Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Laryngol Otol ; 131(3): 190-201, 2017 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28124627

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Bone-anchored hearing aids improve hearing for patients for whom conventional behind-the-ear aids are problematic. However, uptake of bone-anchored hearing aids is low and it is important to understand why this is the case. METHOD: A narrative review was conducted. Studies examining why people accept or decline bone-anchored hearing aids and satisfaction levels of people with bone-anchored hearing aids were reviewed. RESULTS: Reasons for declining bone-anchored hearing aids included limited perceived benefits, concerns about surgery, aesthetic concerns and treatment cost. No studies providing in-depth analysis of the reasons for declining or accepting bone-anchored hearing aids were identified. Studies of patient satisfaction showed that most participants reported benefits with bone-anchored hearing aids. However, most studies used cross-sectional and/or retrospective designs and only included people with bone-anchored hearing aids. CONCLUSION: Important avenues for further research are in-depth qualitative research designed to fully understand the decision-making process for bone-anchored hearing aids and rigorous quantitative research comparing satisfaction of people who receive bone-anchored hearing aids with those who receive alternative (or no) treatments.


Subject(s)
Hearing Aids/psychology , Hearing Loss, Conductive/psychology , Patient Satisfaction , Prostheses and Implants/psychology , Bone Conduction , Cross-Sectional Studies , Decision Making , Humans , Retrospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...