Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 36
Filter
1.
Sci Rep ; 13(1): 4727, 2023 03 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36959236

ABSTRACT

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) comprises approximately 10% of all lung cancer cases. Tobacco is its main risk factor; however, occupation might play a role in this specific lung cancer subtype. The effect of occupation on SCLC risk has been hardly studied and therefore we aim to assess the role of occupation on the risk of SCLC. To do this, we designed a multicentric, hospital-based, case-control study. Cases consisted exclusively in SCLC patients and controls were recruited from patients having minor surgery at the participating hospitals. Face to face interviews emphasizing occupation and tobacco consumption were held and residential radon was also measured. Logistic regression models were adjusted with odds ratios with 95%CI as estimations of the effect. 423 cases and 905 controls were included. Smoking prevalence was higher in cases compared to controls. Those who worked in known-risk occupations for lung cancer showed an OR of 2.17 (95%CI 1.33; 3.52), with a similar risk when men were analysed separately. The results were adjusted by age, sex, smoking and indoor radon exposure. Those who worked in known-risk occupations and were moderate or heavy smokers had a SCLC risk of 12.19 (95%CI 5.68-26.38) compared with never or moderate smokers who had not worked in such occupations. Occupation is a relevant risk factor of SCLC, and it seems that its effect is boosted when tobacco smoking is present.


Subject(s)
Lung Neoplasms , Radon , Small Cell Lung Carcinoma , Male , Humans , Small Cell Lung Carcinoma/etiology , Small Cell Lung Carcinoma/complications , Case-Control Studies , Lung Neoplasms/epidemiology , Lung Neoplasms/etiology , Risk Factors , Radon/adverse effects , Radon/analysis , Occupations
2.
Arch. bronconeumol. (Ed. impr.) ; 58(7): 542-546, jul. 2022. ilus, graf, tab
Article in English | IBECS | ID: ibc-207034

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Residential radon is considered the second cause of lung cancer and the first in never smokers. Nevertheless, there is little information regarding the association between elevated radon levels and small cell lung cancer (SCLC). We aimed to assess the effect of residential radon exposure on the risk of SCLC in general population through a multicentric case–control study. Methods: A multicentric hospital-based case–control study was designed including 9 hospitals from Spain and Portugal, mostly including radon-prone areas. Indoor radon was measured using Solid State Nuclear Track Detectors at the Galician Radon Laboratory. Results: A total of 375 cases and 902 controls were included, with 24.5% of cases being women. The median number of years living in the measured dwelling was higher than 25 years for both cases and controls. There was a statistically significant association for those exposed to concentrations higher than the EPA action level of 148Bq/m3, with an Odds Ratio of 2.08 (95%CI: 1.03–4.39) compared to those exposed to concentrations lower than 50Bq/m3. When using a dose-response model with 100Bq/m3 as a reference, it can be observed a linear effect for small cell lung cancer risk. Smokers exposed to higher radon concentrations pose a much higher risk of SCLC compared to smokers exposed to lower indoor radon concentrations. Conclusions: Radon exposure seems to increase the risk of small cell lung cancer with a linear dose-response pattern. Tobacco consumption may also produce an important effect modification for radon exposure. (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Radon , Lung Neoplasms , Nicotiana , Spain , Portugal , Smokers
3.
Arch. bronconeumol. (Ed. impr.) ; 58(4): 311-322, abr. 2022. ilus, tab
Article in English | IBECS | ID: ibc-206199

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Tobacco consumption and radon exposure are considered the first and second most common causes of lung cancer, respectively. The aim of this study was to analyze both whether selected genetic polymorphisms in loci that are in DNA repair pathways, are related to non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and whether they may modulate the association between residential radon exposure and lung cancer in both smokers and never smokers.Methods: A multicentre, hospital-based, case–control study with 826 cases and 1201 controls was designed in a radon-prone area. Genotyping was determined in whole blood and residential radon exposure was measured in participants’ dwellings.Results: Attending to tobacco exposure, the variant in the gene NBN (rs1805794) was associated with lung cancer in never smokers (OR 2.72; 95%1.44–5.2) and heavy smokers (OR 3.04; 95%CI 1.21–7.69). The polymorphism with the highest lung cancer association was OGG1 (rs125701), showing an OR of 8.04 (95%CI 1.64–58.29) for its homozygous variant genotype in heavy smokers. Attending to indoor radon exposure (>200Bq/m3), rs1452584, for its homozygous variant genotype, showed the highest association (OR 3.04 (95%CI 1.15–8.48).Conclusion: The genes analyzed seem to have no association with the fully adjusted model, but they might modulate lung cancer association when different categories of tobacco consumption are considered (i.e. heavy smokers). This association may similarly be elevated for those individuals having high indoor radon exposures, though at a minor extent. (AU)


Introducción: El consumo de tabaco y la exposición al radón se consideran la primera y la segunda causa más frecuentes de cáncer de pulmón, respectivamente. El objetivo de este estudio fue analizar si determinados polimorfismos genéticos en los loci que forman parte de la cascada de reparación del ADN se asocian con el cáncer de pulmón de célula no pequeña, y también si es posible que modifiquen la asociación entre la exposición al radón en el hogar y el cáncer de pulmón tanto en fumadores como en no fumadores.Métodos: Se diseñó un estudio multicéntrico hospitalario de casos y controles con 826 casos y 1.201 controles en un área proclive a la presencia de radón. Se determinó el genotipo en sangre y se midió la exposición al radón en el lugar de residencia de los participantes.Resultados: Analizando la exposición al tabaco, la variante del gen NBN (rs1805794) se asoció con el cáncer de pulmón en no fumadores (OR 2,72; IC 95% 1,44-5,2) y grandes fumadores (OR 3,04; IC 95% 1,21-7,69). El polimorfismo con mayor asociación con el cáncer de pulmón fue OGG1 (rs125701), con una OR de 8,04 (IC 95% 1,64-58,29) para la variante genotípica en homocigosis en grandes fumadores. En cuanto a la exposición al radón en interiores (>200Bq/m3), rs1452584 en homocigosis mostró la asociación más fuerte (OR 3,04; IC 95% 1,15-8,48).Conclusión: Los genes que se analizaron no muestran asociación con el modelo completamente ajustado, pero podrían modificar la asociación con el cáncer de pulmón cuando se consideran diferentes categorías de consumo de tabaco (esto es, grandes fumadores). Esta asociación podría aumentar de forma similar en aquellos individuos que están expuestos al radón en interiores, aunque en menor medida. (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Tobacco Smoke Pollution , Radon , Lung Neoplasms , Non-Smokers , Genes
4.
Arch Bronconeumol ; 58(7): 542-546, 2022 Jul.
Article in English, Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35312555

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Residential radon is considered the second cause of lung cancer and the first in never smokers. Nevertheless, there is little information regarding the association between elevated radon levels and small cell lung cancer (SCLC). We aimed to assess the effect of residential radon exposure on the risk of SCLC in general population through a multicentric case-control study. METHODS: A multicentric hospital-based case-control study was designed including 9 hospitals from Spain and Portugal, mostly including radon-prone areas. Indoor radon was measured using Solid State Nuclear Track Detectors at the Galician Radon Laboratory. RESULTS: A total of 375 cases and 902 controls were included, with 24.5% of cases being women. The median number of years living in the measured dwelling was higher than 25 years for both cases and controls. There was a statistically significant association for those exposed to concentrations higher than the EPA action level of 148Bq/m3, with an Odds Ratio of 2.08 (95%CI: 1.03-4.39) compared to those exposed to concentrations lower than 50Bq/m3. When using a dose-response model with 100Bq/m3 as a reference, it can be observed a linear effect for small cell lung cancer risk. Smokers exposed to higher radon concentrations pose a much higher risk of SCLC compared to smokers exposed to lower indoor radon concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: Radon exposure seems to increase the risk of small cell lung cancer with a linear dose-response pattern. Tobacco consumption may also produce an important effect modification for radon exposure.


Subject(s)
Air Pollution, Indoor , Lung Neoplasms , Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced , Radon , Small Cell Lung Carcinoma , Air Pollution, Indoor/adverse effects , Case-Control Studies , Environmental Exposure/adverse effects , Female , Housing , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/epidemiology , Lung Neoplasms/etiology , Male , Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/epidemiology , Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/etiology , Radon/toxicity , Risk Factors , Small Cell Lung Carcinoma/epidemiology , Small Cell Lung Carcinoma/etiology
5.
Arch Bronconeumol ; 58(4): 311-322, 2022 Apr.
Article in English, Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35312585

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Tobacco consumption and radon exposure are considered the first and second most common causes of lung cancer, respectively. The aim of this study was to analyze both whether selected genetic polymorphisms in loci that are in DNA repair pathways, are related to non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and whether they may modulate the association between residential radon exposure and lung cancer in both smokers and never smokers. METHODS: A multicentre, hospital-based, case-control study with 826 cases and 1201 controls was designed in a radon-prone area. Genotyping was determined in whole blood and residential radon exposure was measured in participants' dwellings. RESULTS: Attending to tobacco exposure, the variant in the gene NBN (rs1805794) was associated with lung cancer in never smokers (OR 2.72; 95%1.44-5.2) and heavy smokers (OR 3.04; 95%CI 1.21-7.69). The polymorphism with the highest lung cancer association was OGG1 (rs125701), showing an OR of 8.04 (95%CI 1.64-58.29) for its homozygous variant genotype in heavy smokers. Attending to indoor radon exposure (>200Bq/m3), rs1452584, for its homozygous variant genotype, showed the highest association (OR 3.04 (95%CI 1.15-8.48). CONCLUSION: The genes analyzed seem to have no association with the fully adjusted model, but they might modulate lung cancer association when different categories of tobacco consumption are considered (i.e. heavy smokers). This association may similarly be elevated for those individuals having high indoor radon exposures, though at a minor extent.


Subject(s)
Air Pollution, Indoor , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung , Lung Neoplasms , Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced , Radon , Air Pollution, Indoor/adverse effects , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/etiology , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/genetics , Case-Control Studies , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/etiology , Lung Neoplasms/genetics , Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/etiology , Polymorphism, Genetic , Radon/adverse effects , Risk Factors , Nicotiana
6.
Nutr Cancer ; 74(2): 613-621, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34431436

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The etiology of lung cancer in never smokers is partly unknown. We aimed to assess the effect of fruits and vegetables consumption on lung cancer risk in never smokers. METHODS: We pooled five multicenter case-control studies performed in Northwestern Spain. Cases and controls were all never smokers. All lung cancer cases had anatomopathological confirmed diagnoses. We performed a multivariate logistic regression to analyze the effect of different types of fruits and vegetables consumption on lung cancer risk. RESULTS: A total of 438 cases and 781 controls were included. We observed that a consumption from one to six times per week shows a negative association with lung cancer risk for: kiwis (OR 0.67; 95%CI 0.46-0.95), oranges (OR 0.55; 95%CI 0.37-0.80), turnip tops (OR 0.48; 95%CI 0.34-0.66), "berza gallega" (OR 0.70; 95%CI 0.51-0.97) and broccoli (OR 0.55; 95%CI 0.35-0.83) compared to less than once a week consumption. On the other hand, we found an increased risk for lung cancer with a daily consumption of tomatoes, carrots and potatoes. CONCLUSIONS: Oranges, kiwis, turnip tops, berza gallega and broccoli may play a protective role on lung cancer development in never smokers while tomatoes, carrots and potatoes might have some association with this disease.


Subject(s)
Lung Neoplasms , Vegetables , Case-Control Studies , Diet , Fruit , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/epidemiology , Lung Neoplasms/etiology , Risk Factors , Smokers
7.
Int J Radiat Biol ; 97(7): 997-1002, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33856283

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: This study sought to ascertain whether there might be an association between radon concentrations and age, gender, histologic type, and tumor stage at diagnosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Lung cancer cases from different multicenter case-control studies were analyzed, and clinical data were retrieved from electronic health records and personal interviews. A radon device was placed in all dwellings of participants, and we then tested the existence of an association between residential radon and lung cancer characteristics at diagnosis. RESULTS: Of the total of 829 lung cancer cases included, 56.7% were smokers or ex-smokers. There was no association between indoor radon concentrations and age, gender, histologic type or tumor stage at diagnosis. Median indoor radon concentrations increased with age at diagnosis for men, but not for women. When analyzing participants exposed to more than 1000 Bq/m3, a predominance of small cell lung cancer and a higher presence of advanced stages (IIIB and IV) were observed. CONCLUSIONS: There seems to be no association between radon and age, gender, histologic type or tumor stage at diagnosis. Higher radon exposure is more frequent in the case of small-cell lung cancer.


Subject(s)
Housing , Lung Neoplasms/diagnosis , Lung Neoplasms/etiology , Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/diagnosis , Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/etiology , Radon/adverse effects , Adult , Case-Control Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Risk Factors
8.
Article in English, Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33744027

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Residential radon is considered the second cause of lung cancer and the first in never smokers. Nevertheless, there is little information regarding the association between elevated radon levels and small cell lung cancer (SCLC). We aimed to assess the effect of residential radon exposure on the risk of SCLC in general population through a multicentric case-control study. METHODS: A multicentric hospital-based case-control study was designed including 9 hospitals from Spain and Portugal, mostly including radon-prone areas. Indoor radon was measured using Solid State Nuclear Track Detectors at the Galician Radon Laboratory. RESULTS: A total of 375 cases and 902 controls were included, with 24.5% of cases being women. The median number of years living in the measured dwelling was higher than 25 years for both cases and controls. There was a statistically significant association for those exposed to concentrations higher than the EPA action level of 148Bq/m3, with an Odds Ratio of 2.08 (95%CI: 1.03-4.39) compared to those exposed to concentrations lower than 50Bq/m3. When using a dose-response model with 100Bq/m3 as a reference, it can be observed a linear effect for small cell lung cancer risk. Smokers exposed to higher radon concentrations pose a much higher risk of SCLC compared to smokers exposed to lower indoor radon concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: Radon exposure seems to increase the risk of small cell lung cancer with a linear dose-response pattern. Tobacco consumption may also produce an important effect modification for radon exposure.

9.
Sci Rep ; 10(1): 21147, 2020 12 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33273562

ABSTRACT

Polymorphisms in DNA repair pathways may play a relevant role in lung cancer survival in never-smokers. Furthermore, they could be implicated in the response to chemotherapy and toxicity of platinum agents. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of various genetic polymorphisms in the BER and NER DNA repair pathways on survival and toxicity in never-smoker LC patients. The study included never-smokers LC cases diagnosed from 2011 through 2019, belonging to the Lung Cancer Research In Never Smokers study. A total of 356 never-smokers cases participated (79% women; 83% adenocarcinoma and 65% stage IV). Survival at 3 and 5 years from diagnosis was not associated with genetic polymorphisms, except in the subgroup of patients who received radiotherapy or chemo-radiotherapy, and presented with ERCC1 rs3212986 polymorphism. There was greater toxicity in those presenting OGG1 rs1052133 (CG) and ERCC1 rs11615 polymorphisms among patients treated with radiotherapy or chemo-radiotherapy, respectively. In general, polymorphisms in the BER and NER pathways do not seem to play a relevant role in survival and response to treatment among never-smoker LC patients.


Subject(s)
DNA Repair , Lung Neoplasms/genetics , Non-Smokers , Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide , Aged , Case-Control Studies , Female , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Survival Analysis
11.
Environ Res ; 189: 109968, 2020 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32736146

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Through a pooled case-control study design, we have assessed the relationship between residential radon exposure and lung cancer risk. Other objectives of the study were to evaluate the different risk estimates for the non-small cell lung cancer histological types and to assess the effect modification of the radon exposure on lung cancer risk by tobacco consumption. METHODS: We collected individual data from various case-control studies performed in northwest Spain that investigated residential radon and lung cancer. Cases had a confirmed anatomopathological diagnosis of primary lung cancer and controls were selected because they were undergoing ambulatory evaluation or surgical procedures that were unrelated to tobacco use. Residential radon was measured using alpha track detectors. Results were analyzed using logistic regression. RESULTS: 3704 participants were enrrolled, 1842 cases and 1862 controls. Data show that lung cancer risk increases with radon exposure, finding a significant association of radon exposure with lung cancer at radon exposures above 50 Bq/m3. The estimated adjusted OR for individuals exposed to concentrations >200 Bq/m3 was 2.06 (95% CI: 1.61-2.64) compared with those exposed to ≤50 Bq/m3. Within a smoking category, lung cancer risk increases markedly as radon concentration increases, reaching an OR of 29.3 (95% CI: 15.4-55.7) for heavy smokers exposed to more than 200 Bq/m.3 CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms that residential radon exposure is a risk factor for lung cancer well below action levels established by international organizations. As expected, there is also an effect modification between radon exposure and tobacco consumption.


Subject(s)
Air Pollution, Indoor , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung , Lung Neoplasms , Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced , Radon , Case-Control Studies , Environmental Exposure/adverse effects , Environmental Exposure/analysis , Housing , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/epidemiology , Lung Neoplasms/etiology , Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/epidemiology , Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/etiology , Radon/analysis , Radon/toxicity , Risk Factors , Spain/epidemiology
12.
Cancer Lett ; 487: 21-26, 2020 09 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32454144

ABSTRACT

We aimed to evaluate lung cancer survival in never-smokers, both overall and specifically by sex, exposure to residential-radon, age, histological type, and diagnostic stage. We included lung cancer cases diagnosed in a multicentre, hospital-based, case-control-study of never-smoker patients, diagnosed from January-2011 to March-2015 (Lung Cancer Research In Never Smokers study). 369 never-smokers (79% women; median age 71 years; 80% adenocarcinoma; 66% stage IV) were included. Median overall survival, and at one, 3 and 5 years of diagnosis was 18.3 months, 61%, 32% and 22%, respectively. Higher median survival rates were obtained for: younger age, adenocarcinoma, actionable mutations, and earlier-stage at diagnosis. Higher indoor radon showed a higher risk of death in multivariate analysis. Median lung cancer survival in never-smokers seems higher than that in ever-smokers. Patients with actionable mutations have a significantly higher survival. Higher indoor-radon exposure has a negative effect on survival.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/epidemiology , Lung Neoplasms/epidemiology , Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/epidemiology , Radon/adverse effects , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Adult , Aged , Cancer Survivors , Environmental Exposure , Female , Housing , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/pathology , Smoking/adverse effects
13.
Environ Res ; 179(Pt B): 108812, 2019 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31698297

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess the relationship between do-it-yourself activities entailing the exposure to carcinogenic substances and the risk of lung cancer. METHODS: We pooled individual data from different case-control studies conducted in Northwestern Spain which investigated residential radon and lung cancer. Cases had an anatomopathologically confirmed primary lung cancer and controls were selected at the pre-surgery unit with uncomplicated surgeries. Both cases and controls were older than 30 years with no previous cancer history. All participants were interviewed face-to-face using a specific questionnaire. Painting, model building, furniture refinishing and woodworking or home carpentry were the do-it-yourself activities considered risky due to exposure to carcinogenic agents. RESULTS: We included 1528 cases and 1457 controls. Practicing do-it-yourself risk activities was more frequent among cases: 16.0% were exposed to carcinogenic exposures during leisure time, compared to 11.8% for controls. The overall adjusted OR for lung cancer risk among individuals who practiced do-it-yourself risk activities, was 1.77 (95% CI: 1.36-2.31); this was 2.17 (95% CI: 1.51-3.11) when the analysis was restricted to individuals who performed these activities for at least 10 years. These risks were greater when the analyses were carried out exclusively among never-smokers, with the respective ORs being 2.04 (95% CI: 1.38-3.01) and 3.10 (95% CI: 1.78-5.40). CONCLUSION: These results support the hypothesis that do-it-yourself activities involving exposure to certain carcinogens are associated with an increased risk of lung cancer, both in ever and never-smokers.


Subject(s)
Environmental Exposure/statistics & numerical data , Lung Neoplasms/epidemiology , Carcinogens, Environmental , Case-Control Studies , Humans , Radon , Risk Factors , Spain
14.
Lung Cancer ; 135: 10-15, 2019 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31446980

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To analyze the relationship of GSTT1, GSTM1, XRCC1 (rs25487), ERCC1 (rs11615, rs3212986), ERCC2 (rs13181), XRCC3 (rs861539), OGG1 (rs1052133), and Alpha-1-Antitrypsin mutations (AAT) with the risk of lung cancer in never-smokers, and ascertain if there is an effect modification between these polymorphisms and residential radon exposure. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We designed a multicenter hospital-based case-control study in a radon-prone area. 322 cases and 338 controls, all never-smokers, were included. They were selected using a frequency sampling based on sex and age distribution of the cases. Participants donated 3 ml. of whole blood used to determine genotype for polymorphisms. They placed a radon detector to measure residential radon exposure in their dwelling. RESULTS: The OR for deleted GSTM1 patients was 3.46 (95% CI = 1.52-7.89) at residential radon exposures above 200 Bq/m3. The ERCC1 rs3212986 polymorphism was the most associated with the risk of developing lung cancer, both for low and high radon exposures. The ERCC1 rs321986 GT and TT genotypes (at radon concentrations >200 Bq/m3) were more significantly associated with higher lung cancer risk (OR = 2.40, 95% CI = 1.29-4.45; OR = 4.45, 95% CI = 1.26-15.7, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: These findings support the hypothesis that certain polymorphisms in genes involved in DNA-repair and carriers of GSTM1 deletion have an increased risk of lung cancer in never-smokers exposed to residential radon.


Subject(s)
DNA Damage , DNA Repair , Disease Susceptibility , Environmental Exposure/adverse effects , Lung Neoplasms/etiology , Polymorphism, Genetic , Radon/adverse effects , Alleles , Case-Control Studies , Female , Genetic Predisposition to Disease , Genotype , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Male , Odds Ratio , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors
15.
Environ Res ; 172: 713-718, 2019 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30903971

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Using a pooled case-control study design, including only never-smokers, we have assessed the association of residential radon exposure with the subsequent occurrence of lung cancer. We also investigated whether residential radon poses a different risk specifically for adenocarcinoma. METHODS: We pooled individual data from different case-control studies conducted in recent years in Northwestern Spain which investigated residential radon and lung cancer. All participants were never-smokers. Cases had a confirmed biopsy of primary lung cancer. Hospital controls were selected at pre-surgery units, presenting for non-complex surgical procedures. They were interviewed using a standardized instrument. Residential radon was measured using alpha track detectors at the Galician Radon Laboratory at the University of Santiago de Compostela. RESULTS: A total of 1415 individuals, 523 cases and 892 controls were included. We observed an odds ratio of 1.73 (95%CI: 1.27-2.35) for individuals exposed to ≥ 200 Bq/m3 compared with those exposed to ≤100 Bq/m3. Lung cancer risk for adenocarcinoma was 1.52 (95%CI: 1.14-2.02) using the same categories for radon exposure. CONCLUSIONS: Residential radon is a clear risk factor for lung cancer in never-smokers. Our data suggest that radon exposure is associated with all histological types of lung cancer and also with adenocarcinoma, which is currently the most frequent histological type for this disease.


Subject(s)
Air Pollution, Indoor , Lung Neoplasms , Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced , Non-Smokers , Radon , Case-Control Studies , Environmental Exposure , Housing , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/epidemiology , Non-Smokers/statistics & numerical data , Radon/toxicity , Risk Factors , Spain
16.
Respiration ; 95(6): 414-421, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29587299

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Lung cancer (LC) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are associated with increased morbidity and mortality. The differential clinical and functional features among LC patients with or without COPD have not been defined. OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to examine the prevalence and underdiagnosis rate of COPD in LC patients and to compare the clinical and functional features of LC patients with and without COPD. METHODS: We designed a multicenter hospital-based study including all LC cases diagnosed from January 2014 to August 2016. We assessed epidemiological, clinical, radiological, functional, and histological variables in all cases. RESULTS: We recruited 602 patients with LC, most of them men (77.9%), with a median age of 67 ± 15 years. The COPD prevalence among LC patients was 51.5%, with a underdiagnosis rate of 71.6%. The LC+COPD patients were older and the proportion of men was higher compared with the LC-only patients. The LC+COPD patients had more pack-years, more squamous LC, a lower monoxide transfer coefficient (KCO), and higher Charlson index scores than patients with LC only. The median survival of LC-only patients was 37% longer than that of LC+COPD patients (22 vs. 16 months), but this difference was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Among LC patients, COPD is prevalent and underdiagnosed. Patients with LC+COPD more often have squamous LC, have greater comorbidities, and have a lower KCO. More effort should be made for an early diagnosis of COPD to select patients at higher risk of developing LC.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/complications , Lung Neoplasms/complications , Neoplasms, Squamous Cell/complications , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/complications , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/epidemiology , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Prospective Studies , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/diagnosis , Spain/epidemiology
17.
Eur J Public Health ; 28(3): 521-527, 2018 06 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29140412

ABSTRACT

Background: Lung cancer is the deadliest cancer in developed countries but the etiology of lung cancer risk in never smokers (LCRINS) is largely unknown. We aim to assess the effects of alcohol consumption, in its different forms, on LCRINS. Methods: We pooled six multi-center case-control studies developed in the northwest of Spain. Cases and controls groups were composed of never smokers. We selected incident cases with anatomopathologically confirmed lung cancer diagnoses. All participants were personally interviewed. We performed two groups of statistical models, applying unconditional logistic regression with generalized additive models. One considered the effect of alcohol type consumption and the other considered the quantity of each alcoholic beverage consumed. Results: A total of 438 cases and 863 controls were included. Median age was 71 and 66, years, respectively. Adenocarcinoma was the predominant histological type, comprising 66% of all cases. We found that any type of wine consumption posed an OR of 2.20 OR 95%CI 1.12-4.35), and spirits consumption had an OR of 1.90 (95%CI 1.13-3.23). Beer consumption had an OR of 1.33 (95%CI 0.82-2.14). These results were similar when women were analyzed separately, but for men there was no apparent risk for any alcoholic beverage. The dose-response analysis for each alcoholic beverage revealed no clear pattern. Conclusions: Wine and spirits consumption might increase the risk of LCRINSs, particularly in females. These results have to be taken with caution given the limitations of the present study.


Subject(s)
Alcohol Drinking/adverse effects , Alcoholic Beverages/adverse effects , Lung Neoplasms/epidemiology , Non-Smokers/psychology , Non-Smokers/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Alcoholic Beverages/statistics & numerical data , Case-Control Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Risk Factors , Sex Distribution , Spain/epidemiology , Wine/adverse effects , Wine/statistics & numerical data
18.
Arch. bronconeumol. (Ed. impr.) ; 53(12): 675-681, dic. 2017. tab, graf
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-169971

ABSTRACT

Introducción: El cáncer de pulmón de célula pequeña (CPCP) es el tipo histológico más agresivo de las neoplasias broncopulmonares. Representa en torno al 10-15% de todos los casos. Muy pocos estudios han analizado la influencia del radón residencial. Se pretende conocer los factores de riesgo del CPCP. Métodos: Se diseñó un estudio de casos y controles multicéntrico y de base hospitalaria, con 11 hospitales de 4 comunidades autónomas. Resultados: Se analizan los primeros 113 casos reclutados y de ellos 63 con resultados de radón residencial. La edad mediana al diagnóstico fue de 63 años y un 11% de los casos eran menores de 50 años. El 22% de los casos eran mujeres. El 57% tenían enfermedad en estadio IV y el 95% eran fumadores o exfumadores. La concentración mediana de radón residencial era de 128 Bq/m3. Un 8% de los casos tenían concentraciones superiores a 400 Bq/m3. Por sexo, la única diferencia relevante fue en el porcentaje de mujeres nunca fumadoras, más elevado que para los hombres (p < 0,001). La concentración de radón fue superior para los sujetos con enfermedad en estadio IV (diferencias no significativas) y fue más elevada en los pacientes diagnosticados con 63 años o más (p = 0,032). Conclusiones: Existe un diagnóstico a una edad temprana en buena parte de los casos con CPCP y predomina la enfermedad metastásica al diagnóstico. El radón residencial parece jugar un papel importante en la aparición de la enfermedad, existiendo casos diagnosticados con concentraciones de radón muy elevadas (AU)


Introduction: Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is the most aggressive histologic type of lung cancer, and accounts for approximately 10%-15% of all cases. Few studies have analyzed the effect of residential radon. Our aim is to determine the risk factors of SCLC. Methods: We designed a multicenter, hospital-based case-control study with the participation of 11 hospitals in 4 autonomous communities. Results: Results of the first 113 cases have been analyzed, 63 of which included residential radon measurements. Median age at diagnosis was 63 years; 11% of cases were younger than 50 years of age; 22% were women; 57% had extended disease; and 95% were smokers or former smokers. Median residential radon concentration was 128 Bq/m3. Concentrations higher than 400 Bq/m3 were found in 8% of cases. The only remarkable difference by gender was the percentage of never smokers, which was higher in women compared to men (P < .001). Radon concentration was higher in patients with stage IV disease (non-significant difference) and in individuals diagnosed at 63 years of age or older (P = .032). Conclusions: A high percentage of SCLC cases are diagnosed early and there is a predominance of disseminated disease at diagnosis. Residential radon seems to play an important role on the onset of this disease, with some cases having very high indoor radon concentrations (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Small Cell Lung Carcinoma/pathology , Radon/analysis , Risk Factors , Tobacco Use Disorder/epidemiology , Neoplasm Metastasis/pathology
19.
Cancer Lett ; 411: 130-135, 2017 12 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28987389

ABSTRACT

Environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) exposure is a main risk factor of lung cancer in never smokers. Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) mutations and ALK translocations are more frequent in never smokers' lung cancer than in ever-smokers. We performed a multicenter case-control study to assess if ETS exposure is associated with the presence of EGFR mutations and its types and if ALK translocations were related with ETS exposure. All patients were never smokers and had confirmed lung cancer diagnosis. ETS exposure during childhood showed a negative association on the probability of EGRF mutation though not significant. Exposure during adulthood, at home or at workplace, did not show any association with EGFR mutation. The mutation type L858R seemed the most associated with a lower probability of EGFR alterations for ETS exposure at home in adult life. There is no apparent association between ETS exposure and ALK translocation. These results might suggest that ETS exposure during childhood or at home in adult life could influence the EGFR mutations profile in lung cancer in never smokers, reducing the probability of presenting EFGR mutation.


Subject(s)
ErbB Receptors/genetics , Lung Neoplasms/etiology , Receptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases/genetics , Tobacco Smoke Pollution/analysis , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase , Case-Control Studies , ErbB Receptors/metabolism , Female , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/enzymology , Lung Neoplasms/genetics , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Receptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases/metabolism , Risk Factors , Tobacco Smoke Pollution/adverse effects
20.
Arch Bronconeumol ; 53(12): 675-681, 2017 Dec.
Article in English, Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28622908

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is the most aggressive histologic type of lung cancer, and accounts for approximately 10%-15% of all cases. Few studies have analyzed the effect of residential radon. Our aim is to determine the risk factors of SCLC. METHODS: We designed a multicenter, hospital-based case-control study with the participation of 11 hospitals in 4 autonomous communities. RESULTS: Results of the first 113 cases have been analyzed, 63 of which included residential radon measurements. Median age at diagnosis was 63 years; 11% of cases were younger than 50 years of age; 22% were women; 57% had extended disease; and 95% were smokers or former smokers. Median residential radon concentration was 128Bq/m3. Concentrations higher than 400Bq/m3 were found in 8% of cases. The only remarkable difference by gender was the percentage of never smokers, which was higher in women compared to men (P<.001). Radon concentration was higher in patients with stageIV disease (non-significant difference) and in individuals diagnosed at 63 years of age or older (P=.032). CONCLUSIONS: A high percentage of SCLC cases are diagnosed early and there is a predominance of disseminated disease at diagnosis. Residential radon seems to play an important role on the onset of this disease, with some cases having very high indoor radon concentrations.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Small Cell/epidemiology , Lung Neoplasms/epidemiology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Air Pollutants, Radioactive/toxicity , Air Pollution, Indoor/adverse effects , Carcinoma, Small Cell/etiology , Carcinoma, Small Cell/genetics , Carcinoma, Small Cell/virology , Female , Genetic Predisposition to Disease , Habits , Heating , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/etiology , Lung Neoplasms/genetics , Lung Neoplasms/virology , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/epidemiology , Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/etiology , Papillomaviridae/isolation & purification , Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide , Portugal/epidemiology , Radon/toxicity , Risk Factors , Smoking/adverse effects , Spain/epidemiology , alpha 1-Antitrypsin Deficiency/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...