ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to perform a comparative analysis of foot and ankle patient education material generated by the AI chatbots, as they compare to the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS)-recommended patient education website, FootCareMD.org. METHODS: ChatGPT, Google Bard, and Bing AI were used to generate patient educational materials on 10 of the most common foot and ankle conditions. The content from these AI language model platforms was analyzed and compared with that in FootCareMD.org for accuracy of included information. Accuracy was determined for each of the 10 conditions on a basis of included information regarding background, symptoms, causes, diagnosis, treatments, surgical options, recovery procedures, and risks or preventions. RESULTS: When compared to the reference standard of the AOFAS website FootCareMD.org, the AI language model platforms consistently scored below 60% in accuracy rates in all categories of the articles analyzed. ChatGPT was found to contain an average of 46.2% of key content across all included conditions when compared to FootCareMD.org. Comparatively, Google Bard and Bing AI contained 36.5% and 28.0% of information included on FootCareMD.org, respectively (P < .005). CONCLUSION: Patient education regarding common foot and ankle conditions generated by AI language models provides limited content accuracy across all 3 AI chatbot platforms. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.
ABSTRACT
Background: Achilles tendon ruptures (ATR) can have devastating results for athletes in the National Football League (NFL). While many studies have examined the effects of an ipsilateral ATR, there are no reports on the impact of bilateral ATRs on NFL athlete performance. Methods: Publicly available online injury data for NFL athletes who sustained bilateral ATRs between the start of the 2007 season and the start of the 2021 season were queried using online news and sports analysis web sources. Results: After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, 5 NFL athletes were identified. The findings demonstrated a significant difference in age at the time of each rupture (27.8 vs 30.4 years, P < .01) along with a decreasing trend in the number of Pro Bowl nominations following successive ATRs (P = .027). There were no differences reported for the duration and number of games missed during either rehabilitation period following an ATR. Upon analyzing defensive NFL athletes, forced fumbles was the only performance metric that significantly changed across successive ATRs. Conclusion: Overall, bilateral ATRs can adversely impact an NFL player's performance and further research should be performed to continue analyzing the effects of bilateral ATRs on these athletes.Level of Evidence: 4.
