Indications and Outcomes for Planned Cesarean Hysterectomy in Non-Placenta Accreta Spectrum Disorder Patients: A Systematic Review.

OBJECTIVE: Planned hysterectomy at the time of cesarean delivery may be reasonable in cases other than placenta accreta spectrum disorders. Our objective was to synthesize the published literature on the indications and outcomes for planned cesarean hysterectomy. DATA SOURCES: We performed a systematic review of published literature from the following databases from inception (1946) to June 2021: MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL, DARE, and clinicaltrials.gov. STUDY SELECTION: We included all study designs where subjects underwent planned cesarean delivery with simultaneous hysterectomy. Emergency procedures and those performed for placenta accreta spectrum disorders were excluded. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: The primary outcome was surgical indication, though other surgical outcomes were evaluated when data permitted. Quantitative analysis was limited to studies published in 1990 or later. Risk of bias was assessed using an adaptation of the ROBINS-I tool. CONCLUSION: The most common indication for planned cesarean hysterectomy was malignancy, with cervical cancer being the most frequent. Other indications included permanent contraception, uterine fibroids, menstrual disorders, and chronic pelvic pain. Common complications included bleeding, infection, and ileus. The surgical skill for cesarean hysterectomy continues to be relevant in contemporary obstetrical practice for reproductive malignancy and several benign indications. Although the data indicate relatively safe outcomes, these studies show significant publication bias and, therefore, further systematic study of this procedure is justified. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42021260545, registered June 16, 2021.

Consensus Statement No. 434: Simulation in Obstetrics and Gynaecology.

OBJECTIVE: To provide a comprehensive and current overview of the evidence for the value of simulation for education, team training, patient safety, and quality improvement in obstetrics and gynaecology, to familiarize readers with principles to consider in developing a simulation program, and to provide tools and references for simulation advocates. TARGET POPULATION: Providers working to improve health care for Canadian women and their families; patients and their families. OUTCOMES: Simulation has been validated in the literature as contributing to positive outcomes in achieving learning objectives, maintaining individual and team competence, and enhancing patient safety. Simulation is a well-developed modality with established principles to maximize its utility and create a safe environment for simulation participants. Simulation is most effective when it involves interprofessional collaboration, institutional support, and regular repetition. BENEFITS, HARMS, AND COSTS: This modality improves teamwork skills, patient outcomes, and health care spending. Upholding prescribed principles of psychological safety when implementing a simulation program minimizes harm to participants. However, simulation can be an expensive tool requiring human resources, equipment, and time. EVIDENCE: Articles published between 2003 and 2022 were retrieved through searches of Medline and PubMed using the keywords "simulation" and "simulator." The search was limited to articles published in English and French. The articles were reviewed for their quality, relevance, and value by the SOGC Simulation Working Group. Expert opinion from relevant seminal books was also considered. VALIDATION METHODS: The authors rated the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. See online Appendix A (Tables A1 for definitions and A2 for interpretations of strong and conditional [weak] recommendations). INTENDED AUDIENCE: All health care professionals working to improve Canadian women's health, and relevant stakeholders, including granting agencies, physician/nursing/midwifery colleges, accreditation bodies, academic centres, hospitals, and training programs.

Optimal timing of labour induction in contemporary clinical practice.

Induction of labour (IoL) is generally conducted when maternal and foetal risks of remaining pregnant outweigh the risks of delivery. With emerging literature around non-medically indicated IoL, contemporary clinical practice has seen an increase in IoL at 39 weeks' gestation. This review highlights recent evidence on the most common indications for IoL including gestational diabetes, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy, and post-term pregnancies. It also summarizes the evidence related to the timing of IoL for other common conditions based on recent literature reviews.

Defining the short-term disease recurrence after loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP).

BACKGROUND: The goal of cervical cancer screening is to identify dysplastic lesions for subsequent excision in order to prevent invasive disease. There is clinical equipoise, on how to best follow women for disease surveillance after treatment with some Canadian provinces exclusively performing colposcopy and some utilizing Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) testing in addition to cervical cytology. Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure (LEEP) is used to treat pre-invasive HPV-mediated disease and patients are typically followed for 12 months after disease excision. This study aims to quantify the prevalence of high-grade disease at the time of the second follow-up colposcopy visit, in a practice setting that utilizes laser ablation in addition to LEEP. METHODS: In a retrospective cohort study, consecutive patient charts were accessed through the electronic medical record system, ARIA, at the Tom Baker Cancer Centre, in Calgary, Alberta, from January 2010 to December 2015. Data was extracted and a REDCap database was used to compile pertinent information from charts meeting inclusion criteria. Descriptive and analytic statistics were performed. RESULTS: Of the 303 patients identified, 221 patients met inclusion criteria. 86% of these patients met discharge criteria from colposcopy after the second follow up visit. 31 (14%) were seen in a subsequent visit for abnormal findings. Of these, 7 (3.2%) underwent further treatment for high-grade disease/Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia (CIN 2/3). Of the 31, 23 (10.6%) had a third - negative - visit, resulting in discharge from colposcopy. One patient had a repeat LEEP for persistent Low-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion (LSIL). CONCLUSION: In summary, our data demonstrates a prevalence of 3.2% of high-grade disease at the time of a second colposcopic follow up visit after treatment, in a setting which frequently utilizes laser ablation in combination with LEEP, for large lesions. This recurrence rate is consistent with most published literature on recurrence rates of CIN2/3.