Usability evaluation of sufentanil sublingual tablet analgesia in patients following Enhanced Recovery After Surgery.

Aim: To evaluate the usability and satisfaction from the sufentanil sublingual tablet system analgesia in the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery pathway in patients, nurses and physical therapist. Materials & methods: A system usability scale was used to evaluate analgesia system in the prospective observational study in spine, orthopedic and thoracic patients. Result: In 111 cases the median system usability scale score was 90 (80-100) (patients) and 72.5 (57.5-82.5) (nurses). The median satisfaction score of the physiotherapist was 90 (75-100). Conclusion: The usability and the satisfaction of the patients and the caregivers from sufentanil sublingual tablet system analgesia in the context of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocol were good-to-excellent. The economic potential in the reduction of hospital stay should be studied. Trial registration number: NCT03373851 (ClinicalTrial.gov).

Relevance of Modified Debridement-Irrigation, Antibiotic Therapy and Implant Retention Protocol for the Management of Surgical Site Infections: A Series of 1694 Instrumented Spinal Surgery.

Introduction: Management of surgical site infections (SSI) after instrumented spinal surgery remains controversial. The debridement-irrigation, antibiotic therapy and implant retention protocol (DAIR protocol) is safe and effective to treat deep SSI occurring within the 3 months after instrumented spinal surgery. Methods: This retrospective study describes the outcomes of patients treated over a period of 42 months for deep SSI after instrumented spinal surgery according to a modified DAIR protocol. Results: Among 1694 instrumented surgical procedures, deep SSI occurred in 46 patients (2.7%): 41 patients (89%) experienced early SSI (< 1 month), 3 (7%) delayed SSI (from 1 to 3 months), and 2 (4%) late SSI (> 3months). A total of 37 patients had a minimum 1 year of follow-up; among these the modified DAIR protocol was effective in 28 patients (76%) and failed (need for new surgery for persistent signs of SSI beyond 7 days) in 9 patients (24%). Early second-look surgery (≤ 7days) for iterative debridement was performed in 3 patients, who were included in the cured group. Among the 9 patients in whom the modified DAIR protocol failed, none had early second-look surgery; 3 (33%) recovered and were cured at 1 year follow-up, and 6 (66%) relapsed. Overall, among patients with SSI and a minimum 1 year follow-up, the modified DAIR protocol led to healing in 31/37 (84%) patients. Conclusions: The present study supports the effectiveness of a modified DAIR protocol in deep SSI occurring within the 3 months after instrumented spinal surgery. An early second-look surgery for iterative debridement could increase the success rate of this treatment.

Intraoperative Monitoring of Diaphragm Neural Pathways During Cervical Surgery by Electrical Stimulation and Recordings of Ventilator Waveforms: Physiological Bases and Pilot Study.

BACKGROUND: Surgery on the cervical spine entails the risk of damaging the neural structures responsible for diaphragmatic innervation, namely (C3)-C4-(C5) roots. In some "difficult" cases, anatomic identification of these structures may be hard to achieve. Therefore, monitoring of the diaphragm through the ventilation waveforms displayed on the anesthesia machine can be of practical help. According to literature review, very few publications have reported such monitoring. METHODS: The present work aimed at investigating the feasibility and reliability of identifying cervical root(s) responsible for diaphragmatic innervation, by observing the changes on the recorded waveforms, indicating diaphragmatic responses to direct radicular electrical stimulation. In this study, the events not only on the capnography curve but also on pressure-time and flow-time waveforms were analyzed. Eight patients undergoing cervical Microsurgical DREZotomy (MDT) were enrolled in the study, as this surgical modality allows easy access to the C4 root, known to be prominent in diaphragmatic innervation. The technique did not require any harmful additional maneuver to the current anesthesia and surgical protocols. RESULTS: Stimulation resulted in specific patterns of changes in the 3 waveforms in all 8 patients and proved "easy" to interpret, provided that close cooperation exists between the anesthesiologist and the surgeon. CONCLUSION: Intraoperative monitoring of the diaphragmatic responses to stimulation can be advocated in surgery at the cervical spine level, and also more widely in surgery in the supraclavicular region, when neural structures responsible for diaphragmatic function are at risk.

Opioid consumption after levobupivacaine scalp nerve block for craniosynostosis surgery.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Craniosynostosis surgery is considered a very painful procedure due to extended scalp and periosteal detachment, and is associated with prolonged postoperative consumption of opioids and their side effects. In this observational descriptive case series study, we investigated perioperative opioid consumption in children undergoing craniosynostosis repair under general anesthesia when scalp nerve block with levobupivacaine was involved. METHODS: After standard anesthesia induction, scalp nerve block with levobupivacaine 2 mg/kg plus epinephrine 1:800,000 was performed. Hemodynamic parameters and opioid consumption were noted. Patients were monitored in the recovery room. Requirements of additional analgesia, indicated by the Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Pain Scale (CHEOPS) pain score of >9, and incidence of side effects (sedation, nausea, and vomiting) were recorded during the first 24 hours. RESULTS: A total of 32 patients were recruited in this study; 88% of them needed morphine rescue in the recovery room because they had high CHEOPS scores. Trigonocephaly was the most frequent type of craniosynostosis (37.5%), requiring 50% more opioids in the postoperative period than other forms of craniosynostosis. CONCLUSION: Scalp nerve block can be proposed as a complement to the routine craniosynostosis anesthetic protocol, because it is easy to perform, seems to reduce the need for supplementary opioids during the perioperative period, and can reduce the risk of developing acute opioid tolerance and chronic pain. In the event of trigonocephaly or craniofacial reconstruction, a complementary infraorbital nerve block can be added.