Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 11 de 11
Filter
1.
Ann Thorac Med ; 17(3): 145-150, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35968395

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to compare the outcome of treatment with drainage and urokinase (UK) versus thoracoscopy (TS) in pleural empyema secondary to complicated pneumonia. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of patients with complicated parapneumonic effusions between 2008 and 2019 treated with UK or TS. Epidemiological and evolutionary data compared days of fever, antibiotic, pre- and postprocedure stay, time to radiological resolution, and complications. The results were expressed as medians and the comparisons were made by the Mann-Whitney U-test. RESULTS: Of 143 patients with NC, 46 were empyemas (26 men), 25 were treated with TS, and 10 were treated with UK. The remaining 11 received combined treatment, being excluded from the study. There were no significant differences between TS versus UK in age (median 4 vs. 3 years), days of fever before the procedure (4 vs. 2) and after (2 vs. 2), days of antibiotic treatment before the procedure (4 vs. 4), overall hospital stay (15 vs. 13 days), and months until radiological normalization (2 vs. 2). The complications related to the therapy were scarce in both groups and had no impact on evolution. Patients with TS had a longer preprocedural stay (4 vs. 1; P < 0.001) and required fewer days of subsequent antibiotic after procedure (8 vs. 11; P = 0.03), and a shorter overall antibiotic treatment time (11 vs. 16; P = 0.03). They also had a shorter post-TS stay (9 vs. 12 days), although this difference did not become significant (P = 0.09). CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, the results obtained with both procedures are quite similar, although patients undergoing TS had a better evolution (fewer days of antibiotic and a tendency to less hospitalization), despite having been performed a priori in more evolved patients.

2.
Int J Surg ; 82: 231-239, 2020 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32877754

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Despite the dissemination of guidelines for surgical site infection (SSI) prevention, a gap between the theoretical measures and their compliance persists. Accurate estimates of the implementation of preventative measures is crucial before planning dissemination strategies. METHODS: A web-based survey was distributed to members of 11 Associations of operative nurses and surgeons. Questions aimed to determine their awareness of evidence, personal beliefs and actual use of the main preventative measures. RESULTS: Of 1105 responders, 50.5% receive no feed-back of their SSI rate. Responders show a moderate rate of awareness of the recommendations about not removing hair, hair clipping, skin antisepsis with alcoholic solutions, and normothermia. Antibiotic prophylaxis is given for more than 24 h by 18.8% of respondents. Screening for S. aureus is performed by 27.6%. Hair removal by shaving is used by 16.6% of responders. The most common antiseptic solutions are alcoholic chlorhexidine (57.2%) and aqueous povidone (23.3%). 62.8% of surgeons allow the solution to air dry before applying surgical drapes. Adhesive drapes in the surgical field are used routinely in 33.4% of cases. Perioperative normothermia, glucose control and hyperoxia are used in 84.3%, 65.9% and 23.3% of cases. Antimicrobial sutures and negative pressure therapy are used by 20.2% and 43.5% of teams, respectively. Prior to closing the incision, 83.9% replace surgical instruments always or selectively. Wound irrigation before closing is used in 78.1% of cases, mostly with saline. Check-lists, standardized orders, surveillance, feed-back and educational programs were rated most highly by respondents as a means to improve compliance with preventative guidelines, but few of these strategies were in place at their institutions. CONCLUSION: Gaps in the translation of evidence into practice remain in the prevention of SSI among different surgical specialities. Several areas for improvement have been identified, as some core prevention measures are not in common use.


Subject(s)
Qualitative Research , Surgical Wound Infection/prevention & control , Antibiotic Prophylaxis , Antisepsis , Chlorhexidine/therapeutic use , Humans , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Therapeutic Irrigation
3.
An. pediatr. (2003. Ed. impr.) ; 92(2): 88-93, feb. 2020. graf, tab
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-196266

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCCIÓN Y OBJETIVOS: Los tumores ováricos son raros en la infancia y representan entre el 1 y el 5% de todos los tumores sólidos. Nuestro objetivo es conocer las características epidemiológicas, los subtipos histológicos y el manejo terapéutico de los tumores sólidos ováricos de la población pediátrica de la provincia de Córdoba. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Se realizó un estudio retrospectivo, descriptivo, observacional, en el que se han revisado las historias clínicas de pacientes ≤ 14 años diagnosticadas de tumores sólidos ováricos en un hospital de tercer nivel entre los años 1994 y 2017, excluyéndose los tumores secundarios. Se revisó la edad, la presentación clínica, la lateralidad, la metodología diagnóstica, el tratamiento, la anatomía patológica y la evolución. RESULTADOS: Se revisaron 37 tumores ováricos en 31 pacientes, siendo 6 bilaterales. La edad media fue de 10,3 años (0-14). El 58% debutaron como masa palpable. No existe predominio de lateralidad. Los marcadores tumorales fueron negativos. Se practicó cirugía conservadora en el 29,7% y anexectomía en el 70,3%. Solo un teratoma inmaduro estadio I con gliomatosis peritoneal precisó tratamiento quimioterápico adyuvante postoperatorio. El estudio histológico demuestra un predominio de tumores de células germinales (65%) frente a los de estirpe epitelial (22%). Destacan 3 tumores estromales que corresponden a fibromas (síndrome de Gorlin) y un gonadoblastoma bilateral asociado a síndrome de Frasier. El tipo de tumor más frecuente fue el teratoma quístico maduro (35,1%). Evolución favorable en todos los casos. CONCLUSIONES: Dada la alta tasa de benignidad de los tumores ováricos en la infancia, la cirugía conservadora debe ser de primera elección, sobre todo en los bilaterales. Si existen antecedentes hereditarios, es imprescindible realizar estudios genéticos moleculares para descartar síndromes asociados


INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Ovarian tumours are rare in childhood, and account for 1-5% of all tumours. The aim of this study is to determine the epidemiological features, histological subtypes, and therapeutic management of ovarian solid ovarian tumours of the paediatric population of the province of Cordoba, in Spain. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective, descriptive, observational and institutional study was conducted in which a review was made of the clinical histories of patients younger than 14years-old diagnosed with ovarian tumours, excluding secondary tumours in a University Hospital between 1994 and 2017. A review was carried out on the age, clinical presentation, laterality, diagnostic methodology, treatment, histopathology, and evolution of these tumours. RESULTS: A total of 37 ovarian tumours were reviewed in 31 patients, 6 of them being bilateral. The mean age was 10.3 (0-14) years, with 58% presenting as a palpable mass. There was no predominance of laterality. The tumour markers were negative. Conservative surgery was performed in 29.7% and adnexectomy in 70.3%. Only one case required post-operative adjuvant chemotherapy treatment (stage I immature teratoma with peritoneal gliomatosis). The histological study shows a predominance of germ cell tumours (65%) against those of epithelial lineage (22%). There were 3 stromal tumours that corresponded to fibroma (Gorlin syndrome), and bilateral gonadoblastoma associated with Frasier syndrome. The most frequent type of tumour was mature cystic teratoma (35.1%). There were no complications in the follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Given that most childhood ovarian tumours are benign, conservative surgery is considered as the first choice, being even more important in bilateral tumours. If there is a family history, it is essential to carry out molecular genetic studies, to rule out associated syndromes


Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Infant , Child, Preschool , Child , Adolescent , Ovarian Neoplasms/pathology , Fibroma/pathology , Gonadoblastoma/pathology , Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal/pathology , Ovarian Neoplasms/therapy , Retrospective Studies , Spain , Teratoma/pathology
4.
An Pediatr (Engl Ed) ; 92(2): 88-93, 2020 Feb.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30975583

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Ovarian tumours are rare in childhood, and account for 1-5% of all tumours. The aim of this study is to determine the epidemiological features, histological subtypes, and therapeutic management of ovarian solid ovarian tumours of the paediatric population of the province of Cordoba, in Spain. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective, descriptive, observational and institutional study was conducted in which a review was made of the clinical histories of patients younger than 14years-old diagnosed with ovarian tumours, excluding secondary tumours in a University Hospital between 1994 and 2017. A review was carried out on the age, clinical presentation, laterality, diagnostic methodology, treatment, histopathology, and evolution of these tumours. RESULTS: A total of 37 ovarian tumours were reviewed in 31 patients, 6 of them being bilateral. The mean age was 10.3 (0-14) years, with 58% presenting as a palpable mass. There was no predominance of laterality. The tumour markers were negative. Conservative surgery was performed in 29.7% and adnexectomy in 70.3%. Only one case required post-operative adjuvant chemotherapy treatment (stageI immature teratoma with peritoneal gliomatosis). The histological study shows a predominance of germ cell tumours (65%) against those of epithelial lineage (22%). There were 3 stromal tumours that corresponded to fibroma (Gorlin syndrome), and bilateral gonadoblastoma associated with Frasier syndrome. The most frequent type of tumour was mature cystic teratoma (35.1%). There were no complications in the follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Given that most childhood ovarian tumours are benign, conservative surgery is considered as the first choice, being even more important in bilateral tumours. If there is a family history, it is essential to carry out molecular genetic studies, to rule out associated syndromes.


Subject(s)
Ovarian Neoplasms/pathology , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Fibroma/pathology , Gonadoblastoma/pathology , Humans , Infant , Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal/pathology , Ovarian Neoplasms/therapy , Retrospective Studies , Spain , Teratoma/pathology
5.
An. pediatr. (2003. Ed. impr.) ; 87(4): 236.e1-236.e6, oct. 2017.
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-167304

ABSTRACT

La alerta de la FDA de diciembre 2016, sobre la seguridad de la anestesia general y las sedaciones en pacientes menores de 3 años y en mujeres embarazadas, ha suscitado numerosas dudas sobre la actitud que deben tomar los profesionales implicados en el tratamiento de estos pacientes. Ante esta situación, las siguientes sociedades científicas médicas: Sociedad Española de Anestesia y Reanimación (SEDAR), Sociedad Española de Cirugía Pediátrica (SECP), Sociedad Española de Cuidados Intensivos Pediátricos (SECIP) y Sociedad Española de Neonatología (SENeo), han constituido un grupo de trabajo para analizar y clarificar la seguridad de estas técnicas. En este artículo concluimos que en el momento actual tanto la anestesia general como la sedación profunda deben seguir siendo consideradas como técnicas seguras, porque no existen evidencias de lo contrario en estudios con seres humanos. Esta seguridad no nos permite ignorar el problema, que debe ser seguido con atención, fundamentalmente en pacientes de menos de 3 años, sometidos a procedimientos anestésicos de más de 3 horas o a sedaciones prolongadas en las Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos Neonatales o Pediátricos (AU)


An FDA alert in December 2016 on the safety of general anesthesia and sedations in patients less than 3 years of age and pregnant women has raised doubts in relation to the attitude that professionals implicated in these procedures should adopt in relation to these specific group of patients. Confronted with this situation, the following medical scientific societies: Sociedad Española de Anestesia y Reanimación (SEDAR), Sociedad Española de Cirugía Pediátrica (SECP), Sociedad Española de Cuidados Intensivos Pediátricos (SECIP) y Sociedad Española de Neonatología (SENeo), have established a working group to analyze and clarify the safety of these techniques. In the present article we conclude that at present both general anesthesia and profound sedation are considered safe procedures because there is no evidence of the opposite in studies with human beings. However, this ascertained safety should not obviate the problem which still needs to be followed with attention, especially in patients less than 3 years of age undergoing anesthetic procedures for more than 3 hours or prolonged sedation in the Neonatal or Pediatric Intensive Care Units (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Infant, Newborn , Infant , Child, Preschool , Anesthesia, General/standards , Surgical Procedures, Operative/methods , Deep Sedation/standards , Patient Safety/standards , Operative Time , Intraoperative Complications/epidemiology , Intensive Care, Neonatal/methods , Intensive Care Units, Pediatric/standards
6.
An Pediatr (Barc) ; 87(4): 236.e1-236.e6, 2017 Oct.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28625557

ABSTRACT

An FDA alert in December 2016 on the safety of general anesthesia and sedations in patients less than 3 years of age and pregnant women has raised doubts in relation to the attitude that professionals implicated in these procedures should adopt in relation to these specific group of patients. Confronted with this situation, the following medical scientific societies: Sociedad Española de Anestesia y Reanimación (SEDAR), Sociedad Española de Cirugía Pediátrica (SECP), Sociedad Española de Cuidados Intensivos Pediátricos (SECIP) y Sociedad Española de Neonatología (SENeo), have established a working group to analyze and clarify the safety of these techniques. In the present article we conclude that at present both general anesthesia and profound sedation are considered safe procedures because there is no evidence of the opposite in studies with human beings. However, this ascertained safety should not obviate the problem which still needs to be followed with attention, especially in patients less than 3 years of age undergoing anesthetic procedures for more than 3 hours or prolonged sedation in the Neonatal or Pediatric Intensive Care Units.


Subject(s)
Anesthesia/standards , Patient Safety/standards , Surgical Procedures, Operative , Anesthesia/methods , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Time Factors
7.
An. pediatr. (2003. Ed. impr.) ; 86(4): 220-225, abr. 2017. tab
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-161544

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCCIÓN: La funduplicatura de Nissen (FN) es la técnica más utilizada y con mejores resultados para tratar el reflujo gastroesofágico en niños. El abordaje laparoscópico (FNL) es seguro, con baja morbilidad y alta tasa de éxito, aunque algunos casos precisan abordaje convencional (FNC) o abierto. Nuestro objetivo es comparar los resultados entre la FNC y la FNL en nuestro centro. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Estudio retrospectivo de los pacientes < 14 años sometidos a FN entre 2000 y 2015. Comparamos ambos abordajes: complicaciones, estancia hospitalaria y seguimiento. RESULTADOS: Se realizaron 75 FN; 49 (65,3%) FNL, 23 (30,7%) FNC y 3 (4,0%) reconversiones. Se asoció gastrostomía por laparoscopia en el 10,7% y abierta en el 5,3%. El 10,7% portaban gastrostomía previamente a la FN. La edad media fue de 4 a˜nos, y el 68,7% fueron varones. El 36% presentaron algún grado de encefalopatía, el 14,7% hernia hiatal, el 5,4% antecedente de atresia esofágica intervenida y el 5,4% al menos un episodio aparentemente letal. No encontramos diferencias significativas en la duración de la intervención entre ambos abordajes. El 36% presentaron complicaciones, más frecuente en la FNC: OR = 3,30 (IC 95%: 1,1-9,6). La estancia disminuyó en 9 días en la FNL (IC 95%: 5,5-13,5). El seguimiento medio fue de 26 meses (IC 95%: 20,9-31,6), con 10,7% fallecimientos (5 insuficiencias respiratorias, una muerte súbita y 2 por su encefalopatía); el 4,2% precisaron nueva funduplicatura, el 15,8% mostraron mejoría sintomática y el 64,0%, ausencia de síntomas. CONCLUSIONES: La FNL es una técnica adecuada para el tratamiento del reflujo gastroesofágico, con menor morbilidad y menor estancia que la FNC, por lo que se recomienda como primera opción terapéutica


INTRODUCTION: Nissen fundoplication (NF) is the most used and effective technique for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux in children. The laparoscopic approach (LNF) is safe, with low morbidity and high success rate, although some cases require a conventional approach (CNF). The aim of the study is to compare the results between LNF and CNF in our centre. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective review was performed on patients < 14 years after NF between 2000 and 2015. A comparison was made of the complications, hospital stay, and followup for both approaches. RESULTS: Of the total 75 NF performed, 49 (65.3%) were LNF, 23 (30.7%) CNF, and 3 (4.0%) reconversions. Concomitant laparoscopic gastrostomy was performed in 10.7%, and open gastrostomy in 5.3% of cases. Prior to NF, 10.7% had a gastrostomy. The mean age was 4 years and 68.7% were male. Of the diagnoses, 36% had encephalopathy, 14.7% hiatal hernia, 5.4% oesophageal atresia, and 5.4% an acute life-threatening event. No differences were found in operation time. More than two-thirds (36%) had complications, which were more frequent in the CNF (OR = 3.30, 95% CI: 1.1-9.6). The hospital-stay decreased by 9 days in the LNF (95% CI: 5.5-13.5). Mean follow-up was 26 months (95% CI: 20.9-31.6). Mortality during follow-up was of 5.3% (5 respiratory failure, 1 sudden cardiac death, and 2 due to complications of the encephalopathy), 4.2% required re-fundoplication, 15.8% had symptomatic improvement, and 64.0% had absence of symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: The LNF is an effective technique for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux, with lower morbidity and shorter hospital stay than CNF. It is recommended as the first surgical option


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Child , Gastroesophageal Reflux/diagnosis , Gastroesophageal Reflux/surgery , Fundoplication/methods , Laparoscopy/methods , Hernia, Hiatal/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Follow-Up Studies , Deglutition Disorders/complications
8.
An Pediatr (Barc) ; 86(4): 220-225, 2017 Apr.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26826758

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Nissen fundoplication (NF) is the most used and effective technique for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux in children. The laparoscopic approach (LNF) is safe, with low morbidity and high success rate, although some cases require a conventional approach (CNF). The aim of the study is to compare the results between LNF and CNF in our centre. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective review was performed on patients <14years after NF between 2000 and 2015. A comparison was made of the complications, hospital stay, and follow-up for both approaches. RESULTS: Of the total 75 NF performed, 49 (65.3%) were LNF, 23 (30.7%) CNF, and 3 (4.0%) reconversions. Concomitant laparoscopic gastrostomy was performed in 10.7%, and open gastrostomy in 5.3% of cases. Prior to NF, 10.7% had a gastrostomy. The mean age was 4 years and 68.7% were male. Of the diagnoses, 36% had encephalopathy, 14.7% hiatal hernia, 5.4% oesophageal atresia, and 5.4% an acute life-threatening event. No differences were found in operation time. More than two-thirds (36%) had complications, which were more frequent in the CNF (OR=3.30, 95%CI: 1.1-9.6). The hospital-stay decreased by 9 days in the LNF (95%CI: 5.5-13.5). Mean follow-up was 26 months (95%CI: 20.9-31.6). Mortality during follow-up was of 5.3% (5 respiratory failure, 1 sudden cardiac death, and 2 due to complications of the encephalopathy), 4.2% required re-fundoplication, 15.8% had symptomatic improvement, and 64.0% had absence of symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: The LNF is an effective technique for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux, with lower morbidity and shorter hospital stay than CNF. It is recommended as the first surgical option.


Subject(s)
Fundoplication/methods , Gastroesophageal Reflux/surgery , Laparoscopy , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Infant , Male , Retrospective Studies
9.
Arch. esp. urol. (Ed. impr.) ; 69(10): 691-697, dic. 2016. tab, ilus
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-158583

ABSTRACT

OBJETIVOS: Los tumores testiculares (TT) y paratesticulares (TP) constituyen el 1-2% de los tumores sólidos infantiles. Estudios recientes recomiendan un manejo conservador, ante la mayor frecuencia de tumores benignos. Con estas premisas, revisamos nuestra experiencia, así como la actitud terapéutica adoptada. MÉTODOS: Todos los TT y TP tratados desde 1998 hasta 2016 se analizaron de manera retrospectiva. Entre los datos recogidos se encuentran la edad, clínica, lateralidad de la tumoración, pruebas de imagen, tratamiento realizado, tipo histológico y evolución. RESULTADOS: Se revisaron un total de 19 casos de TT y TP en 17 pacientes. El 79% de los casos debutaron como una masa escrotal asintomática con marcadores tumorales negativos. El estudio anatomopatológico demostró una proporción similar de TT estromales y de células germinales. En cuanto a los TP se evidenció una proporción similar entre los tumores de características benignas y malignas. Se practicó cirugía conservadora en el 58% de los TT y tumorectomía en el 57% de los TP. CONCLUSIONES: La alta incidencia de benignidad de los TT y TP en la infancia, sobre todo con marcadores tumorales normales, hace que deba considerarse la cirugía conservadora como primera opción terapéutica


OBJECTIVES: Testicular (TT) and paratesticular (PT) tumors account for 1-2% of all infant solid tumors. Due to the increased frequency of benign tumors, conservative management is recommended. Our experience and the therapeutic approach adopted considering testis-sparing surgery, was reviewed. METHODS: A retrospective observational study concerning testicular and paratesticular tumors in our hospital between 1998 and 2016, was performed. Age, side, symptoms, imaging, treatment methods, histological findings and evolution were reviewed. RESULTS: Nineteen cases of TT and PT were reviewed in 17 patients. A painless scrotal mass was found in most cases as the initial presentation (79%). Tumor markers were normal in all cases. Similar distribution between germ cell and stromal testicular tumors was found. Nevertheless, benign and malignant PT proportion was similar. Testis preserving surgery was performed in 58% of TT and in 57% of PT. CONCLUSIONS: Due to the high incidence of the benign histological findings, testicular sparing surgery should be considered as a first therapeutic option, especially in those cases with normal tumor markers


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Child , Testicular Neoplasms/congenital , Testicular Neoplasms/pathology , Pediatrics/methods , Orchiectomy/methods , Cysts/diagnosis , Ultrasonography/methods , Testicular Hydrocele/pathology , Leydig Cell Tumor/pathology , Hemangioma/pathology , Biopsy/methods , Testicular Neoplasms/complications , Testicular Neoplasms/diagnosis , Retrospective Studies , Orchiectomy/standards , Cysts/complications , Ultrasonography/instrumentation , Testicular Hydrocele/diagnosis , Leydig Cell Tumor/metabolism , Hemangioma/blood , Biopsy
10.
Arch Esp Urol ; 69(10): 691-697, 2016 Dec.
Article in Spanish, English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28042790

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Testicular (TT) and paratesticular (PT) tumors account for 1-2%of all infant solid tumors. Due to the increased frequency of benign tumors, conservative management is recommended. Our experience and the therapeutic approach adopted considering testis-sparing surgery, was reviewed. METHODS: A retrospective observational study concerning testicular and paratesticular tumors in our hospital between 1998 and 2016, was performed. Age, side, symptoms, imaging, treatment methods, histological findings and evolution were reviewed. RESULTS: Nineteen cases of TT and PT were reviewed in 17 patients. A painless scrotal mass was found in most cases as the initial presentation (79%). Tumor markers were normal in all cases. Similar distribution between germ cell and stromal testicular tumors was found Nevertheless, benign and malignant PT proportion was similar. Testis preserving surgery was performed in 58% of TT and in 57% of PT. CONCLUSIONS: Due to the high incidence of the benign histological findings, testicular sparing surgery should be considered as a first therapeutic option, especially in those cases with normal tumor markers.


Subject(s)
Testicular Neoplasms , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Retrospective Studies , Testicular Neoplasms/diagnosis , Testicular Neoplasms/therapy
11.
Prog. obstet. ginecol. (Ed. impr.) ; 55(9): 441-444, nov. 2012.
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-105736

ABSTRACT

El absceso tubo-ovárico es una complicación de la enfermedad inflamatoria pélvica (EPI), entidad poco frecuente en mujeres sin actividad sexual previa. Presentamos el caso de una paciente de 13 años, sin relaciones sexuales, que consultó por cuadro de dolor abdominal, fiebre y diarrea. Fue diagnosticada de absceso tubo-ovárico bilateral que se resolvió mediante antibioterapia por vía intravenosa y drenaje laparoscópico. El diagnóstico del absceso tubo-ovárico y su tratamiento precoz son esenciales para prevenir posibles secuelas (infertilidad, embarazo ectópico o dolor abdominal crónico) y debe ser sospechado aun en ausencia de relaciones sexuales. Actualmente, la laparoscopia es el tratamiento quirúrgico de elección porque genera menos morbilidad postoperatoria (AU)


Tubo-ovarian abscess (TOA) is a complication of pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) rarely found in sexually inactive girls. We report the case of a 13-year-old sexually inactive adolescent who presented with abdominal pain, fever and diarrhea. The patient was diagnosed with bilateral tubo-ovarian abscess, which was resolved by laparoscopic drainage of the abscess and antibiotic therapy. Early diagnosis and treatment are essential to prevent further sequelae including infertility, ectopic pregnancy and chronic pelvic pain. TOA should be included in the broad differential diagnosis of abdominal pain with fever in adolescent girls regardless of sexual history. Currently, laparoscopy is the surgical treatment of choice because it produces less postoperative morbidity (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Adolescent , Abdomen, Acute/diagnosis , Abdomen, Acute/surgery , Abscess/complications , Pelvic Inflammatory Disease/complications , Laparoscopy/methods , Laparoscopy , Abdomen, Acute/physiopathology , Abdomen, Acute , Abdominal Pain/etiology , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Diagnosis, Differential
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...