Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 85
Filter
2.
Radiat Environ Biophys ; 60(4): 519-530, 2021 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34657188

ABSTRACT

This document presents the ICRP's updated vision on "Areas of Research to Support the System of Radiological Protection", which have been previously published in 2017. It aims to complement the research priorities promoted by other relevant international organisations, with the specificity of placing them in the perspective of the evolution of the System of Radiological Protection. This document contributes to the process launched by ICRP to review and revise the System of Radiological Protection that will update the 2007 General Recommendations in ICRP Publication 103.


Subject(s)
International Agencies , Radiation Protection
3.
Ann ICRP ; 48(2-3): 9-501, 2019 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31850780

ABSTRACT

The 2007 Recommendations (ICRP, 2007) introduced changes that affect the calculation of effective dose, and implied a revision of the dose coefficients for internal exposure, published previously in the Publication 30 series (ICRP, 1979a,b, 1980a, 1981, 1988) and Publication 68 (ICRP, 1994b). In addition, new data are now available that support an update of the radionuclide-specific information given in Publications 54 and 78 (ICRP, 1989a, 1997) for the design of monitoring programmes and retrospective assessment of occupational internal doses. Provision of new biokinetic models, dose coefficients, monitoring methods, and bioassay data was performed by Committee 2 and its task groups. A new series, the Occupational Intakes of Radionuclides (OIR) series, will replace the Publication 30 series and Publications 54, 68, and 78. OIR Part 1 (ICRP, 2015) describes the assessment of internal occupational exposure to radionuclides, biokinetic and dosimetric models, methods of individual and workplace monitoring, and general aspects of retrospective dose assessment. OIR Part 2 (ICRP, 2016), OIR Part 3 (ICRP, 2017), this current publication, and the final publication in the OIR series (OIR Part 5) provide data on individual elements and their radioisotopes, including information on chemical forms encountered in the workplace; a list of principal radioisotopes and their physical half-lives and decay modes; the parameter values of the reference biokinetic models; and data on monitoring techniques for the radioisotopes most commonly encountered in workplaces. Reviews of data on inhalation, ingestion, and systemic biokinetics are also provided for most of the elements. Dosimetric data provided in the printed publications of the OIR series include tables of committed effective dose per intake (Sv per Bq intake) for inhalation and ingestion, tables of committed effective dose per content (Sv per Bq measurement) for inhalation, and graphs of retention and excretion data per Bq intake for inhalation. These data are provided for all absorption types and for the most common isotope(s) of each element. The online electronic files that accompany the OIR series of publications contains a comprehensive set of committed effective and equivalent dose coefficients, committed effective dose per content functions, and reference bioassay functions. Data are provided for inhalation, ingestion, and direct input to blood. This fourth publication in the OIR series provides the above data for the following elements: lanthanum (La), cerium (Ce), praseodymium (Pr), neodymium (Nd), promethium (Pm), samarium (Sm), europium (Eu), gadolinium (Gd), terbium (Tb), dysprosium (Dy), holmium (Ho), erbium (Er), thulium (Tm), ytterbium (Yb), lutetium (Lu), actinium (Ac), protactinium (Pa), neptunium (Np), plutonium (Pu), americium (Am), curium (Cm), berkelium (Bk), californium (Cf), einsteinium (Es), and fermium (Fm).


Subject(s)
Occupational Exposure/prevention & control , Radiation Exposure/prevention & control , Radiation Monitoring/standards , Radiation Protection/standards , Radioisotopes/adverse effects , Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation , Humans , Radiation Exposure/standards , Radiation, Ionizing , Risk Assessment
4.
Ann ICRP ; 47(3-4): 63-74, 2018 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29658294

ABSTRACT

Internal doses are calculated using biokinetic and dosimetric models. These models describe the behaviour of the radionuclides after ingestion, inhalation, and absorption to the blood, and the absorption of the energy resulting from their nuclear transformations. The International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) develops such models and applies them to provide dose coefficients and bioassay functions for the calculation of equivalent or effective dose from knowledge of intakes and/or measurements of activity in bioassay samples. Over the past few years, ICRP has devoted a considerable amount of effort to the revision and improvement of models to make them more physiologically realistic representations of uptake and retention in organs and tissues, and of excretion. Provision of new biokinetic models, dose coefficients, monitoring methods, and bioassay data is the responsibility of Committee 2 and its task groups. Three publications in a series of documents replacing the ICRP Publication 30 series and ICRP Publications 54, 68, and 78 have been issued [Occupational Intakes of Radionuclides (OIR) Parts 1-3]. OIR Part 1 describes the assessment of internal occupational exposure to radionuclides, biokinetic and dosimetric models, methods of individual and workplace monitoring, and general aspects of retrospective dose assessment. OIR Parts 2-5 provide data on individual elements and their radioisotopes. Work is also in progress on revision of dose coefficients for radionuclide intakes by members of the public.


Subject(s)
Radiation Dosage , Radiation Exposure/analysis , Radiation Protection/methods , Radiometry/methods , Humans , International Agencies , Models, Theoretical , Occupational Exposure , Retrospective Studies
5.
Ann ICRP ; 46(3-4): 1-486, 2017 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29380630

ABSTRACT

Abstract ­: The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP, 2007) introduced changes that affect the calculation of effective dose, and implied a revision of the dose coefficients for internal exposure, published previously in the Publication 30 series (ICRP, 1979, 1980, 1981, 1988) and Publication 68 (ICRP, 1994). In addition, new data are now available that support an update of the radionuclide-specific information given in Publications 54 and 78 (ICRP, 1988a, 1997b) for the design of monitoring programmes and retrospective assessment of occupational internal doses. Provision of new biokinetic models, dose coefficients, monitoring methods, and bioassay data was performed by Committee 2, Task Group 21 on Internal Dosimetry, and Task Group 4 on Dose Calculations. A new series, the Occupational Intakes of Radionuclides (OIR) series, will replace the Publication 30 series and Publications 54, 68, and 78. OIR Part 1 has been issued (ICRP, 2015), and describes the assessment of internal occupational exposure to radionuclides, biokinetic and dosimetric models, methods of individual and workplace monitoring, and general aspects of retrospective dose assessment. OIR Part 2 (ICRP, 2016), this current publication and upcoming publications in the OIR series (Parts 4 and 5) provide data on individual elements and their radioisotopes, including information on chemical forms encountered in the workplace; a list of principal radioisotopes and their physical half-lives and decay modes; the parameter values of the reference biokinetic model; and data on monitoring techniques for the radioisotopes encountered most commonly in workplaces. Reviews of data on inhalation, ingestion, and systemic biokinetics are also provided for most of the elements. Dosimetric data provided in the printed publications of the OIR series include tables of committed effective dose per intake (Sv Bq−1 intake) for inhalation and ingestion, tables of committed effective dose per content (Sv Bq−1 measurement) for inhalation, and graphs of retention and excretion data per Bq intake for inhalation. These data are provided for all absorption types and for the most common isotope(s) of each element. The electronic annex that accompanies the OIR series of publications contains a comprehensive set of committed effective and equivalent dose coefficients, committed effective dose per content functions, and reference bioassay functions. Data are provided for inhalation, ingestion, and direct input to blood. This third publication in the series provides the above data for the following elements: ruthenium (Ru), antimony (Sb), tellurium (Te), iodine (I), caesium (Cs), barium (Ba), iridium (Ir), lead (Pb), bismuth (Bi), polonium (Po), radon (Rn), radium (Ra), thorium (Th), and uranium (U).


Subject(s)
Occupational Exposure/prevention & control , Occupational Health/standards , Radiation Exposure/prevention & control , Radiation Monitoring/standards , Radiation Protection/standards , Radioisotopes/adverse effects , Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation , Humans , Radiation Exposure/standards , Radiation, Ionizing , Risk Assessment
6.
Toxicol Lett ; 257: 44-59, 2016 Aug 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27267564

ABSTRACT

The civilian and military use of uranium results in an increased risk of human exposure. The toxicity of uranium results from both its chemical and radiological properties that vary with isotopic composition. Validated biomarkers of health effects associated with exposure to uranium are neither sensitive nor specific to uranium radiotoxicity and/or radiological effect. This study aimed at investigating if serum proteins could be useful as biomarkers of both uranium exposure and radiological effect. Male Sprague-Dawley rats were chronically exposed through drinking water to low levels (40mg/L, corresponding to 1mg of uranium per animal per day) of either 4% (235)U-enriched uranium (EU) or 12% EU during 6 weeks. A proteomics approach based on two-dimensional electrophoresis (2D-DIGE) and mass spectrometry (MS) was used to establish protein expression profiles that could be relevant for discriminating between groups, and to identify some differentially expressed proteins following uranium ingestion. It demonstrated that the expressions of 174 protein spots over 1045 quantified spots were altered after uranium exposure (p<0.05). Using both inferential and non-supervised multivariate statistics, we show sets of spots features that lead to a clear discrimination between controls and EU exposed groups on the one hand (21 spots), and between 4% EU and 12% EU on the other hand (7 spots), showing that investigation of the serum proteome may possibly be of relevance to address both uranium contamination and radiological effect. Finally, using bioinformatics tools, pathway analyses of differentially expressed MS-identified proteins find that acute phase, inflammatory and immune responses as well as oxidative stress are likely involved in the response to contamination, suggesting a physiological perturbation, but that does not necessarily lead to a toxic effect.


Subject(s)
Blood Proteins/metabolism , Proteome , Radiation Injuries/blood , Uranium/toxicity , Uranyl Nitrate/toxicity , Water Pollutants, Radioactive/toxicity , Acute-Phase Proteins/metabolism , Animals , Biomarkers/blood , Discriminant Analysis , Drinking , Inflammation Mediators/blood , Male , Multivariate Analysis , Oxidative Stress/radiation effects , Principal Component Analysis , Protein Interaction Maps , Proteomics/methods , Radiation Injuries/diagnosis , Rats, Sprague-Dawley , Spectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-Ionization , Two-Dimensional Difference Gel Electrophoresis
7.
Ann ICRP ; 45(1 Suppl): 156-77, 2016 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27048756

ABSTRACT

Major current efforts within Committee 2 of the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) involve the development of dose coefficients for inhalation and ingestion of radionuclides, and those for exposure to environmental radiation fields. These efforts build upon changes in radiation and tissue weighting factors (Publication 103), radionuclide decay schemes (Publication 107), computational phantoms of the adult reference male and female (Publication 110), external dose coefficients for adult reference workers for idealised radiation fields (Publication 116), models of radionuclide intake (Publications 66, 100 and 130), and models of radionuclide systemic biokinetics (Publication 130). This paper will review the overall computational framework for both internal and external dose coefficients. For internal exposures, the work entails assessment of organ self-dose and cross-dose from monoenergetic particle emissions (specific absorbed fraction), absorbed dose per nuclear transformation (S value), time-integrated activity of the radionuclide in source tissues (inhalation, ingestion, and systemic biokinetic models), and their numerical combination to yield the organ equivalent dose or effective dose per activity inhaled or ingested. Various challenges are reviewed that were not included in the development of Publication 30 dose coefficients, which were based upon much more simplified biokinetic models and computational phantoms. For external exposures, the computations entail the characterisation of environmental radionuclide distributions, the transport of radiation particles through that environment, and the tracking of energy deposition to the organs of the exposed individual. Progress towards the development of dose coefficients to members of the general public (adolescents, children, infants and fetuses) are also reviewed.


Subject(s)
Air Pollutants, Radioactive/metabolism , Food Contamination, Radioactive/analysis , Radiation Dosage , Radiation Exposure , Radiation Protection/standards , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Air Pollutants, Radioactive/analysis , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Fetus , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Inhalation Exposure , International Agencies , Male , Middle Aged , Young Adult
8.
Ann ICRP ; 45(1 Suppl): 202-14, 2016 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27044362

ABSTRACT

Internal doses are calculated on the basis of knowledge of intakes and/or measurements of activity in bioassay samples, typically using reference biokinetic and dosimetric models recommended by the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP). These models describe the behaviour of the radionuclides after ingestion, inhalation, and absorption to the blood, and the absorption of the energy resulting from their nuclear transformations. They are intended to be used mainly for the purpose of radiological protection: that is, optimisation and demonstration of compliance with dose limits. These models and parameter values are fixed by convention and are not subject to uncertainty. Over the past few years, ICRP has devoted a considerable amount of effort to the revision and improvement of models to make them more physiologically realistic. ICRP models are now sufficiently sophisticated for calculating organ and tissue absorbed doses for scientific purposes, and in many other areas, including toxicology, pharmacology and medicine. In these specific cases, uncertainties in parameters and variability between individuals need to be taken into account.


Subject(s)
Radiation Dosage , Radiation Exposure , Radiation Protection , Radioisotopes/metabolism , Radiometry/methods , Humans , International Agencies , Models, Theoretical , Uncertainty
9.
Ann ICRP ; 45(1 Suppl): 17-24, 2016 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26984902

ABSTRACT

The focus of the work of Committee 2 of the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) is the computation of dose coefficients compliant with Publication 103 A set of reference computational phantoms is being developed, based on medical imaging data, and used for radiation transport calculations. Biokinetic models used to describe the behaviour of radionuclides in body tissues are being updated, also leading to changes in organ doses and effective dose coefficients. Dose coefficients for external radiation exposure of adults calculated using the new reference phantoms were issued as Publication 116, jointly with the International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements. Forthcoming reports will provide internal dose coefficients for radionuclide inhalation and ingestion by workers, and associated bioassay data. Work is in progress to revise internal dose coefficients for members of the public, and, for the first time, to provide reference values for external exposures of the public. Committee 2 is also working with Committee 3 on dose coefficients for radiopharmaceuticals, and leading a cross-Committee initiative to give advice on the use of effective dose.


Subject(s)
International Agencies/organization & administration , Radiation Dosage , Radiation Protection/standards , Radiation, Ionizing , Radioisotopes , Humans , International Agencies/legislation & jurisprudence , Models, Theoretical , Phantoms, Imaging , Radiation Exposure/analysis , Radiation Monitoring/instrumentation , Radioisotopes/analysis , Risk Assessment
10.
Ann ICRP ; 45(3-4): 7-349, 2016 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28657340

ABSTRACT

Abstract ­: The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP, 2007) introduced changes that affect the calculation of effective dose, and implied a revision of the dose coefficients for internal exposure, published previously in the Publication 30 series (ICRP, 1979, 1980, 1981, 1988b) and Publication 68 (ICRP, 1994b). In addition, new data are available that support an update of the radionuclide-specific information given in Publications 54 and 78 (ICRP, 1988a, 1997b) for the design of monitoring programmes and retrospective assessment of occupational internal doses. Provision of new biokinetic models, dose coefficients, monitoring methods, and bioassay data was performed by Committee 2, Task Group 21 on Internal Dosimetry, and Task Group 4 on Dose Calculations. A new series, the Occupational Intakes of Radionuclides (OIR) series, will replace the Publication 30 series and Publications 54, 68, and 78. Part 1 of the OIR series has been issued (ICRP, 2015), and describes the assessment of internal occupational exposure to radionuclides, biokinetic and dosimetric models, methods of individual and workplace monitoring, and general aspects of retrospective dose assessment. The following publications in the OIR series (Parts 2­5) will provide data on individual elements and their radioisotopes, including information on chemical forms encountered in the workplace; a list of principal radioisotopes and their physical half-lives and decay modes; the parameter values of the reference biokinetic model; and data on monitoring techniques for the radioisotopes encountered most commonly in workplaces. Reviews of data on inhalation, ingestion, and systemic biokinetics are also provided for most of the elements. Dosimetric data provided in the printed publications of the OIR series include tables of committed effective dose per intake (Sv per Bq intake) for inhalation and ingestion, tables of committed effective dose per content (Sv per Bq measurement) for inhalation, and graphs of retention and excretion data per Bq intake for inhalation. These data are provided for all absorption types and for the most common isotope(s) of each element. The electronic annex that accompanies the OIR series of reports contains a comprehensive set of committed effective and equivalent dose coefficients, committed effective dose per content functions, and reference bioassay functions. Data are provided for inhalation, ingestion, and direct input to blood. The present publication provides the above data for the following elements: hydrogen (H), carbon (C), phosphorus (P), sulphur (S), calcium (Ca), iron (Fe), cobalt (Co), zinc (Zn), strontium (Sr), yttrium (Y), zirconium (Zr), niobium (Nb), molybdenum (Mo), and technetium (Tc).


Subject(s)
Occupational Exposure/prevention & control , Radiation Exposure/prevention & control , Radiation Monitoring/standards , Radiation Protection/standards , Radioisotopes , Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation , Humans , Occupational Health , Radiation, Ionizing , Radiometry , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors
11.
Ann ICRP ; 44(2): 5-188, 2015 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26494836

ABSTRACT

Abstract ­: This report is the first in a series of reports replacing Publications 30 and 68 to provide revised dose coefficients for occupational intakes of radionuclides by inhalation and ingestion. The revised dose coefficients have been calculated using the Human Alimentary Tract Model (Publication 100) and a revision of the Human Respiratory Tract Model (Publication 66) that takes account of more recent data. In addition, information is provided on absorption into blood following inhalation and ingestion of different chemical forms of elements and their radioisotopes. In selected cases, it is judged that the data are sufficient to make material-specific recommendations. Revisions have been made to many of the models that describe the systemic biokinetics of radionuclides absorbed into blood, making them more physiologically realistic representations of uptake and retention in organs and tissues, and excretion. The reports in this series provide data for the interpretation of bioassay measurements as well as dose coefficients, replacing Publications 54 and 78. In assessing bioassay data such as measurements of whole-body or organ content, or urinary excretion, assumptions have to be made about the exposure scenario, including the pattern and mode of radionuclide intake, physical and chemical characteristics of the material involved, and the elapsed time between the exposure(s) and measurement. This report provides some guidance on monitoring programmes and data interpretation.


Subject(s)
Occupational Exposure/prevention & control , Radiation Monitoring , Radiation Protection/standards , Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation , Humans , Occupational Health , Radiation Protection/methods , Radiation, Ionizing , Radiometry
12.
J Radiol Prot ; 33(1): R1-16, 2013 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23296029

ABSTRACT

The assessment and management of risks associated with exposures to ionising radiation are defined by the general radiological protection system, proposed by the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP). This system is regarded by a large majority of users as a robust system although there are a number of dissenting voices, claiming that it is not suitable for estimating the risks resulting from internal exposures. One of the specific issues of internal exposure involves short-range radiations such as Auger and beta particles. Auger- and beta-emitting radionuclides can be distributed preferentially in certain tissue structures and even in certain cellular organelles, according to their chemical nature and the vector with which they are associated. Given the limited range of the low-energy electrons in biological matter, this heterogeneous distribution can generate highly localised energy depositions and exacerbate radiotoxic responses at cellular level. These particularities in energy distribution and cellular responses are not taken into account by the conventional methods for the assessment of risk.Alternative systems have been proposed, based on dosimetry conducted at the cellular or even molecular level, whose purpose is to determine the energy deposition occurring within the DNA molecule. However, calculation of absorbed doses at the molecular level is not sufficient to ensure a better assessment of the risks incurred. Favouring such a microdosimetric approach for the risk assessments would require a comprehensive knowledge of the biological targets of radiation, the dose-response relationships at the various levels of organisation, and the mechanisms leading from cellular energy deposition to the appearance of a health detriment. The required knowledge is not fully available today and it is not yet possible to link an intracellular energy deposition to a probability of occurrence of health effects or to use methods based on cellular dosimetry directly.The imperfections of the alternative approaches proposed so far should not discourage efforts. Protection against exposure to Auger and low-energy beta emitters would benefit from mechanistic studies, dedicated to the study of energy depositions of the radionuclides in various cellular structures, but also from radiotoxicological studies to define the relative biological effectiveness of the various Auger emitters used in medicine and of certain low-energy beta emitters, whose behaviour may depend greatly on their chemical form during intake. The scientific expertise, as well as the human and physical resources needed to conduct these studies, is available. They could be now mobilised into international low-dose research programmes, in order to ultimately improve the protection of people exposed to these specific radionuclides.


Subject(s)
Environmental Exposure/analysis , Radiation Injuries/etiology , Radiation Injuries/physiopathology , Radiation Monitoring/methods , Radiation Protection/methods , Radioisotopes/adverse effects , Risk Assessment/methods , Animals , Beta Particles , Humans , Radiation Injuries/prevention & control , Research Design/trends , Risk Assessment/trends
13.
Ann ICRP ; 41(3-4): 368-77, 2012.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23089036

ABSTRACT

The International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) recently estimated the risk of lung cancer associated with radon exposure, and a statement was issued in ICRP Publication 115. This was based on recent epidemiological studies and the results from a joint analysis of cohorts of Czech, French, and German uranium miners, and indicated that the excess relative risk of lung cancer per unit of exposure should be expressed with consideration of chronic exposure over more than 10 years, by modelling time since median exposure, age attained or age at exposure, and taking in account, if possible, interaction between radon and tobacco. The lifetime excess absolute risk (LEAR) calculated from occupational exposure studies is close to 5 × 10(-4) per working level month (WLM) (14 × 10(-5) per hmJ/m(3)). LEAR values estimated using risk models derived from both miners and domestic exposure studies are in good agreement after accounting for factors such as sex, attained age, and exposure scenario. A sensitivity analysis highlighted the high dependence of background mortality rates on LEAR estimates. Using lung cancer rates among Euro-American males instead of the ICRP reference rates (males and females, and Euro-American and Asian populations), the estimated LEAR is close to 7 × 10(-4) per WLM (20 × 10(-5) per hm J/m(3)).


Subject(s)
Lung Neoplasms/epidemiology , Mining , Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/epidemiology , Occupational Diseases/epidemiology , Occupational Exposure , Radon/toxicity , Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation , Environmental Exposure , Guidelines as Topic , Humans , International Agencies , Lung Neoplasms/etiology , Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/etiology , Occupational Diseases/etiology , Radiation Protection/standards , Risk Assessment , Sensitivity and Specificity , Uranium
14.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry ; 144(1-4): 361-6, 2011 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21037264

ABSTRACT

Potential internal contamination of workers is monitored by periodic bioassay measurements interpreted in terms of intake and committed effective dose by the use of biokinetic and dosimetric models. After a prospective evaluation of exposure at a workplace, a suitable monitoring programme can be defined by choosing adequate measurement techniques and frequency. In this study, the sensitivity of a programme is evaluated by the minimum intake and dose, which may be detected with a given level of confidence by taking into account uncertainties on exposure conditions and measurements. This is made for programme optimisation, which is performed by comparing the sensitivities of different alternative programmes. These methods were applied at the AREVA NC reprocessing plant and support the current monitoring programme as the best compromise between the cost of the measurements and the sensitivity of the programme.


Subject(s)
Occupational Exposure/analysis , Radiation Monitoring/methods , Radiation Protection/methods , Radiation Protection/standards , Radiometry/methods , Radiometry/standards , Bayes Theorem , Biological Assay , Feces , Humans , Models, Theoretical , Occupational Exposure/prevention & control , Plutonium/analysis , Probability , Prospective Studies , Radiation Dosage , Radiation Monitoring/standards , Reproducibility of Results , Risk Assessment , Uncertainty , Urine
15.
Health Phys ; 99(4): 517-22, 2010 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20838093

ABSTRACT

Potential internal contaminations of workers are monitored by periodic bioassays interpreted in terms of intake and committed effective dose through biokinetic and dosimetric models. After a prospective evaluation of exposure at a workplace, a suitable monitoring program can be defined by the choice of measurement techniques and frequency of measurements. However, the actual conditions of exposure are usually not well defined and the measurements are subject to errors. In this study we took into consideration the uncertainties associated with a routine monitoring program in order to evaluate the minimum intake and dose detectable for a given level of confidence. Major sources of uncertainty are the contamination time, the size distribution and absorption into blood of the incorporated particles, and the measurement errors. Different assumptions may be applied to model uncertain knowledge, which lead to different statistical approaches. The available information is modeled here by classical or Bayesian probability distributions. These techniques are implemented in the OPSCI software under development. This methodology was applied to the monitoring program of workers in charge of plutonium purification at the AREVA NC reprocessing facility (La Hague, France). A sensitivity analysis was carried out to determine the important parameters for the minimum detectable dose. The methods presented here may be used for assessment of any other routine monitoring program through the comparison of the minimum detectable dose for a given confidence level with dose constraints.


Subject(s)
Models, Biological , Occupational Exposure/analysis , Plutonium/analysis , Radiation Dosage , Radiation Monitoring/methods , Uncertainty , Algorithms , Alpha Particles , Body Burden , Computer Simulation , Humans , Occupational Exposure/prevention & control , Plutonium/pharmacokinetics , Radiation Monitoring/standards , Radiation Protection , Risk Assessment , Time Factors
16.
J Radiol Prot ; 30(1): 5-21, 2010 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20220216

ABSTRACT

In order to optimise the monitoring of potentially exposed workers, it is desirable to determine specific values of absorption for the compounds handled. This study derives specific values of absorption rates for different chemical forms of plutonium from in vitro and animal (monkeys, dogs, mice, rats) experiments, and from human contamination cases. Different published experimental data have been reinterpreted here to derive values for the absorption parameters, f(r), s(r) and s(s), used in the human respiratory tract model currently adopted by the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP). The consequences of the use of these values were investigated by calculating related committed effective doses per unit intake. Average and median estimates were calculated for f(r), s(r), and s(s) for each plutonium compound, that can be used as default values for specific chemical forms instead of the current reference types. Nevertheless, it was shown that the use of the current ICRP reference absorption types provides reasonable approximations. Moreover, this work provides estimates of the variability in pulmonary absorption and, therefore, facilitates analyses of the uncertainties associated with assessments, either from bioassay measurements or from prospective calculations, of intake and dose.


Subject(s)
Air Pollutants, Radioactive/adverse effects , Air Pollutants, Radioactive/pharmacokinetics , Inhalation Exposure/adverse effects , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Plutonium/adverse effects , Plutonium/pharmacokinetics , Respiratory System/metabolism , Respiratory System/radiation effects , Absorption , Animals , Dogs , Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation , Humans , Macaca fascicularis , Mice , Monte Carlo Method , Papio , Radiation Dosage , Radiation Protection , Radiometry , Rats , Reference Values , Risk Assessment
17.
Ann ICRP ; 40(1): 1-64, 2010 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22108246

ABSTRACT

Recent epidemiological studies of the association between lung cancer and exposure to radon and its decay products are reviewed. Particular emphasis is given to pooled case-control studies of residential exposures, and to cohorts of underground miners exposed to relatively low levels of radon. The residential and miner epidemiological studies provide consistent estimates of the risk of lung cancer, with significant associations observed at average annual concentrations of approximately 200 Bq/m³ and cumulative occupational levels of approximately 50 working level months (WLM), respectively. Based on recent results from combined analyses of epidemiological studies of miners, a lifetime excess absolute risk of 5 × 10⁻4 per WLM [14 × 10⁻5 per (mJh/m³)] should now be used as the nominal probability coefficient for radon- and radon-progeny-induced lung cancer, replacing the previous Publication 65 (ICRP, 1993) value of 2.8 × 10⁻4 per WLM [8 × 10⁻5 per (mJh/m³)]. Current knowledge of radon-associated risks for organs other than the lungs does not justify the selection of a detriment coefficient different from the fatality coefficient for radon-induced lung cancer. Publication 65 (ICRP, 2003) recommended that doses from radon and its progeny should be calculated using a dose conversion convention based on epidemiological data. It is now concluded that radon and its progeny should be treated in the same way as other radionuclides within the ICRP system of protection; that is, doses from radon and its progeny should be calculated using ICRP biokinetic and dosimetric models. ICRP will provide dose coefficients per unit exposure to radon and its progeny for different reference conditions of domestic and occupational exposure, with specified equilibrium factors and aerosol characteristics.


Subject(s)
Air Pollutants, Occupational/toxicity , Air Pollutants, Radioactive/toxicity , Lung Neoplasms/epidemiology , Occupational Exposure , Radon Daughters/toxicity , Radon/toxicity , Adult , Aged , Air Pollution, Indoor , Case-Control Studies , Child , Cohort Studies , Female , Housing , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/chemically induced , Male , Mining , Radiation Dosage , Risk Assessment
18.
J Radiol Prot ; 29(2): 175-81, 2009 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19454789

ABSTRACT

Tritium is a radionuclide that will be used and produced in fusion reactors. Tritium toxicity is well known, but its health consequences are more difficult to assess, due to difficulties in assessing doses and to the very few cases of contamination that have occurred since it started being used. The assessment of risks resulting from tritium exposure is based on ICRP models that enable the calculation of doses in tissues, by means of a weighting factor WR, based on the relative biological effectiveness of the various radioactive emissions. Some authors are currently asking for a revision of the weighting factor used for tritium beta-ray emissions, arguing that tritium could be incorporated into DNA. A review of the extensive research conducted on this subject shows that the relative biological effectiveness of tritium is not so different from that of gamma emissions, which are taken as reference radiations. This supports the drive to keep the current weighting factor of 1 for tritium beta emissions, initially proposed and then reaffirmed by the ICRP.


Subject(s)
Environmental Exposure/statistics & numerical data , Models, Biological , Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/epidemiology , Proportional Hazards Models , Radiation Monitoring/statistics & numerical data , Tritium/analysis , Computer Simulation , Environmental Exposure/analysis , France/epidemiology , Humans , Incidence , Radiation Monitoring/methods , Risk Assessment/methods , Risk Factors
19.
Health Phys ; 96(2): 144-54, 2009 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19131736

ABSTRACT

The dosimetry of internal exposure to radionuclides is performed on the basis of biokinetic and dosimetric models. For prospective purpose, the organ or effective dose resulting from potential conditions of exposure can be calculated by applying these models with dedicated software. However, it is acknowledged that a significant uncertainty is associated with such calculation due to the variability of individual cases and to the possible lack of knowledge about some factors influencing the dosimetry. This uncertainty has been studied in a range of situations by modeling the uncertainty on the model parameters by probability distributions and propagating this uncertainty onto the dose result by Monte Carlo calculation. However, while probability distributions are well adapted to model the known variability of a parameter, they may lead to an unrealistically low estimate of the uncertainty due to a lack of knowledge about some input parameters. Here we present a mathematical method, based on the Dempster-Shafer theory, to deal with such imprecise knowledge. We apply this method to the prospective dosimetry of inhaled uranium dust in the nuclear fuel cycle when its physico-chemical properties are not precisely known. The results show an increased estimation of the range of uncertainty as compared to the application of a probabilistic method. This Dempster-Shafer method may valuably be applied in future prospective dosimetry of internal exposure in order to more realistically estimate the uncertainty resulting from an imprecise knowledge of the parameters of the dose calculation.


Subject(s)
Inhalation Exposure , Models, Biological , Uranium , Dust/analysis , Humans , Mining , Nuclear Fission , Occupational Exposure , Oxides , Radiation Dosage , Radiometry , Sensitivity and Specificity , Uncertainty , Uranium Compounds
20.
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique ; 56(1): 21-9, 2008 Feb.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18262377

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: A pilot study was carried out in the AREVA NC Pierrelatte nuclear facility in order to investigate a possible carcinogenic effect of internal radiation exposure among nuclear workers in France. The objective of this study was to develop a method for retrospective reconstruction of the occupational exposure to internal radiation from uranium and associated chemical exposures. METHODS: A plant- and period-specific job exposure matrix (JEM) was designed. Job groups and exposure agents groups including uranium compounds and other chemical agents known as being carcinogenic, mutagenic or toxic were defined by an expert committee. Exposure was evaluated by active and retired workers included in the evaluator committee. A quantitative assignment of quantity and frequency of handling (both coded from 0 to 3) was performed for each agent groups using a method derived from the Delphi technique. RESULTS: In all, 23 experts and 353 evaluators participated to the JEM elaboration. A final JEM involved 232 "job-periods" presenting throughout the plant period 1960-2006 and 22 exposure agents groups in use at the plant. Six of them involved uranium compounds classified by their blood-transferability and toxicity characteristics. A first validation of the JEM by experts in radiological protection and industrial hygiene showed an acceptable internal consistency. CONCLUSION: In the context of missing past exposure measurement data, the plant- and period-specific job exposure matrices may be considered as a valid alternative for exposure estimation. This method may be applied to other nuclear plants and offers allowance to investigate a possible carcinogenic effect of internal radiation exposure among nuclear workers.


Subject(s)
Nuclear Reactors , Occupational Exposure/analysis , France , Humans , Neoplasms/prevention & control , Pilot Projects , Radiation Injuries/prevention & control , Risk Assessment
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...