Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 59(8): 894-897, 2021 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34364712

ABSTRACT

Treatments facilitated by healthcare trusts are transformed into codes through which payments are organised. Accurate coding is essential for correct payment, inaccurate clinical coding results in significant loss of income. Our OMFS unit performs regular day-case procedures with data recorded in a standardised proforma. An audit was performed to determine the accuracy of ICD and OPCS codes generated by the OMFS department to identify factors contributing to inaccuracies leading to loss of income. All local anaesthetic and IV sedation cases were reviewed at two separate 3 monthly time frames within the OMFS department with 100 cases per cycle. A gold standard of 100% coding information recorded and accuracy were set. The first data cycle demonstrated a number of factors to improve the clinical coding process including implementing a new clinical coding form. This was utilised in the second audit cycle. Regarding ICD-10 the first audit cycle yielded a 65% accuracy of primary diagnoses. Following recommendations this improved to 72%. Coding accuracy in the first cycle was recorded as 62% with improvement to 78% in the second cycle. OPCS data accuracy was 80% in the first cycle improving to 90% in the second cycle. Secondary or bilateral procedures also showed improvement from 83% to 89% accuracy in the second cycle. Across the audit cycle £20,000 of revenue was generated. Inaccuracies in clinical coding reduces income, improved understanding of error sources can ensure income is commensurate with clinical activity.


Subject(s)
Anesthetics, Local , Clinical Coding , Anesthesia, Local , Elective Surgical Procedures , Humans , International Classification of Diseases
3.
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 52(3): 283-4, 2014 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24377441

ABSTRACT

The suction blistering technique produces an ultra-thin skin graft with no morbidity at the donor site. Negative pressure using wall suction in outpatients is used to generate a graft that can be used for reconstruction, and it avoids the need for invasive procedures in patients with coexisting conditions. The harvested tissue has a low metabolic demand and survival is excellent. We used it in a patient when previous reconstructions after excision of skin cancer had failed. Graft survival was more than 95% by surface area and there was no donor site morbidity. We have found it particularly useful for grafting over Integra® dermal regeneration template (Integra LifeSciences Corporation, NJ, USA) to produce healing at difficult sites. Patients tolerate the procedure well and the donor site heals quickly. It is useful where recipient vascularity is poor or where coexisting conditions prevent complex procedures.


Subject(s)
Blister/surgery , Skin Transplantation/methods , Suction/methods , Tissue and Organ Harvesting/methods , Autografts/transplantation , Chondroitin Sulfates , Collagen , Epidermis/transplantation , Graft Survival , Humans , Skin, Artificial , Transplant Donor Site/surgery
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...