ABSTRACT
Word order alternation has been described as one of the most productive information structure markers and discourse organizers across languages. Psycholinguistic evidence has shown that word order is a crucial cue for argument interpretation. Previous studies about Spanish sentence comprehension have shown greater difficulty to parse sentences that present a word order that does not respect the order of participants of the verb's lexico-semantic structure, irrespective to whether the sentences follow the canonical word order of the language or not. This difficulty has been accounted as the cognitive cost related to the miscomputation of prominence status of the argument that precedes the verb. Nonetheless, the authors only analyzed the use of alternative word orders in isolated sentences, leaving aside the pragmatic motivation of word order alternation. By means of an eye-tracking task, the current study provides further evidence about the role of information structure for the comprehension of sentences with alternative word order and verb type, and sheds light on the interaction between syntax, semantics and pragmatics. We analyzed both "early" and "late" eye-movement measures as well as accuracy and response times to comprehension questions. Results showed an overall influence of information structure reflected in a modulation of late eye-movement measures as well as offline measures like total reading time and questions response time. However, effects related to the miscomputation of prominence status did not fade away when sentences were preceded by a context that led to non-canonical word order of constituents, showing that prominence computation is a core mechanism for argument interpretation, even in sentences preceded by context.
ABSTRACT
Linking is the theory that captures the mapping of the semantic roles of lexical arguments to the syntactic functions of the phrases that realize them. At the sentence level, linking allows us to understand "who did what to whom" in an event. In Spanish, linking has been shown to interact with word order, verb class, and case marking. The current study aims to provide the first piece of experimental evidence about the interplay between word order and verb type in Spanish. We achieve this by adopting role and reference grammar and the extended argument dependency model. Two different types of clauses were examined in a self-paced reading task: clauses with object-experiencer psychological verbs and activity verbs. These types of verbs differ in the way that their syntactic and semantic structures are linked, and thus they provide interesting evidence on how information that belongs to the syntax-semantics interface might influence the predictive and integrative processes of sentence comprehension with alternative word orders. Results indicate that in Spanish, comprehension and processing speed is enhanced when the order of the constituents in the sentence mirrors their ranking on a semantic hierarchy that encodes a verb's lexical semantics. Moreover, results show that during online comprehension, predictive mechanisms based on argument hierarchization are used rapidly to inform the processing system. Our findings corroborate already existing cross-linguistic evidence on the issue and are briefly discussed in the light of other sentence-processing models.
Subject(s)
Comprehension/physiology , Judgment/physiology , Language , Semantics , Speech Perception/physiology , Vocabulary , Adolescent , Adult , Algorithms , Factor Analysis, Statistical , Female , Hispanic or Latino , Humans , Linguistics , Male , Middle Aged , Models, Psychological , Reaction Time/physiology , Reading , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Pin-site myiasis is a rare complication of external fixation of open fractures of the tibia. METHODS: Case report and literature review. RESULTS: A 32 year-old man with a history of alcohol and drug abuse presented with an open fracture of the middle third of the fibula and tibia (Gustilo type IIIA) after a motor vehicle crash. Definitive surgical correction of the fracture was made with the insertion of an external skeletal fixator, type Baummer, with 2 bars, 6 pins, and 12 rotules. After three weeks, he presented again with a primary complaint of purulent secretion and maggots at the distal pin site. On removal of the pin, significant destruction of peripheral tissue was evidenced, with a wound approximately 5 cm diameter, from which 105 maggots were extracted, being identified as Cochliomyia hominivorax. CONCLUSIONS: There have been no previous reports of myiasis involving an external skeletal fixation and pin, and only one similar case has been reported in a patient with a halo orthosis for the management of a gunshot wound of the neck. As in that case, presumably, in our patient, myiasis occurred via the small infected wound adjacent to the distal pin. Adequate treatment for myiasis requires complete removal of the maggots, as well as antimicrobial therapy.