate of GIST recurrence (beyond 5 years) and cost of imatinib. At a threshold of $100,000/QALY, 3 years vs 1 year of imatinib was cost-effective in 100% of simulations. LIMITATIONS: The model is a simplified representation of disease natural history and may not account for all possible health states and complications associated with disease. Resource utilization on treatment was estimated using the resource use data from previous trials, therefore calculated medical costs might be over-estimated compared to the real-world setting. CONCLUSIONS: Model results suggest that treatment with 3 years vs 1 year of imatinib is cost-effective at a $100,000/QALY threshold. Clinical and economic results suggest treating surgically resected Kit+ GIST patients with 3 years of imatinib would result in improved quality-adjusted survival.

Experiences and perspectives on the GIST patient journey.

PURPOSE: The tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) imatinib has improved outcomes for patients with unresectable or metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST), and for patients receiving adjuvant therapy following GIST resection. This qualitative study explored the experiences and emotions of patients through GIST diagnosis, treatment initiation, disease control, and in some patients, loss of response and therapy switch. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Ethnographic investigations were conducted, including semi- structured qualitative interviews of patients with resected or metastatic/unresectable GIST and their caregivers, from Canada (n = 15); the United States (n = 10); and Brazil, France, Germany, Russia, and Spain (n = 5 each). Some interviewees also kept 7-day photo journals. Responses were qualitatively analyzed to identify gaps and unmet needs where communication about disease, treatments, and adherence could be effective. RESULTS: Patients shared common experiences during each stage of disease management (crisis, hope, adaptation, new normal, and uncertainty). Patients felt a sense of crisis during diagnosis, followed by hope upon TKI therapy initiation. Over time, they came to adapt to their new lives (new normal) with cancer. With each follow-up, patients confronted the uncertainty of becoming TKI resistant and the possible need to switch therapy. During uncertainty many patients sought new information regarding GIST. Cases of disease progression and drug switching caused patients to revert to crisis and restart their emotional journey. Patients with primary or unresectable/metastatic GIST shared similar journeys, especially regarding uncertainty, although differences in the scope and timing of phases were observed. Strategies patients used to remain adherent included obtaining family support, setting reminder mechanisms, taking medicine at routine times, and storing medicine in prominent places. CONCLUSIONS: Physicians and support staff can manage patient expectations and encourage adherence to therapy, which may facilitate optimal patient outcomes. Patient education about current GIST developments and adherence across all phases of the patient journey are of benefit.