[Contribution of teledermatology in a hospital pediatrics department]. / Apport de la télédermatologie dans un service de pédiatrie hospitalière.

The hospital of Versailles no longer has a dermatologist; consequently the pediatrics department suggested assess to the system put in place in 2015 based on the telemedicine software platform WebDCR developed throughout the hospital. The acceptability of this was based on its implementation as well as speed and ease of use. METHODS: In 2015, 47 reviews were submitted. RESULTS: No patient refusal was noted. The answer was obtained in 100 % of cases on the day the requests were made, during the week. A diagnosis was made in 36 % of cases and one or more hypotheses were formulated in the 64 % of the remaining cases. The review resulted in a further consultation in 28 % of cases, and in one case to transfer to the dermatology department. The quality of the data collected was considered good or excellent in 96 % of cases. DISCUSSION: This first teledermatology experiment seems to show its utility in terms of the services provided. Given the successful deployment of the system, it was extended to the pediatric emergency department. The response time was reduced to 1h. CONCLUSION: This first teledermatology experiment seems to show its real value in terms of services rendered. However, it is necessary to have more experience to confirm the contribution of this tool, and to reassess the sustainability and economic relevance of the device.

[Teledermatology between two French hospitals: Two years of experience]. / Télédermatologie unissant deux hôpitaux : deux ans d'expérience.

BACKGROUND: Teledermatology is currently booming. Due to the shortage of dermatologists in hospitals access to dermatological consultations is very limited in some hospitals. We present our experience of collaboration between an expert center, the dermatology department of the Victor-Dupouy Hospital Centre in Argenteuil, and all medical structures under the André-Mignot Hospital in Versailles (CHV), including 2 prison medical centers (UCSA), traditional departments and emergency department. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Teledermatology, developed in the form of tele-expertise, began at the UCSA in November 2013. This expertise was then extended in June 2014 to the Internal Medicine department of CHV, and in December 2014 to all departments, including the emergency department. The rules and ethics of teledermatology were strictly adhered to. While UCSA could file all expertise dossiers, only urgent or difficult cases could be filed by other CHV departments. RESULTS: In 26 months, 347 expertise requests were filed: 231 by prisons and 116 by the other departments of the CHV. No patients refused teledermatology. The quality of information and photographs was considered good or excellent in over 95% of cases. A response was given within 3hours in more than 50% of cases and in all cases within 24hours (on working days). Analysis of diseases diagnosed illustrates the wide variety of conditions encountered in dermatology, with different structures having their own specific features. CONCLUSION: Our example illustrates the possibility of developing such an inter-hospital platform. However, it does not yet cater for requests made by patients to dermatologists, by dermatologists to dermatologists, or by dermatologists to the hospital teledermatology department. Acceptability was considered excellent by patients (with no refusals), physicians at the CHV, and the expert center.