Discontinuation of imatinib in patients with oligometastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumour who are in complete radiological remission: a prospective multicentre phase II study.

INTRODUCTION: Metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST) is considered incurable, and life-long treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors is recommended. We investigated whether selected patients with metastatic GIST may remain in durable remission despite imatinib discontinuation. PATIENTS: In this 1-group, prospective, multicentre phase II trial selected patients with oligometastatic (≤3 metastases) GIST discontinued imatinib treatment. Eligible patients had been treated with imatinib >5 years without progression and had no radiologically detectable metastases after metastasectomy, radiofrequency ablation (RFA) or complete response to imatinib. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) 3-years after stopping imatinib. Overall survival (OS) and quality of life (QoL) were secondary endpoints. RESULTS: The trial closed prematurely due to slow accrual. Between January 5, 2017, and June 5, 2019, 13 patients were enrolled, of whom 12 discontinued imatinib. The median follow-up time was 55 months (range, 36 to 69) after study entry. Five (42%) of the 12 eligible patients remained progression free, and seven (58%) progressed with a median time to progression 10 months. Median PFS was 23 months and the estimated 3-year PFS 41%. Six of the seven patients who progressed restarted imatinib, and all six responded. Three-year OS was 100%, and all patients were alive at the time of the study analysis. QoL measured 5 and 11 months after discontinuation of imatinib demonstrated improvement compared to the baseline. INTERPRETATION: A substantial proportion of selected patients with oligometastatic GIST treated with imatinib and metastasis surgery/RFA may remain disease-free for ≥3 years with improved QoL after stopping of imatinib.

Comprehensive Genomic Profiling Alters Clinical Diagnoses in a Significant Fraction of Tumors Suspicious of Sarcoma.

PURPOSE: Tumor classification is a key component in personalized cancer care. For soft tissue and bone tumors, this classification is currently based primarily on morphology assessment and immunohistochemical staining. However, these standard-of-care methods can pose challenges for pathologists. We therefore assessed how whole-genome and whole-transcriptome sequencing (WGTS) impacted tumor classification and clinical management when interpreted together with histomorphology. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We prospectively evaluated WGTS in routine diagnostics of 200 soft tissue and bone tumors suspicious for malignancy, including DNA and RNA isolation from the tumor, and DNA isolation from a peripheral blood sample or any non-tumor tissue. RESULTS: Based on specific genomic alterations or absence of presumed findings, WGTS resulted in reclassification of 7% (13/197) of the histopathological diagnoses. Four cases were downgraded from low-grade sarcomas to benign lesions, and two cases were reclassified as metastatic malignant melanomas. Fusion genes associated with specific tumor entities were found in 30 samples. For malignant soft tissue and bone tumors, we identified treatment relevant variants in 15% of cases. Germline pathogenic variants associated to a hereditary cancer syndrome were found in 22 participants (11%). CONCLUSION: We conclude that WGTS provides an important dimension of data which aids in the classification of soft tissue and bone tumors, correcting a significant fraction of clinical diagnoses, and identifies molecular targets relevant for precision medicine. However, genetic findings need to be evaluated in their morphopathological context, just as germline findings need to be evaluated in the context of patient phenotype and family history.

Impact of Primary Breast Surgery on Overall Survival of Patients With De Novo Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Breast surgery in cases of de novo metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is associated with improved outcomes in retrospective studies, although the results of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are conflicting. We aimed to investigate whether surgery in this context prolongs patient survival. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of the literature to identify RCTs comparing surgery of primary breast cancer to no surgery in patients with de novo MBC. Cochrane Library, Embase, Medline (OVID), and Web of Science were searched with latest update in July 2023, while conference proceedings were manually searched. Data concerning patient and tumor characteristics, as well as outcomes, were extracted. A meta-analysis with random effects models was performed considering heterogeneity between trials. RESULTS: Overall, 3255 entries were identified and 5 RCTs fulfilled all inclusion criteria, which had enrolled 1381 patients. The overall estimation in the intention-to-treat population showed no benefit for patients who had surgical excision of the primary breast tumor (HR = 0.93; 95% CI, 0.76-1.14). No subgroups in terms of receptor status or patterns of metastasis seemed to benefit from surgery, except for younger/premenopausal patients (HR = 0.74, 95% CI, 0.58-0.94). Breast surgery was associated with improved local progression-free survival (HR = 0.37, 95% CI, 0.19-0.74). CONCLUSION: Surgery of the primary tumor in patients with de novo MBC does not prolong survival, except possibly in younger/premenopausal patients. Breast surgery should be offered within the context of well-designed clinical trials examining the issue.

Long-term outcome after surgical resection of non-high-risk gastrointestinal stromal tumours without adjuvant therapy.

BACKGROUND: Gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST) is the most common intra-abdominal sarcoma. Risk classification systems, commonly the modified National Institutes of Health consensus criteria, identify tumour properties relating to patient outcomes. However, owing to limited long-term evidence, most guidelines recommend up to 10-year follow-up for all risk groups except very low-risk GIST. METHODS: This retrospective multicentre study included patients who had complete resection of primary, non-metastatic GIST from three Scandinavian sarcoma centres: Gothenburg (2004-2020), Stockholm (2000-2019), and Oslo (2000-2017). Medical records were reviewed for clinical details regarding diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up, and recurrence-free and disease-specific survival evaluated. RESULTS: The total cohort consisted of 1213 patients with GIST. High-risk patients and those treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors were excluded. The remaining 649 patients were included in the present analysis: 118 with very low-, 381 with low-, and 150 with intermediate-risk GISTs. Five-year recurrence-free survival rates were 100, 98.5, and 100 per cent for the intermediate-, low-, and very low-risk groups respectively (P = 0.246). Disease-specific survival rates 10 years after surgery were 100, 98.4, and 100 per cent for the intermediate-, low-, and very low-risk groups respectively (P = 0.262). CONCLUSION: Patients with completely resected non-high-risk GISTs have an excellent long-term outcome, irrespective of risk group. Follow-up programmes to detect disease recurrences in these patients are probably not indicated.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) originate from the muscle layer of the gastrointestinal tract. They are divided into risk groups according to size, location, and how quickly they grow. Patients with GIST, regardless of risk group, have been followed with imaging for several years after their tumour has been successfully removed with an operation. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether follow-up is necessary for patients in the lower-risk groups. Six hundred and forty-nine patients with GISTs from the lower-risk groups were followed for 5 years (median). Only 1.2 per cent of the patients experienced a recurrence of their cancer. It was concluded that patients with GIST in the lower-risk groups do not need follow-up with imaging after a successful operation.

Sarcoma care in the era of precision medicine.

Sarcoma subtype classification is currently mainly based upon histopathological morphology. Molecular analyses have emerged as an efficient addition to the diagnostic workup and sarcoma care. Knowledge about the sarcoma genome increases, and genetic events that can either support a histopathological diagnosis or suggest a differential diagnosis are identified, as well as novel therapeutic targets. In this review, we present diagnostic, therapeutic, and prognostic molecular markers that are, or might soon be, used clinically. For sarcoma diagnostics, there are specific fusions highly supportive or pathognomonic for a diagnostic entity-for instance, SYT::SSX in synovial sarcoma. Complex karyotypes also give diagnostic information-for example, supporting dedifferentiation rather than low-grade central osteosarcoma or well-differentiated liposarcoma when detected in combination with MDM2/CDK4 amplification. Molecular treatment predictive sarcoma markers are available for gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) and locally aggressive benign mesenchymal tumors. The molecular prognostic markers for sarcomas in clinical practice are few. For solitary fibrous tumor, the type of NAB2::STAT6 fusion is associated with the outcome, and the KIT/PDGFRA pathogenic variant in GISTs can give prognostic information. With the exploding availability of sequencing technologies, it becomes increasingly important to understand the strengths and limitations of those methods and their context in sarcoma diagnostics. It is reasonable to believe that most sarcoma treatment centers will increase the use of massive-parallel sequencing soon. We conclude that the context in which the genetic findings are interpreted is of importance, and the interpretation of genomic findings requires considering tumor histomorphology.

New Insights in the Era of Clinical Biomarkers as Potential Predictors of Systemic Therapy-Induced Cardiotoxicity in Women with Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review.

Cardiotoxicity induced by breast cancer therapies is a potentially serious complication associated with the use of various breast cancer therapies. Prediction and better management of cardiotoxicity in patients receiving chemotherapy is of critical importance. However, the management of cancer therapy-related cardiac dysfunction (CTRCD) lacks clinical evidence and is based on limited clinical studies. AIM: To provide an overview of existing and potentially novel biomarkers that possess a promising predictive value for the early and late onset of CTRCD in the clinical setting. METHODS: A systematic review of published studies searching for promising biomarkers for the prediction of CTRCD in patients with breast cancer was undertaken according to PRISMA guidelines. A search strategy was performed using PubMed, Google Scholar, and Scopus for the period 2013-2023. All subjects were >18 years old, diagnosed with breast cancer, and received breast cancer therapies. RESULTS: The most promising biomarkers that can be used for the development of an alternative risk cardiac stratification plan for the prediction and/or early detection of CTRCD in patients with breast cancer were identified. CONCLUSIONS: We highlighted the new insights associated with the use of currently available biomarkers as a standard of care for the management of CTRCD and identified potentially novel clinical biomarkers that could be further investigated as promising predictors of CTRCD.

Long-term and real-life incidence of cancer therapy-related cardiovascular toxicity in patients with breast cancer: a Swedish cohort study.

Background: The administration of anticancer drugs in females with comorbidity increases the risk for cancer therapy-related cardiovascular toxicity (CTR-CVT), which in turn contributes to cardiovascular disease (CVD). Furthermore, a pathophysiological connection between cancer and cardiovascular disease may exist. Objective: To assess the long-term risks and predictors of CTR-CVT, including clinical hypertension (HT), coronary artery disease (CAD), heart failure (HF), atrial fibrillation (AF), as well as all-cause mortality in women diagnosed with early breast cancer (BC) and eligible for adjuvant chemotherapy in Sweden. Methods: Data were extracted from Swedish registers and medical records on 433 women, 18-60 years of age, diagnosed 1998-2002 with lymph node-positive BC, and considered for adjuvant chemotherapy. CTR-CVT was defined as HT, CAD, HF, or AF after the diagnosis of BC. Follow-up was from the date of BC diagnosis until November 30, 2021, or death. Prevalence of CTR-CVT and all-cause mortality were calculated. Hazard ratios (HR) were determined for factors associated with CTR-CVT. Results: The median age was 50 (interquartile range (IQR) 32) years. 910 CTR-CVT events were diagnosed in 311 women with a median of 19.3 (IQR 15,3) years follow-up. The proportions of CTR-CVT events were: HT 281 (64%); CAD 198 (46%); HF 206 (47%); and AF 225 (51%). The cumulative incidence of CTR-CVT was 71.8%, and 50% of all 433 patients developed CTR-CVT within 11.7 years of BC diagnosis (standard deviation (SD) 0.57, 95% confidence interval (CI) 10.6-12.9). Age was a risk factor for CTR-CVT. Anthracycline increased the risk for HF (p=0,001; HR 2,0; 95%CI 1,4-2,8), CAD (p= 0,002; HR 1,7; 95% CI 1,2-2,4), and AF (p=0,013; HR 1,5; 95% CI 1,0-2,0). At the end of the 24-year study period, 227 of the 433 women were alive, and the total cumulative mortality was 47,6%. Conclusion: The prevalence of CTR-CVT and all-cause mortality is high after BC diagnosis and treatment, particularly in older patients and those receiving anthracyclines. These findings and the onset of CTR-CVT support cardio-oncology guidelines recommending initial risk stratification and cardiovascular monitoring during treatment, followed by long-term annual screening for cardiovascular risk factors and CTR-CVT among BC survivors.

Landscape of neoadjuvant therapy in HER2-positive breast cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The recommended preoperative approach for HER2-positive breast cancer is unclear. We aimed to investigate the following: i) what is the optimal neoadjuvant regimen and ii) whether anthracyclines could be excluded. METHODS: A systematic literature search in Medline, Embase and Web of Science databases was performed. Studies had to satisfy the following criteria: i) randomised controlled trials (RCTs), ii) enroled patients treated preoperatively for HER2-positive BC (breast cancer), iii) at least one treatment group received an anti-HER2 agent, iv) available information of any efficacy end-point and v) published in English. A network meta-analysis with a frequentist framework using random-effects model was used to pool direct and indirect evidence. Pathologic complete response (pCR), event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were the efficacy end-points of interest, and selected safety end-points were also analysed. RESULTS: A total of 11,049 patients with HER2-positive BC (46 RCTs) were included in the network meta-analysis, and 32 different regimens were evaluated. Dual anti-HER2-therapy, with pertuzumab or tyrosine kinase inhibitors, combined with chemotherapy was significantly superior to trastuzumab and chemotherapy in terms of pCR, EFS and OS. However, a higher risk of cardiotoxicity was observed with dual anti-HER2-therapy. Anthracycline-based chemotherapy was not associated with better efficacy outcomes in comparison with non-anthracycline-based chemotherapy. In anthracycline-free regimens, the addition of carboplatin presented numerically better efficacy outcomes. CONCLUSION: Dual HER2 blockade with chemotherapy is the recommended choice as neoadjuvant therapy for HER2-positive breast cancer, preferably by omitting anthracyclines in favour of carboplatin.

The conundrum of breast cancer and microbiome - A comprehensive review of the current evidence.

Disturbance of the microbial balance of a habitat can have detrimental effects on the health of the individual and, in addition, polymorphic microbiomes were recently suggested as emerging cancer hallmarks. Modern sequencing and metagenomics techniques have allowed characterization of intratumoral microbiome composition even in tissues such as the breast. We conducted a comprehensive literature review on different aspects related to the microbial landscape of the breast tissue and breast tumors, as well as its relation to systemic therapy. Emerging data suggest varying microbiome composition intratumorally compared to the normal breast tissue and other tumor types. Differences in the microbes present in normal breast and cancerous lesions of the breast have also been described, as well as potential correlation between microbiome composition and breast cancer subtype and stage. The interplay between gut and breast microbiome is not well understood although bacterial allocation through mesenteric lymph nodes has been suggested as a possible pathway. Moreover, gut bacteria with estrogen metabolizing properties are of special interest in the context of breast cancer and available knowledge and reported studies are hereby described. The relationship of gut microbiome and cancer therapy is another aspect of interest and available data are presented. Notwithstanding, the field of microbiome in the context of breast cancer is starting to evolve and a number of questions arise, with the gut-breast-cancer therapy axis in the center.

Pharmacogenomics for Prediction of Cardiovascular Toxicity: Landscape of Emerging Data in Breast Cancer Therapies.

Pharmacogenomics is an emerging field in oncology, one that could provide valuable input on identifying patients with inherent risk of toxicity, thus allowing for treatment tailoring and personalization on the basis of the clinical and genetic characteristics of a patient. Cardiotoxicity is a well-known side effect of anthracyclines and anti-HER2 agents, although at a much lower incidence for the latter. Data on single-nucleotide polymorphisms related to cardiotoxicity are emerging but are still scarce, mostly being of retrospective character and heterogeneous. A literature review was performed, aiming to describe current knowledge in pharmacogenomics and prediction of cardiotoxicity related to breast cancer systemic therapies and radiotherapies. Most available data regard genes encoding various enzymes related to anthracycline metabolism and HER2 polymorphisms. The available data are presented, together with the challenges and open questions in the field.

The role of neoadjuvant imatinib in gastrointestinal stromal tumor patients: 20 years of experience from a tertial referral center.

Surgery is the cornerstone of gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) treatment, and adjuvant therapy with imatinib has improved survival for high-risk tumors. The use of imatinib preoperatively has been increasing, but efficacy and impact on patient outcomes have not been formally investigated. This is a retrospective study from a single-center cohort of patients diagnosed with GIST and treated with neoadjuvant imatinib at Karolinska University Hospital in Stockholm, Sweden over a 20-year period. Eighty-four patients diagnosed with GIST and treated with neoadjuvant imatinib were identified and included. Tumors were located throughout the whole gastrointestinal tract but most frequently in the stomach (n = 29; 35%) and the small intestine (n = 30; 36%), followed by the rectum (n = 12; 14%) and the gastroesophageal junction (n = 10; 12%). The tumors were large (mean 10.5 cm) and decreased after treatment (mean 7.6 cm). Main indications for neoadjuvant imatinib were tumor size or anatomical location. None of the patients with stomach tumors and four patients with tumors near the gastroesophageal junction underwent gastrectomy. Three patients with tumors in the small intestine underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy, whereas seven patients with rectal tumors underwent rectal amputation. After surgery, 94% (n = 79) of the tumors had R0-resection. About one-fourth experienced local relapse or distant metastasis. In conclusion, neoadjuvant imatinib can reduce tumor size and prevent high morbidity due to more extensive surgery, or at least reduce the extent of the surgery, especially for tumors in the stomach or small intestine.

Diagnosing gastrointestinal stromal tumors: The utility of fine-needle aspiration cytology versus biopsy.

BACKGROUND: Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) are mesenchymal tumors in the intestinal tract originating from a precursor to the interstitial cells of Cajal, which plays a role in gastric motility. The preoperative diagnosis of GIST may be very important for the surgical approach or the need for neoadjuvant treatment and is often done in conjunction with molecular testing. DESIGN: GISTs diagnosed in Stockholm between 1999 and 2019 with biopsy and/or fine-needle aspiration (FNA) material were included. Clinical and tumor characteristics, as well as sample representability, ancillary techniques, diagnostic accuracy, and time to diagnosis, were categorized and compared. RESULTS: We identified 460 diagnostic samples from 347 patients, consisting of 212 biopsies and 248 FNAs. FNA cytology had a significantly (p < 0.05) better sample representability (92% vs. 77%), diagnostic accuracy (84% vs. 76%), and shorter time to diagnosis (4.5 vs. 12.3 days on average) in comparison with biopsies. In addition, ancillary techniques such as immunochemistry and molecular analysis for KIT and PDGFRA mutations could satisfactorily be performed on FNA materials. CONCLUSIONS: There are advantages to both biopsy and FNA cytology in diagnosing GISTs. While the significantly shorter time to diagnosis for FNA cytology can be due to institutional differences, its many strengths make it both an accurate and time-efficient method for preoperative diagnosis of GIST.

Evaluation of PD-L1 Expression in Undifferentiated Pleomorphic Sarcomas, Liposarcomas and Chondrosarcomas.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) such as PD1/PD-L1 blockers are an established treatment for many solid cancers. There are currently no approved ICIs for sarcomas, but satisfactory results have been seen in some patients with disseminated disease in certain histological types. Most studies on PD-L1 in sarcoma have used small specimens and there are no clear cutoff values for scoring. We investigated PD-L1 immunoreactivity in high-grade chondrosarcomas (CS), abdominal liposarcoma (LS) and undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcomas (UPS). In total, 230 tumors were stained with SP142 and SP263 assays and evaluated by two clinical pathologists. Immunoreactivity in tumor and immune cells was correlated with clinical outcome. Overall, ≥1% PD-L1 immunoreactivity in tumor cells was found in 11 CS, 26 LS and 59 UPS (SP142 assay) and in 10 CS, 26 LS and 77 UPS (SP263 assay). Most tumors exhibited ≤10% PD-L1 immunoreactivity, but a subset across all three subtypes had >50%. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed no significant difference in metastasis-free or overall survival in relation to PD-L1 immunoreactivity in tumor or immune cells for any subtype. As there is a lack of clinical data regarding PD-L1/PD-1 status and therapy response, it is not currently possible to establish clear cutoff values. Patients with high (>50%) PD-L1 immunoreactivity in tumor cells (TC) with the SP263 assay would be a logical group to investigate for potentially beneficial PD1/PD-L1-targeted treatment.

Prognostic value of ctDNA detection in patients with early breast cancer undergoing neoadjuvant therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is increasingly being used as a biomarker in early breast cancer (EBC). We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the prognostic value of ctDNA in patients with EBC treated with neoadjuvant therapy (NAT). We searched Medline, Web of Science and Embase for observational or interventional studies that included patients with EBC undergoing NAT, reported outcomes related to the predefined endpoints, and had full text articles available. Study selection followed the PRISMA guidelines and quality assessment the REMARK tool for biomarker studies. Primary endpoint was impact of ctDNA detection in different time points (baseline, on-treatment, and after NAT) on relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included the association of ctDNA detection with pathologic complete response (pCR), and the positive and negative predictive value of ctDNA detection in predicting residual disease after NAT. From the 2908 studies initially identified, 11 met the eligibility criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. Detection of ctDNA, both at baseline and after completion of NAT, significantly associated to worse RFS (HR 4.22, 95% CI: 1.29-13.82 and HR 5.67, 95% CI: 2.73-11.75, respectively) and worse OS (HR 19.1, 95% CI: 6.9-53.04 and HR 4.00, 95% CI: 1.90-8.42, respectively). In contrast, detection of ctDNA did not associate with the probability of achieving a pCR. Our results suggest that ctDNA assessment during NAT for EBC merits further evaluation as a stratification risk factor in prospective trials, in order to better individualize patient's treatment.

Brain Metastases in HER2-Positive Breast Cancer: Current and Novel Treatment Strategies.

Development of brain metastases can occur in up to 30-50% of patients with breast cancer, representing a significant impact on an individual patient in terms of survival and quality of life. Patients with HER2-positive breast cancer have an increased risk of developing brain metastases; however, screening for brain metastases is not currently recommended due to the lack of robust evidence to support survival benefit. In recent years, several novel anti-HER2 agents have led to significant improvements in the outcomes of HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. Despite these advances, brain and leptomeningeal metastases from HER2-positive breast cancer remain a significant cause of morbidity and mortality, and their optimal management remains an unmet need. This review presents an update on the current and novel treatment strategies for patients with brain metastases from HER2-positive breast cancer and discusses the open questions in the field.

Current Status of Management and Outcome for Patients with Ewing Sarcoma.

Ewing sarcoma is the second most common bone sarcoma in children after osteosarcoma. It is a very aggressive malignancy for which systemic treatment has greatly improved outcome for patients with localized disease, who now see survival rates of over 70%. However, for the quarter of patients presenting with metastatic disease, survival is still dismal with less than 30% of patients surviving past 5 years. Patients with disease relapse, local or distant, face an even poorer prognosis with an event-free 5-year survival rate of only 10%. Unfortunately, Ewing sarcoma patients have not yet seen the benefit of recent years' technical achievements such as next-generation sequencing, which have enabled researchers to study biological systems at a level never seen before. In spite of large multinational studies, treatment of Ewing sarcoma relies entirely on chemotherapeutic agents that have been largely unchanged for decades. As many promising modern therapies, including monoclonal antibodies, small molecules, and immunotherapy, have been disappointing to date, there is no clear candidate as to which drug should be investigated in the next large-scale clinical trial. However, the mechanisms driving tumor development in Ewing sarcoma are slowly unfolding. New entities of Ewing-like tumors, with fusion transcripts that are related to the oncogenic EWSR1-FLI1 fusion seen in the majority of Ewing tumors, are being mapped. These tumors, although sharing much of the same morphologic features as classic Ewing sarcoma, behave differently and may require a different treatment. There are also controversies regarding local treatment of Ewing sarcoma. The radiosensitive nature of the disease and the tendency for Ewing sarcoma to arise in the axial skeleton make local treatment very challenging. Surgical treatment and radiotherapy have their pros and cons, which may give rise to different treatment strategies in different centers around the world. This review article discusses some of these controversies and reproduces the highlights from recent publications with regard to diagnostics, systemic treatment, and surgical treatment of Ewing sarcoma.

CD11c-CD8 Spatial Cross Presentation: A Novel Approach to Link Immune Surveillance and Patient Survival in Soft Tissue Sarcoma.

Checkpoint inhibitors are slowly being introduced in the care of specific sarcoma subtypes such as undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma, alveolar soft part sarcoma, and angiosarcoma even though formal indication is lacking. Proper biomarkers to unravel potential immune reactivity in the tumor microenvironment are therefore expected to be highly warranted. In this study, intratumoral spatial cross presentation was investigated as a novel concept where immune cell composition in the tumor microenvironment was suggested to act as a proxy for immune surveillance. Double immunohistochemistry revealed a prognostic role of direct spatial interactions between CD11c+ antigen-presenting cells (APCs) and CD8+ cells in contrast to each marker alone in a soft tissue sarcoma (STS) cohort of 177 patients from the Karolinska University Hospital (MFS p = 0.048, OS p = 0.025). The survival benefit was verified in multivariable analysis (MFS p = 0.012, OS p = 0.004). Transcriptomics performed in the TCGA sarcoma cohort confirmed the prognostic value of combining CD11c with CD8 (259 patients, p = 0.005), irrespective of FOXP3 levels and in a CD274 (PD-LI)-rich tumor microenvironment. Altogether, this study presents a histopathological approach to link immune surveillance and patient survival in STS. Notably, spatial cross presentation as a prognostic marker is distinct from therapy response-predictive biomarkers such as immune checkpoint molecules of the PD-L1/PD1 pathway.