Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 9 de 9
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Kardiol Pol ; 39(10): 281-4, 1993 Oct.
Article in Polish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8246356

ABSTRACT

A case of a 53-year old man is presented who developed postpericardiotomy syndrome and subsequently constrictive pericarditis following prosthetic aortic valve replacement due to severe aortic stenosis. The diagnosis was based on clinical picture and confirmed invasively. Nearly total excision of thickened fibrous pericardium resulted in a slow but full disappearance of constriction signs.


Subject(s)
Aortic Valve Stenosis/surgery , Heart Valve Prosthesis , Pericardiectomy/adverse effects , Pericarditis, Constrictive/etiology , Aortic Valve/surgery , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pericarditis, Constrictive/surgery , Syndrome
2.
Kardiol Pol ; 33(11-2): 10-6, 1990.
Article in Polish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2096247

ABSTRACT

60 to 95% pts in the age group below 60 return to work after having* suffered the first M.I. Up to the present moment, it has not been proved whether such return influences in any (positive or negative) way the recurrence of M.I. or the mortality rate. Two groups of pts who underwent M.I. in the years 1976-84 were included in the long term questionnaire observation: 1. 222 men (mean age 49.3 +/- 3.8 yrs) who resumed work and; 2. 153 men (mean age 50.7 +/- 8.4 yrs) who did not return to work after the first M.I. All pts were sent the questionnaires by post annually. The aim of the questionnaire was to establish whether the patient is alive, if he underwent reinfarction and, in case of death--what was its cause. Until 1985 reinfarction occurred in 25%, and until 1989--in 33% of the pts who resumed work, and 42% of pts who did not. The mean value of reinfarction was about 1.4 in the first group and 1.5 in the latter. Until 1985 the death rate was respectively 15% and 12%. Until 1989--the death rate was 28% and 30%. Thus, the differences between those two groups were statistically insignificant. In conclusion, it may--indirectly--speak in favour of resuming work after the first M.I., showing that, although it does not decrease the reinfarction and mortality rates, it also does not increase the risk.


Subject(s)
Death, Sudden/etiology , Myocardial Infarction/rehabilitation , Rehabilitation, Vocational , Adult , Death, Sudden/epidemiology , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Myocardial Infarction/epidemiology , Myocardial Infarction/mortality , Poland , Recurrence , Surveys and Questionnaires , Time Factors , Urban Population
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...