Erratum to "Prediction of non-genotoxic carcinogenesis in rats using changes in gene expression following acute dosing".

Carcinogenicity of chemicals can currently only be evaluated in 2-year rodent bioassays. Therefore, the development of early biomarkers for carcinogenesis would result in substantial savings in time and expense. The current study investigates whether early changes in gene expression may be developed as markers for cancer. Animals were treated for 1 or 5 days with either non-genotoxic carcinogens or non-carcinogens and gene expression was analyzed by quantitative PCR (qPCR).We tested two gene signatures previously reported to detect non-genotoxic carcinogens. Using one gene signature it was confirmed that 3/3 nongenotoxic carcinogens and 2/2 non-carcinogens are correctly identified with data from 1 or 5 days of dosing. In contrast an alternative signature correctly identified 0/3 and 2/3 nongenotoxic carcinogens at 1 and 5 days of treatment, respectively and 2/2 non-carcinogens at both time-points. Additionally, we evaluated a novel panel of putative biomarker genes, from the literature, many of which have roles in cell growth and division, including myc, cdc2 and mcm6. These genes were significantly induced by non-genotoxic carcinogens and not by non-carcinogens. Using the average fold-induction across this panel, 2/3 non-genotoxic carcinogens were detected on both day 1 and day 5. These data support the idea that acute changes in gene expression may provide biomarkers for non-genotoxic carcinogenesis but also highlight interesting differences in the sensitivities of distinct gene signatures.

Monitoring the accumulation of fluorescently labeled phospholipids in cell cultures provides an accurate screen for drugs that induce phospholipidosis.

A large number of cationic amphiphilic drugs (CADs) are known to cause phospholipidosis (PLD) in vivo. In the present study, we have built upon our previous findings to further qualify the use of a fluorescently labeled phospholipid-based cell-culture assay to detect PLD-inducing drugs. In this paper, we demonstrate that 12 PLD-negative compounds and 11 drugs known to cause PLD in vivo are all correctly identified by using this assay. Interestingly, we found that in cells treated with certain CADs, the fluorescent phospholipid was sequestered in a very specific punctate pattern, which overlapped strongly with the staining pattern seen with a lysosomal marker protein. Our data also show that false positives can be generated with the fluorescence assay when compounds are used at concentrations that cause a >30% decrease in cell number in this assay. Confocal microscopy demonstrated that the staining pattern of fluorescent phospholipids in these cases may be differentiated from those of true positives by the fact that diffuse, rather than punctuate, fluorescence is observed. These studies confirm and expand our previous results showing that the fluorescent phospholipid assay is a highly sensitive, specific tool for detecting PLD-inducing drugs, if care is taken to rule out cytotoxicity-related artifact.

Prediction of non-genotoxic carcinogenesis in rats using changes in gene expression following acute dosing.

Non-genotoxic carcinogenicity of chemicals is currently routinely evaluated in 2-year rodent bioassays. Therefore, the development of early biomarkers for non-genotoxic carcinogenesis would result in substantial savings in time and expense. The current study investigates whether early changes in gene expression may be developed as markers for cancer. Animals were treated for 1 or 5 days with either non-genotoxic carcinogens (NGTCs) or non-carcinogens and gene expression was analyzed by quantitative PCR (qPCR). We tested two gene signatures previously reported to detect non-genotoxic carcinogens. Using one gene signature it was confirmed that 3/3 non-genotoxic carcinogens and 2/2 non-carcinogens are correctly identified with data from 1 or 5 days of dosing. In contrast an alternative signature correctly identified 0/3 and 2/3 non-genotoxic carcinogens at 1 and 5 days of treatment, respectively and 2/2 non-carcinogens at both time-points. Additionally, we evaluated a novel panel of putative biomarker genes, from the literature, many of which have roles in cell growth and division, including myc, cdc2 and mcm6. These genes were significantly induced by non-genotoxic carcinogens and not by non-carcinogens. Using the average fold-induction across this panel, 2/3 non-genotoxic carcinogens were detected at both 1 and 5 days. These data support the idea that acute changes in gene expression may provide biomarkers for non-genotoxic carcinogenesis but also highlight interesting differences in the sensitivities of distinct gene signatures.

Phylogenetic characterization of canine distemper viruses detected in naturally infected dogs in North America.

In 2004, six puppies and one adult dog from a total of four premises were subjected to necropsy evaluation. For five of the seven dogs, disease caused by canine distemper virus (CDV) infection was suspected based on clinical signs. In all of the dogs, a diagnosis of CDV infection was established by the presence of compatible gross and histologic lesions, immunohistochemical labeling for CDV antigen, and detection of CDV RNA by reverse transcription-PCR. To further characterize the CDV strains detected in the four cases, complete gene sequences were determined for the hemagglutinin (H) and fusion (F) protein genes, while partial gene sequencing was performed for the phosphoprotein gene. A total of 4,508 bases were sequenced for the CDV strains detected from each of the four cases. Two cases were found to have identical sequences except for 2 bases in the intergenic region of the F and H genes. Phylogenetic analysis strongly suggested an evolutionary relationship between sequences detected in these two cases and those of phocine distemper virus 2 and two other strains of CDV not previously detected in the continental United States. Clear phylogenetic relationships were not established for viruses detected in the two additional cases; however, one strain showed similarity to CDV strains detected in a panda from China. Importantly, the three CDV strains detected were demonstrated to be genetically distinct from known vaccine strains and strains previously reported in the continental United States.