Knowledge and Attitudes of Medical and Nursing Students in a Greek University Regarding Sexually Transmitted Diseases.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: the present study aimed to assess the knowledge and attitudes of medical and nursing students at the University of Patras, western Greece, regarding sexually transmitted infections (STIs), sexual behavior and STI prevention measures, as well as the level of future healthcare professionals' education. METHOD: A descriptive, cross-sectional study was conducted. A total of 231 medical and nursing students (n = 106 medical, and n = 125 nursing) completed and returned the pre-tested study questionnaire. RESULTS: Most participants (77.5%) were females and46.1% were in the age group of 18-21 years. Syphilis, HIV/AIDS, and Hepatitis B were regarded as STIs by 65.8% of them. Medical students could predominantly list the widely known STIs compared to nursing students (p = 0.004). Regarding HIV/AIDS, 72.7% of the respondents reported that it is transmitted sexually and through blood transfusion. However, medical students were better informed than nursing students (p = 0.001). Medical students as well as students in the final year of their studies were found to be better informed about the vaccines available to prevent STIs. Regarding the question about what constitutes a risky sexual behavior, 71.4% answered sexual intercourse without the use of condom and 18.6% indicated having sex with an unknown partner. Most participants (69.7%) were satisfied with the education provided by their institution and no statistically significant difference was observed between medical and nursing students. Almost all students (97.8%) agreed that the course/subject of sex education must be included in school programs. CONCLUSIONS: A comprehensive analysis of knowledge and attitudes of Greek medical and nursing students regarding STIs, prevention measures and education level was conducted. The results of the present study could assist in the development of targeted training courses that can improve healthcare professionals' knowledge and ability to manage STIs.

Inflammatory biomarker-based clinical practice in patients with pneumonia: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Objectives: Biomarker-based clinical practice is currently gaining ground and increasingly affects decision making. A variety of biomarkers have been studied through the years and some of them have already an established role in modern medicine, such as procalcitonin (PCT) which has been proposed to reduce antibiotic exposure. We purposed to systematically review all biomarkers examined for guiding the clinical practice in patients with pneumonia. METHODS: A systematic review on PubMed was performed on April 2023 by two independent researchers using the PRISMA guidelines. Randomized trials which enrolled patients with pneumonia and compared biomarker-guided strategies to standard of care were included. RESULTS: 1242 studies were recorded, from whom 16 were eligible for this study. 14 studies investigated PCT as a biomarker. From these, 8 studies reported on community acquired pneumonia (CAP), 2 on ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP), 1 on aspiration pneumonia, 1 on hospital acquired pneumonia (HAP) and 2 on exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (ECOPD). There was 1 study, referred to VAP, that investigated interleukin-1ß (IL-1ß) and interleukin-8 (IL-8) and 1 study that reported the role of C-reactive protein (CRP) in ECOPD. In a total of 4751 patients in 15 studies, the biomarker-based approach did not lead to increased mortality [OR: 0.998 (95%CI: 0.74-1.34, p value: 0.991). I2:19%]. Among different types of pneumonia and time-points of assessment, biomarker-guided practice appeared to improve antibiotic-related outcomes, such as rate of antibiotic prescription, duration of antibiotic therapy and rate of antibiotic exposure, while 5 studies reported a possible decrease in antibiotic-related adverse effects. Biomarker-guided practice did not seem to lead in an increase in other adverse outcomes such as need for hospitalization and duration of hospitalization. However, the included studies have high risk of bias mainly due to improper blinding of participants/personnel and outcome assessors. CONCLUSION: Biomarker-guided clinical practice improves provided healthcare, in terms of reduced antibiotic consumption with no inferiority to mortality, relapses and exacerbations in patients with different types of pneumonia. Thus, such approaches should be further evaluated to achieve personalized medicine.

Knowledge and Attitudes of Healthcare Workers towards Antibiotic Use and Antimicrobial Resistance in Two Major Tertiary Hospitals in Western Greece.

Antibiotic resistance (ABR) and antimicrobial stewardship arethe two sides of the same coin that constitute a public health hydra. This study aimed to assessthe knowledge and attitude of healthcare workers (HCWs), on antibiotic use and antimicrobial resistance in Western Greece. A total of 200 healthcare workers (doctors, nurses, and others) from the two largest tertiary hospitals in Western Greece were included in our survey. HCWs seem not to decide based on patient opinion in order to prescribe antibiotics. Approximately 97% of them are aware of their main adverse effects. Remarkably, 25% of respondents prescribe antibiotics due to diagnostic uncertainty, and 32.5% of them prescribe antibiotics based on their experience. HCWs statedthat they do not report adverse effects often. Inappropriate antibiotic prescriptions were mentioned as the main reason for bacterial resistance to antimicrobials. Monitoring the patient's treatment progress, using electronic prescriptions, and adhering to international guidelines were suggested as solutions to the problem. Post Hoc analysis showed that nursing staff apply to the national guidelines (p: 0.011) and use electronic prescriptions (p: 0.003) less often compared to consultants, doctor directors, and trainees. The findings of our survey may be useful for the development of future national education programs and interventions thatmay improve healthcare workers' knowledge and ability to manage antibiotics.

Presepsin in the diagnosis of sepsis.

OBJECTIVES: Sepsis is a life-threatening condition characterized by organ dysfunction. It occurs due to the host's dysregulated response to an infection. Clinicians use inflammatory biomarkers to evaluate patients at risk of sepsis in various settings. METHODS: We included studies focusing on the diagnostic accuracy of presepsin in patients under suspicion of sepsis. The bivariate model of Reitsma was used for the quantitative synthesis, and summary estimates were calculated. The Zhou-Dendukuri approach was followed to assess heterogeneity. Subgroup analyses were performed based on settings and diagnostic criteria. RESULTS: The summary sensitivity for diagnosing sepsis was 0.805 (95 % CI: 0.759-0.844), while the false positive rate (FPR) was 0.174 (95 % CI: 0.124-0.239). The area under the curve (AUC) for the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve was 0.875, with a slightly lower partial AUC of 0.833. The analysis using the Zhou-Dendukuri approach revealed low heterogeneity (I2 = 15.9 %). Subgroup analyses showed no significant differences in SROC curves and summary estimates between the ED and ICU settings, although the ED subgroup exhibited higher heterogeneity (I2 = 52.7 % vs. 20.2 %). The comparison between the diagnostic criteria, Sepsis 1 and Sepsis 3, demonstrated similar summary estimates and SROC curves. The examination of the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) tool revealed a high risk of bias regarding the participants and their applicability. Also, there was an increased risk of bias in all the studies concerning the index test. CONCLUSION: Based on our research, presepsin is a promising biomarker for triage and early diagnosis of sepsis.

Superoxide dismutase for bronchopulmonary dysplasia in preterm infants.

BACKGROUND: Free oxygen radicals have been implicated in the pathogenesis of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) in preterm infants. Superoxide dismutase (SOD) is a naturally occurring enzyme which provides a defense against such oxidant injury. Providing supplementary SOD has been tested in clinical trials to prevent BPD in preterm infants. OBJECTIVES: To determine the efficacy and safety of SOD in the prevention and treatment of BPD on mortality and other complications of prematurity in infants at risk for, or having BPD. SEARCH METHODS: We searched CENTRAL, PubMed, Embase, and three trials registers on 22 September 2022 together with reference checking, citation searching and contact with study authors to identify additional studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized, quasi-randomized and cluster-randomized controlled trials (RCTs) where the participants were preterm infants who had developed, or were at risk of developing BPD, and who were randomly allocated to receive either SOD (in any form, by any route, any dose, anytime) or placebo, or no treatment. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard Cochrane methods. Our primary outcomes were BPD defined as an oxygen requirement at 28 days, BPD defined as oxygen at 36 weeks' postmenstrual age, neonatal mortality, mortality prior to discharge, and BPD or death at 36 weeks' postmenstrual age. We reported risk ratio (RR) and risk difference (RD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the dichotomous outcomes. We used GRADE to assess certainty of evidence for each outcome. MAIN RESULTS: We included three RCTs (380 infants) on SOD administration in preterm infants at risk for BPD, and no studies in preterm infants with evolving BPD / early respiratory insufficiency. The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of SOD on BPD defined as an oxygen requirement at 28 days (RR 1.09, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.26; RD 0.06, 95% CI -0.05 to 0.16, 1 study, 302 infants; I2 for RR and RD not applicable), BPD defined as oxygen at 36 weeks' postmenstrual age (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.29; RD -0.01, 95% CI -0.11 to 0.09, 2 studies, 335 infants; I2 for RR and RD = 0%), neonatal mortality (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.57 to 1.68; RD -0.00, 95% CI -0.08 to 0.07, 2 studies, 335 infants; I2 for RR and RD = 0%), and mortality prior to discharge (RR 1.20, 95% CI 0.53 to 2.71; RD 0.04, 95% CI -0.14 to 0.23, 2 studies, 78 infants; I2 for RR and RD = 0%). No studies reported BPD or death at 36 weeks' postmenstrual age. The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of SOD on retinopathy of prematurity any stage (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.15; RD -0.03, 95% CI -0.15 to 0.08, 2 studies, 335 infants; I2for RR = 0%, I2 for RD = 8%), and severe retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) (RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.57 to 1.65; RD -0.01, 95% CI -0.10 to 0.09, 1 study, 244 infants; I2 for RR and RD not applicable). No studies reported moderate to severe neurodevelopmental outcome at 18 to 24 months. Certainty of evidence was very low for all outcomes. We identified no ongoing trials. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of SOD on BPD defined as an oxygen requirement at 28 days, BPD defined as oxygen at 36 weeks' postmenstrual age, neonatal mortality and mortality prior to discharge compared to placebo. No studies reported BPD or death at 36 weeks' postmenstrual age and need for supplemental oxygen. The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of SOD on retinopathy of prematurity any stage and severe retinopathy of prematurity. No studies reported moderate to severe neurodevelopmental outcome at 18 to 24 months. The effects of SOD in preterm infants has not been reported in any trial in the last few decades, considering that the most recent trial on SOD in preterm infants was conducted in 1997/1998, and no new studies are ongoing. In the light of the limited available evidence, new data from preclinical and observational studies are needed to justify the conduction of new RCTs. Observational studies might report how SOD is administered, including indication, dose and association with relevant outcomes such as mortality, BPD and long-term neurodevelopment.

Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence-Based Technologies for the Diagnosis of Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia with a high burden of morbidity including impaired quality of life and increased risk of thromboembolism. Early detection and management of AF could prevent thromboembolic events. Artificial intelligence (AI)--based methods in healthcare are developing quickly and can be proved as valuable for the detection of atrial fibrillation. In this metanalysis, we aim to review the diagnostic accuracy of AI-based methods for the diagnosis of atrial fibrillation. A predetermined search strategy was applied on four databases, the PubMed on 31 August 2022, the Google Scholar and Cochrane Library on 3 September 2022, and the Embase on 15 October 2022. The identified studies were screened by two independent investigators. Studies assessing the diagnostic accuracy of AI-based devices for the detection of AF in adults against a gold standard were selected. Qualitative and quantitative synthesis to calculate the pooled sensitivity and specificity was performed, and the QUADAS-2 tool was used for the risk of bias and applicability assessment. We screened 14,770 studies, from which 31 were eligible and included. All were diagnostic accuracy studies with case-control or cohort design. The main technologies used were: (a) photoplethysmography (PPG) with pooled sensitivity 95.1% and specificity 96.2%, and (b) single-lead ECG with pooled sensitivity 92.3% and specificity 96.2%. In the PPG group, 0% to 43.2% of the tracings could not be classified using the AI algorithm as AF or not, and in the single-lead ECG group, this figure fluctuated between 0% and 38%. Our analysis showed that AI-based methods for the diagnosis of atrial fibrillation have high sensitivity and specificity for the detection of AF. Further studies should examine whether utilization of these methods could improve clinical outcomes.

The Role of the Pancreatic Stone Protein in Predicting Intra-Abdominal Infection-Related Complications: A Prospective Observational Single-Center Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: The Pancreatic Stone Protein (PSP) is an acute-phase protein that is mainly secreted by pancreatic cells in response to stress. The current literature supports its use as a predictor of sepsis. Its prognostic role has recently been evaluated in a point-of-care setting, mostly in high-risk patients. We conducted a prospective observational cohort study to evaluate its utility in the prognosis of patients admitted to the hospital with a diagnosis of intra-abdominal infection. METHODS: Adult patients consecutively admitted to the Internal Medicine Department of the University Hospital of Patras, Greece, with a diagnosis of intra-abdominal infection were enrolled. PSP levels were measured within 24 h of admission in whole blood. RESULTS: a total of 40 patients were included after being diagnosed with IAI. PSP was used as an independent predictive factor for sepsis after adjusting for age with OR = 7.888 (95% CI: 1.247-49.890). PSP also predicted readmission and the need for treatment escalation (p: <0.01) and was an excellent prognostic factor regarding these outcomes (AUC = 0.899, 95% CI: 0.794-1.0, and AUC = 0.862, 95% CI: 0.748-0.976, respectively). PSP also proved superior to CRP, ferritin, and fibrinogen in sepsis diagnosis, treatment escalation, and readmission prediction with an AUC of 0.862, 0.698, and 0.899, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: PSP can predict unfavorable outcomes, such as sepsis development, readmission, and the need for treatment escalation among patients with intra-abdominal infections.

Pharmacological pain and sedation interventions for the prevention of intraventricular hemorrhage in preterm infants on assisted ventilation - an overview of systematic reviews.

BACKGROUND: Germinal matrix hemorrhage and intraventricular hemorrhage (GMH-IVH) may contribute to neonatal morbidity and mortality and result in long-term neurodevelopmental sequelae. Appropriate pain and sedation management in ventilated preterm infants may decrease the risk of GMH-IVH; however, it might be associated with harms. OBJECTIVES: To summarize the evidence from systematic reviews regarding the effects and safety of pharmacological interventions related to pain and sedation management in order to prevent GMH-IVH in ventilated preterm infants. METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Library August 2022 for reviews on pharmacological interventions for pain and sedation management to prevent GMH-IVH in ventilated preterm infants (< 37 weeks' gestation). We included Cochrane Reviews assessing the following interventions administered within the first week of life: benzodiazepines, paracetamol, opioids, ibuprofen, anesthetics, barbiturates, and antiadrenergics. Primary outcomes were any GMH-IVH (aGMH-IVH), severe IVH (sIVH), all-cause neonatal death (ACND), and major neurodevelopmental disability (MND). We assessed the methodological quality of included reviews using the AMSTAR-2 tool. We used GRADE to assess the certainty of evidence. MAIN RESULTS: We included seven Cochrane Reviews and one Cochrane Review protocol. The reviews on clonidine and paracetamol did not include randomized controlled trials (RCTs) matching our inclusion criteria. We included 40 RCTs (3791 infants) from reviews on paracetamol for patent ductus arteriosus (3), midazolam (3), phenobarbital (9), opioids (20), and ibuprofen (5). The quality of the included reviews was high. The certainty of the evidence was moderate to very low, because of serious imprecision and study limitations. Germinal matrix hemorrhage-intraventricular hemorrhage (any grade) Compared to placebo or no intervention, the evidence is very uncertain about the effects of paracetamol on aGMH-IVH (risk ratio (RR) 0.89, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.38 to 2.07; 2 RCTs, 82 infants; very low-certainty evidence); midazolam may result in little to no difference in the incidence of aGMH-IVH (RR 1.68, 95% CI 0.87 to 3.24; 3 RCTs, 122 infants; low-certainty evidence); the evidence is very uncertain about the effect of phenobarbital on aGMH-IVH (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.19; 9 RCTs, 732 infants; very low-certainty evidence); opioids may result in little to no difference in aGMH-IVH (RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.12; 7 RCTs, 469 infants; low-certainty evidence); ibuprofen likely results in little to no difference in aGMH-IVH (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.21; 4 RCTs, 759 infants; moderate-certainty evidence). Compared to ibuprofen, the evidence is very uncertain about the effects of paracetamol on aGMH-IVH (RR 1.17, 95% CI 0.31 to 4.34; 1 RCT, 30 infants; very low-certainty evidence). Compared to midazolam, morphine may result in a reduction in aGMH-IVH (RR 0.28, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.87; 1 RCT, 46 infants; low-certainty evidence). Compared to diamorphine, the evidence is very uncertain about the effect of morphine on aGMH-IVH (RR 0.65, 95% CI 0.40 to 1.07; 1 RCT, 88 infants; very low-certainty evidence). Severe intraventricular hemorrhage (grade 3 to 4) Compared to placebo or no intervention, the evidence is very uncertain about the effect of paracetamol on sIVH (RR 1.80, 95% CI 0.43 to 7.49; 2 RCTs, 82 infants; very low-certainty evidence) and of phenobarbital (grade 3 to 4) (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.66 to 1.25; 9 RCTs, 732 infants; very low-certainty evidence); opioids may result in little to no difference in sIVH (grade 3 to 4) (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.34; 6 RCTs, 1299 infants; low-certainty evidence); ibuprofen may result in little to no difference in sIVH (grade 3 to 4) (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.54 to 1.26; 4 RCTs, 747 infants; low-certainty evidence). No studies on midazolam reported this outcome. Compared to ibuprofen, the evidence is very uncertain about the effects of paracetamol on sIVH (RR 2.65, 95% CI 0.12 to 60.21; 1 RCT, 30 infants; very low-certainty evidence). Compared to midazolam, the evidence is very uncertain about the effect of morphine on sIVH (grade 3 to 4) (RR 0.08, 95% CI 0.00 to 1.43; 1 RCT, 46 infants; very low-certainty evidence). Compared to fentanyl, the evidence is very uncertain about the effect of morphine on sIVH (grade 3 to 4) (RR 0.59, 95% CI 0.18 to 1.95; 1 RCT, 163 infants; very low-certainty evidence). All-cause neonatal death Compared to placebo or no intervention, the evidence is very uncertain about the effect of phenobarbital on ACND (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.51 to 1.72; 3 RCTs, 203 infants; very low-certainty evidence); opioids likely result in little to no difference in ACND (RR 1.12, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.55; 5 RCTs, 1189 infants; moderate-certainty evidence); the evidence is very uncertain about the effect of ibuprofen on ACND (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.38 to 2.64; 2 RCTs, 112 infants; very low-certainty evidence). Compared to midazolam, the evidence is very uncertain about the effect of morphine on ACND (RR 0.31, 95% CI 0.01 to 7.16; 1 RCT, 46 infants; very low-certainty evidence). Compared to diamorphine, the evidence is very uncertain about the effect of morphine on ACND (RR 1.17, 95% CI 0.43 to 3.19; 1 RCT, 88 infants; very low-certainty evidence). Major neurodevelopmental disability Compared to placebo, the evidence is very uncertain about the effect of opioids on MND at 18 to 24 months (RR 2.00, 95% CI 0.39 to 10.29; 1 RCT, 78 infants; very low-certainty evidence) and at five to six years (RR 1.6, 95% CI 0.56 to 4.56; 1 RCT, 95 infants; very low-certainty evidence). No studies on other drugs reported this outcome. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: None of the reported studies had an impact on aGMH-IVH, sIVH, ACND, or MND. The certainty of the evidence ranged from moderate to very low. Large RCTs of rigorous methodology are needed to achieve an optimal information size to assess the effects of pharmacological interventions for pain and sedation management for the prevention of GMH-IVH and mortality in preterm infants. Studies might compare interventions against either placebo or other drugs. Reporting of the outcome data should include the assessment of GMH-IVH and long-term neurodevelopment.

Evaluation of Reliability and Validity of the RALE and BRIXIA Chest-X Ray Scores in Patients Hospitalized with COVID-19 Pneumonia.

INTRODUCTION: Chest X-rays are commonly used to assess the severity in patients that present in the emergency department with suspected COVID-19 pneumonia, but in clinical practice quantitative scales are rarely employed. AIMS: To evaluate the reliability and validity of two semi-quantitative radiological scales in patients hospitalized for COVID-19 pneumonia (BRIXIA score and RALE score). METHODS: Patients hospitalized between October 2021 and March 2022 with confirmed COVID-19 pneumonia diagnosis were eligible for inclusion. All included patients had a chest X-ray taken in the ED before admission. Three raters that participated in the treatment and management of patients with COVID-19 during the pandemic independently assessed chest X-rays. RESULTS: Intraclass coefficients for BRIXΙA and RALES was 0.781 (0.729-0.826) and 0.825 (0.781-0.862) respectively, showing good to excellent reliability overall. Pairwise analysis was performed using quadratic weighted kappa showing significant variability in the inter-rater agreement. The prognostic accuracy of the two scores for in-hospital mortality for all raters was between 0.753 and 0.763 for BRIXIA and 0.737 and 0.790 for RALES, demonstrating good to excellent prognostic value. Both radiological scores were significantly associated with inhospital mortality after adjustment for 4C Mortality score. We found a consistent upwards trend with significant differences between severity groups in both radiological scores. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that BRIXIA and RALES are reliable and can be used to assess the prognosis of patients with COVID-19 requiring hospitalization. However, the inherent subjectivity of radiological scores might make it difficult to set a cut-off value suitable for all assessors.

A Literature Review of Pathophysiology, Clinical Manifestations, Medications and Optimal Dosage, Outpatient, and Post-hospitalization Use of Anticoagulation in COVID-19 Patients.

Since severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 led to a world pandemic, extensive research has been conducted to identify its characteristics and form an appropriate management plan. One recognized complication of COVID-19 is coagulation defects that can lead to thromboembolic events. We have reviewed the literature to summarize and present the latest research about the pathophysiology, clinical manifestations, anticoagulation use and appropriate dose in COVID-19 patients, as well as the effect of anticoagulation in outpatient and post-hospital settings. The pathophysiology of coagulation abnormalities in COVID-19 is not fully understood yet, but multiple mechanisms appear to be involved, such as a direct viral attack, hyperinflammation, increased immune response, blood stasis, and endothelial injury. Clinical manifestations are mainly venous thromboembolism (deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism), arterial thromboembolism, ischemic stroke, central venous sinus thrombosis, and central retinal vein occlusion. Anticoagulation is widely used in hospitalized patients with COVID-19, unless it is contraindicated. Heparinoid is the main anticoagulant used. However, the appropriate dosage is still debated as research is trying to find a balance between benefits and risks. In outpatients, it appears that anticoagulation has no benefit in contrast to post-hospitalization use, where benefit could be observed in severely affected patients. We concluded that thromboprophylaxis should be used in treating hospitalized COVID-19 patients, but the dosage is still a matter of debate. More research needs to be done on outpatient and post-hospitalized patients to derive accurate conclusions.

Impact of Bacterial Infections on COVID-19 Patients: Is Timing Important?

BACKGROUND: Along with important factors that worsen the clinical outcome of COVID-19, it has been described that bacterial infections among patients positive for a SARS-CoV-2 infection can play a dramatic role in the disease process. Co-infections or community-acquired infections are recognized within the first 48 h after the admission of patients. Superinfections occur at least 48 h after admission and are considered to contribute to a worse prognosis. Microbiologic parameters differentiate infections that happen after the fifth day of hospitalization from those appearing earlier. Specifically, after the fifth day, the detection of resistant bacteria increases and difficult microorganisms emerge. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to evaluate the impact of bacterial infections in patients with COVID-19 on the length of the hospital stay and mortality. METHODS: A total of 177 patients hospitalized due to COVID-19 pneumonia were consecutively sampled during the third and fourth wave of the pandemic at a University Hospital in Greece. A confirmed bacterial infection was defined as positive blood, urinary, bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) or any other infected body fluid. Patients with confirmed infections were further divided into subgroups according to the time from admission to the positive culture result. RESULTS: When comparing the groups of patients, those with a confirmed infection had increased odds of death (odds ratio: 3.634; CI 95%: 1.795-7.358; p < 0.001) and a longer length of hospital stay (median 13 vs. 7 days). A late onset of infection was the most common finding in our cohort and was an independent risk factor for in-hospital death. Mortality and the length of hospital stay significantly differed between the subgroups. CONCLUSION: In this case series, microbial infections were an independent risk factor for a worse outcome among patients with COVID-19. Further, a correlation between the onset of infection and a negative outcome in terms of non-infected, community-acquired, early hospital-acquired and late hospital-acquired infections was identified. Late hospital-acquired infections increased the mortality of COVID-19 patients whilst superinfections were responsible for an extended length of hospital stay.

The role of cerebrospinal fluid levels of neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) and electroencephalography in the assessment of impaired consciousness in the context of infection.

INTRODUCTION: The sepsis syndrome is potentially affecting several organs and systems irrespectively of the primary source of the infection. Alterations of the brain function in sepsis patients may result either from a primary central nervous system (CNS) infection or could be part of the sepsis-associated encephalopathy (SAE), a common complication of sepsis, characterized by a diffuse dysfunction of the brain due to an infection elsewhere in the body without overt CNS infection. Aim of the study was to evaluate the usefulness of electroencephalography and the biomarker neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) when measured in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in the management of these patients. METHODS: Patients presenting at the emergency department with altered mental status and signs of infection were included in this study. Among initial assessment and treatment of the patients based on the international guidelines for treating sepsis, NGAL was measured in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) using ELISA technique. Electroencephalography was performed when possible within 24 hours after admission and EEG abnormalities were recorded. RESULTS: 32 of 64 patients included in this study were diagnosed with central nervous system (CNS) infection. CSF NGAL was significantly higher in patients with CNS infection compared to patients without CNS infection (18.1 [5.1-71.1] vs 3.6 [1.2-11.6]; p<0.001). There was a trend for higher CSF NGAL in patients with EEG abnormalities, which did not reach statistical significance (p=0.106). CSF NGAL levels were similar between survivors and non-survivors (medians: 7.04 vs 11.79). CONCLUSION: In patients presenting at the emergency department with altered mental status and signs of infection, CSF NGAL was significantly higher in patients with CSF infection. Its role in this acute setting should be evaluated further. CSF NGAL could be suggestive of EEG abnormalities.

N-acetylcysteine efficacy in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 pneumonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: N-acetylcysteine (NAC) is a mucolytic agents with anti-inflammatory properties that has been suggested as an adjunctive therapy in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. OBJECTIVES: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate available evidence on the possible beneficial effects of NAC on SARS-CoV-2 infection. METHODS: In September 2022, we conducted a comprehensive search on Pubmed/Medline and Embase on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies on NAC in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. Study selection, data extraction and risk of bias assessment was performed by two independent authors. RCTs and observational studies were analyzed separately. RESULTS: We included 3 RCTs and 5 non-randomized studies on the efficacy of NAC in patients with COVID-19, enrolling 315 and 20826 patients respectively. Regarding in-hospital mortality, the summary effect of all RCTs was OR: 0.85 (95% CI: 0.43 to 1.67, I2=0%) and for non-randomized studies OR: 1.02 (95% CI: 0.47 to 2.23, I2=91%). Need for ICU admission was only reported by 1 RCT (OR: 0.86, 95% CI:0.44-1.69, p=0.66), while all included RCTs reported need for invasive ventilation (OR:0.91, 95% CI:0.54 to 1.53, I2=0). Risk of bias was low for all included RCTs, but certainty of evidence was very low for all outcomes due to serious imprecision and indirectness. CONCLUSION: The certainty of evidence in the included studies was very low, thus recommendations for clinical practice cannot be yet made. For all hard clinical outcomes point estimates in RCTs are close to the line of no effect, while observational studies have a high degree of heterogeneity with some of them suggesting favorable results in patients receiving NAC. More research is warranted to insure that NAC is both effective and safe in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia.

Alterations in Laboratory Parameters Related to Disease Severity in Vaccinated Patients Against SARS-CoV-2.

Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has spread rapidly worldwide with global financial and health care systems consequences. It is already well recognized that immunization against the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is a precondition for blocking mutations and prevent the emergence of variants. The aim of the study was to investigate the possible relationship between COVID-19 vaccines and the commonly used disease-related blood biomarkers. Methods: Adult patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection who were hospitalized from November 8, 2021, to December 31, 2021, were included. The retrospective study was conducted in Patras University Hospital, Greece. Two groups of patients were assessed, the ones who were previously vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2 (group A, n = 21), and those who were not (group B, n = 55). After analysis of peripheral blood, we calculated on admission day for each patient the total white blood cell (WBC), absolute lymphocytes count (ALC), absolute monocyte count, D-dimers, C-reactive protein (CRP) plasma levels, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), ferritin, high-sensitive troponin, as well as the arterial oxygen partial pressure/fractional inspired oxygen (PO2/FiO2) ratio. Results: The median age of all patients was 65.3 ± 15.2 years old; 68.4% were men and 31.6% were women. Comorbidities were present in 51 patients (67.1%). Hypertension and diabetes were observed as the most common comorbidities (33.3%). About 72.4% of the patients were unvaccinated or have received the first dose of vaccine, and 27.6% were completely vaccinated. No statistical difference was found in the total WBC count and ALC between the two groups (group A vs. group B: 8,168.95 ± 7,584.4 vs. 8,521.9 ± 6,571.3, P = 0.848 and 3,052.1 ± 7,230.7 vs. 1,279.6 ± 1,218.6, P = 0.087). Monocytes count in both groups did not show statistical difference: group A vs. group B: 672.6 ± 384.7 vs. 637.9 ± 477.8 (P = 0.754). Similarly, no difference for D-dimers (1,348.5 ± 1,397.6 vs. 1,850.9 ± 3,877.5, P = 0.575), ferritin (1,082.8 ± 1,399.5 vs. 1,327.4 ± 1,307.8, P = 0.508), high-sensitive troponin (113.6 ± 318.1 vs. 157.5 ± 48.8, P = 0.252), and CRP (6.92 ± 4.9 vs. 7.4 ± 5.9, P = 0.732). For LDH plasma levels, the statistical difference was significant (274.2 ± 85.6 vs. 387.5 ± 223.4, P = 0.003), as well as for the PO2/FiO2 ratio (355.6 ± 129.7 vs. 260.5 ± 123.3, P = 0,006). Conclusions: In a mixed population hospitalized for COVID-19, only LDH plasma levels and the PaO2/FiO2 on admission day showed statistically significant difference between vaccinated and unvaccinated patients. Although unvaccinated patients are more likely to develop severe illness, they did not express significantly higher values of commonly used plasma biomarkers such as ferritin, CRP, and D-dimers which are related to disease severity.

External validation of the 4C Mortality Score and PRIEST COVID-19 Clinical Severity Score in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 pneumonia in Greece.

Background: Prognostic scores can be used to facilitate better management of patients suffering from life-threatening diseases, provided that they have been tested in the population of interest. Aim: To perform external validation of the 4C Mortality Score and PRIEST COVID-19 Clinical Severity Score. Study Design: Prospective observational Study. Methods: Patients hospitalized with COVID-19 pneumonia in a tertiary hospital in Greece were enrolled in the study. The prognostic scores were calculated based on hospital admission data and ROC curve analysis was performed. We assessed a composite outcome of either in-hospital death or need for invasive ventilation. Results: Both 4C and PRIEST scores showed good discriminative ability with an AUC value of 0.826 (CI 95%: 0.765-0.887) and 0.852 (CI 95%: 0.793-0.910) respectively. Based on the Youden Index the optimal cut-off for the 4C score was 11 (Sensitivity 75%, Specificity 75.5%) and 10 for the PRIEST score (Sensitivity 83% and Specificity 69.4%). Calibration was adequate for both scores, except for the low and very high risk groups in the PRIEST score. Conclusion: The 4C Mortality Score and PRIEST COVID-19 Clinical Severity Score can be used for early identification of patients with poor prognosis in a Greek population cohort hospitalized with COVID-19.

Anti-Diabetic Therapy, Heart Failure and Oxidative Stress: An Update.

Diabetes mellitus (DM) and heart failure (HF) are two chronic disorders that affect millions worldwide. Hyperglycemia can induce excessive generation of highly reactive free radicals that promote oxidative stress and further exacerbate diabetes progression and its complications. Vascular dysfunction and damage to cellular proteins, membrane lipids and nucleic acids can stem from overproduction and/or insufficient removal of free radicals. The aim of this article is to review the literature regarding the use of antidiabetic drugs and their role in glycemic control in patients with heart failure and oxidative stress. Metformin exerts a minor benefit to these patients. Thiazolidinediones are not recommended in diabetic patients, as they increase the risk of HF. There is a lack of robust evidence on the use of meglinitides and acarbose. Insulin and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors may have a neutral cardiovascular effect on diabetic patients. The majority of current research focuses on sodium glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists. SGLT2 inhibitors induce positive cardiovascular effects in diabetic patients, leading to a reduction in cardiovascular mortality and HF hospitalization. GLP-1 receptor agonists may also be used in HF patients, but in the case of chronic kidney disease, SLGT2 inhibitors should be preferred.

The role of soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) in patients with cancer: a review of the current literature.

Aim Several biomarkers are currently used as diagnostic and prognostic tools in patients with cancer. Soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) is elevated in acute and chronic inflammatory procedures and several observational studies during the last 20 years have investigated its role in oncology. The purpose of this article was to review the current literature regarding suPAR's role in clinical practice. Methods A systematic literature search of PubMed, Scopus, OpenGrey and Cochrane Library databases through September 2021 was conducted using the following search terms: "supar"or "soluble urokinase plasminogen receptor" and "cancer" or "malignancy". Original articles reporting on suPAR's role in the diagnosis, prognosis and prediction of therapeutic outcomes in patients with confirmed or suspected cancer were included. Results Among 45 found articles, the most were observational cohort studies. The included studies were further categorized by cancer site. SuPAR level was higher in patients with cancer compared to healthy controls, but its diagnostic and prognostic accuracy differs depending on the site of cancer. Conclusion SuPAR has promising aspects in the field of oncology and public health and future research should further investigate its use in clinical practice. As it is elevated in different types of cancer, it could potentially serve as an adjunctive tool for the mass screening of patients with non-specific signs of cancer, but larger cohort studies that support these findings must be conducted.

Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio and Platelet to Lymphocyte Percentage Ratio as Predictors of In-hospital Mortality in Sepsis. An Observational Cohort Study.

Background: Sepsis remains a major public health problem with increased incidence of mortality. As early recognition and prompt treatment in the first 'golden hour' remain the cornerstone of the septic patient approach, there is a real need for rapid and cost-effective reliable markers. Objective: The aim of the study was to evaluate the neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet to lymphocyte percentage ratio (PL%R) in patients with sepsis who were initially treated in the Emergency Department and investigate their predictive ability regarding in-hospital mortality and performance comparing them to SOFA, APACHE II, and SAPS II score. Methods: A retrospective observational study in the Emergency Department and Internal Medicine Department in a Mediterranean University Hospital. A total of forty-three patients suffering from sepsis were enrolled in the study. Demographic information, past medical history with pre-existing co-morbidities, physical examination findings, and radiological data were reviewed. Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio and platelets to lymphocyte percentage ratio was calculated from the complete blood count (CBC). Disease severity was evaluated by calculating SOFA, SAPS II and APACHE II score on admission. The outcome of patients was noted as a primary endpoint. Results: Values of NLR and PL%R were statistically significantly higher in the group of non-survivors and correlate with sepsis prognostic scores. Conclusion: Calculation of NLR and PL%R is easy, fast, and inexpensive in the assessment of patients with sepsis. Their role as prognostic indexes and their validity in the Emergency Department setting should be evaluated with large prospective studies.

Accidental ingestion of a dental bur in an 84-year-old male.

This report describes the case of an 84-year-old male who was brought to the emergency room because a dental bur was swallowed accidentally during a dental procedure. The foreign body was successfully removed by gastroenterologists endoscopically 8 days after the ingestion and was identified as a 2-cm-long dental bur.

SARS-CoV-2 infection in adults and HIV: an update.

Aim COVID-19 pandemic caused by SARS-CoV-2 is spreading throughout the world affecting both healthy individuals and people with underlying immune-deficiencies. People living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) consist a group multiply affected by this universal crisis. Methods Literature search aiming to identify relevant publications referring to the consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic in HIV infected population. Results A body of literature is rapidly growing in regard to epidemiological data, the interaction between HIV and SARS-CoV-2, and clinical outcome in people living with HIV. Intensive research is warranted to identify any interactions of the co-existence of the two viruses in the immune system of HIV infected patients as common pathophysiology and molecular aspects are recognized. Human relations are diminished as a result of the social measures, and detailed recording of the consequences in this population is needed. Conclusion Further research could shed light on the common underlying molecular mechanisms of both conditions in an attempt to discover treatment regimens for SARS-CoV-2 infection.