ABSTRACT
This prospective observational study aimed to identify at presentation the maternal hemodynamic and demographic variables associated with a therapeutic response to oral labetalol and to use these variables to develop a prediction model to anticipate the response to labetalol monotherapy in women with hypertension. It was set at a maternity unit in a UK teaching hospital. Maternal demographic data from 50 pregnant women, presenting with hypertension between January and August 2013, was collected and blood pressure measured with a device validated for pregnancy and pre-eclampsia. Maternal haemodynamics were assessed with a bioreactance monitor. Participants were commenced on oral labetalol, and reviewed until delivery and discharge home. Logistic regression analysis was performed to assess the prediction of response to labetalol according to the maternal demographic and hemodynamic variables. Main outcome measures were the response to labetalol monotherapy up to delivery and discharge home, defined as sustained blood pressure control <140/90, and the rates of severe hypertension. Thirty-seven women (74%) had their blood pressure well controlled with labetalol monotherapy, 13 (26%) failed to achieve control with labetalol alone, of whom 9 developed severe hypertension. Multivariate logistic regression showed that heart rate, ethnicity and stroke volume index were independent predictors of the response to labetalol. The predictive accuracy of the model was 96% (95% confidence interval (CI) 86-99%). Maternal demographics and haemodynamics are potent predictors for the response to labetalol, and these parameters may guide therapy to enable effective blood pressure control and a lowering of severe hypertension rates.
Subject(s)
Antihypertensive Agents/therapeutic use , Hypertension, Pregnancy-Induced/drug therapy , Labetalol/therapeutic use , Adult , Female , Humans , Logistic Models , Pregnancy , Prospective Studies , Young AdultABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Fetal growth restriction (FGR) is a powerful determinant of poor perinatal outcome. From our previous work in pregnancies at high risk of development of hypertension we found impaired cardiovascular adaptation early in gestation in those destined to deliver growth-restricted infants. In this study, we monitored serially maternal hemodynamics from the first to third trimester in a similar high-risk cohort, in order to determine whether this distinct hemodynamic profile found at presentation persisted throughout pregnancy in those complicated by FGR. METHODS: This was a prospective observational study based at a specialist antenatal hypertension clinic at a tertiary hospital in London. Maternal hemodynamics were evaluated serially using a non-invasive bioreactance method in pregnant women referred to the clinic with a history of chronic hypertension or a history of hypertensive disorder in a previous pregnancy. Differences in maternal hemodynamic parameters were compared between women who delivered a baby with a birth weight ≥ 10th vs < 10th percentile and ≥ 5th vs < 5th percentile. RESULTS: Eighty-four pregnant women were included in the study. Mean gestational age at presentation was 14.3 weeks. Sixteen women delivered babies with a birth weight < 10th percentile and 11 with a birth weight < 5th percentile. In pregnancies with a birth weight ≥ 10th percentile, longitudinal maternal hemodynamics showed a pattern consistent with well-established physiological changes in pregnancy, i.e. a reduction in vascular resistance and an increase in cardiac output with advancing gestation until mid-pregnancy. However, women who delivered babies with a birth weight < 10th percentile showed a static pattern with no change during gestation and lower cardiac output and higher peripheral vascular resistance. Similar differences were seen when the 5th percentile was used to discriminate between appropriately-grown and growth-restricted babies. CONCLUSION: Serial assessment of maternal hemodynamics in high-risk women identifies distinctive trends associated with pregnancies destined to deliver babies with birth weights < 10th and < 5th percentiles. These pregnancies have a suppressed and static maternal cardiac output and stroke volume, and have consistently raised peripheral vascular resistance. This suggests that, in women with chronic hypertension or a history of hypertensive disorder in a previous pregnancy, FGR is associated with a primary and persistent failure of maternal cardiovascular adaptation in pregnancy. Copyright © 2016 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Subject(s)
Fetal Growth Retardation/diagnosis , Hypertension, Pregnancy-Induced/diagnosis , Prenatal Diagnosis , Adult , Birth Weight , Cohort Studies , Female , Fetal Growth Retardation/physiopathology , Hemodynamics , Humans , Hypertension, Pregnancy-Induced/physiopathology , Infant, Newborn , Longitudinal Studies , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Outcome , Prospective StudiesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Hypertensive pregnant women who do not respond to treatment with labetalol to control blood pressure (BP), but require vasodilatory therapy, progress rapidly to severe hypertension. This could be delayed by early recognition and individualized treatment. In this study, we sought to create prediction models from data at presentation and at 1 h and 24 h after commencement of treatment to identify patients who will not have a sustained response to labetalol and therefore need vasodilatory therapy. METHODS: The study population comprised 134 women presenting with hypertension at a UK hospital. Treatment with oral labetalol was administered when BP was > 150/100 mmHg or > 140/90 mmHg with systemic disease. BP and hemodynamic parameters were recorded at presentation and at 1 h and 24 h after commencement of treatment. Labetalol doses were titrated to maintain BP around 135/85 mmHg. Women with unresponsive BP, despite labetalol dose maximization (2400 mg/day), received additional vasodilatory therapy with nifedipine. Binary logistic and longitudinal (mixed-model) data analyses were performed to create prediction models anticipating the likelihood of hypertensive women needing vasodilatory therapy. The prediction models were created from data at presentation and at 1 h and 24 h after treatment, to assess the value of central hemodynamics relative to the predictive power of BP, heart rate and demographic variables at these intervals. RESULTS: Twenty-two percent of our cohort required additional vasodilatory therapy antenatally. These women had higher rates of severe hypertension and delivered smaller babies at earlier gestational ages. The unresponsive women were more likely to be of black ethnicity, had higher BP and peripheral vascular resistance (PVR), and lower heart rate and cardiac output (CO) at presentation. Those who needed vasodilatory therapy showed an initial decrease in BP and PVR, which rebounded at 24 h, whereas BP and PVR in those who responded to labetalol showed a sustained decrease at 1 h and 24 h. Stroke volume and CO did not decrease during the acute phase of treatment in either group. The best model for prediction of the need for vasodilators was provided at 24 h by combining ethnicity and longitudinal BP and heart rate changes. The model achieved a detection rate of 100% for a false-positive rate of 20% and an area under the receiver-operating characteristics curve of 0.97. CONCLUSION: Maternal demographics and hemodynamic changes in the acute phase of labetalol monotherapy provide a powerful tool to identify hypertensive pregnant patients who are unlikely to have their BP controlled by this therapy and will consequently need additional vasodilatory therapy. Copyright © 2016 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. RESUMEN OBJETIVO: Las embarazadas hipertensas que no responden al tratamiento con labetalol para el control de la presión arterial (PA), pero que requieren terapia vasodilatadora, evolucionan rápidamente hacia una hipertensión severa. Ésta se puede retrasar mediante un diagnóstico precoz y un tratamiento individual. En este estudio se ha tratado de crear modelos de predicción a partir de datos al inicio del tratamiento y al cabo de 1 hora y de 24 horas después del mismo, para identificar a las pacientes que no mostrarán una respuesta constante al labetalol y que por lo tanto necesitarán terapia vasodilatadora. MÉTODOS: La población de estudio incluyó 134 mujeres con hipertensión en un hospital del Reino Unido. El tratamiento con labetalol por vía oral se administró cuando la PA fue >150/100 mm de Hg o >140/90 mm de Hg con enfermedad multisistémica. Se registró la PA y los parámetros hemodinámicos tanto al inicio como al cabo de 1 h y de 24 h después del inicio del tratamiento. Las dosis de Labetalol se ajustaron para mantener la PA en torno a los 135/85 mm de Hg. Las mujeres cuya PA no produjo respuesta, a pesar de haberles administrado la dosis máxima de labetalol (2400 mg/día), recibieron terapia vasodilatadora adicional con nifedipino. Se realizaron análisis de datos mediante logística binaria y longitudinal (modelo mixto), para crear modelos de predicción con los que pronosticar la probabilidad de la necesidad de terapia vasodilatadora en mujeres hipertensas. Los modelos de predicción se crearon a partir de datos al inicio y al cabo de 1 hora y 24 horas del tratamiento, para evaluar el valor de los parámetros hemodinámicos principales con respecto a la capacidad predictiva de la PA, la frecuencia cardíaca y las variables demográficas en estos intervalos. RESULTADOS: El 22 % de la cohorte necesitó terapia vasodilatadora adicional antes del parto. Estas mujeres tuvieron tasas más altas de hipertensión grave y neonatos más pequeños en edades gestacionales más tempranas. Las mujeres que no respondieron al tratamiento fueron con más frecuencia de raza negra, tuvieron la PA y la resistencia vascular periférica (RVP) más alta, y la frecuencia cardíaca y el gasto cardíaco (GC) más bajos al inicio del tratamiento. Aquellas que necesitaron terapia vasodilatadora mostraron un descenso inicial de la PA y la RVP, que se recuperó al cabo de 24 h, mientras que la PA y la RVP en las que respondieron al labetalol mostraron una disminución constante al cabo de 1 h y de 24 h. El volumen sistólico y el GC no disminuyeron durante la fase aguda del tratamiento en ninguno de los grupos. El mejor modelo para la predicción de la necesidad de vasodilatadores se obtuvo a las 24 h mediante la combinación de la etnia con los cambios longitudinales de la PA y la frecuencia cardíaca. El modelo alcanzó una tasa de detección del 100% para una tasa de falsos positivos del 20% y un área bajo la curva de características operativas del receptor de 0,97. CONCLUSIÓN: Los datos demográficos maternos y los cambios hemodinámicos en la fase aguda de la monoterapia con labetalol constituyen una herramienta poderosa para identificar a las pacientes embarazadas hipertensas con pocas probabilidades de que se les pueda controlar su PA mediante esta terapia y que por lo tanto necesitarán terapia vasodilatadora adicional. : ã(blood pressure,BP),ãã,1 h24 h,ã : 134ãBP>150/100 mmHgBP>140/90 mmHgã1 h24 hBPã,BP135/85 mmHgãBP,()ãlogistic(),ã1 h24 h,,BPãã : 22%ãã,BP(peripheral vascular resistance,PVR),(cardiac output,CO)ãBPPVR,24 h,1 h24 hBPPVRãCOã24hBPã100%,20%,0.97ã : ,BPã.
Subject(s)
Hypertension/drug therapy , Labetalol/therapeutic use , Vasodilator Agents/therapeutic use , Drug Therapy, Combination , Female , Hemodynamics , Humans , Infant, Low Birth Weight , Infant, Newborn , Longitudinal Studies , Precision Medicine , Pregnancy , Vascular ResistanceABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To examine whether treatment for hypertension in pregnancy that is guided by serial monitoring of maternal central hemodynamics leads to a reduction in the rate of severe hypertension, defined as blood pressure ≥ 160/110 mmHg; and to assess the distinct longitudinal hemodynamic profiles associated with beta-blocker monotherapy, vasodilator monotherapy and dual agent therapy, and their relationships with outcomes, including fetal growth restriction. METHODS: This was a prospective observational study at a dedicated antenatal hypertension clinic in a tertiary UK hospital. Fifty-two untreated women presenting with hypertension were recruited consecutively and started on treatment, either with a beta-blocker or a vasodilator. The choice of initial antihypertensive agent was determined according to a model constructed previously to predict the response to the beta-blocker labetalol in pregnant women needing antihypertensive treatment. At presentation, the demographic and maternal hemodynamic variables associated with a therapeutic response to labetalol, defined as blood pressure control < 140/90 mmHg with labetalol monotherapy throughout pregnancy, were ascertained and analyzed with logistic regression to create a model to predict sustained blood pressure control as described above. The women were reviewed regularly until delivery and underwent serial hemodynamic monitoring throughout pregnancy. If their blood pressure was elevated, the prediction model was referred to again to determine if alternative antihypertensive therapy, either with additional beta-blocker or a vasodilator, should be added. RESULTS: Treatment by referring to results of serial hemodynamic monitoring reduced the rate of severe antenatal hypertension from 18% to 3.8%. Seventy-seven percent of women were initially prescribed a beta-blocker and 23% a vasodilator. The group that maintained good blood pressure control with beta-blocker monotherapy had the best fetal and maternal outcomes. They had lower blood pressures at presentation and throughout gestation, demonstrated well-maintained cardiac output and had the lowest rates of fetal growth restriction. The groups that required dual therapy to control their blood pressure had persistently higher blood pressure and rate of fetal growth restriction. The groups that required vasodilator therapy due to high levels of peripheral vascular resistance, either at presentation or later in pregnancy, accounted for 81% of cases with fetal growth restriction. CONCLUSION: Using serial hemodynamic monitoring in pregnancy to guide treatment of hypertension significantly reduces the rate of severe hypertension and allows identification of high-resistance, low-output hypertensive pregnancies that are associated with an increased rate of fetal growth restriction. Copyright © 2016 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. RESUMEN OBJETIVOS: Examinar si el tratamiento para la hipertensión en el embarazo guiado por un seguimiento en serie de las principales constantes hemodinámicas de la madre conduce a una reducción en la tasa de hipertensión grave, definida como presión arterial ≥ 160/110 mmHg; y evaluar los diferentes perfiles hemodinámicos longitudinales asociados a la monoterapia con beta-bloqueantes, la monoterapia con vasodilatadores y la terapia dual, y su relación con los resultados, como la restricción del crecimiento fetal. MÉTODOS: Se realizó un estudio observacional prospectivo en una clínica especializada en hipertensión prenatal de un hospital de atención terciaria del Reino Unido. Se reclutaron consecutivamente a cincuenta y dos mujeres no tratadas que presentaban hipertensión y se comenzó a tratarlas, bien con un beta-bloqueante o bien con un vasodilatador. La elección del agente antihipertensivo inicial se determinó de acuerdo con un modelo elaborado previamente para predecir la respuesta al beta-bloqueante labetalol en mujeres embarazadas que necesitaban tratamiento antihipertensivo. Al inicio se registraron las características demográficas y las variables hemodinámicas maternas asociadas con una respuesta terapéutica al labetalol, definida como un control de la presión arterial < 140/90 mmHg con monoterapia de labetalol durante todo el embarazo que se analizó mediante regresión logística para crear un modelo con el que pronosticar un control sostenido de la presión arterial, como se describe arriba. Las mujeres fueron sometidas a revisiones regulares hasta el momento del parto y se les hizo un seguimiento hemodinámico en serie durante todo el embarazo. Si la presión arterial era elevada, se empleó de nuevo el modelo de predicción para determinar si se debería añadir un tratamiento antihipertensivo alternativo, ya sea con un beta-bloqueante adicional o con un vasodilatador. RESULTADOS: El tratamiento que tuvo en cuenta los resultados del seguimiento hemodinámico en serie redujo la tasa de hipertensión prenatal grave del 18% al 3,8%. Al 77% de las mujeres se les recetó inicialmente un y al 23% un vasodilatador. El grupo que mantuvo un buen control de la presión arterial con monoterapia de beta-bloqueantes logró mejores resultados fetales y maternos. Este grupo tuvo menor presión arterial al inicio y durante toda la gestación, mostró un gasto cardíaco en buen estado y tuvo las tasas más bajas de restricción del crecimiento fetal. Los grupos que requirieron terapia dual para controlar su presión arterial mostraron persistentemente una mayor presión arterial y un mayor ritmo de restricción del crecimiento fetal. Los grupos que requirieron tratamiento vasodilatador debido a los altos niveles de resistencia vascular periférica, tanto al inicio como durante el embarazo, representaron el 81% de los casos con restricción del crecimiento fetal. CONCLUSIÓN: El uso de un seguimiento hemodinámico en serie en el embarazo como guía para el tratamiento de la hipertensión reduce significativamente la tasa de hipertensión severa y permite la identificación de embarazos con hipertensión de alta resistencia y malos resultados, asociados con una mayor tasa de restricción del crecimiento fetal. : (≥ 160/110 mmHg);ßã,()ã : ã52ã,ßãßã,(<140/90 mmHg),logistic,ã,ã,(ß)ã : ,18%3.8%ã77%ß,23%ãßã,,ã,ã,81%ã : ,,ãã.
Subject(s)
Adrenergic beta-Antagonists/therapeutic use , Fetal Growth Retardation/etiology , Hypertension/drug therapy , Vasodilator Agents/therapeutic use , Adrenergic beta-Antagonists/pharmacology , Adult , Blood Pressure/drug effects , Female , Hemodynamics , Humans , Hypertension/complications , Hypertension/physiopathology , Pregnancy , Prospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Vasodilator Agents/pharmacologyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Blood pressure (BP) control outside pregnancy is associated with a reduction in adverse cardiovascular events, and in pregnancy with improved outcomes. Outside pregnancy, there is evidence ß-blockers are less effective in controlling BP in black populations. However, in pregnancy, labetalol is recommended as a universal first-line treatment, without evidence for the impact of ethnicity on its efficacy. We sought to compare haemodynamic responses to labetalol in black and white pregnant patients. METHODS: This was a prospective observational cohort study in a London teaching hospital. Maternal haemodynamics were assessed in 120 pregnant women treated with labetalol monotherapy. Measurements were taken at presentation, 1 and 24â h after treatment. Participants were monitored regularly until delivery. Statistical analysis was performed by multilevel modelling. RESULTS: Both groups exhibited similar temporal trends in haemodynamic changes over the first 24â h following labetalol. Both showed a reduction in BP and peripheral vascular resistance within 1â h and in heart rate after 24â h. There was no change in cardiac output and stroke volume in either group. BP control (<140/90) was achieved at 1â h in 79.7% of the white and 77% of the black cohort. At 24â h, control was achieved among 83.1% and 63.9%, and up to the immediate intrapartum period control was achieved in 89.8% and 70.4% of white and black patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: There is no difference in the acute haemodynamic changes and hypertension can be controlled throughout pregnancy with labetalol monotherapy in excess of 70% pregnant black and white patients.
ABSTRACT
STUDY OBJECTIVE: Serum markers of smooth muscle destruction have been shown to be elevated in ectopic pregnancy, but they remain of questionable clinical utility. Our goal was to determine the clinical utility of 3 markers of smooth muscle destruction: creatine phosphokinase (CPK), smooth muscle heavy-chain myosin (SMHC), and myoglobin. METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study, with consecutive enrollment of all women in the first trimester of pregnancy who presented to our urban emergency department with complaints of lower abdominal pain, vaginal bleeding, or both. Patients were excluded from the study if there was a history of recent surgery or major trauma. Data analysis included receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and a regression model. RESULTS: A total of 378 patients were enrolled, with 61 patients diagnosed with an ectopic pregnancy, and 317 patients placed in the non-ectopic pregnancy group with other diagnoses. ROC curve analysis revealed an area under the curve of 0.56 (95% CI 0.51 to 0.61) for CPK, 0.63 (95% CI 0.59 to 0.68) for SMHC, and 0.58 (95% CI 0.53 to 0.63) for myoglobin. A regression model analyzing the effects of race, maternal age, estimated gestational age, and serum levels of human chorionic gonadotropin beta-subunit found no significant confounders. CONCLUSION: Although there is a statistically significant elevation in the serum levels of SMHC, the range of values seen is too large to allow SMHC to be a useful screening tool.