Men after the sexual assault: The journey from medical service to court.

BACKGROUND: There may be significant physical and psychological consequences and impacts for males who experience sexual assault as adults, however, published literature in this context is sparse, specifically for the investigative outcomes in the criminal legal process. METHOD: This clinical audit tracked 138 adult males who presented for forensic and medical sexual assault care from initial presentation to ACT Police investigation and court outcome from 2004 to 2022. RESULTS: There were 103/138 (74.6%) males who attended for medical and forensic care within 72 h of the reported assault. Pre-existing mental health conditions were self-reported in 59/138 (42.7%) males. Nearly half of males 67/138 (48.5%) had a medical evidence kit collected. Males presenting for medical care 44/138 (31.2%) went on to report to ACT Policing, 36/44 (81.2%) of cases did not proceed to court. The most common clearance type was inadequate evidence to proceed (17/44, 38.6%). In 8/44 (18.2%) of adult male cases who subsequently reported to ACT Police, the investigation resulted in entry to the judicial process with a suspect charged with a sexual offence. Five of those cases resulting in a conviction. CONCLUSIONS: Many adult male patients presented within timeframes that enabled the provision of time critical medical care and provided an opportunity for forensic medical evidence collection. Many adult males 59 (42.7%) self-reported pre-existing mental health conditions upon initial presentation. Attrition occurred throughout the patient journey with many males not reporting to police and thus not presenting in the legal process. This further emphasises the need for independent sexual violence patient advisors to support adult male victims through the medical and criminal justice process.

Sexually transmitted infections diagnosed in individuals presenting for forensic and medical care following sexual assault.

BACKGROUND: People who report sexual assault express concerns regarding contracting sexually transmitted infection (STI); however, published literature regarding the risk of STI transmission in this context is sparse. METHOD: We audited STI and blood-borne virus (BBV) testing at a forensic and medical sexual assault care service in the Australian Capital Territory between 2004 and 2022. Eligibility for testing among 1928 presentations was defined based on risk (eg, reported penetration). Testing at presentation included chlamydia and gonorrhoea 1850, syphilis and BBV 1472, and after 2-6 weeks, 890 out of 1928 (46.2%) and after 3 months 881 out of 1928 (45.7%), respectively. RESULTS: At presentation, 100 out of 1928 (5.2%) individuals were diagnosed with chlamydia, of those, 95 out of 1799 (5.3%) were female, and 5 out of 121 (4.1%) were male. Gonorrhoea was diagnosed in 7 out of 1920 (0.4%), 5 out of 95 female and 2 out of 5 male. Hepatitis B, which was all pre-existing, was diagnosed in 5 out of 1799 (0.3%). Overall, chlamydia prophylaxis was given to 203 out of 1928 (10.5%) and HIV post-exposure prophylaxis to 141 out of 1928 (7.3%).At 2-6 weeks of follow-up, 10 out of 890 (1.1%) individuals were diagnosed with chlamydia, with no gonorrhoea diagnosed. There were no cases of syphilis, hepatitis B or HIV diagnosed at 3-month serology testing in 881 individuals. Chlamydia detection at follow-up was more common in the group aged 15-29 years. Of those provided with chlamydia prophylaxis, 203 out of 1928, only 16 out of 203 (7.9%) were diagnosed with chlamydia. CONCLUSIONS: The offer of STI testing is almost universally accepted by individuals presenting for post-sexual assault care. There were no identifiable factors to justify the routine use of chlamydia prophylaxis. STI testing provided an opportunity for screening and should remain part of the clinical care of people who report sexual assault.