Classification of choroiditis based on inflammatory lesion process rather than fundus appearance: enhanced comprehension through the ICGA concepts of the iceberg and jellyfish effects.

Choroidal inflammatory diseases have been classically grouped under the term of white dot syndromes (WDS), a term only based on the appearance (white-yellow dots) of inflammatory fundus lesions. This purely descriptive and vague terminology, regrouping a pot-pourri of posterior inflammatory conditions, probably came into use because the precise exploration of the choroid was not possible, and also because many of the diseases were rare and not well understood. Since the availability of indocyanine green angiography (ICGA) that allows one to explore the choroidal compartment, it became possible to understand the lesion mechanism of choroiditides and to classify this group of diseases according to their pathophysiological behaviour. It was our aim to show here that the term WDS is applied to and encompasses inflammatory conditions that are characterized by completely different lesion mechanisms and should therefore be classified separately from each other. ICGA made it possible to differentiate two types of choroiditides, including on the one hand inflammatory diseases of the choroidal stroma and on the other hand inflammatory diseases of the choriocapillaris. Unfortunately, twenty years after its advent, ICGA is still not used routinely in uveitis centres and the traditional inappropriate but overall useless term of WDS is still used, maintaining the confusion about these diseases. The aim of this work was (i) to illustrate that meaningful exploration of choroidal inflammation, mostly occult and inaccessible to usual investigations, has to be performed using ICGA, (ii) to insist on the crucial importance of ICGA in the management of choroiditis and (iii) to enhance the comprehension of the ICGA-based classification of choroiditis, by using the demonstrative and striking analogue concepts of iceberg and jellyfish effects.

Indocyanine green angiography (ICGA) is essential for the early diagnosis of birdshot chorioretinopathy.

BACKGROUND: Birdshot chorioretinitis (BC) is a rare disease involving the retina and the choroid independently. The hallmark for BC is the presence of depigmented oval lesion of the choroid, the so called "birdshot lesions", however in the early phase of disease these lesions are often not visible. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of BC patients that were investigated in Centre for Ophthalmic Specialised Care, Lausanne, Switzerland between 1995 and 2010 was performed. Patients seen in the initial phase of BC disease devoid of a specific diagnosis when referred were included. Clinical investigations along with fluorescein angiography (FA), indocyanine green angiography (ICGA) and visual field testing (VF) were analysed. RESULTS: Three out of 7 patients (43 %) seen in the initial phase of the disease devoid of a diagnosis at presentation were analysed. These patients presented with no "birdshot" lesions whatsoever. All three patients were HLA-A29 positive, presented with vitreitis and retinal vasculitis on FA. On ICGA, all 3 patients presented bilateral evenly distributed choroidal hypofluorescent dark dots (HDD) representing choroidal granulomas. CONCLUSIONS: ICGA, by providing occult information on the choroid, is an essential tool for early diagnosis of BC. Because ICGA is still not universally practiced in uveitis centres early disease is often missed, its diagnosis delayed and proper treatment started late.

Retinal nerve fibre layer measurements and optic nerve head analysis in multiple sclerosis patients.

PURPOSE: To verify whether scanning laser polarimeter with the new variable corneal compensation algorithm (GDx VCC) and scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (Heidelberg Retina Tomograph (HRT)) allow measuring retinal ganglion cell loss in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We enrolled 23 MS patients with a history of previous demyelinating monocular optic neuritis. Examination included visual evoked potentials (VEPs), scanning laser ophthalmoscopy, and scanning laser polarimeter. HRT was performed to assess optic nerve head (ONH) shape, while GDx VCC was used to evaluate the retinal nerve fibre layer thickness (RNFLt) around the ONH. Statistical analysis was performed comparing results obtained for each eye with the available normative database and with the unaffected fellow eye. RESULTS: When the affected eye group was compared to the fellow-eye group, a significant (P<0.05) difference was found for few GDx VCC parameters. In contrast, no significant correlation was observed between clinical assessment and imaging techniques when the normal database of HRT and GDx VCC was used. A significant association was observed between VEP latency and some GDx VCC parameters. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggested that scanning laser polarimetry could detect loss of ganglion cells following demyelinating optic neuritis, but further studies are needed.

Evaluation of threshold estimation and learning effect of two perimetric strategies, SITA Fast and CLIP, in damaged visual fields.

PURPOSE: The threshold estimation, learning effect, and between-algorithm differences of the Fast Swedish Interactive Thresholding Algorithm (SITA Fast), of the Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA), and the Continuous Light Increment Perimetry (CLIP) strategy of the Oculus Twinfield perimeter were evaluated in damaged visual fields. METHODS: Twenty-one glaucomatous patients with damaged visual fields (MD worse than -8 dB) underwent Oculus Full Threshold (FT), Humphrey FT, SITA Fast, and CLIP 30-2 perimetric examinations. All the tests were repeated in a second session at least 3 days later. The point-wise differences in absolute sensitivity and of the total deviation plot values between FT and fast algorithms, between fast algorithms and the learning effect were evaluated (Wilcoxon test and Bland-Altman analysis). RESULTS: The average point-wise sensitivity difference between SITA Fast and HFA FT strategy (0.84 dB) was significantly lower than that found between CLIP and Oculus FT strategy (1.71 dB). Between-algorithm point-wise differences of the total deviation plot values of the fast strategies were not significantly different. Learning effect for SITA Fast (0.67 dB) was higher than that found for CLIP (0.39 dB). Test time for SITA (367+/-71 sec) and CLIP (453+/-98 sec) were about 55% and 35%, respectively, shorter (p<0.001) than those found with FT algorithms. The acceptance for fast algorithms and particularly for CLIP was significantly better. CONCLUSIONS: The two fast strategies, even though using very different algorithms, showed good threshold estimation compared to FT strategies with a consistent time saving in damaged visual fields.

Corneal thickness and visual field damage in glaucoma patients.

PURPOSE: To verify whether there was a significant correlation between central corneal thickness (CCT) and visual field damage in patients with primary open angle glaucoma (POAG). METHODS: A total of 99 eyes with POAG were consecutively recruited. Patients were classified as glaucomatous based on visual field and optic nerve head damage. All underwent applanation tonometry, Humphrey perimetry, and measurement of CCT with ultrasonic pachymetry. Based on CCT value, the sample was split at the mode in two groups (group 1<535 microm, n=49; group 2>or=535 microm, n=50). RESULTS: Entire cohort: mean CCT 554 microm+/-45.03; mean deviation (MD) -6.68 dB+/-7.32; pattern standard deviation (PSD) 5.33+/-3.75; intraocular pressure (IOP) 17.91+/-4.16 mmHg with treatment. Group 1: CCT was 504.8 microm+/-30.8; MD -9.01 dB+/-8.72; PSD 6.38+/-3.99; IOP 18.02 mmHg+/-4.66. Group 2: mean CCT 574.6 microm+/-35.03; MD -4.39 dB+/-4.70; PSD 4.25+/-3.19; IOP 17.79 mmHg+/-3.57. A significant difference was found between the two groups for both MD and PSD. Linear regression analysis showed a significant correlation between CCT and PSD (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our data show that patients with a thinner cornea had a worse MD and PSD. As a thinner CCT causes an underestimation of the true IOP, there may be a delay in the diagnosis of POAG or an inadequate estimate of the clinical course despite apparently desirable IOP applanation readings.

Conventional perimetry, short-wavelength automated perimetry, frequency-doubling technology, and visual evoked potentials in the assessment of patients with multiple sclerosis.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the diagnostic power of conventional, achromatic, automated perimetry (CAP), short-wavelength automated perimetry (SWAP), frequency-doubling technology (FDT) perimetry, and visual evoked potentials (VEP) in a group of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) with or without a history of optic neuritis. METHODS: Thirty eyes of 15 patients (5 male, 10 female, average age 38+/-7 years) with confirmed diagnosis of MS underwent CAP, SWAP (Humphrey 750-II VFA, program central 30-2, full-threshold strategy), FDT perimetry (program N-30), and pattern VEPs. Sixteen eyes (53.3%) had no history of ocular involvement and a negative ophthalmologic examination. They were matched with a control group of 10 healthy volunteers (4 male, 6 female, average age 31+/-10 years). The mean deviation (MD) and the pattern standard deviation (PSD) of the two groups were compared (t-test). Fourteen eyes (46.7%) had, on the contrary, a history of optic neuritis. Inside this group, the MD and the PSD of the three techniques were correlated (Spearman's rank test), in order to investigate whether any significant differences might be revealed by these techniques in pointing out the total amount of visual field damage. RESULTS: When comparing MS patients without signs or symptoms of ocular involvement and a control group, no significant differences were found for CAP MD, CAP PSD, and FDT PSD. Significant differences were found, on the contrary, for SWAP MD (p=0.0014), SWAP PSD (p=0.0001), and FDT MD (p=0.0001). When considering the MD and the PSD of the three techniques in the group of MS patients who had a history of optic neuritis, a significant correlation was found only between CAP MD and SWAP MD (r=0.0057), with a tendency by SWAP to reveal a higher rate of visual field loss. The other correlations were not significant. According to predefined criteria, the group of asymptomatic subjects had abnormal CAP in 1 eye (6.25%), abnormal SWAP in 9 (56.2%), abnormal FDT in 11 (68.7%), and abnormal VEPs in 7 (43.7%). The combined use of all techniques allowed us to identify silent optic nerve impairment in 15 (93.7%) eyes. CONCLUSIONS: Short-wavelength automated perimetry and FDT perimetry are two non-conventional perimetric techniques that were mainly developed for the early detection of glaucomatous damage. The results of this study demonstrate their efficacy also in detecting early visual field deficits in MS patients without clinical signs of optic neuropathy. Frequency doubling perimetry, in particular, proved to be an easy, fast, and sensitive technique in the assessment of patients with MS. Our results also suggest that subclinical visual involvement in MS can be better diagnosed using multiple (neurophysiologic and psychophysical) tests.