Public health insurance, frailty, and lack of home support predict rehab discharge following elective anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is a commonly-performed and generally well-tolerated procedure used to treat cervical disc herniation. Rarely, patients require discharge to inpatient rehab, leading to inconvenience for the patient and increased healthcare expenditure for the medical system. PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to create an accurate and practical predictive model for, as well as delineate associated factors with, rehab discharge following elective ACDF. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective, single-center, cohort study. PATIENT SAMPLE: Patients who underwent ACDF between 2012 and 2022 were included. Those with confounding diagnoses or who underwent concurrent, staged, or nonelective procedures were excluded. OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcomes for this study included measurements of accuracy for predicting rehab discharge. Secondary outcomes included associations of variables with rehab discharge. METHODS: Current Procedural Terminology codes identified patients. Charts were reviewed to obtain additional demographic and clinical characteristics on which an initial univariate analysis was performed. Two logistic regression and two machine learning models were trained and evaluated on the data using cross-validation. A multimodel logistic regression was implemented to analyze independent variable associations with rehab discharge. RESULTS: A total of 466 patients were included in the study. The logistic regression model with minimum corrected Akaike information criterion score performed best overall, with the highest values for area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (0.83), Youden's J statistic (0.71), balanced accuracy (85.7%), sensitivity (90.3%), and positive predictive value (38.5%). Rehab discharge was associated with a modified frailty index of 2 (p=.007), lack of home support (p=.002), and having Medicare or Medicaid insurance (p=.007) after correction for multiple hypotheses. CONCLUSIONS: Nonmedical social determinants of health, such as having public insurance or a lack of support at home, may play a role in rehab discharge following elective ACDF. In combination with the modified frailty index and other variables, these factors can be used to predict rehab discharge with high accuracy, improving the patient experience and reducing healthcare costs.

Outcome of Chronic Subdural Hematoma Intervention in Patients on Long-Term Antiplatelet Therapy-A Propensity Score Matched Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Patients presenting with chronic subdural hematomas (cSDHs) and on antiplatelet medications for various medical conditions often complicate surgical decision making. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate risks of preprocedural and postprocedural antiplatelet use in patients with cSDHs. METHODS: Patients with cSDH who were treated between January 2006 and February 2022 at a single institution with surgical intervention were identified. A propensity score matching analysis was then performed analyzing length of hospitalization, periprocedural complications, reintervention rate, rebleeding risk, and reintervention rates. RESULTS: Preintervention, 178 patients were on long-term antiplatelet medication and 298 were not on any form of antiplatelet. Sixty matched pairs were included in the propensity score analysis. Postintervention, 88 patients were resumed on antiplatelet medication, whereas 388 patients did not have resumption of antiplatelets. Fifty-five pairs of matched patients were included in the postintervention propensity score analysis. No significant differences were found in length of hospitalization (7.8 ± 4.2 vs 6.8 ± 5.4, P = .25), procedural complications (3.3% vs 6.7%, P = .68), or reintervention during the same admission (3.3% vs 5%, P = 1). No significant differences were seen in recurrence rate (9.1% vs 10.9%, P = 1) or reintervention rate after discharge (7.3% vs 9.1%, P = 1) in the postintervention group. CONCLUSION: Preintervention antiplatelet medications before cSDH treatment do not affect length of hospitalization, periprocedural complications, or reintervention. Resumption of antiplatelet medication after cSDH procedures does not increase the rebleeding risk or reintervention rate.

Effect of long-term anticoagulant therapy on the outcome of chronic subdural hematoma: a propensity score-matched analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Chronic subdural hematomas (cSDHs) are particularly common in older adults who have increased risk of falls and the conditions that require anticoagulants (ACs). In such cases, clinicians are often left with the dilemma of co-managing the cSDH and the ongoing need for ACs. METHODS: Patients who underwent surgical management for cSDH at the authors' institution between January 2006 and June 2022 were identified. Propensity score-matched analysis was used to obtain a balance in patients who were on ACs before the procedure versus those who were not, and in patients who were on ACs postprocedure versus those who were not. Length of hospitalization, periprocedural complications, reintervention rate during the same admission, rebleeding risk, and reintervention rates after discharge were compared. RESULTS: In total, 104 patients were on long-term ACs before the procedure, whereas 372 were not. After matching, 55 pairs were included in the analysis. Postprocedure, 74 patients were started on long-term ACs; the rest were not. A total of 49 patients in each group were then included in the analysis after matching. Comparing the preprocedure AC group with the non-AC group, no significant differences were found in length of hospitalization (8.5 ± 6.7 days vs 8.1 ± 7.7 days, p = 0.75), periprocedural complications (7.3% vs 7.3%, p > 0.99), or reintervention during the same admission (1.8% vs 5.5%, p = 0.31). In the comparison of postprocedure AC and non-AC groups, no significant differences were seen in recurrence rate (8.2% vs 14.3%, p = 0.52), reintervention rate after discharge (4.1% vs 14.3%, p = 0.16), or disability (i.e., mRS ≤ 2; 83.7% vs 89.8%, p = 0.55). CONCLUSIONS: Being treated with long-term ACs before cSDH procedures does not affect length of hospitalization, periprocedural complications, or reintervention during the same admission. Similarly, administration of long-term ACs after a procedure for cSDH does not increase rebleeding risk or reintervention rate. Patients who are on long-term ACs can have similar interventions to those who are not on ACs. In addition, it is safe to restart patients on AC agents in a 7- to 14-day window after admission for cSDH with or without acute/subacute components.

Reduced recurrence of chronic subdural hematomas treated with open surgery followed by middle meningeal artery embolization compared to open surgery alone: a propensity score-matched analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Middle meningeal artery embolization (MMAE) is an emerging endovascular treatment technique with proven promising results for chronic subdural hematomas (cSDHs). MMAE as an adjunct to open surgery is being utilized with the goal of preventing the recurrence of cSDH. However, the efficacy of MMAE following surgical evacuation of cSDH has not been clearly demonstrated. The authors sought to compare the outcomes of open surgery followed by MMAE versus open surgery alone. METHODS: Patients who underwent surgical evacuation alone (open surgery-alone group) or MMAE along with open surgery for cSDH (adjunctive MMAE group) were identified at the authors' institution. Two balanced groups were obtained through propensity score matching. Primary outcomes included recurrence risk and reintervention rate. Secondary outcomes included decrease in hematoma size and modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at last follow-up. Variables in the two groups were compared by use of the Mann-Whitney U-test, paired-sample t-test, and Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: A total of 345 cases of open surgery alone and 52 cases of open surgery with adjunctive MMAE were identified. After control for subjective confounders, 146 patients treated with open surgery alone and 41 with adjunctive MMAE following open surgery with drain placement were included in the analysis. Before matching, the rebleeding risk and reintervention rate for open surgery trended higher in the open surgery alone than the open surgery plus MMAE group (14.4% vs 7.3%, p = 0.18; and 11.6% vs 4.9%, p = 0.17, respectively). No significant differences were seen in duration of radiographic or clinical follow-ups or decreases in hematoma size and mRS score at last follow-up. After one-to-one nearest neighbor propensity score matching, 26 pairs of cases were compared for outcomes. Rates of recurrence (7.7% vs 30.8%, p = 0.038) and overall reintervention (3.8% vs 23.1%, p = 0.049) after open surgery were found to be significantly lower in the adjunctive MMAE group than the open surgery-alone group. With one-to-many propensity score matching, 76 versus 37 cases were compared for open surgery alone versus adjunctive MMAE following open surgery. Similarly, the adjunctive MMAE group had significantly lower rates of recurrence (5.4% vs 19.7%, p = 0.037) and overall reintervention (2.7% vs 14.5%, p = 0.049). CONCLUSIONS: Adjunctive MMAE following open surgery can lower the recurrence risks and reintervention rates for cSDH.

Middle Meningeal Artery Embolization Versus Conventional Treatment of Chronic Subdural Hematomas.

BACKGROUND: Middle meningeal artery (MMA) embolization is an emerging minimally invasive endovascular technique for chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH). Currently, limited literature exists on its safety and efficacy compared with conventional treatment (open-surgical-evacuation-only). OBJECTIVE: To compare MMA embolization to conventional treatment. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of patients with cSDHs treated with MMA embolization in a single center from 2018 to 2019 was performed. Comparisons were made with a historical conventional treatment cohort from 2006 to 2016. Propensity score matching analysis was used to assemble a balanced group of subjects. RESULTS: A total of 357 conventionally treated cSDH and 45 with MMA embolization were included. After balancing with propensity score matching, a total of 25 pairs of cSDH were analyzed. Comparing the embolization with the conventional treatment group yielded no significant differences in complications (4% vs 4%; P > .99), clinical improvement (82.6% vs 83.3%; P = .95), cSDH recurrence (4.3% vs 21.7%; P = .08), overall re-intervention rates (12% vs 24%; P = .26), modified Rankin scale >2 on last follow-up (17.4% vs 32%; P = .24), as well as mortality (0% vs 12%; P = .09). Radiographic improvement at last follow-up was significantly higher in the open surgery cohort (73.9% vs 95.6%; P = .04). However, there was a trend for lengthier last follow-up for the historical cohort (72 vs 104 d; P = .07). CONCLUSION: There was a trend for lower recurrence and mortality rates in the embolization era cohort. There were significantly higher radiological improvement rates on last follow-up in the surgical only cohort era. There were no significant differences in complications and clinical improvement.

Automated Lateral Ventricular and Cranial Vault Volume Measurements in 13,851 Patients Using Deep Learning Algorithms.

BACKGROUND: No large dataset-derived standard has been established for normal or pathologic human cerebral ventricular and cranial vault volumes. Automated volumetric measurements could be used to assist in diagnosis and follow-up of hydrocephalus or craniofacial syndromes. In this work, we use deep learning algorithms to measure ventricular and cranial vault volumes in a large dataset of head computed tomography (CT) scans. METHODS: A cross-sectional dataset comprising 13,851 CT scans was used to deploy U-Net deep learning networks to segment and quantify lateral cerebral ventricular and cranial vault volumes in relation to age and sex. The models were validated against manual segmentations. Corresponding radiologic reports were annotated using a rule-based natural language processing framework to identify normal scans, cerebral atrophy, or hydrocephalus. RESULTS: U-Net models had high fidelity to manual segmentations for lateral ventricular and cranial vault volume measurements (Dice index, 0.878 and 0.983, respectively). The natural language processing identified 6239 (44.7%) normal radiologic reports, 1827 (13.1%) with cerebral atrophy, and 1185 (8.5%) with hydrocephalus. Age-based and sex-based reference tables with medians, 25th and 75th percentiles for scans classified as normal, atrophy, and hydrocephalus were constructed. The median lateral ventricular volume in normal scans was significantly smaller compared with hydrocephalus (15.7 vs. 82.0 mL; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to measure lateral ventricular and cranial vault volumes in a large dataset, made possible with artificial intelligence. We provide a robust method to establish normal values for these volumes and a tool to report these on CT scans when evaluating for hydrocephalus.

Bisphosphonates and parathyroid hormone analogs for improving bone quality in spinal fusion: State of evidence.

Spinal fusion is among the most commonly performed surgical procedures for elderly patients with spinal disorders - including degenerative disc disease with spondylolisthesis, deformities, and trauma. With the large increase in the aging population and the prevalence of osteoporosis, the number of elderly osteoporotic patients needing spinal fusion has risen dramatically. Due to reduced bone quality, postoperative complications such as implant failures, fractures, post-junctional kyphosis, and pseudarthrosis are more commonly seen after spinal fusion in osteoporotic patients. Therefore, pharmacologic treatment strategies to improve bone quality are commonly pursued in osteoporotic cases before conducting spinal fusions. The two most commonly used pharmacotherapeutics are bisphosphonates and parathyroid hormone (PTH) analogs. Evidence indicates that using bisphosphonates and PTH analogs, alone or in combination, in osteoporotic patients undergoing spinal fusion, decreases complication rates and improves clinical outcomes. Further studies are needed to develop guidelines for the administration of bisphosphonates and PTH analogs in osteoporotic spinal fusion patients in terms of treatment duration, potential benefits of sequential use, and the selection of either therapeutic agents based on patient characteristics.

Risk Factors for Wire Fracture or Tethering in Deep Brain Stimulation: A 15-Year Experience.

BACKGROUND: In deep brain stimulation (DBS), tunneled lead and extension wires connect the implantable pulse generator to the subcortical electrode, but circuit discontinuity and wire revision compromise a significant portion of treatments. OBJECTIVE: To identify factors predisposing to fracture or tethering of the lead or extension wire in patients undergoing DBS. METHOD: Retrospective review of wire-related complications was performed in a consecutive series of patients treated with DBS at a tertiary academic medical center over 15 yr. RESULTS: A total of 275 patients had 513 extension wires implanted or revised. There were 258 extensions of 40 cm implanted with a postauricular connector (50.3%), 229 extensions of 60 cm with a parietal connector (44.6%), and 26 extensions 40 cm with a parietal connector (5.1%). In total, 26 lead or extension wires (5.1%) were replaced for fracture. Fracture rates for 60 cm extensions with a parietal connector, 40 cm wires with a postauricular connector, and 40 cm extensions with a parietal connector were 0.2, 1.4, and 12.9 fractures per 100 wire-years, significantly different on log-rank test. Total 16 (89%) 40 cm extension wires with a postauricular connector had fracture implicating the lead wire. Tethering occurred only in patients with 60 cm extensions with parietal connectors (1.14 tetherings per 100 wire-years). Reoperation rate correlated with younger age, dystonia, and target in the GPI. CONCLUSION: The 40 cm extensions with parietal connectors have the highest fracture risk and should be avoided. Postauricular connectors risk lead wire fracture and should be employed cautiously. The 60 cm parietal wires may reduce fracture risk but increase tethering risk.

Intramedullary-Extramedullary Breast Metastasis to the Caudal Neuraxis Two Decades after Primary Diagnosis: Case Report and Review of the Literature.

BACKGROUND: Intramedullary metastases to the caudal neuraxis with exophytic extension to the extramedullary space are rare. We describe the unique case of a patient with locally recurrent breast cancer who developed an intramedullary-extramedullary metastasis to the conus medullaris and cauda equina 22 years after primary diagnosis, the longest interval between primary breast cancer and intramedullary spread to date. We also reviewed the published literature on focal breast metastases to the conus medullaris or cauda equina. CASE DESCRIPTION: A 66-year-old woman with a history of node-positive estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor-positive, infiltrating ductal carcinoma diagnosed in 1997 and locally recurrent in 2007. Initial treatment included lumpectomy and targeted chemoradiation with mastectomy and hormonal therapy at recurrence. Twelve years later, she developed 6 weeks of bilateral buttock and leg pain without motor or sphincter compromise. Magnetic resonance imaging of the total spine revealed a 2 x 1.7 cm bilobed intradural, intramedullary-extramedullary, homogenously enhancing, T1-and T2-isointense lesion involving the conus medullaris and cauda equina. She underwent subtotal resection of a hormone receptor-positive breast metastasis. Her pain improved postoperatively and she was stable at 5 months. CONCLUSIONS: We provide evidence that patients who present with symptoms of spinal neurologic disease and a history of hormone receptor-positive breast cancer require high suspicion for metastatic pathology, despite significant time lapse from primary diagnosis. The tumor may involve both the intramedullary and extramedullary space, complicating resection. Symptom relief and quality of life should guide resection of metastatic lesions to the caudal neuraxis.

Current Strategies in Prevention of Postoperative Infections in Spine Surgery.

STUDY DESIGN: Narrative review. OBJECTIVES: Postoperative surgical site infections (SSIs) are among the most common acute complications in spine surgery and have a devastating impact on outcomes. They can lead to increased morbidity and mortality as well as greater economic burden. Hence, preventive strategies to reduce the rate of SSIs after spine surgery have become vitally important. The purpose of this article was to summarize and critically analyze the available evidence related to current strategies in the prevention of SSIs after spine surgery. METHODS: A literature search utilizing Medline database was performed. Relevant studies from all the evidence levels have been included. Recommendations to decrease the risk of SSIs have been provided based on the results from studies with the highest level of evidence. RESULTS: SSI prevention occurs at each phase of care including the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative periods. Meticulous patient selection, tight glycemic control in diabetics, smoking cessation, and screening/eradication of Staphylococcus aureus are some of the main preoperative patient-related preventive strategies. Currently used intraoperative measures include alcohol-based skin preparation, topical vancomycin powder, and betadine irrigation of the surgical site before closure. Postoperative infection prophylaxis can be performed by administration of silver-impregnated or vacuum dressings, extended intravenous antibiotics, and supplemental oxygen therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Although preventive strategies are already in use alone or in combination, further high-level research is required to prove their efficacy in reducing the rate of SSIs in spine surgery before evidence-based standard infection prophylaxis guidelines can be built.

Prognostic Factors for Adjacent Segment Disease After L4-L5 Lumbar Fusion.

BACKGROUND: Adjacent segment disease (ASD) is an important consideration during decision making for lumbar spinal fusion. OBJECTIVE: To identify risk factors for development of ASD after L4-L5 fusion and differences in incidence between rostral and caudal ASD. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all consecutive patients at a single institution who underwent first-time spinal fusion at the L4-L5 level for degenerative spinal disease over a 10-yr period, using posterolateral pedicular screw fixation with or without posterior interbody fusion. ASD was defined as clinical and radiographic evidence of degenerative spinal disease requiring reoperation at the level rostral (L3-L4) or caudal (L5-S1) to the index fusion. RESULTS: Among 131 identified patients, the incidence of ASD requiring reoperation was 25.2% (n = 33). Twenty-four cases (18.3% of the entire cohort) developed rostral ASD (segment L3-L4), 3 cases (2.3%) developed caudal (L5-S1), and 6 cases (4.6%) developed bilateral ASD (both rostral and caudal). Cumulatively, the incidence of caudal ASD was significantly lower than rostral ASD (P < .001). Following multivariate logistic regression for factors associated with ASD reoperation, decompression of segments outside the fusion construct was associated with higher ASD rates (odds ratio [OR] = 2.68, P = .039), as was female gender (OR = 3.55, P = .011), whereas older age was associated with lower ASD incidence (OR = 0.95, P = .011). CONCLUSION: When considering posterior L4-L5 fusion, surgeons should refrain from prophylactic procedures in the L5-S1 level, without clinical indications, because ASD incidence on that segment is reassuringly low.

Factors Predictive of Adjacent Segment Disease After Lumbar Spinal Fusion.

OBJECTIVE: Adjacent segment disease (ASD) is a long-term complication of lumbar spinal fusion. This study aims to evaluate demographic and operative factors that influence development of ASD after fusion for lumbar degenerative pathologies. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed on patients undergoing instrumented lumbar fusion for degenerative disorders (spondylolisthesis, stenosis, or intervertebral disk degeneration) with a minimum follow-up of 6 months. RESULTS: Our inclusion criteria were met by 568 patients; 29.4% of patients had developed surgical ASD. Median follow-up was 2.8 years. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that decompression of segments outside the fusion construct had higher ASD (odds ratio = 2.6; P < 0.001), and those undergoing fusion for spondylolisthesis had lower ASD (odds ratio = 0.47; P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Results of our study show that the most important surgical factor contributing to ASD is decompression beyond fused levels. Hence caution should be exercised when decompressing spinal segments outside the fusion construct. Conversely, spondylolisthesis patients had the lowest ASD rates in our cohort.

Fate of Hardware in Spinal Infections.

Background: Removal of hardware with irrigation and debridement in patients with surgical site infections (SSIs) is performed commonly. However, the removal of hardware from patients with SSIs after spinal procedures is controversial. Moreover, primary spinal infections such as spondylodiscitis may require instrumentation along with surgical debridement. The purpose of this article was to evaluate critically and summarize the available evidence related to retention of hardware in patients with deep SSIs, and the use of instrumentation in surgical treatment of primary spinal infections. Methods: A literature search utilizing PubMed database was performed. Studies reporting the management of deep SSIs after instrumented spinal procedures, and of primary spinal infections using instrumentation published in peer-reviewed journals were included. Identified publications were evaluated for relevance, and data were extracted from the studies deemed relevant. Results: Because SSIs occur typically during the early post-operative period before stable bony fusion has been achieved, the removal of instrumentation may be associated with instability of the spinal column, pseudarthrosis, progressive deformity, pain, loss of function, and deterioration in the activities of daily living (ADL). Hence, early SSIs after spinal instrumentation are usually treated without removal of hardware. Moreover, primary spinal infections such as spondylodiscitis may require surgical debridement and instrumentation in cases with associated instability. Conclusions: Retaining or using instrumentation in patients with SSIs after spinal procedures or in patients with primary spinal infections, respectively, are commonly practiced in the field of spine surgery. Further evidence is required for the development of definitive algorithms to guide spine surgeons in decision making regarding the fate of instrumentation in the treatment of spinal infections.

Advancing Simulation-Based Orthopaedic Surgical Skills Training: An Analysis of the Challenges to Implementation.

Simulation-based surgical skills training is recognized as a valuable method to improve trainees' performance and broadly perceived as essential for the establishment of a comprehensive curriculum in surgical education. However, there needs to be improvement in several areas for meaningful integration of simulation into surgical education. The purpose of this focused review is to summarize the obstacles to a comprehensive integration of simulation-based surgical skills training into surgical education and board certification and suggest potential solutions for those obstacles. First and foremost, validated simulators need to be rigorously assessed to ensure their feasibility and cost-effectiveness. All simulation-based courses should include clear objectives and outcome measures (with metrics) for the skills to be practiced by trainees. Furthermore, these courses should address a wide range of issues, including assessment of trainees' problem-solving and decision-making abilities and remediation of poor performance. Finally, which simulation-based surgical skills courses will become a standard part of the curriculum across training programs and which will be of value in board certification should be precisely defined. Sufficient progress in these areas will prevent excessive development of training and assessment tools with duplicative effort and large variability in quality.

Factors influencing the presence of hemiparesis in chronic subdural hematoma.

OBJECTIVE: Chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) has a variety of clinical presentations, including hemiparesis. Hemiparesis is of the utmost importance because it is one of the major indications for surgical intervention and influences outcome. In the current study, the authors intended to identify factors influencing the presence of hemiparesis in CSDH patients and to determine the threshold value of hematoma thickness and midline shift for development of hemiparesis. METHODS: The authors retrospectively reviewed 325 patients (266 with unilateral and 59 with bilateral hematomas) with CSDH who underwent surgical evacuation, regardless of presence or absence of hemiparesis. RESULTS: In univariate analysis, hematoma loculation, age, hematoma maximal thickness, and midline shift were significantly associated with hemiparesis. Moreover, patients with unilateral hematomas had a higher rate of hemiparesis than patients with bilateral hematomas. Sex, trauma history, anticoagulant and antiplatelet drug use, presence of comorbidities, Glasgow Coma Scale score, hematoma density characteristics on CT scan, and hematoma signal intensity on T1- and T2-weighted MRI were not associated with hemiparesis. In multivariate analysis, the presence of loculation and hematoma laterality (unilateral vs bilateral) influenced hemiparesis. For unilateral hematomas, maximal hematoma thickness of 19.8 mm and midline shift of 6.4 mm were associated with a 50% probability of hemiparesis. For bilateral hematomas, 29.0 mm of maximal hematoma thickness and 6.8 mm of shift were associated with a 50% probability of hemiparesis. CONCLUSIONS: Presence of loculations, unilateral hematomas, older patient age, hematoma maximal thickness, and midline shift were associated with a higher rate of hemiparesis in CSDH patients. Moreover, 19.8 mm of hematoma thickness and 6.4 mm of midline shift were associated with a 50% probability of hemiparesis in patients with unilateral hematomas.

Factors Predicting the Need for Surgery of the Opposite Side After Unilateral Evacuation of Bilateral Chronic Subdural Hematomas.

BACKGROUND: Patients with bilateral chronic subdural hematoma (bCSDH) undergo unilateral evacuation for the large or symptomatic side because the contralateral hematoma is either small or asymptomatic. However, the contralateral hematoma may subsequently grow and require evacuation. OBJECTIVE: To characterize factors that predict contralateral hematoma growth and need for evacuation. METHODS: A retrospective study on 128 surgically treated bCSDHs. RESULTS: Fifty-one and 77 were bilaterally and unilaterally evacuated, respectively. Glasgow Coma Scale was lower and midline shift was higher in those evacuated unilaterally compared to those evacuated bilaterally. Hematoma size was a significant determinant of decision for unilateral vs bilateral evacuation. The contralateral side needed evacuation at a later stage in 7 cases (9.1%). There was no significant difference in terms of reoperation rate between those evacuated unilaterally and bilaterally. Greater contralateral hematoma thickness on the first postoperative day computed tomography (CT) and more postoperative midline shift reversal had higher rates of operation in the opposite side. There was no difference between the daily pace of hematoma decrease in the operated and nonoperated sides (0.7% decrease per day vs 0.9% for the operated and nonoperated sides, respectively). CONCLUSION: Results of this study show that most bCSDHs evacuated unilaterally do not experience growth in the nonoperated side and unilateral evacuation results in hematoma resolution for both sides in most cases. Hematoma thickness on the opposite side on the first postoperative day CT and amount of midline shift reversal after surgery are the most important factors predicting the need for surgery on the opposite side.

Intracranial hypertension after Chiari decompression resolving after removal of a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device: case report.

Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine devices (LIUDs) are thought to release this progestin locally in the uterus to limit side effects. Authors here present a case of treatment-refractory hydrocephalus and pseudomeningocele (PMC), both of which fully resolved after LIUD removal.A 35-year-old woman with an implanted LIUD developed symptomatic PMC and hydrocephalus after suboccipital craniectomy for Chiari malformation type I. Over the next 8 months, she underwent ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement and two attempts at needle decompression of the fluid collection, which did not relieve her symptoms or the PMC, except for a few days at a time. Subsequently, she had her LIUD removed. Three weeks after removal of the LIUD, her symptoms as well as the fluid collection resolved completely without any further intervention. Thus, the increased intracranial pressure and associated persistence of the PMC may be partially attributed to the LIUD.This case indicates that a persistent problem (PMC and intracranial hypertension) that may be associated with the LIUD rapidly resolves after its removal. Implication of LIUDs as the cause of intracranial hypertension is still a matter of controversy. Further studies are needed to evaluate any potential causal relationship between LIUDs and intracranial hypertension, and physicians are advised to consider this scenario in their differential diagnosis.

Civilian Gunshot Wounds to the Head: Prognostic Factors Affecting Mortality: Meta-Analysis of 1774 Patients.

Civilian gunshot wounds to the head (cGSWH) are devastating, but there is no consensus regarding prognosis and management. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to identify prognostic factors associated with mortality. PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were queried for retrospective cohort studies of isolated cGSWH reporting mortality prognostic factors. Meta-Analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) guidelines were followed. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Primary outcome was mortality. Pooled estimates of odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were derived using random-effects models. Seventeen (17) observational studies (1774 patients) were identified and included. Factors associated with mortality were: age >40 years (OR, 3.44; 95% CI [1.71-6.91]), suicide attempt (5.78; [3.07-10.87]), Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) 3-8 compared with 9-15 (38.02; [21.98-65.77]), GCS 3-5 versus 6-8 (15.38; [6.72-35.23], bilateral fixed and dilated pupils versus normal (67.12; [16.67-270.22]), and versus unilateral fixed and dilated pupil (25.35; [5.82-110.41]), dural penetration (29.07; [4.30-196.53]) and bihemispheric (4.23; [2.32-7.68]), and multi-lobar injuries (6.53; [1.99-21.42]). Selection for operative management, according to expert neurosurgical opinion, was protective (0.06; [0.01-0.22]). This is the first meta-analysis on cGSWH mortality prognostic factors. Increasing age, suicide attempt, lower GCS, bilateral mydriasis, dural penetration, and bihemispheric and multi-lobar injury are associated with increased mortality. This study can serve as a guide to clinicians and will provide directions for future research to develop evidence-based management algorithms.