Identifying risk for status epilepticus with the ADAN scale: a prospective multicenter validation study. / Escala ADAN para la identificación del estado epiléptico: estudio de validación prospectivo y multicéntrico.

OBJECTIVES: Status epilepticus (SE) is a serious event associated with high mortality. This study aims to validate the recently developed ADAN (Abnormal speech, ocular Deviation, Automatisms, and Number of motor epileptic seizures) scale for detecting high risk for SE. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Prospective, multicenter, observational study in adults with suspected epileptic seizures. Consecutive recruitment took place over a 27-month period in 4 hospital emergency departments (EDs). The main endpoint was the proportion of patients with criteria for SE based on the collection and analysis of clinical characteristics and the ADAN scale criteria on arrival at the ED. RESULTS: Of the 527 patients recruited, 203 (38.5%) fulfilled the criteria that predicted SE. Multiple regression analysis demonstrated that the 4 ADAN criteria were the only variables independently associated with a final diagnosis of SE (P .001). The predictive power of the scale was 90.9% (95% CI, 88.4%-93.4%) for a final SE diagnosis. We established 3 risk groups based on ADAN scores: low (score, 0-1: 8.7%), moderate (2, 46.6%), and high (> 2, 92.6%). A cut point of more than 1 had a sensitivity of 88.2% for predicting SE, specificity of 77.8%, positive predictive value of 71.3%, and negative predictive value of 91.3%. CONCLUSION: The ADAN scale is a prospectively validated, simple clinical tool for identifying patients in the ED who are at high risk for SE.

OBJETIVO: El estado epiléptico (EE) es una enfermedad grave con elevada mortalidad. Este estudio tiene como objetivo validar la escala ADAN, propuesta recientemente para identificar pacientes con alto riesgo de desarrollar un EE. METODO: Se realizó un estudio prospectivo, multicéntrico y observacional que incluyó a pacientes adultos con sospecha de crisis epilépticas. Se llevó a cabo un reclutamiento consecutivo durante 27 meses en los servicios de urgencias (SU) de cuatro hospitales. La variable principal fue la proporción de pacientes que cumplían criterios para EE. Se han recopilado y analizado las características clínicas y la puntuación en la escala ADAN a su llegada al SU. RESULTADOS: Se reclutaron 527 pacientes, de los cuales 203 (38,5%) cumplieron criterios de EE. En el análisis de regresión múltiple, se demostró que el habla anormal, la desviación ocular, los automatismos y el número de crisis epilépticas motoras fueron las únicas variables independientemente asociadas con un diagnóstico final de EE (p 0,001). La capacidad predictiva de la escala fue del 90,9% (intervalo de confianza del 95%, 88,4-93,4) para identificar el EE como diagnóstico final. Se establecieron tres grupos de riesgo: bajo (0 1 puntos: 8,7%), moderado (2: 46,6%) y alto (> 2: 92,6%). Una puntuación de corte > 1 punto proporcionó una sensibilidad del 88,2%, especificidad del 77,8%, valor predictivo positivo del 71,3% y valor predictivo negativo del 91,3% para predecir el EE. CONCLUSIONES: La escala ADAN es una herramienta clínica simple y validada de manera prospectiva para identificar, en los SU, a los pacientes con elevado riesgo de EE.

The usefulness of NDDI-E and QOLIE-10 scales for the screening of major depressive disorders in patients with epilepsy in video-EEG units.

OBJECTIVE: Mood disorders in patients with epilepsy are common, with depression being the most prevalent. However, this comorbidity is often underdiagnosed. The systematic use of scales such as NDDI-E and QOLIE-10 in prolonged video-EEG monitoring units could be a useful tool for the detection of this comorbidity. METHODS: Descriptive cross-sectional study of a series of patients with epilepsy evaluated in a prolonged video-EEG monitoring unit. RESULTS: Three hundred forty-nine patients were included. The mean age was 49.1 years, and 49.3% were female. 66.2% had focal epilepsy. 20.4% had pharmacoresistant epilepsy. 38.7% of patients had NDDI-E > 13. 43% of patients with focal epilepsy had NDDI-E > 13 versus 21.8% of patients with idiopathic generalized epilepsy (p = .015). Patients with focal temporal epilepsy had the highest rate of NDDI-E > 13 (48.5%). Significant association was found between patient-perceived mood and NDDI-E score (p < .001). However, in the group of patients with NDDI-E > 13, 37.6% had reported feeling "very good" or "good" in mood. Likewise, in the group that had reported feeling "very good" or "good" 21.6% had NDDI-E > 13. In 50.5% of patients with NDDI-E > 13 some kind of therapeutic intervention aimed at this comorbidity was performed. Perceived quality of life as measured by the QOLIE-10 scale was lower in patients with NDDI-E > 13 (p < .001). SIGNIFICANCE: The use of scales such as the NDDI-E and QOLIE-10 at the time of admission in video-EEG monitoring units allows screening for major depressive disorders in patients with epilepsy, which subsequently needs to be confirmed by formal assessment by a psychiatrist. Their systematic use in these units prevents some patients from going undiagnosed. Detection of these disorders allows targeted therapeutic intervention.

Real-life evidence about the use of intravenous brivaracetam in urgent seizures: The BRIV-IV study.

PURPOSE: Urgent seizures are a medical emergency for which new therapies are still needed. This study evaluated the use of intravenous brivaracetam (IV-BRV) in an emergency setting in clinical practice. METHODS: BRIV-IV was a retrospective, multicenter, observational study. It included patients ≥18 years old who were diagnosed with urgent seizures (including status epilepticus (SE), acute repetitive seizures, and high-risk seizures) and who were treated with IV-BRV according to clinical practice in 14 hospital centers. Information was extracted from clinical charts and included in an electronic database. Primary effectiveness endpoints included the rate of IV-BRV responder patients, the rate of patients with a sustained response without seizure relapse in 12 h, and the time between IV-BRV administration and clinical response. Primary safety endpoints were comprised the percentage of patients with adverse events and those with adverse events leading to discontinuation. RESULTS: A total of 156 patients were included in this study. The mean age was 57.7 ± 21.5 years old with a prior diagnosis of epilepsy for 57.1% of patients. The most frequent etiologies were brain tumor-related (18.1%) and vascular (11.2%) epilepsy. SE was diagnosed in 55.3% of patients. The median time from urgent seizure onset to IV treatment administration was 60.0 min (range: 15.0-360.0), and the median time from IV treatment to IV-BRV was 90.0 min (range: 30.0-2400.0). Regarding dosage, the mean bolus infusion was 163.0 ± 73.0 mg and the mean daily dosage was 195.0 ± 87.0 mg. A total of 77.6% of patients responded to IV-BRV (66.3% with SE vs. 91% other urgent seizures) with a median response time of 30.0 min (range: 10.0-60.0). A sustained response was achieved in 62.8% of patients. However, adverse events were reported in 14.7%, which were predominantly somnolence and fatigue, with 4.5% leading to discontinuation. Eighty-six percent of patients were discharged with oral brivaracetam. CONCLUSION: IV-BRV in emergency settings was effective, and tolerability was good for most patients. However, a larger series is needed to confirm the outcomes.

Epidaily, a scale for comprehensive functional assessment of patients with epilepsy.

OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate an epilepsy-specific scale for comprehensive functional assessment of patients with epilepsy, named Epidaily. METHODS: The multidisciplinary research group created through brainstorming a list of 47 items to explore the cognitive, social, basic and instrumental functionality of the patient. A group of epilepsy experts independent of the research group evaluated the suitability of all the items, which then were selected and reviewed by the research group to conform the Epidaily scale. On a sample of 102 patients, a reliability analysis was performed, as well as a validation one using as reference scale the score on the Activities of Daily Living Questionnaire (ADLQ), which evaluates basic and instrumental functionality. RESULTS: Epidaily consisted of 10 items distributed in four dimensions, with a possible score from 0 to 100 (perfect functionality). Inter-observer reliability was excellent, with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.98 (95% confidence interval 0.97-0.99). Criterion validity was demonstrated by the high positive correlation of the Epidaily score with the ADLQ score (Spearman's rho coefficient 0.85, p < 0.001). Significant relation was found between ADLQ and Epidaily in the linear regression analysis (p < 001), which reported that Epidaily explains 85.5% of the variability of ADLQ (R-squared 0.85). Discriminant validity was also proved, as Epidaily allowed to classify epilepsy severity based on Cramer et al epilepsy severity classification. The median time to obtain the Epidaily score was 5 min (interquartile range 4-6). SIGNIFICANCE: Epidaily is a brief and versatile scale, with excellent inter-observer reliability, which has been validated for comprehensive functional assessment of patients with epilepsy.

Therapy delay in status epilepticus extends its duration and worsens its prognosis.

BACKGROUND: Timing in status epilepticus (SE) attention is probably the most relevant modifiable prognostic factor and may influence SE duration and prognosis. We aimed to describe the precise relationship between management timing, duration, and prognosis of SE. METHODS: Observational longitudinal prospective study on a cohort of all patients diagnosed with SE admitted to our tertiary hospital from September 2017 to August 2019, with a 3-month follow-up. Univariate and multivariable analyses were performed to identify clinical and timing variables associated with SE duration and prognosis. RESULTS: Eighty-three SE affecting 76 patients were included. Median age was 73 years, 61.4% were women, median baseline modified Rankin Scale (mRS) was 2, and 55.4% had prior epilepsy. In the out-of-hospital group (n = 50), median time to emergencies was 1.3 h and to hospital admission 2.8 h. In the global series, median time to neurologist was 4.3 h, and median time to therapy initiation was 4.5 h. These four times positively correlated with SE duration (all Spearman's rho coefficient >0.5, all p < .001). SE median duration was 24 h and was extended 1.2 h for each hour of treatment delay. A longer SE duration was associated with increased mortality and morbidity, both at hospital discharge and at 3-month follow-up (both p < .05). After 3 months, mortality was 30.1%, while recovery to baseline mRS occurred in 39.5%, with an overall median mRS of 4. CONCLUSIONS: There were pervasive delays in all phases of SE attention, which conditioned a longer SE duration, and this led to increased long-term morbimortality.

Non-Convulsive Status Epilepticus in Behavioral Variant Frontotemporal Dementia.

Epilepsy in frontotemporal dementia is considered to be less frequent than in Alzheimer's disease. We report two cases of patients with non-convulsive status epilepticus associated with behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia. In the first case, status epilepticus was the first symptom of the disease, and consisted of loss of consciousness and mutism. In the second case, status epilepticus led to a clinical worsening one year after the diagnosis. Our study highlights the importance of suspecting non-convulsive status epilepticus in patients with frontotemporal dementia, and including frontotemporal dementia within the differential diagnosis of new-onset seizures.

Effectiveness and safety of perampanel monotherapy for focal and generalized tonic-clonic seizures: Experience from a national multicenter registry.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness and tolerability of perampanel (PER) monotherapy in routine clinical practice for the treatment of focal onset and generalized tonic-clonic seizures (GTCS). METHODS: This multicenter, retrospective, observational study was conducted in patients aged ≥12 years treated with PER as primary monotherapy or converted to PER monotherapy by progressive reduction of background antiepileptic drugs. Outcomes included retention, responder, and seizure-free rate after 3, 6, and 12 months and tolerability throughout the follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 98 patients (mean age = 49.6 ± 21.7 years, 51% female) with focal seizures and/or GTCS were treated with PER monotherapy for a median exposure of 14 months (range = 1-57) with a median dose of 4 mg (range = 2-10). The retention rates at 3, 6, and 12 months and last follow-up were 93.8%, 89.3%, 80.9%, and 71.4%, respectively. The retention rates according to the type of monotherapy (primary vs conversion) did not differ (log-rank P value = .57). Among the 98 patients, 61.2% patients had seizures throughout the baseline period, with a median seizure frequency of 0.6 seizures per month (range = 0.3-26). Responder rates at 3, 6, and 12 months were 79.6%, 70.1%, and 52.8%, respectively, and seizure freedom rates at the same points were 62.7%, 56.1%, and 41.5%. Regarding the 33 patients who had GTCS in the baseline period, 87.8% were seizure-free at 3 months, 78.1% at 6 months, and 55.1% at 12 months. Over the entire follow-up, PER monotherapy was generally well tolerated, and only 16% of patients discontinued PER due to adverse events (AEs). Female patients were found to be at a higher risk of psychiatric AEs (female vs male odds ratio = 2.85, 95% confidence interval = 1-8.33, P = .046). SIGNIFICANCE: PER demonstrated good effectiveness and a good safety profile when used as primary therapy or conversion to monotherapy at relatively low doses, in a clinical setting with patients with focal seizures and GTCS.

An Online Observational Study of Patients With Olfactory and Gustory Alterations Secondary to SARS-CoV-2 Infection.

Introduction: Since the beginning of the Covid-19 epidemic produced by SARS2-Cov virus, olfactory alterations have been observed at a greater frequency than in other coronavirus epidemics. While olfactory alterations may be observed in patients with rhinovirus, influenza virus, or parainfluenza virus infection, they are typically explained by nasal obstruction with mucus or direct epithelial damage; in the case of SARS-CoV-2, olfactory alterations may present without nasal congestion with mucus. We performed a study of patients presenting olfactory/gustatory alterations in the context of SARS-CoV-2 infection in order to contribute to the understanding of this phenomenon. Material and Methods: We performed a descriptive, cross-sectional, observational study of the clinical characteristics of olfactory/gustatory alterations using a self-administered, anonymous online questionnaire. Results: A total of 909 patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection and olfactory/gustatory alterations responded to the questionnaire in the 4-day data collection period; 824 cases (90.65%) reported simultaneous olfactory and gustatory involvement. Patients' responses to the questionnaire revealed ageusia (581, 64.1% of respondents), hypogeusia (256, 28.2%), dysgeusia (22, 2.4%), anosmia (752 82.8%), hyposmia (142, 15.6%), and dysosmia (8, 0.9%). Fifty-four percent (489) did not report concomitant nasal congestion or mucus. Conclusion: Olfactory alterations are frequent in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection and is only associated with nasal congestion in half of the cases.

Praxis induction and its relationship with cognition in genetic generalized epilepsy.

INTRODUCTION: Praxis induction (PI) is a reflex trait defined as the precipitation of epileptic discharges (ED) or seizures by cognition-guided tasks that often involve visuomotor coordination and decision-making. This is a characteristic of genetic generalized epilepsy (GGE), and especially of juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (JME). Additionally, several studies have described dysexecutive traits in these patients. Our objective was to analyze PI in the different syndromes of GGE and explore the relationship between PI and cognitive performance. METHODS: Sixty-one adult patients with GGE underwent video-electroencephalograph (EEG) during which a neuropsychological activation protocol (NPAP) was performed: reading, writing, calculations, crosswords, and tangram. Praxis induction was defined by the presence of ED during the NPAP with a persistence of at least twice seen on the basal EEG. All patients also underwent a comprehensive cognitive evaluation. RESULTS: We observed PI in 22 out of 61 patients (36%). Grouped by syndrome, PI was more frequent in adult patients with persistent childhood or juvenile absence epilepsy (JAE, 60%), followed by JME (42.1%) and in a lesser grade in patients with only tonic-clonic generalized seizures (9%). Patients classified as having PI did not obtain worse results in the cognitive evaluation. The presence of ED during the performance of a test was associated with a trend to lower results in that specific test. SIGNIFICANCE: Our study showed a relevant presence of PI in patients whose absence epilepsy persists into adulthood, and not only in JME, the syndrome classically associated with PI. According to our results, PI as a reflex trait does not imply necessarily a poorer cognitive phenotype, but the induction of frequent ED during the tasks could be associated with transient cognitive impairment.

Patients' knowledge on epilepsy and SUDEP improves after a semi-structured health interview.

BACKGROUND: Patients' education is the most relevant contributor to patient self-management of epilepsy. We aimed to assess the acquisition of knowledge after a semi-structured interview. METHODS: We performed a quasi-experimental prospective study with a cohort of patients with epilepsy admitted for prolonged video electroencephalogram (VEEG). We measured patients' baseline knowledge with a 10-item true-false test (test A). Then, a qualified nurse carried out a semi-structured interview. We measured acquired knowledge with another 10-item true-false exam (test B), prior to VEEG discharge and after a 3- to 5-month follow-up, and we compared the difference between the scores in test A and test B. Finally, we conducted a satisfaction and suitability survey on the interview at follow-up. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients participated, half were women. Their median age was 39.5, and the median length of schooling was 14 years. The median time since epilepsy onset was 13 years, 75% had suffered tonic-clonic seizures. The median score on test A was 7, while the median score on test B was 8.5 (p < 0.001) both at VEEG discharge and after follow-up. After the interview, 84.4% of participants reported that they were very satisfied with the information received; 87.5% stated that they had not previously heard about SUDEP (sudden unexpected dead in epilepsy); and 93.8% considered it important to receive detailed information about SUDEP. CONCLUSIONS: Patient education through a semi-structured comprehensive interview improves knowledge of patients with epilepsy about their disease. The calm atmosphere and the qualified nursing working at VEEG units make them an appropriate setting for talking about epilepsy and its risks, including SUDEP.

Use of intravenous brivaracetam in status epilepticus: A multicenter registry.

OBJECTIVE: The pharmacokinetics of brivaracetam (BRV), added to its effectiveness observed in animal models of status epilepticus (SE), makes this drug attractive for use in emergency situations. Our objective was to evaluate the use of intravenous BRV in a multicenter study. METHODS: A retrospective multicenter registry of SE cases treated with BRV was created. These patients were evaluated between January and December 2018 at seven hospitals in Spain. Demographic variables, SE characteristics, concomitant drugs, loading doses, and response to treatment were collected. RESULTS: Forty-three patients were registered. The mean age was 56 ± 23.1 years, 51.2% were male, 29 had previous epilepsy, 24 (55.8%) had prominent motor symptoms, and 19 had nonconvulsive symptoms. Regarding the etiology, 19 (44.2%) were considered acute symptomatic, 16 (17.2%) remote symptomatic, four (9.3%) progressive symptomatic, and four (9.3%) cryptogenic. Regarding concomitant antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), 17 had previously received levetiracetam (LEV). In 14 patients, BRV was used early (first or second AED). The median loading dose was 100 mg (range = 50-400), and the weight-adjusted dose was 1.8 mg/kg (range = 0.4-7.3). BRV was effective in 54% (n = 23), and a response was observed in <6 hours in 13 patients. We observed a tendency for it to be more effective when administered earlier (P = 0.09), but there were no differences regarding SE type and the concomitant use of LEV. In those with the fastest responses, we observed that both the total administered dose (300 mg vs 100 mg, P = 0.008) and the weight-adjusted dose (3.85 mg vs 1.43 mg, P = 0.006) were significantly higher. The receiver operating characteristic curve showed that the best cutoff point for a faster response was 1.82 mg/kg. SIGNIFICANCE: BRV is useful for the treatment of SE, even when patients are already being treated with LEV. The response rate seems higher when it is administered earlier and at higher doses (>1.82 mg/kg).

The cognitive phenotype of idiopathic generalized epilepsy.

OBJECTIVE: Dysexecutive traits have been described in idiopathic generalized epilepsy (IGE), but studies mainly focused on juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (JME). To better understand the neuropsychology of IGE, more research is needed on syndromes other than JME, controlling potential confounding factors as the cognitive effects of valproate and epileptic discharges (ED). We describe the neuropsychological profile of a group of patients with different syndromes of IGE including simultaneous video electroencephalography (EEG). METHODS: We performed a comprehensive cognitive and neuropsychiatric evaluation with video-EEG on 61 adults with IGE (JME 19; IGE with generalized tonic-clonic seizures [GTCS] alone [IGE-GTCS] 22; childhood absence epilepsy [CAE] or juvenile absences epilepsy [JAE] persisting in adulthood 20). We compared results between patients (globally and by syndrome) and a control group of 21 individuals (similar age, educational level); p-values were adjusted for multiple testing according to a 0.05 false discovery rate. RESULTS: Patients obtained significantly lower results than controls on visuospatial working memory, processing speed, cognitive flexibility and strategy, abstract visuospatial reasoning, arithmetic, and acquired knowledge. While CAE/JAE showed the lowest scores on cognitive assessment and highest anxiety index, IGE-GTCS showed the most favorable scores. Most tests were not influenced by valproate intake, and the dose did not correlate with cognitive performance in the test that yielded differences between patients and controls. Epileptic discharges during assessment were not frequent (10 patients, 1-4 tests). SIGNIFICANCE: Our findings suggest that patients with IGE have significantly lower abilities in various executive functions and acquired knowledge, compared to population of same age and education. The low frequency of ED on simultaneous video-EEG and absence of correlation of scores with valproate dose reinforce that the obtained results are due to a cognitive phenotype in IGE. This phenotype may be influenced by syndrome, and patients with CAE/JAE persisting in the adult may have a wider neuropsychiatric impairment.

The relevance of timing in nonconvulsive status epilepticus: A series of 38 cases.

BACKGROUND: Timing in the management of nonconvulsive status epilepticus (NCSE) seems to be one of the most important modifiable prognostic factors. We aimed to determine the precise relationship between timing in NCSE management and its outcome. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional study in which clinical data were prospectively obtained from all consecutive adults with NCSE admitted to our hospital from 2014 to 2016. Univariate and multivariable regression analyses were performed to identify clinical and timing variables associated with NCSE prognosis. RESULTS: Among 38 NCSE cases, 59.9% were women, and 39.5% had prior epilepsy history. The median time to treatment (TTT) initiation and the median time to assessment by a neurologist (TTN) were 5h, and the median time to first electroencephalography assessment was 18.5h; in the cases with out-of-hospital onset (n=24), the median time to hospital (TTH) arrival was 2.8h. The median time to NCSE control (TTC) was 16.5h, and it positively correlated with both the TTH (Spearman's rho: 0.439) and the TTT (Spearman's rho: 0.683). In the multivariable regression analyses, the TTC was extended 1.7h for each hour of hospital arrival delay (p=0.01) and 2.7h for each hour of treatment delay (p<0.001). Recognition delay was more common in the episodes with in-hospital onset, which also had longer TTN and TTC, and increased morbidity. CONCLUSIONS: There were pervasive delays in all phases of NCSE management. Delays in hospital arrival or treatment initiation may result in prolonged TTC. Recognition of in-hospital episodes may be more delayed, which may lead to poorer prognosis in these cases.

Lacosamide for refractory generalized tonic-clonic seizures of non-focal origin in clinical practice: A clinical and VEEG study.

•7 of 9 patients with GGE reduced ≥ 50% their tonic-clonic seizure frequency on LCM.•All 7 patients remained seizure free for > 1 year, and 2 of them for > 5 years.•In 2 of the 9 patients, both with Juvenile Absence Epilepsy, absences aggravated.•One aggravation consisted on a myoclonia and absence status, in a patient with no history of myoclonia.•VEEG paralleled clinical improvement but didn't change in a case of absence worsening.

Adult Prevalence of Epilepsy in Spain: EPIBERIA, a Population-Based Study.

BACKGROUND: This study assesses the lifetime and active prevalence of epilepsy in Spain in people older than 18 years. METHODS: EPIBERIA is a population-based epidemiological study of epilepsy prevalence using data from three representative Spanish regions (health districts in Zaragoza, Almería, and Seville) between 2012 and 2013. The study consisted of two phases: screening and confirmation. Participants completed a previously validated questionnaire (EPIBERIA questionnaire) over the telephone. RESULTS: A total of 1741 valid questionnaires were obtained, including 261 (14.99%) raising a suspicion of epilepsy. Of these suspected cases, 216 (82.75%) agreed to participate in phase 2. Of the phase 2 participants, 22 met the International League Against Epilepsy's diagnostic criteria for epilepsy. The estimated lifetime prevalence, adjusted by age and sex per 1,000 people, was 14.87 (95% CI: 9.8-21.9). Active prevalence was 5.79 (95% CI: 2.8-10.6). No significant age, sex, or regional differences in prevalence were detected. CONCLUSIONS: EPIBERIA provides the most accurate estimate of epilepsy prevalence in the Mediterranean region based on its original methodology and its adherence to ILAE recommendations. We highlight that the lifetime prevalence and inactive epilepsy prevalence figures observed here were compared to other epidemiological studies.

Paroxysmal head pain with backward radiation: will epicrania fugax go in the opposite direction?

Epicrania fugax (EF) has been recently described as a paroxysmal head pain starting in a focal cranial area of the posterior scalp and rapidly spreading forward to the ipsilateral eye or nose along a linear or zigzag trajectory. Here we report two patients presenting with the same clinical features, except for the starting site and the direction of the pain. Unilateral pain paroxysms occurred on either side of the head, with a quick backward radiation along a linear trajectory. The pain always stemmed from a particular point located at the fronto-parietal region, and reached the parieto-occipital region in several seconds. The symptoms did not fit any of the acknowledged headaches and neuralgias, and might correspond to a reverse variant of EF.