ABSTRACT
A theoretical study on evolution has been carried out, with the aim of disproving some value judgements essentially represented by the idea that the degree of evolution can increase. Our conclusions are based upon the preliminary statement that efficiency of survival is directly related to regulative ability. On this ground our reasoning led us to conclude that: (i) actual fitness measure units derive from an anthropocentric bias, and they mainly evaluate similarity to man rather than some objective parameter; (ii) a complete and meaningful unit is, at present, impossible to achieve in practice; (iii) since the study of evolution is only descriptive, and since the evolutionary process is time dependent, every ecological dominant living today must be considered as the most fitted to its environment; (iv) the view we can have of evolution is simply a transection, so that many generalized phyletic trees are trivial and it is impossible to claim the persistence today of those "ancestor organisms" upon which such trees are constructed. Moreover, a functional definition of the term "organism" is given, following criteria drawn from bioenergetics and from biological hierarchization. The concluding step is the assemblage of a slightly heterodox model for evolution.
