Oral ketamine for neuropathic cancer pain.

Optimal pain management in patients with advanced cancer often requires multiple pharmacological interventions and multimodal approach. Ketamine is an anaesthetic agent with increasing evidence supporting its use for pain. Due to its N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonism and its activity at opioid receptors, it is an adjuvant to traditional analgesics. Ketamine has a safety profile with limited experience of oral prolonged use in patients with cancer. We report a case of a 40-year-old man with refractory neuropathic cancer-related pain. Opioid rotation to methadone was previously performed, coanalgesics were added, the patient was reluctant to invasive anaesthetic techniques and his pain was poorly controlled. Ketamine was added to attenuate pain keeping functionality. This is a report of a patient with refractory cancer pain treated with methadone and ketamine orally during months, without reported side effects. Ketamine's use to treat pain is increasing along with its evidence of efficacy for long-term oral use.

Encuesta de opinión a pacientes ingresados en un centro monográfico de cáncer sobre el modo de recibir la información. Estudio descriptivo y transversal / Opinion survey of patients admitted to a monographic cancer center on how to receive information. A descriptive, cross-sectional study

Introducción: Dentro de la autonomía se debe contemplar las preferencias de los pacientes sobre cómo recibir la información (mediante conversación con profesionales o informáticamente). En Cataluña los ciudadanos tienen acceso a un portal informático (“La Meva Salut”) donde pueden consultar información relevante sobre su historial clínico. En cuanto al grado de participación en la toma de decisiones, Control Preferences Scale valora las preferencias en la toma de decisiones. Objetivos: Conocer las preferencias de los pacientes sobre cómo desean ser informados y sobre cómo tomar decisiones. Metodología: Estudio observacional descriptivo transversal realizado en una planta de hospitalización de oncología, hematología y cuidados paliativos en un hospital terciario. Recogidas variables sociodemográficas, nivel de estudios, estadio de la enfermedad, preferencias sobre cómo recibir información y Control Preferences Scale. Se dispuso de la aprobación del CEIC. Resultados: Incluidos 33 pacientes, con mediana de edad de 51 años. El 76 % hombres; el 57 % tenían enfermedad metastásica; el 51 % con estudios elementales. 22 pacientes (66 %) no conocían el portal “La Meva Salut”. El 91 % quería que un profesional sanitario les informara sobre sus enfermedades y ninguno de manera informática. El 33 % quería tomar decisiones de forma compartida, con médico y familia. Los 11 pacientes que conocían el portal (33 %) eran más jóvenes, afectados principalmente de enfermedades hematológicas y con nivel de estudios superior. Conclusiones: Al 91 % de los pacientes les gustaría que un profesional sanitario les diera información sobre su salud. El 33 % de los pacientes querían tomar las decisiones después de escuchar tanto la opinión o el aporte de la familia como del médico. Ninguno prefería que el portal informático fuese su única fuente de información. (AU)

Introduction: Within the Autonomous Community, the preferences of patients on how to receive information should be considered (whether in a conversation with professionals or via electronic means). In Catalonia, citizens have access to an Internet web page (“La Meva Salut”) where they can consult relevant information about their medical history. Regarding the degree of participation in decision-making, the “Control Preferences Scale” values preferences in decision-making. Objectives: To know the preferences of patients on how they want to be informed and on how to make decisions. Methodology: A cross-sectional, descriptive, observational study carried out in an oncology, hematology, and palliative care hospitalization unit at a tertiary hospital. Collected sociodemographic variables included educational level, stage of disease, preferences on how to receive information, and “The Control Preferences Scale”. The Ethics Committee approval was obtained. Results: A total of 33 patients were included with a median age of 51 years; 76% were men, 57 % had metastatic disease; 51 % had basic education; 22 patients (66 %) were unaware of the web page; 91 % wanted a health professional to inform them about their illness, and none preferred it delivered through electronic means; 33 % wanted decisions to be made in a shared way, with heir doctor and family. The 11 patients who were aware of the web age (33 %) were younger, mainly affected by hematological diseases, and with a higher educational level. Conclusions: 91 % of patients would like a healthcare professional to give them information about their health; 33 % preferred to make their decisions after listening to their physicians’ and family’s opinions. None preferred that the web page was their only source of information. (AU)

Comparative study on the clinical and virological characteristics among patients with single occult hepatitis B virus (HBV), single occult hepatitis C virus (HCV) and occult HBV and HCV dual infection.

Occult hepatitis B virus (HBV) and occult hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection are two recently described different forms of HBV and HCV infections. This work compares the clinical, virologic, and histologic characteristics of patients with occult dual infection to those of patients with single occult HBV or HCV infection. Seventy-six patients with abnormal liver function tests of unknown etiology (serum HBsAg, anti-HCV, HBV-DNA, and HCV-RNA negative) were included in the study. Viral genomes were tested in liver by real-time PCR and confirmed by in situ hybridization. Of the 76 patients, 17 had occult HBV infection (intrahepatic HBV-DNA positive, HCV-RNA negative), 35 had occult HCV infection (intrahepatic HCV-RNA positive, HBV-DNA negative) and 24 occult dual infection (intrahepatic HCV-RNA and HBV-DNA). No differences among the three groups were found regarding clinical and epidemiologic data. The median load of intrahepatic genomic and antigenomic HCV-RNA strands was similar between single occult HCV infection and occult HBV and HCV dual infection. The percentage of HCV-infected hepatocytes did not differ between these groups. In occult single HBV infection, intrahepatic levels of HBV-DNA and percentage of HBV-infected hepatocytes were similar to the group of patients with occult dual infection. Finally, no differences were found in histological liver damage among the three groups. In conclusion, liver disease in patients with occult dual infection was not more severe than in patients with single occult HBV or occult HCV infection. Moreover, in occult dual infection there is no a reciprocal inhibition of the viral genomes.

Cellular immune responses associated with occult hepatitis C virus infection of the liver.

Occult hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a type of recently identified chronic infection that is evidenced only by detection of HCV RNA in liver; patients consistently test negative for antibodies to HCV and HCV RNA in serum. Using ex vivo and in vitro measures of T-cell responses, we have identified functional virus-specific memory CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells in the peripheral blood of patients with occult HCV infection. The features of the virus-specific T cells were consistent with immune surveillance functions, supporting previous exposure to HCV. In addition, the magnitudes of CD4(+) and CD8(+) T-cell responses were in parallel and correlated inversely with the extent of liver HCV infection. The detection of HCV-specific T cells in individuals in whom HCV RNA can persist in the liver despite the absence of viremia and antibodies indicates that HCV replication is prolonged in the face of virus-specific CD4(+) and CD8(+) T-cell responses. These findings demonstrate that HCV-specific cellular immune responses are markers not only of previous exposure to and recovery from HCV but also of ongoing occult HCV infection.

Combined hepatitis C virus (HCV) antigen-antibody detection assay does not improve diagnosis for seronegative individuals with occult HCV infection.

A combined hepatitis C virus (HCV) antigen-antibody assay was evaluated for 115 seronegative individuals with occult HCV infection. The assay was reactive in one patient and negative to weakly reactive in three others (all four gave indeterminate results by supplemental assay) but failed to detect HCV in the remaining patients. Despite increased sensitivity the combined assay does not improve serodiagnosis of occult HCV infection.

Hepatitis C virus replicates in the liver of patients who have a sustained response to antiviral treatment.

BACKGROUND: Positive-strand hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA has been detected in the livers of patients who have achieved a sustained biochemical and virological response to antiviral therapy (hereafter, referred to as sustained responders), but negative-strand HCV RNA was undetectable in the hepatic tissue of these patients. We studied the presence of both positive- and negative-strand HCV RNA in the livers of 20 sustained responders with chronic hepatitis C whose response persisted for a mean (+/- standard deviation [SD]) of 47.4+/-32.8 months after treatment. METHODS: HCV RNA was tested by strand-specific, real-time reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction and by in situ hybridization in posttreatment liver biopsy samples (obtained a mean [+/- SD] 35.4+/-35.0 months after therapy) and in patients' peripheral blood mononuclear cells. RESULTS: Positive-strand HCV RNA was found in 19 (95%) of 20 liver biopsy specimens, and negative-strand HCV RNA was found in 15 (79%) of the 19 samples that had positive-strand HCV RNA. These results were confirmed by in situ hybridization. Regarding peripheral blood mononuclear cells, 13 (65%) of 20 samples had positive-strand HCV RNA, and negative-strand HCV RNA was detected in 12 (92%) of the 13 samples with positive-strand HCV RNA. Liver necroinflammation was still present in the posttreatment liver biopsy specimens of 15 patients, and fibrosis was present in 7, although liver damage improved in all but 2 patients. CONCLUSIONS: HCV persisted and replicated in the livers and peripheral blood mononuclear cells of most sustained responders. Thus, these patients did not experience HCV infection clearance, despite apparent clinical disease resolution.

Virus-specific T-cell responses associated with hepatitis C virus (HCV) persistence in the liver after apparent recovery from HCV infection.

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA persistence in the liver has been described even after apparent resolution of HCV infection. Because T-cell reactivity plays a role in recovery from HCV infection, virus-specific T-cell responses were investigated in apparently recovered individuals in whom hepatic HCV RNA persistence was documented: 15 sustained virological responders to interferon (IFN)-treatment and 9 asymptomatic aviremic anti-HCV carriers. HCV-specific CD4(+) T-cell proliferative responses were detected significantly more often in apparently recovered individuals (sustained virological responders: 60%; asymptomatic anti-HCV carriers: 66%) compared with 50 chronic hepatitis C patients (28%; P < 0.05). However, T-cell frequencies and numbers tended to decline over time and the number of HCV proteins targeted by CD4(+) T-cell proliferative responses was limited. Interestingly, liver viral load correlated inversely with virus-specific immune responses. Thus, CD4(+) T-cell responders showed significantly lower hepatic HCV RNA levels (P < 0.05). HCV-specific IFN-gamma-secreting CD4(+) T-cells were not detected in all the apparently recovered patients although they were found significantly more often compared with chronic hepatitis C patients (P < 0.05). Also, HCV NS3-specific CD8(+) T-cells were detected in 11 HLA-A2-positive apparently recovered individuals (8 sustained virological responders and 3 asymptomatic anti-HCV carriers); T-cell frequencies tended to be greater in those patients who had lower hepatic viral levels. In conclusion, HCV-specific T-cells are detectable in apparently recovered individuals in whom HCV RNA can persist in the liver indicating that HCV replication may be prolonged in the face of an insufficient or inadequate virus-specific CD4(+) and CD8(+) T-cell response.

Detection of hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA in the liver of healthy, anti-HCV antibody-positive, serum HCV RNA-negative patients with normal alanine aminotransferase levels.

BACKGROUND: It is unknown whether hepatitis C virus (HCV) is present in the liver of anti-HCV antibody-positive patients with persistently normal alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels and undetectable serum HCV RNA levels. METHODS: We determined the presence of genomic and antigenomic HCV RNA strands in liver biopsy specimens and peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) samples obtained from 12 anti-HCV antibody-positive patients who had normal ALT levels and who had been serum HCV RNA negative for at least 12 months, according to the results of quantitative, strand-specific, real-time reverse-transcription-polymerase chain reaction and, also, in situ hybridization of liver cells. Intrahepatic HCV RNA was cloned and sequenced. RESULTS: All patients remained anti-HCV antibody positive and serum HCV RNA negative, and all had normal ALT values during follow-up (mean duration +/- SD, 29.2 +/- 19.8 months). Genomic HCV RNA was detected in liver biopsy specimens obtained from 10 (83%) of 12 patients, and the antigenomic strand was detected in 10 (100%) of 10 liver biopsy specimens in which genomic HCV RNA was detected. Results were confirmed by in situ hybridization. Intrahepatic HCV was of genotype 1b, and HCV sequencing demonstrated no cross-contamination among samples. Genomic HCV RNA was found in 6 (50%) of 12 PBMC samples, and antigenomic HCV RNA was also detected in 5 (83%) of these 6 PBMC samples. CONCLUSION: HCV may persist and replicate in the liver and PBMCs of healthy, anti-HCV antibody-positive, serum HCV RNA-negative patients who have persistently normal ALT levels. These patients should be followed up, because they have an ongoing viral infection.

Percentage of hepatitis C virus-infected hepatocytes is a better predictor of response than serum viremia levels.

Pegylated alpha-interferon plus ribavirin is the current therapy for chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Serum HCV-RNA concentration before treatment has been identified as an independent predictive factor of response. We have compared the percentage of HCV-infected hepatocytes with the concentration of serum HCV-RNA in baseline samples as predictors of response. We included 97 patients with chronic HCV infection (genotype 1), treated with pegylated-interferon-alpha2b plus ribavirin. Of these 97, 38 (39%) were sustained responders and 59 (61%) were not. Statistical differences between responders and nonresponders were found regarding the percentage of infected hepatocytes (6.83+/-4.50% versus 13.44+/-10.05%; P=0.00003) but not in serum HCV-RNA concentration [1.71+/-2.70 (x10(6) IU/L) versus 1.32+/-1.86 (x10(6) IU/L); P=0.40694]. Other factors associated with response were age, gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase level, and absence of previous therapy. Logistic regression demonstrated that percentage of infected hepatocytes (odds ratio, 1.160; 95% confidence interval, 1.065-1.264) and previous therapy (odds ratio, 0.294; 95% confidence interval, 0.109-0.795) were significant predictive factors for response. Therefore, the percentage of infected hepatocytes in liver biopsy before treatment is a better predictive factor of sustained response to 48 weeks of therapy with pegylated alpha-interferon plus ribavirin than serum HCV-RNA concentration in baseline serum sample.

Hepatitis B infection of the liver in chronic hepatitis C without detectable hepatitis B virus DNA in serum.

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA may persist in the liver in the absence of serum HBV-DNA after a self-limited acute hepatitis B. This may also occur in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection but its prevalence and its impact on liver histology is unknown. HBV-DNA was tested by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and by in situ hybridisation in liver biopsies from 98 patients with chronic hepatitis C who were hepatitis B surface antigen negative and serum HBV-DNA negative by PCR. HBV-DNA resulted positive in the liver of 37/98 (37.7%) patients without serum HBV-DNA. To test whether these patients had serum HBV-DNA levels under the detection limit of the PCR assay used in this study (50 copies/ml), PCR products in which HBV-DNA was undetectable after visualization of agarose gels were analysed by dot-blot hybridisation. With this method, HBV-DNA was positive in serum of 12/37 patients with liver HBV-DNA. Thus, 25/98 (25.5%) patients have HBV-DNA detectable only in liver. This was confirmed by in situ hybridisation, the percentage of infected hepatocytes ranging from 0.1% to 12%. In patients in whom the HCV infection was shorter than 20 years, HBV infected patients had higher (P = 0.01) fibrosis score (1.64 +/- 1.21) than HBV negative cases (0.53 +/- 0.66). In conclusion, a significant proportion of patients with chronic HCV infection have HBV-DNA in the liver in the absence of viral DNA in serum. The impact of this finding on liver histology deserves further research.

Occult hepatitis C virus infection in patients in whom the etiology of persistently abnormal results of liver-function tests is unknown.

BACKGROUND: There are patients in whom the etiology of long-standing abnormal results of liver-function tests is unknown (ALF-EU) after exclusion of all known causes of liver diseases. We analyzed the presence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA in liver-biopsy specimens from 100 patients who were negative for anti-HCV antibodies and for serum HCV RNA and who had ALF-EU. METHODS: HCV RNA status was tested by reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and by in situ hybridization, in liver and peripheral-blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). RESULTS: HCV RNA was detected in liver-biopsy specimens from 57 of 100 patients negative for anti-HCV antibodies and for serum HCV RNA (i.e., who had occult HCV infection). HCV RNA of negative polarity was found in the liver of 48 (84.2%) of these 57 patients with occult HCV infection. Nucleotide-sequence analysis confirmed the specificity of detection of HCV RNA and that patients were infected with the HCV 1b genotype. Of these 57 patients with intrahepatic HCV RNA, 40 (70%) had viral RNA in their PBMCs. With regard to liver histology, patients with occult HCV infection were more likely to have necroinflammatory activity (P=.017) and fibrosis (P=.022) than were patients without intrahepatic HCV RNA. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with ALF-EU may have intrahepatic HCV RNA in the absence of anti-HCV antibodies and of serum HCV RNA.

Distribution of hepatitis B virus in the liver of chronic hepatitis C patients with occult hepatitis B virus infection.

Although occult hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection (HBV-DNA in serum in the absence of hepatitis B surface antigen [HBsAg]) is common in chronic hepatitis C, its characteristics are not well known. In this work, the presence of HBV-DNA (by polymerase chain reaction; PCR) and its distribution (by in situ hybridization) in liver biopsies and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from 32 patients with chronic hepatitis C and occult HBV infection and in 20 HBsAg chronic carriers were determined. The results showed that serum HBV-DNA levels were statistically lower (P = 0.001) in patients with occult HBV infection than in HBsAg chronic carriers. The HBV infection pattern in liver cells was identical between patients with occult HBV infection and those with chronic hepatitis B. However, the mean percentage of HBV-infected hepatocytes was significantly lower (P = 0.001) in patients with occult HBV infection (5 +/- 4.44%) than in HBsAg chronic carriers (17.99 +/- 11.58%). All patients with chronic hepatitis B have HBV-DNA in their PBMCs while this occurred in 50% of the cases with occult HBV infection. In conclusion, patients with occult HBV infection have a low number of HBV-infected hepatocytes and this fact could explain the lack of HBsAg detection and low viremia levels found in these cases.

Hepatitis C virus replicates in sweat glands and is released into sweat in patients with chronic hepatitis C.

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) replicates in salivary glands of chronic hepatitis C patients and is released into the saliva, suggesting that HCV may replicate in other exocrine glands. The presence of positive and negative HCV RNA strands was demonstrated by in situ hybridization, and of HCV core protein by immunohistochemistry, in sweat glands and keratinocytes in healthy skin biopsies from 15 patients with chronic hepatitis C and 10 anti-HCV negative patients with chronic liver disease. Positive and negative HCV RNA strands were detected in 9.6 +/- 5.2% and 4.2 +/- 3.8%, respectively, of the epithelial cells of eccrine sweat glands. Core protein was detected in 6.0 +/- 3.93% of these cells. HCV RNA resistant to RNase digestion (encapsidated HCV RNA) was detected in 10/10 sweat samples from HCV-infected patients. Positive and negative HCV RNA strands were detected in 6.7 +/- 2.97% and 3.0 +/- 3.08% of the keratinocytes, respectively. HCV core protein was found in 4.5 +/- 2.76% of these cells. No HCV RNA or HCV core protein was detected in the skin biopsies from the 10 anti-HCV negative patients. In conclusion, HCV replicates in eccrine sweat glands cells and keratinocytes in healthy skin and is released into the sweat.

Detection of hepatitis C virus RNA and core protein in keratinocytes from patients with cutaneous lichen planus and chronic hepatitis C.

Cutaneous lichen planus has been associated in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection. It is still unknown whether hepatitis C virus infects keratinocytes of lichen planus lesions. In this report we have analyzed the presence of genomic and anti-genomic hepatitis C virus RNA in skin biopsies from 26 patients with chronic hepatitis C and healthy skin and from 24 patients with cutaneous lichen planus (five with and 19 without hepatitis C virus infection) by in situ hybridization. Hepatitis C virus RNA was detected in the keratinocytes of 69% of the patients with healthy skin and chronic hepatitis C, in 100% of the patients with lichen planus and hepatitis C virus infection, and in none of lichen planus patients without hepatitis C virus infection. The percentage of keratinocytes showing genomic or anti-genomic hepatitis C virus RNA was statistically lower (p < 0.01 in all cases) in patients with healthy skin (mean +/- SD: 5.7 +/- 3.5% and 2.7 +/- 3.1% of keratinocytes with genomic or anti-genomic hepatitis C virus RNA, respectively) than in those with lichen planus lesions (31.7 +/- 7.9% and 18.8 +/- 7.4%, mean +/- SD) or the unaffected adjacent skin (24.8 +/- 6.9% and 14.3 +/- 3.8%, mean +/- SD). In conclusion, we have demonstrated that hepatitis C virus infects keratinocytes from patients with lichen planus and hepatitis C virus infection.

Features of the CD4+ T-cell response in liver and peripheral blood of hepatitis C virus-infected patients with persistently normal and abnormal alanine aminotransferase levels.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The liver is the primary site of hepatitis C virus (HCV) replication; intrahepatic T-cell responses may influence liver disease severity. METHODS: HCV-specific CD4(+) T-cell reactivity was investigated ex vivo in paired liver tissue and peripheral blood from 42 chronic HCV patients. RESULTS: The frequencies with which HCV-specific HLA class-II-restricted CD4(+) T-cell proliferation were observed were 29% in liver and 36% in peripheral blood. Among responses, non-structural-3 protein (NS3)-specific T-cell proliferation was dominant but non-exclusive and did rarely occur concurrently in liver infiltrate and peripheral blood suggesting liver compartmentalization of a CD4(+) T-cells population. Compared with 24 patients with abnormal ALT levels, 18 HCV carriers with persistently normal ALT levels had similar serum and liver viral loads but showed: (i) a low-activity grade and stage chronic hepatitis (P<0.001); (ii) less intrahepatic CD4(+) T-lymphocytes (P<0.01); (iii) less frequent intrahepatic (17 vs. 33%) and peripheral (17 vs. 38%) NS3-specific CD4(+) T-cell proliferation; (iv) less often in vitro T-helper (Th)1 (interferon-gamma) cytokine production (2 vs. 18%; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our data show a low frequency of intrahepatic HCV-specific HLA class-II-restricted CD4(+) Th1 responses in patients with chronic HCV. However, these Th1 responses are detected more often in those patients with overt clinical and histological disease.