Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation Followed by Surgery for Locally Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma Esophagus: Demographics and Evaluation of Prognostic Factors at a Tertiary Care Center in India.

Neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by surgery has been the standard of care for locally advanced carcinoma esophagus. We present our experience and inference of various factors associated with the same treatment and the prognostic influence of the same. A retrospective analysis of a cohort of 132 squamous cell carcinoma esophagus patients post neoadjuvant chemoradiation operated with curative intent was carried out. The 2-year overall survival rate was 64.5%. A pathological complete response was achieved in 32.5% of patients and was the only factor that significantly determined overall survival (p = 0.048). Neoadjuvant chemoradiation before surgery for locally advanced squamous cell cancer of the esophagus remains the standard of care with a pathological complete response being a significant factor in predicting overall survival. More prospective randomized studies are necessary to analyze factors affecting and predicting a pathological complete response which would help organ preservation in patients with a complete response.

Comparison of pathological response of standard chemoradiotherapy versus short course radiotherapy in rectal carcinoma: A pilot study.

Introduction: Neoadjuvant chemoradiation (CRT) is standard of care for locally advanced rectal cancer. However short course radiotherapy (SCRT) was developed for the benefit of a shorter treatment duration and early surgical intervention which also helped in reducing the case burden to the hospital. SCRT is routinely practised in European countries, Indian experience with the SCRT is limited and hence a pilot study was conducted to compare the morphological difference and pathological response between SCRT and CRT. Objectives: A) Evaluate the morphological changes and pathological response between SCRT and CRT. B) Compare the pathologic response with outcome between SCRT and CRT. Materials and Methods: All rectal cancer patients in clinical stage II and III diagnosed during 2016 to 2020, who underwent SCRT or CRT were selected. Altered histopathologic findings due to therapy such as tumor cell morphology, necrosis and stromal response along with pathological response between the study groups were compared along with the outcome. Results: Ten (12.6%) patients were subjected to SCRT and 69 (87.4%) patients underwent CRT. Morphological changes such as necrosis was noted in nine (90%) and eight (11.5%) cases in SCRT and CRT group respectively. Pathologic complete response (pCR) was noted in 12 (17.5%) cases of CRT only. Near complete response was seen in one (10%) and 14 (20.5%) cases of SCRT and CRT respectively. Despite lower rates of pCR in SCRT, no difference in survival or outcome was noted between the two study groups. Conclusion: pCR as expected is less in patients who received SCRT, despite this the outcome during follow up was similar in both the groups. Indian data is very limited and large multi-centre studies should be carried as SCRT offers an advantage of early definitive surgical intervention in addition to shorter duration of hospitalisation when compared with CRT.

Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor with analysis of various prognostic factors: A single-institutional experience.

CONTEXT: Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST) is a rare and aggressive soft-tissue sarcoma. AIMS: The aim of this study was to analyze various prognostic factors and treatment outcome of patients with MPNST. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: This was a retrospective study. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Ninety-two patients, who presented with MPNST at a tertiary care cancer center from 2011 to 2018, were included in this study. The median follow-up of all living patients was 33 months. Neurofibromatosis 1 (NF1) was seen in 12 (13%) patients. Sixty (65.2%) patients received curative-intent treatment. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis. Log-rank test was used for univariate analysis, and multivariate analysis was done by Cox proportional hazard ratio method. RESULTS: The 5-year overall survival (OS) of all patients was 47.2% and the 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) of operated patients was 41.5%. On univariate analysis, association with NF1 (P = 0.009), grade (P = 0.017), and margin status (P = 0.002) had a significant effect on DFS, whereas association with NF1 (P = 0.025), metastatic disease on presentation (P < 0.0001), palliative intent of treatment (P < 0.0001), grade (P = 0.049), and margin status (P = 0.036) had a significant effect on OS. On multivariate analysis for patients who were treated with curative-intent treatment, grade (P = 0.015), and margin status (P = 0.028) had a significant effect on DFS, whereas association with NF1 (P = 0.00026) and location of tumor (P = 0.040) had a significant effect on OS. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of distant metastasis, palliative intent of treatment, association with NF1, location of the tumor in the head and neck, high tumor grade, and positive margin status were the risk factors associated with poor survival for the patients with MPNST. Wide local excision with negative resection margin is the highly recommended treatment.

18F-FDG PET/CT in the Evaluation of Solitary Extramedullary Plasmacytoma: A Case Series.

The role of fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/ computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) and other plasma cell disorders is well-known. Solitary plasmacytoma (SP), an extremely rare form within this entity accounting for approximately 4% of plasma cell malignancies, can be classified as solitary bone plasmacytoma (SBP) or solitary extramedullary plasmacytoma (SEMP). Extramedullary plasmacytoma (EMP) is a rare neoplasm characterized by the monoclonal proliferation of plasma cells outside the bone marrow. Breast and craniocerebral regions are the uncommon sites of the presentations of EMP, rarely reported in the literature. The most frequent site of presentation is the upper airways. The EMPs have similar pathogenesis as MM; however, they differ in management as they are radiosensitive in nature, and radiotherapy is the preferred treatment modality. As SEMP has a better prognosis than SPB with a lower conversion rate to MM, accurate staging is essential to plan for the treatment. The 18F-FDG PET/CT has higher sensitivity for the evaluation of treatment response. In the present case series, it was aimed to depict the role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in newly diagnosed SEMP with different sites of origin to exclude further lesions leading to changes in the treatment plan and treatment response assessment.

Comparison of thermoplastic masks and knee wedge as immobilization devices for image-guided pelvic radiation therapy using Cone Beam Computed Tomography.

INTRODUCTION: Pelvic radiotherapy is generally performed with the use of an immobilization and positioning device. AIM AND OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to ascertain and compare setup errors between the two positioning devices. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 35 patients of stage II and III cervical cancers were enrolled in the study and divided into two groups, one using knee wedge and the other using thermoplastic pelvic mask as an immobilization device. Radiation was planned by four field box conformal technique. The random and systematic setup errors were then calculated for each patient in both the groups in the mediolateral (ML), superoinferior (SI), and anteroposterior (AP) directions. RESULTS: The translational mean setup variation in the lateral, longitudinal, and vertical direction is 0.17 ± 0.24, -0.12 ± 0.48, and -0.18 ± 0.27 cm for thermoplastic pelvic mask and -0.03 ± 0.26, -0.04 ± 0.48, and -0.09 ± 0.37 cm for knee wedge, respectively. The systematic setup error and random errors were 0.24, 0.48, 0.27 cm and 0.31, 0.60, and 0.40 cm for thermoplastic mask and 0.26, 0.48, and 0.37 cm and 0.38, 0.37, and 0.45 cm for knee wedge in ML, SI, and AP axis, respectively. The one way analysis of variance test was applied to compare the setup errors in between the three axes for both the immobilization devices. To compare the positioning accuracy of thermoplastic mask and knee wedge, Student's t-test was applied. Both the tests were found to be insignificant (P value > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Thermoplastic mask and knee wedge are equally effective as immobilization devices for treating cervical cancers with conformal techniques.

Combined external beam radiotherapy and vaginal brachytherapy versus vaginal brachytherapy in stage I, intermediate- and high-risk cases of endometrium carcinoma.

PURPOSE: Randomized trials on the effect of external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) with or without vaginal brachytherapy (VBT) for endometrial carcinoma are very few. In view of this, the current study was conducted with the hypothesizes: whether the escalated dose of 26 Gy (VBT alone) in comparison with various major international trials (PORTEC-2) has any difference in rates of disease-free and overall survival with fewer adverse effects in low resource setting like India. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An open-labeled, non-inferiority, randomized control trial was undertaken at a regional cancer center among patients with stage IA or IB high-intermediate risk endometrial carcinoma. A total of 50 patients were divided equally among two arms of combined EBRT with VBT (arm I) and VBT alone (arm II). A dose of 50-50.4 Gy in 25-28 fractions of EBRT with 2 fractions of VBT 6.5 Gy each were delivered to patients in arm I and 4 fractions of VBT 6.5 Gy each to patients in arm II, and were followed up for 60 months. RESULTS: During the median follow-up of 36.5 months, two patients developed loco-regional recurrence in arm II, three (arm II), and one (arm I) developed distant metastasis. The 5-year survival rates for arms I and II were 96.0% vs. 92.0% overall, and 88.0% vs. 84.0% disease-free, respectively, and were not found to be statistically significantly different. Dermatological, gastro-intestinal toxicities, and cystitis were lower in the VBT group compared to combined group. CONCLUSIONS: VBT alone is as effective as EBRT+VBT in ensuring loco-regional control and achieving comparable survival rates, with fewer toxic effects for patients with stage I intermediate- and high-risk endometrial carcinoma. The dose escalation did not make a difference in the survival rates and was like in the other major trials (PORTEC-2).

Dosimetric analysis of the effects of the bladder volume on organs at risk (OAR) in high-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy in carcinoma cervix - an institutional study.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to establish a dosimetric correlation between the bladder volume and its effects on the dose received by the organs at risk (OARs) (urinary bladder, rectum, and sigmoid) during computed tomography (CT)-guided high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy in carcinoma cervix, and to determine an optimum bladder volume to limit the dose to OARs. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Seventy-five intracavitary applications in patients of carcinoma cervix (stage IIB, IIIA, IIIB, IVA) treated with external beam radiotherapy with concurrent chemotherapy followed by CT-based HDR intracavitary brachytherapy (tandem and ovoid type) at our institute between July 2014 to January 2016 were studied. The bladder volume at the time of imaging was noted and was correlated with the radiation dose received by bladder, rectum, and sigmoid colon. RESULTS: Dose volume histogram (DVH) parameters of the bladder increases by elevating the volume of the bladder. Rectum dose does not follow a continuous increasing trend. It increases up to a bladder volume of 110 cc and then starts decreasing. The highest rectal dose observed was in the bladder volume, range 70-110 cc. The minimum doses were recorded when the bladder volume was > 170 cc. Sigmoid colon DVH parameters follow a similar trend as that of the rectum. CONCLUSIONS: A relationship exists between the volume of the OARs and the dose received by them. A bladder volume of about 70 cm3 or less proved better for achieving the prescribed dose limits of bladder, rectum, and sigmoid. The correlations between the bladder volume and the doses received by the OARs were not significant.

Calculation of dose volume parameters and indices in plan evaluation of HDR interstitial brachytherapy by MUPIT in carcinoma cervix.

BACKGROUND: Evaluation of a HDR- interstitial brachytherapy plan is a challenging job. Owing to the complexities and diversity of the normalization and optimization techniques involved, a simple objective assessment of these plans is required. This can improve the radiation dose coverage of the tumour with decreased organ toxicity. AIM: To study and document the various dose volume indices and parameters required to evaluate a HDR interstitial brachytherapy plan by Volume normalization and graphical optimization using MUPIT (Martinez Universal Perineal Interstitial Template) in patients of carcinoma cervix. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: Single arm, retrospective study. METHODS AND MATERIALS: 35 patients of carcinoma cervix who received EBRT and HDR brachytherapy using MUPIT, were selected. The dose prescribed was 4 Gray/Fraction in four fractions (16Gy/4) treated twice daily, at least 6 hours apart. CTV and OARs were delineated on the axial CT image set. Volume normalization and graphical optimization was done for planning. Coverage Index (CI), Dose homogeneity index (DHI), Overdose index (OI), Dose non-uniformity ratio (DNR), Conformity Index (COIN) and dose volume parameters i.e. D2cc, D1cc, D0.1cc of rectum and bladder were evaluated. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: SPSS version 16 was used. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: CI was 0.95 ± 1.84 which means 95% of the target received 100% of the prescribed dose. The mean COIN was 0.841 ± 0.06 and DHI was 0.502 ± 0.11. D2cc rectum and bladder was 3.40 ± 0.56 and 2.95 ± 0.62 respectively which was within the tolerance limit of this organs. There should be an optimum balance between these indices for improving the quality of the implant and to yield maximum clinical benefit out of it, keeping the dose to the OARs in limit. Dose optimization should be carefully monitered and an institutional protocol should be devised for the acceptability criteria of these plans.