Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry ; 132(1): 18-24, 2008.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18818270

ABSTRACT

In most countries of European Union, legislation requires the determination of the total skin dose received by patients during interventional procedures in order to prevent deterministic damages. Various dose indicators like dose-area product (DAP), cumulative dose (CD) and entrance dose at the patient plane (EFD) are used for patient dosimetry purposes in clinical practice. This study aimed at relating those dose indicators with doses ascribed to the most irradiated areas of the patient skin usually expressed in terms of local maximal skin dose (MSD). The study was performed in two different facilities for two most common cardiac procedures coronary angiography (CA) and percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). For CA procedures, the registered values of fluoroscopy time, total DAP and MSD were in the range (0.7-27.3) min, (16-317) Gy cm(2) and (43-1507) mGy, respectively, and for interventions, accordingly (2.1-43.6) min, (17-425) Gy cm(2), (71-1555) mGy. Moreover, for CA procedures, CD and EFD were in the ranges (295-4689) mGy and (121-1768) mGy and for PCI (267-6524) mGy and (68-2279) mGy, respectively. No general and satisfactory correlation was found for safe estimation of MSD. However, results show that the best dose indicator which might serve for rough, preliminary estimation is DAP value. In the study, the appropriate trigger levels were proposed for both facilities.


Subject(s)
Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary , Coronary Angiography , Radiation Dosage , Radiation Monitoring/methods , Radiography, Interventional , Skin/radiation effects , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Fluoroscopy , Humans , Male , Middle Aged
2.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry ; 129(1-3): 328-32, 2008.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18319283

ABSTRACT

The results of international calibration of Kerma Area Product (KAP) meters for European SENTINEL survey on patient dose optimisation of cardiac and interventional radiology practice are presented. Twelve countries were involved in the study. An investigation was conduced on 25 KAP meters fitted to undercouch X-ray tubes; 13 KAP meters were installed on cardiac units and the remaining 12 on interventional ones. The simplified calibration method has been applied, consisting of KAP estimation by multiplying the air kerma at the centre of the X-ray field by the irradiated area. The obtained values of calibration factors range from 0.4 to 0.9 and from 0.4 to 0.8 for KAP meters installed on cardiac and interventional units, respectively. They account also for table and mattress attenuation. For air kerma assessment, measurements with thermoluminescent dosemeters have been applied and when possible compared against an additional reference dosemeter. As the result of the investigation, the importance of calibration of KAP meters in clinical conditions that include mattress and table attenuation has been recognised.


Subject(s)
Cardiology/instrumentation , Cardiology/standards , Occupational Exposure/analysis , Radiation Dosage , Radiation Monitoring/methods , Radiation Protection/methods , Radiology, Interventional/instrumentation , Radiology, Interventional/standards , Calibration , Cardiology/methods , Data Collection , Humans , Radiology, Interventional/methods , Sensitivity and Specificity , X-Rays
3.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry ; 129(1-3): 39-45, 2008.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18287189

ABSTRACT

Patient doses for a few common fluoroscopy-guided procedures in interventional radiology (IR) (excluding cardiology) were collected from a few radiological departments in 13 European countries. The major aim was to evaluate patient doses for the basis of the reference levels. In total, data for 20 procedures for about 1300 patients were collected. There were many-fold variations in the number of IR equipment and procedures per population, in the entrance dose rates, and in the patient dose data (total dose area product or DAP, fluoroscopy time and number of frames). There was no clear correlation between the total DAP and entrance dose rate, or between the total DAP and fluoroscopy time, indicating that a number of parameters affect the differences. Because of the limited number of patients, preliminary reference levels were proposed only for a few procedures. There is a need to improve the optimisation of IR procedures and their definitions and grouping, in order to account for their different complexities.


Subject(s)
Diagnostic Imaging , Radiation Dosage , Radiology, Interventional/standards , Angiography , Fluoroscopy , Humans , Neuroradiography , Radiation Monitoring , Radiation Protection , Reference Standards
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...