Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol ; 34(2): 1103-1109, 2024 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37947897

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is one of the most common musculoskeletal disorder in infants. The most significant risk factors include female gender, breech presentation, left hip and family history. In this study, we utilized the Graf method at different time intervals to evaluate both breech-delivered and cephalic-born newborns. The objectives were to compare the incidence of DDH in cephalic and breech-delivered neonates and investigate whether the hip joints of neonates delivered in the breech position exhibit a distinct maturation pattern. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We studied prospectively 618 hip joints (309 newborns). Each hip joint was examined with the Graf method in four time periods as follows: Phase #1 (0-1 weeks), Phase #2 (1-4 weeks), Phase #3 (4-7 weeks), and Phase #4 (7-10 weeks). The α and ß angles for each hip joint were measured, and the hips were classified according to Graf classification. With our statistical analysis within the different phases, we were able to investigate potential variations in the maturation patterns between newborns delivered in the breech and cephalic delivery positions. RESULTS: A significant difference (at the 5% level) was observed in Phase 1 between breech and cephalic-delivered neonates (35.6-8.6%). This difference tended to decrease in next phases (13.6-1% in Phase 2, 2.5-0% in Phase 3 and 1.7-0% in Phase 4). A significant difference (at the 5% level) for cephalic-delivered neonates was also observed between Phase 1 and Phase 4 (8.5-0%), but the percentages were low. Additionally, the breech-delivered had extreme difference in incidence of DDH from Phase 1 to Phase 4 (35.6-11.9%, 2.5%, and 1.7%, respectively). CONCLUSION: It appears that there is an actual difference in the incidence of DDH between breech-delivered and cephalic-delivered neonates, although the difference may be less significant than previously considered. The majority of the breech-delivered neonates that were initially considered as pathological (Phase 1) are, in fact, healthy. This is ascertained in subsequent ultrasound examinations conducted in later phases (Phases 2-4), when the incidence of pathological cases decreases. This could be attributed to potential different maturation pattern between these groups.


Subject(s)
Breech Presentation , Hip Dislocation, Congenital , Infant , Pregnancy , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Female , Hip Dislocation, Congenital/diagnostic imaging , Hip Dislocation, Congenital/epidemiology , Hip Joint/diagnostic imaging , Risk Factors , Ultrasonography/adverse effects , Ultrasonography/methods , Breech Presentation/diagnostic imaging , Breech Presentation/epidemiology
2.
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol ; 34(2): 723-734, 2024 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37884843

ABSTRACT

Until the 1980s, the diagnosis of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) was based on clinical examination and radiographic imaging. In 1980, Reinhard Graf developed his own ultrasonographic method for the examination of the infant hip joint. Graf's method evaluates the osseous and cartilaginous coverage of the femoral head by the acetabulum in the infantile hip joint by measuring the angles α and ß. The validity of Graf method is that with these measurements the hip joint is further classified by Graf classification into types I to IV that guide treatment. Currently, Graf method is considered the gold standard examination for the diagnosis of DDH in many European countries. This review article aims to discuss the incidence, risk factors and pathophysiology of DDH, and to emphasize on the Graf method for the evaluation, classification, prevention and further management of this entity.


Subject(s)
Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip , Hip Dislocation, Congenital , Infant , Humans , Hip Dislocation, Congenital/diagnostic imaging , Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip/diagnostic imaging , Ultrasonography/methods , Hip Joint/diagnostic imaging , Acetabulum/diagnostic imaging
3.
Cureus ; 14(9): e29775, 2022 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36340525

ABSTRACT

Introduction Water polo is a competitive team sport played in the water between two teams of seven players each. Water polo players must have swimming speed, strong abdominal and back muscles, and strong shoulder muscles to cope with this sport's special conditions. In this study, we investigate the possible association of shoulder and trunk muscle systems in adolescent water polo athletes of high demands. Materials and methods The research included 42 water polo players aged 14-16, who train regularly for at least five years, six times a week, and participate in national championships and national teams. The athletes were evaluated on the strength and torque of these muscular systems using the isokinetic dynamometer Biodex System 4 Pro (Biodex Medical Systems, Inc, Shirley, NY). The correlation of the results was done using the statistical package SPSS 21. Results The correlations revealed statistically significant differences in trunk extension in combination with the shoulder external/internal rotation ratio. Also, most of the correlations occurred between the trunk and non-dominant limb of the athletes and, more often, in the female athletes. Furthermore, for the hand grip, the male athletes showed a greater difference in strength between the dominant and the non-dominant member than female athletes. Finally, the evaluation of the trunk extension/flexion ratio and external/internal rotation ratio for the shoulder joint showed that many athletes are outside the normal range and need targeted strengthening. Conclusion The negative correlation coefficient between trunk extension/flexion and shoulder external/internal rotation indicates that the trunk extension mechanism helps for better internal rotation of the shoulder. Therefore, water polo players should focus on the training of the stretching mechanism of the trunk and also give weight to achieving a balance between the competing muscular systems of the trunk and the shoulder. Thus, athletes can maximize their skills and, at the same time, protect themselves from injuries.

4.
J Long Term Eff Med Implants ; 32(3): 39-56, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35993988

ABSTRACT

Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is the most common musculoskeletal disorder of the infant age. Its incidence ranges from 0.06/1000 to 76.1/1000 live births and is more frequent in female infants. Breech position, family history and firstborn children are the main risk factors for DDH and this disorder is also associated with the presence of other congenital deformities. Anatomically, the acetabulum remains shallow and the femoral head grows in a wrong position. Clinical examination is important and tests such us Barlow and Ortolani give indications only for a part of the spectrum of this entity. Nowadays the sonographic examination is the most accurate option for the diagnosis. Graf classification categorizes the DDH cases in four types, from normal to dislocated hip, by description and measuring specific angles in sonographic examination. The wide usage of ultrasonography has decreased the non-diagnosed or neglected cases; treatment begins immediately in young age and is usually conservative with the usage of devices such as Pavlik harness and hip spica. To enhance the literature, we searched for published studies on DDH, to summarize the pathogenesis and the diagnosis and to discuss the treatment and outcome of the patients with this disorder.


Subject(s)
Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip , Hip Dislocation, Congenital , Acetabulum/diagnostic imaging , Child , Female , Hip Dislocation, Congenital/diagnostic imaging , Hip Dislocation, Congenital/epidemiology , Humans , Infant , Orthotic Devices , Retrospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...