Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Dtsch Arztebl Int ; 117(46): 783-789, 2020 Nov 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33533713

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Dorsally displaced distal radius fractures are generally treated with closed reduction followed by casting. Current evidence suggests that fracture reduction is of no benefit before either conservative or surgical treatment. It has not been studied to date whether the degree of pain suffered by the patient during preoperative casting is any different if the fracture is reduced beforehand. METHODS: In a prospective, randomized trial, dorsally displaced unstable distal radius fractures were treated surgically, either with or without prior closed reduction (22 and 25 patients, respectively). The primary endpoint was the difference between the pain score (on the Visual Analog Scale) on day 1 after treatment and the initial pain score on presentation. The secondary endpoints included the clinical and radiological outcome and any damage to the median nerve. Moreover, the Krimmer score (strength, mobility, pain, and function of the wrist joint) an the DASH score (Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand) were determined 3 and 12 months after treatment. This trial has been registered with the number DRKS00010570. RESULTS: With regard to the primary endpoint on day 1 after treatment, there was a statistically significant non-inferiority of the group without reduction, compared to the group with reduction. Sensory disturbances appeared at similar frequencies in the two groups four to six weeks after treatment (9.5% with reduction, 9.1% without). At 12 months, the Krimmer and DASH scores of patients whose fractures had not been reduced were no worse than those of patients whose fractures had been reduced (96 and 7 versus 96.5 and 4.5, respectively; p-values for non-inferiority, 0.004 and 0.008). CONCLUSION: This trial shows that dispensing with closed reduction before casting as a preliminary to planned surgery yields no disadvantage. Thus, in the authors' view, routine reduction is not warranted.


Subject(s)
Radius Fractures , Fracture Fixation , Fracture Fixation, Internal , Humans , Pain Measurement , Prospective Studies , Radiography , Radius Fractures/diagnostic imaging , Radius Fractures/surgery , Treatment Outcome
2.
J Hand Microsurg ; 11(2): 111-116, 2019 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31413496

ABSTRACT

Introduction Closed reduction and cast immobilization is a common practice as initial treatment for distal radius fractures. This study examines the pain perception that accompanies this approach. Materials and Methods Thirty dorsally displaced distal radius fractures were reduced and casted under finger-trap traction with intravenous analgesics. Patients rated their pain perception on visual analog scale prior to presentation, during reduction, during casting, and for every day until surgery. Closed reduction improved palmar tilt from -26.3 to -10.8 degrees. Surgery improved palmar tilt from -10.8 to +6.1 degrees. Closed reduction improved radial inclination from 15.5 to 19.1 degrees. Surgery improved radial inclination from 19.1 to 21.6 degrees. Mean pain perception was 5.8 at presentation. Reduction increased pain to 7.5 ( p < 0.001), whereas casting was less painful (3.7; p < 0.001). At the evening following casting and the following days until surgery, mean pain was still as high as 4.1, 4.2, 4.1, 3.6, 3.9, 2.8, 3.0, and 3.0, with some patients experiencing more pain than initially. Conclusion Reduction generates significant pain with only minor relief during cast immobilization. The indication for closed reduction prior to cast application is therefore questionable.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...