'Conceptualizations and implementation of user engagement in Weather and climate services: A climateservicesproviders' perspective by Di Fant, V., del Pozo, M., Gulikers, J. and Paparrizos, S.

Weather and Climate Information Services are increasingly used worldwide to facilitate the provision of information to their intended users. Despite this, the definition, classification and evaluation of climate services remains highly debated, particularly regarding user engagement. High forms of user engagement like co-production and co-creation are the least understood. This study looks at three case studies to clarify the current understanding of user engagement in climate services. The research identifies explicit and implicit conceptualizations of user engagement by service providers and characterizes their implementation. The study confirms the current lack of clarity for providers regarding the terminology used to describe user engagement in climate services, which calls for a different understanding of user engagement that allows to better embrace its complexity. Furthermore, our findings reveal that the highest form of user engagement occurred in the case study where there was a shared understanding of how service providers conceptualized user engagement. This conceptualization was aligned with the actual user engagement strategies implemented in the project. This stresses the importance of a shared understanding of user engagement terminology. Finally, the same service is often found to have implemented different user engagement levels at different stages and for different elements of the products. This brings up the issue of how to best describe user engagement in such situations. We recommend embracing the multi-faceted nature of user engagement in climate services by characterizing different elements and stages differently.

Local rainfall forecast knowledge across the globe used for agricultural decision-making.

The agriculture sector is vital to the world's economy and weather and climate are key drivers that affect the productivity and profitability of agricultural systems. At the same time, weather-related risks pose significant challenges to farmers' livelihoods. Although scientific weather forecast (SFK) is available, many farmers, especially in the Global South, have limited access to this information, and they rely on local forecast knowledge (LFK) to make farming decisions. Many studies also recognize the value of combining both forecasting systems; yet, unlike SFK which is readily available, indicators for LFK needs to be collected first. Therefore, this study identifies and documents the spatial distribution of LFK use for agriculture across the globe through a systematic literature review. Results show that a high number of LFK regions with a total of around 1350 local environmental indicators were found in Africa and Asia and less in South and North America. The low usability of scientific weather forecasts is perceived as the main reason farmers use LFK instead of SFK, yet the accessibility of LFK both for scientists and users, needs to be improved. Indicators based on animals and meteorology appeared to be more frequently used for weather predictions than plant- and astronomy-based indicators. Digitalizing the LFK inventory and collecting more detailed information about the regions where LFK was identified could promote and foster research on integrating scientific and local forecasting systems. This study will draw attention to the importance of LFK in weather forecasting, maintain this knowledge and enhance it.