Assessing Postsurgical Outcomes with Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction: A Literature Review and Meta-analysis Update.

BACKGROUND: Prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction is an alternative to subpectoral/dual-plane reconstruction. METHODS: This study examined outcomes of prepectoral reconstruction using a meta-analysis of data pooled with data from our previous review. Thirty studies were included. RESULTS: Explantation, seroma, and infection were the most common complications with no animation deformity reported. Significantly lower odds of infection were observed with prepectoral compared with dual-plane reconstruction. CONCLUSIONS: Current literature suggests that prepectoral reconstruction may be associated with lower rates of postsurgical infections.

Clinical and Economic Burden of Glaucoma by Disease Severity: A United States Claims-Based Analysis.

PURPOSE: To provide updated estimates of the clinical and economic burden in patients with ocular hypertension (OHT) or open-angle glaucoma (OAG) by disease severity in the United States and to estimate incremental costs associated with disease progression. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with 1 or more International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, Clinical Modification, diagnoses for OAG or OHT who are 40 years of age or older. METHODS: Patients were identified from IQVIA's PharMetrics Plus database during the index period (October 1, 2015, to August 31, 2017). Patients had continuous health plan enrollment for 12 months or more before and after the index date (first OAG or OHT diagnosis during index period) and were stratified by baseline disease severity based on diagnosis code. Annual eye-related outpatient healthcare use and costs were estimated on a per-user basis. A generalized linear model was used to estimate adjusted mean costs by severity and to evaluate the impact of observed disease worsening on costs. A multivariate logistic regression analysis evaluated the relationship between severity and odds of falls or fractures. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Total eye-related outpatient costs and odds of falls or fractures. RESULTS: One hundred seventy-seven thousand three hundred fifty-two OHT and OAG patients were identified (67.8% with OAG). Open-angle glaucoma patients showed higher eye-related outpatient costs than OHT patients (median, $516 [interquartile range (IQR), $323-$898] vs. $344 [IQR, $197-$617], respectively). Patients with severe OAG showed higher eye-related outpatient costs than moderate and mild OAG patients (median, $639 [IQR, $381-$1264] vs. $546 [IQR, $345-$950] vs. $476 [IQR, $304-$765], respectively; P < 0.0001), as well as higher glaucoma-related pharmacy costs (median, $493 [IQR, $122-$1457] vs. $244 [IQR, $84-$1113] vs. $139 [IQR, $66-$818], respectively; P < 0.0001). In adjusted analyses, disease worsening was associated with at least 2-fold higher annual eye-related outpatient costs (P < 0.0001). Severe OAG patients had significantly higher odds of fall or fracture compared with OHT patients (odds ratio, 1.34; 95% confidence interval, 1.13-1.59). CONCLUSIONS: Updated estimates showed highest eye-related costs for those with severe disease and disease progression among patients with OAG and OHT. Severe OAG was associated with increased risk of falls or fractures compared with patients with OHT. Therapies that delay disease progression may provide clinical and economic benefits.

Real-World Outcomes of Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty in the United Kingdom.

PURPOSE: Selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) is a common treatment option for managing glaucoma and ocular hypertension. We assessed the real-world effectiveness of SLT and baseline factors associated with treatment success in the United Kingdom. DESIGN: Retrospective observational study of de-identified electronic medical records (Medisoft Glaucoma module [Medisoft Ltd, Leeds, UK]) from 5 UK ophthalmology teaching centers. PARTICIPANTS: Adult patients undergoing their first recorded SLT. For bilateral SLT (same day), analyses included 1 randomly selected eye. METHODS: Patient demographics, procedure details, and clinical outcomes data were extracted. Factors associated with treatment success were assessed using multivariable Cox regression. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Change from baseline in intraocular pressure (IOP) and glaucoma medication use at 12 to 18 and 24 to 36 months post-SLT. A Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was also conducted. Failure of SLT was defined as any further glaucoma procedure post-SLT or any of the following at 2 consecutive visits: IOP >21 mmHg, IOP reduction <20% from baseline, or increase in glaucoma medications from baseline. RESULTS: A total of 831 SLT-treated eyes (mean baseline IOP 22.0 mmHg) of 831 patients were analyzed. At 12 to 18 and 24 to 36 months post-SLT, respectively, significant reductions in IOP (-4.2 [95% confidence interval {CI}, -4.7 to -3.7] and -3.4 [95% CI, -4.1 to -2.7] mmHg; both P < 0.0001) and significant increases in the number of glaucoma medications (0.13 [95% CI, 0.04-0.23], P = 0.007, and 0.20 [95% CI, 0.06-0.33], P = 0.005) were observed. Survival analysis demonstrated treatment success in 70%, 45%, and 27% of eyes at 6, 12, and 24 months post-SLT, respectively. Higher baseline IOP was strongly associated with treatment success (hazard ratio [HR], 0.67 for baseline IOP >21 mmHg vs. ≤21 mmHg, 95% CI, 0.57-0.80; P < 0.001). Selective laser trabeculoplasty success was not significantly associated with age (P = 0.78), baseline visual field mean deviation (P = 1.00), or concurrent use of IOP-lowering medication (P = 0.52). CONCLUSIONS: Most patients initially responded to SLT, but the majority failed within 1 year. Efficacy of SLT was better in patients with higher baseline IOP but did not differ by glaucoma severity or concurrent use of IOP-lowering medication. These findings may help inform which patients are suitable for SLT therapy.

Early assessment of post-surgical outcomes with pre-pectoral breast reconstruction: A literature review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Pre-pectoral breast reconstruction is an emerging surgical approach. This study provides an early assessment of outcomes with the technique. METHODS: A comprehensive literature review was performed through searches of PubMed® /MEDLINE® to identify studies on pre-pectoral reconstruction. Patient characteristics and outcomes were extracted from studies and pooled. Linear relationships between complication rates and patient characteristics with pre-pectoral reconstruction were analyzed. A meta-analysis compared complication rates between pre-pectoral and dual-plane reconstruction. RESULTS: Fourteen studies (406 women/654 breasts) were included. The most common complications with pre-pectoral reconstruction were flap necrosis (7.8%), seroma (6.7%), capsular contracture (5.8%), and explantation (4.6%). No hyperanimation was reported. Significant correlation between previous radiation and flap necrosis, post-operative chemotherapy and infection, hypertension and flap necrosis, diabetes and dehiscence, and smoking and explantation were found. A meta-analysis of four studies comparing pre-pectoral (135 women/219 breasts) and dual-plane (230/408) reconstruction found no significant difference for likelihood of infection (odds ratio, 0.46; 95% confidence interval, 0.16-1.30), explantation (0.83; 0.29-2.38), necrosis (1.61; 0.77-3.36), seroma (1.88; 0.71-5.02), dehiscence (1.84; 0.68-4.95), or capsular contracture (0.14; 0.02-1.14). CONCLUSIONS: Complication rates are comparable following pre-pectoral and dual-plane reconstruction, indicating the pre-pectoral technique may be a feasible option for appropriate patients.

A Comparison of Two Fat Grafting Methods on Operating Room Efficiency and Costs.

BACKGROUND: Centrifugation (Cf) is a common method of fat processing but may be time consuming, especially when processing large volumes. OBJECTIVES: To determine the effects on fat grafting time, volume efficiency, reoperations, and complication rates of Cf vs an autologous fat processing system (Rv) that incorporates fat harvesting and processing in a single unit. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients who underwent autologous fat grafting during reconstructive breast surgery with Rv or Cf. Endpoints measured were volume of fat harvested (lipoaspirate) and volume injected after processing, time to complete processing, reoperations, and complications. A budget impact model was used to estimate cost of Rv vs Cf. RESULTS: Ninety-eight patients underwent fat grafting with Rv, and 96 patients received Cf. Mean volumes of lipoaspirate (506.0 vs 126.1 mL) and fat injected (177.3 vs 79.2 mL) were significantly higher (P < .0001) in the Rv vs Cf group, respectively. Mean time to complete fat grafting was significantly shorter in the Rv vs Cf group (34.6 vs 90.1 minutes, respectively; P < .0001). Proportions of patients with nodule and cyst formation and/or who received reoperations were significantly less in the Rv vs Cf group. Based on these outcomes and an assumed per minute operating room cost, an average per patient cost savings of $2,870.08 was estimated with Rv vs Cf. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to Cf, the Rv fat processing system allowed for a larger volume of fat to be processed for injection and decreased operative time in these patients, potentially translating to cost savings. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 3.

The Safety, Effectiveness, and Efficiency of Autologous Fat Grafting in Breast Surgery.

BACKGROUND: For years, the safety and effectiveness of autologous fat grafting (AFG) for breast reconstruction have been in question, with particular concern over fat necrosis, calcifications, cyst formation, and interfering with the detection of breast cancer. However, increasing evidence suggests that the complication rates and clinical results are generally acceptable to both clinicians and patients. The emerging challenge is the numerous AFG techniques and systems, where there are limited knowledge and data. The objective of this study was to conduct a literature review that focuses on the safety, effectiveness, and efficiency of various AFG techniques as applied to the breast. METHODS: A PubMed search using terms related to AFG was performed over a 5-year period (April 1, 2010-April 30, 2015). Original articles focused on AFG to the breast, with outcomes on safety, effectiveness, and efficiency, were included. RESULTS: Five hundred ninety-eight articles were identified with 36 articles included (n = 4306 patients). Satisfaction rates were high although the prevalence of complications was low-similar to previous findings. Seven studies reported average operating room time with an overall mean of 125 minutes (range: 40-210). The mean volume of fat harvested was 558 mL (range: 120-1299), and fat injected was 145 mL (range: 20-607). A positive association between injection volume and operating time was observed. CONCLUSIONS: This review validates previous findings on the safety and effectiveness of AFG to the breast and highlights its efficiency. The efficiency data available, although limited, suggest that there is an opportunity to achieve time and cost savings while not sacrificing safety and effectiveness.