Heavy metals fractionation and desorption in pine bark amended mine soils.

The European Community Bureau of Reference method (BCR) was used for evaluating the effects of pine bark amendment (0, 24 and 48 g kg-1) and ageing (1 and 30 days) on Cd, Cu, Ni, Pb and Zn fractionation, on samples from an acid mine soil. In addition, the stirred flow chamber technique was applied for analyzing heavy metals desorption from the unamended and pine bark amended mine soil. When the unamended soil were not subjected to ageing, the added heavy metals were mainly accumulated as soluble fraction (>90% for Cd, Ni and Zn; 71% for Cu; and 45% for Pb). Pine bark amendment and ageing had little effect on Cd, Ni and Zn fractionation, whereas important changes were detected for Cu and Pb in response to both pine bark amendment and ageing (decrease in the soluble fractions, and increase in less mobile fractions). Desorption experiments showed that both pine bark amendment and ageing decreased heavy metals release from the mine soil. The results of this study indicate that pine bark amendment could be used to increase heavy metals retention (especially in the case of Cu and Pb) in acid mine soils, thus reducing the risks of metal transfer to uncontaminated environmental zones.

As(V)/Cr(VI) pollution control in soils, hemp waste, and other by-products: competitive sorption trials.

We study As(V)/Cr(VI) competitive sorption on a forest soil, a vineyard soil, pyritic material, mussel shell, pine bark, oak ash, and hemp waste, adding variable As(V) and Cr(VI) concentrations or displacing each pollutant with the same concentration of the other. When using variable concentrations, As(V) showed more affinity than Cr(VI) for sorption sites on most materials (sorption up to >84 % on oak ash and pyritic material). The only exception was pine bark, with clearly higher Cr(VI) sorption (>90 %) for any Cr(VI)/As(V) concentration added. Regarding the displacement experiments, when As(V) was added and reached sorption equilibrium, the subsequent addition of equal Cr(VI) concentration did not cause relevant As displacement from oak ash and pyritic material, indicating strong As bindings, and/or low competitive effects. When Cr(VI) was added and reached sorption equilibrium, the subsequent addition of equal As(V) concentration caused Cr(VI) displacement from all materials except pine bark, indicating weak Cr bindings. In view of these results, oak ash and the pyritic material could be used to remove As(V) in concentrations as high as 6 mmol L(-1), even in the presence of a wide range of Cr(VI) concentrations, whereas pine bark could be used to remove Cr(VI) concentrations as high as 6 mmol L(-1). The other materials assayed (including hemp waste, studied for the first time as As(V) and Cr(VI) bio-sorbent) cannot be considered appropriate to remove As(V) and/or Cr(VI) from polluted media.

F sorption/desorption on two soils and on different by-products and waste materials.

We used batch-type experiments to study F sorption/desorption on a forest soil, a vineyard soil, pyritic material, granitic material, finely and coarsely ground mussel shell, mussel shell calcination ash, oak wood ash, pine-sawdust, slate processing fines, and three different mixtures that included three components: sewage sludge, mussel shell ash, and calcined mussel shell or pine wood ash. The three waste mixtures, forest soil, pyritic material, and shell ash showed high sorption capacity (73-91 % of added F) and low desorption, even when 100 mg F L(-1) was added. All these materials (and to a lower extent wood ash) could be useful to remove F from polluted media (as certain soils, dumping sites, and contaminated waters). The vineyard soil, the granitic material, mussel shell, slate fines, and pine-sawdust were less effective in F removal. In most cases, sorption data fitted better to the Freundlich than to the Langmuir equation. These results can be useful to program the correct management of the soils, by-products, and waste materials assayed, mostly in situations where F concentrations are excessive and F removal should be promoted.

As(V) and P Competitive Sorption on Soils, By-Products and Waste Materials.

Batch-type experiments were used to study competitive As(V) and P sorption on various soils and sorbent materials. The materials assayed were a forest soil, a vineyard soil, pyritic material, granitic material, coarsely and finely ground mussel shell, calcinated mussel shell ash, pine sawdust and slate processing fines. Competition between As(V) and P was pronounced in the case of both soils, granitic material, slate fines, both shells and pine sawdust, showing more affinity for P. Contrary, the pyritic material and mussel shell ash showed high and similar affinity for As(V) and P. These results could be useful to make a correct use of the soils and materials assayed when focusing on As and P removal in solid or liquid media, in circumstances where both pollutants may compete for sorption sites.

Physiologically based extraction of heavy metals in compost: preliminary results.

A physiologically based extraction test (PBET) was run for the extraction of six metals (Cu, Zn, Cd, Cr, Ni and Pb) in four composts containing high concentrations of heavy metals. An aqueous solution of pepsin plus citric, acetic, and malic acids buffered to pH 2 was used to simulate the gastric mixture, and an extraction of 1h at 37 degrees C was run with a solid:liquid ratio of 1:100. The results were compared to those obtained using water and CaCl(2)-DTPA solution. The PBET extracted far more metals than water, but less than CaCl(2)-DTPA for Cu, Pb and Cr, while giving similar or slightly lower results for Cd, Zn, and Ni.