Quality evaluation of the usefulness of an emergency department fall risk assessment tool.

INTRODUCTION: Falls that occur within a hospital setting are difficult to predict, however, are preventable adverse events with the potential to negatively impact patient care. Falls have the potential to cause serious or fatal injuries and may increase patient morbidity. Many hospitals utilize fall "predictor tools" to categorize a patient's fall risk, however, these tools are primarily studied within in-patient units. The emergency department (ED) presents a unique environment with a distinct patient population and demographic. The Memorial Emergency Department Fall Risk Assessment Tool (MEDFRAT) has shown to be effective with predicting a patient's fall risk in the ED. This IRB-approved study aims to assess the predictive validity of the MEDFRAT by evaluating the sensitivity and specificity for predicting a patient's fall risk in an emergency department at a level 1 trauma center. METHODS: A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted using an electronic medical record (EMR) for patients who met study inclusion criteria at a level 1 trauma center ED. Extracted data includes MEDFRAT components, demographic information, and data from the Moving Safely Risk Assessment (MSRA) Tool, our institution's current fall assessment tool. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was constructed to determine the best cutoff for identifying any fall risk. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive likelihood ratio (LR+) and negative LR (LR-), with 95% CIs were then calculated for the cutoff value determined from the ROC curve. To compare overall tool performance, the areas under the ROC curves (AUC) were determined and compared with a z-test. RESULTS: The MEDFRAT had a significantly higher sensitivity compared to the MSRA (83.1% vs. 66.1%, p = 0.002), while the MSRA had a significantly higher specificity (84.5% vs. 69.0%, p = 0.012). For identifying any level of fall risk, ROC curve analysis showed that the cutoff providing the best trade-off between sensitivity and specificity for the MEDFRAT was a score of ≥1. Additionally, area under the curve was determined for the MEDFRAT and MSRA (0.817 vs. 0.737). CONCLUSION: This study confirms the validity of the MEDFRAT as an acceptable tool to predict in-hospital falls in a level 1 trauma center ED. Accurate identification of patients at a high risk of falling is critical for decreasing healthcare costs and improving health outcomes and patient safety.

The silver lining of the pandemic in surgical education: virtual surgical education and recommendations for best practices.

Virtual education is an evolving field within the realm of surgical training. Since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, the application of virtual technologies in surgical education has undergone significant exploration and advancement. While originally developed to supplement in-person curricula for the development of clinical decision-making, virtual surgical education has expanded into the realms of clinical decision-making, surgical, and non-surgical skills acquisition. This manuscript aims to discuss the various applications of virtual surgical education as well as the advantages and disadvantages associated with each education modality, while offering recommendations on best practices and future directions.

Perception versus Reality: A Review of Narcotic Prescribing Habits After Common Laparoscopic Surgeries.

INTRODUCTION: Data on how surgeons perceive their habits of prescribing narcotics compared to their actual practice are scarce. This study examines the perception and actual narcotic prescribing habits of surgeons and advanced practitioners. METHODS: Surgical residents, attendings, and advanced practice providers (APPs) were surveyed to assess their perceived prescribing habits at discharge for laparoscopic appendectomy and laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Data on narcotics prescription for patients receiving either of the procedures from January 2017 to August 2020 were extracted from electronic health records. Prescribed narcotics were converted to morphine equivalent doses (MEQs) for comparison. RESULTS: Of the 52 participants, the majority were residents (57.7%). Approximately 90% of residents, 72% of attendings, and 18% of APPs reported regularly prescribing narcotics at discharge. Approximately 67% (889/1332) of patients were discharged with narcotics. Of those, the majority of patients' narcotics were prescribed by surgery residents (71.2%). However, 72% of residents, 80% of attendings, and 72% of APPs were confident on prescribing the correct regimen of narcotics. There were no differences in average daily MEQs among the groups. However, the number of narcotics prescribed was higher among APPs compared to that in the other groups (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Most participants self-reported routinely prescribing narcotics at discharge. Although not the current recommendation, participants felt confident they were prescribing the correct regimen, but were observed to prescribe more than the recommended number of total narcotics which indicates a discrepancy between perception and actual habits of prescribing narcotics. Our findings suggest a need for education in the general surgery residency and continuing medical education setting.

Performance-Based Assessment of Trauma Systems: Estimates for the State of Ohio.

OBJECTIVES: There are no widely accepted metrics to determine the optimal number and geographic distribution of trauma centers (TCs). We propose a Performance-based Assessment of Trauma System (PBATS) model to optimize the number and distribution of TCs in a region using key performance metrics. METHODS: The proposed PBATS approach relies on well-established mathematical programming approach to minimize the number of level I (LI) and level II (LII) TCs required in a region, constrained by prespecified system-related under-triage (srUT) and over-triage (srOT) rates and TC volume. To illustrate PBATS, we collected 6002 matched (linked) records from the 2012 Ohio Trauma and EMS registries. The PBATS-suggested network was compared to the 2012 Ohio network and also to the configuration proposed by the Needs-Based Assessment of Trauma System (NBATS) tool. RESULTS: For this data, PBATS suggested 14 LI/II TCs with a slightly different geographic distribution compared to the 2012 network with 21 LI and LII TC, for the same srUT≈.2 and srOT≈.52. To achieve UT ≤ .05, PBATS suggested 23 LI/II TCs with a significantly different distribution. The NBATS suggested fewer TCs (12 LI/II) than the Ohio 2012 network. CONCLUSION: The PBATS approach can generate a geographically optimized network of TCs to achieve prespecified performance characteristics such as srUT rate, srOT rate, and TC volume. Such a solution may provide a useful data-driven standard, which can be used to drive incremental system changes and guide policy decisions.

Increasing Social Media Presence for Graduate Medical Education Programs.

Virtual residency interviews during COVID-19 pandemic created a need for residency programs to use social media to increase their visibility and connect with potential applicants. This was, however, new and a road never travelled for many programs. This report describes how our General Surgery Residency Program increased its presence through social media by using various exposure methods and approaches, including diversifying presence and developing candid personalized content. Results suggest that these methods have increased our exposure and reach from an average of 7 people per post to posts reaching over 4500 people. Moreover, the video posts introducing our residents and faculty provided the highest activity and reach. Thus, appropriate use of social media with described interventions and new content creation could exponentially increase the visibility of a residency program. Moreover, educating faculty and residents on the use and importance of social media could increase their interest and participation as well.

Thriving in the Virtual Era: An Organized Approach to Improve Program Visibility and Virtual Residency Interview Process.

OBJECTIVE: Since residency interviews became virtual due to COVID-19, and likely continue in the future, programs must find ways to improve their non-traditional recruiting methods. The objective of this study was to evaluate effectiveness of a structured, non-traditional approach on visibility and perception of the program as well as virtual interview experience. METHODS: The focus of our approach was to ensure constant engagement while maintaining all pre-interview communication as resident-led and informal. The program focused on improving visibility and outreach through an organized utilization of social media platforms highlighting people and local culture. The virtual interview process was restructured with resident-led virtual meet and greets followed by small group discussions and providing virtual hospital tours, videos, and slides of the program's culture and expectationson the interview day. Perception of the program and the new approach to the interview process was assessed via an anonymous survey. RESULTS: The program's visibility was measured via social media analytics with an increase in reach on Facebook from 0/post to as high as 4200/post and engagement 2/post to nearly 600/post. Tweet Impressions from approximately 350/mo to 11,000/mo with the increase in new Followers/month by 532.5%. Increase in total number of applicants in 2021 of 16% compared to average between 2018 and 2020. Survey response rate was 66.1%; of those 53.8% of interviewees attended a virtual meet and greet session. Perceptions of interviewees on our program was exclusively positive. Specific characteristics of the program that would make students rank us higher were program's culture, people, academics, and clinical experiences they would get as residents. CONCLUSIONS: The exponential increase in our program's visibility and exclusively positive program assessment suggest that a structured approach utilizing social media and virtual technologies could improve both the recruitment and the virtual interview process while maintaining positive perceptions of the program.

The Oregon District Shooting: Reviewing the Pre-Hospital Protocols and the Role of the Resident During a Multiple Casualty Event.

Background: Review of multiple casualty events (MCEs) protocols in an academic trauma center and more importantly role of residents in management of MCEs has not been discussed. Also, no real-world examples have been described. This study reviews utilization of multiple casualty protocols by the area hospitals and EMS along with role of residents in one such real-world MCEMethods: A mass shooting event in the Oregon District in Dayton, Ohio from 2019 was reviewed. MCE protocols from a Level I trauma center were reviewed as well as patient outcomes and role of residents.Results: A total of 10 casualties were observed and 38 patients presented to hospitals throughout the city. There were 25 patients presented to the Level I trauma center, 1 to the Level II trauma center, and 12 to the Level III trauma centers in the community. Surgical and Emergency residents performed initial triage upon arrival to the ED, managed resuscitation, and performed various procedures under supervision of attending staff. A total of 5 patients required emergent surgery and 4 patients required tourniquets. All patients that were presented to the hospitals survived.Conclusion: MCEs are going to continue, and healthcare systems should have protocols in place. Residents are a valuable resource to hospital systems that provide trauma services. Creation of a protocol with the assistance of EMS will allow first responders to utilize resources available. We recommend testing of this protocol, as an MCE in your area may not be a matter of if, but when.

Trauma-Specific Performance Improvement Activities for Emergency Medical Services Providers: A Statewide Perspective.

INTRODUCTION: Trauma-specific performance improvement (PI) activities are highly variable among Emergency Medical Services (EMS) providers. This study assesses the perception of the trauma PI activities of EMS providers in the state of Ohio and identifies potential barriers to conducting a successful program. METHODS: An institutional review board-approved, voluntary, and anonymous Qualtrics survey was disseminated to all EMS agencies registered under the Ohio Department of Public Safety throughout the 88 counties of Ohio. It included questions regarding what agencies considered trauma-specific PI activities, how frequently they completed those activities, and barriers related to conducting such PI activities. There were both open-ended and closed-ended questions in the survey, along with a follow-up interview. The data were descriptively and thematically analyzed. RESULTS: From the recorded responses (341), most the respondents (98.5%) either agreed or strongly agreed that trauma-specific PI activities improve performance of EMS providers, while only 63.8% (218) of the agencies performed them. Some activities considered as trauma PI and conducted at least once a month included (1) record keeping (74.6%), (2) confirmation on the use of correct triage protocols (66.9%), (3) measuring response time on trauma calls (60.0%), (4) PI reviews of trauma cases (56.9%), and (5) obtaining feedback from the receiving facility and or authorizing physicians (48.5%). Primary barriers to performing trauma PI activities included a lack of interest and financial resources, followed by system-level reasons such as unavailability of training centers and a lack of regional/state support. Thematic analysis of the data suggested that improved communication and awareness of trauma PI, sharing statewide data on trauma PI, better synchronization among EMS agencies and trauma centers, and enhanced EMS funding could potentially improve trauma-specific PI programs at the EMS level. CONCLUSIONS: Our results showed variability in the perception, execution, and availability of trauma-specific PI activities among EMS agencies in the state. Common barriers could potentially be mitigated by collaboration between agencies, trauma centers, and state-led initiatives. With the increased frequency of mass shootings and other large-scale trauma disasters, it is imperative from a state and regional level to address these inconsistencies and further elucidate effective measures of trauma PI for the EMS community.

Complications Following Splenic Embolization for Trauma: Have Things Changed Over Time?

INTRODUCTION: Splenic artery embolization (SAE) is a routinely used adjunct in the nonoperative management (NOM) of blunt splenic injury (BSI). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the rate and type of adverse events that occur in patients undergoing SAE and to compare this with the previous data. METHODS: Patients who had SAE for BSI between 2011 and 2018 were identified. Splenic abscess, splenic infarction, and contrast-induced renal insufficiency were considered major complications. Coil migration, fever, and pleural effusions were regarded minor complications. The results were compared with data from a prior study examining similar indices at the same trauma center between 2000 and 2010. RESULTS: There were 716 patients admitted with BSI. SAE was performed in 74 (13.3%) of the 557 (78%) NOM patients. The overall complication rate was 33.8%. Major complications occurred in 11 patients (14.9%) and minor in 13 patients (18.9%). There was no association between complications and coil location by logistic regression. CONCLUSIONS: SAE continues to be a useful adjunct in the NOM of BSI though complications continue to occur. Fewer minor complications were noted in the period studied compared to past similar studies.

Unmasking bias and perception of lead surgeons in the operating room: A simulation based study.

BACKGROUND: Perception of a surgeon based on physical attributes in the operating room (OR) environment has not been assessed, which was our primary goal. METHODS: A common OR scenario was simulated using 8 different actors as a lead surgeon with combinations of age (<40 vs. >55), race (white vs. black), and gender (male vs. female). One video scenario with a survey was electronically distributed to surgeons, residents, and OR nurses/staff. The overall rating, assessment, and perception of the lead surgeon were assessed. RESULTS: Of 974 respondents, 64.5% were females. There were significant differences in the rating and assessment based upon surgeon's age (p = .01) favoring older surgeons. There were significant differences in the assessments of surgeons by the study group (p = .03). The positive assessments as well as perceptions trended highest towards male, older, and white surgeons, especially in the stressful situation. CONCLUSION: While perception of gender bias may be widespread, age and race biases may also play a role in the OR. Inter-professional education training for OR teams could be developed to help alleviate such biases.

Clerkship Experiences During Medical School: Influence on Specialty Decision.

OBJECTIVE: Clinical rotations during medical school are the time when most students select their specialty. Limited or lack of exposure could deter students from certain sub-specialties, and thus, insight into the selection process is essential. This study assesses the role of limited clinical rotations and perception of students on specialty selection. METHODS: All graduating medical students were surveyed at our US-based institution for 2 years. The survey included both open- and close-ended questions related to influence of clerkship experience and other factors on specialty choice and suggestions for improvement. The data were analyzed descriptively and thematically. RESULTS: Majority of students (87%) had minimal exposure to their chosen residency specialty prior to the third-year clerkships. Role of a clerkship experience in selecting a specialty was significant for 70% students, especially interaction with attendings (92%) and residents (86.3%). The most influential reasons for specialty choice to change were clerkship experience (41%) and mentors (21%). Approximately 34% students chose a specialty that was not a part of third-year core clerkships, and the most significant factors influencing their choice were shadowing experience (21%) and lifestyle (18%). Further, thematic analysis suggested that earlier and more clinical exposure to various specialties and formal mentoring could make specialty selection process easier. CONCLUSIONS: Along with specialty content, the relationship of learners and teachers in the clinical setting plays a significant role in selecting and/or rejecting certain specialty by medical students. The study provides broader baseline data for medical schools and educators in preparation of curriculum and future physician workforce composition.

Why Interested Surgeons Are Not Choosing Rural Surgery: What Can We Do Now?

BACKGROUND: There is a growing deficit of rural surgeons, and preparation to meet this need is inadequate. More research into stratifying factors that specifically influence choice in rural versus urban practice is needed. METHODS: An institutional review board-approved survey related to factors influencing rural practice selection and increasing rural recruitment was distributed through the American College of Surgeons. The results were analyzed descriptively and thematically. RESULTS: Of 416 respondents (74% male), 287 (69%) had previous rural experience. Of those, 71 (25%) did not choose rural practice; lack of professional or hospital support (30%) and lifestyle (26%) were the primary reasons. A broad scope of practice was most important among surgeons (52%), who chose rural practice without any previous rural experience. Over 60% of urban practitioners agreed that improved lifestyle and financial advantages would attract them to rural practice. The thematic analysis suggested institutional support, affiliation with academic institutions, and less focus on subspecialty fellowship could help increase the number of rural surgeons. CONCLUSIONS: Many factors influence surgeons' decisions on practice location. Providing appropriate hospital support in rural areas and promoting specific aspects of rural practice, including broad scope of practice to those in training could help grow interest in rural surgery. Strong collaboration with academic institutions for teaching, learning, and mentoring opportunities for rural surgeons could also lead to higher satisfaction, security, and potentially higher retention rate. These results provide a foundation to help focus specific efforts and resources in the recruitment and retention of rural surgeons.

Predicting Discharge Disposition in Trauma Patients: Development, Validation, and Generalization of a Model Using the National Trauma Data Bank.

BACKGROUND: Limited work has been done in predicting discharge disposition in trauma patients; most studies use single institutional data and have limited generalizability. This study develops and validates a model to predict, at admission, trauma patients' discharge disposition using NTDB, transforms the model into an easy-to-use score, and subsequently evaluates its generalizability on institutional data. METHODS: NTDB data were used to build and validate a binary logistic regression model using derivation-validation (ie, train-test) approach to predict patient disposition location (home vs non-home) upon admission. The model was then converted into a trauma disposition score (TDS) using an optimization-based approach. The generalizability of TDS was evaluated on institutional data from a single Level I trauma center in the U.S. RESULTS: A total of 614 625 patients in the NTDB were included in the study; 212 684 (34.6%) went to a non-home location. Patients with a non-home disposition compared to home had significantly higher age (69 ± 19.7 vs 48.3 ± 20.3) and ISS (11.2 ± 8.2 vs 8.2 ± 6.3); P < .001. Older age, female sex, higher ISS, comorbidities (cancer, cardiovascular, coagulopathy, diabetes, hepatic, neurological, psychiatric, renal, substance abuse), and Medicare insurance were independent predictors of non-home discharge. The logistic regression model's AUC was 0.8; TDS achieved a correlation of 0.99 and performed similarly well on institutional data (n = 3161); AUC = 0.8. CONCLUSION: We developed a score based on a large national trauma database that has acceptable performance on local institutions to predict patient discharge disposition at the time of admission. TDS can aid in early discharge preparation for likely-to-be non-home patients and may improve hospital efficiency.

Development and implementation of a sustainable research curriculum for general surgery residents: A foundation for developing a research culture.

BACKGROUND: Different methods to incorporate research training during residency are suggested, however, long-term impact is not studied well. This study reports development of a research curriculum with milestones, a long-term outcome and sustainability, and its impact on the overall departmental research culture. METHODS: The research curriculum that included a research seminar for resident preparation, annual milestones, and structured research mentoring was implemented in our hybrid program in 2012. The research output for five-year period before and after the implementation was evaluated as peer-reviewed publications, presentations, and grant submissions. Further, secondary effects on faculty and medical student research was evaluated. RESULTS: Following implementation, we observed a significant increase in the number of resident presentations (p < 0.05) and higher trends for publications and grant submissions. Medical student research increased significantly in terms of both presentations and publications (p < 0.05). Consequently, we observed a significant improvement in the overall department research productivity. CONCLUSIONS: Our resident research curriculum was associated with improved long-term research productivity. It allowed residents to work closely with faculty and medical students leading to more collaboration resulting in an enhanced scholarly environment.

The Affordable Care Act: Long-Term Financial Impact on a Level I Trauma Center.

BACKGROUND: Prior studies of the impact of the Affordable Care Act on reimbursement for inpatient trauma care do not include disproportionate share hospital (DSH) funding. Because trauma centers and other safety-net hospitals are sensitive to any changes in financial support, it is essential to include DSH funding in evaluating overall reimbursement. This study analyzes the long-term financial trends, including DSH, of a level I trauma center in Ohio, a state that expanded Medicaid. METHODS: Charges, reimbursement, sources of insurance coverage, Injury Severity Scores, and DSH funding for the trauma patient population of an Ohio American College of Surgeons level 1 trauma center were studied from 2012 to 2017. Data were collected from Transition Systems, Inc. RESULTS: During 2012-2017, self-pay patient cases decreased from 15.0% to 4.1% and commercial insurance patients decreased from 34.2% to 27.6%. The percentage of Medicaid patients increased from 15.5% to 27.1%; however, Medicaid reimbursement average per case declined from $17,779 in 2012 to $10,115 in 2017 (a decline of 43.1%). Self-pay charges decreased from $22.0 million to $6.7 million. Total DSH funding, compensation given to hospitals that disproportionately treat underserved populations, decreased 17.4%. CONCLUSIONS: Self-pay charges and self-pay patients decreased dramatically; Medicaid patients and charges increased substantially in the years after the implementation of the Affordable Care Act at our trauma center. However, there was a decrease in commercial insurance, which had the highest reimbursement for our hospital, and a significant decline in DSH, a critical supplemental source of funding for safety-net hospitals.

Team-Based Learning in the Surgery Clerkship: Impact on Student Examination Scores, Evaluations, and Perceptions.

OBJECTIVE: There is little evidence for effectiveness of team-based learning (TBL) in specialties such as Surgery. We developed and instituted TBLs in surgery clerkship and compared National Board of Medical Examiners (NBME) Surgery Subject Exam scores before and after implementation. We also analyzed students' feedback for their perception of TBLs. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPATNTS: The TBLs were transitioned into the curriculum during the 2013-2014 academic year. The "before" and "after" implementation periods were 2011-2013 and 2014-2016, respectively. NBME Surgery Subject Examination scores at our institution and nationally were compared using the independent samples t test. Satisfaction with the clerkship was assessed with Association of American Medical Colleges Graduate Questionnaire data. Student feedback regarding TBL was gathered at the end of each surgery rotation and were analyzed for themes, both positive and negative. RESULTS: Mean NBME score was higher at our institution than nationally, both before (77.10 ± 8.75 vs. 75.20 ± 8.95, p = 0.032) and after (74.65 ± 8.0 vs. 73.10 ± 8.55, p = 0.071) TBL implementation. The mean score decreased following TBL implementation at our medical school (77.10 ± 8.75 vs. 74.65 ± 8.00, p = 0.039), but it was also lower nationally (75.20 ± 8.95 vs. 73.10 ± 8.55, p < 0.001). Further, students were more likely to rate the surgery clerkship as "good and/or excellent" on the Association of American Medical Colleges Graduate Questionnaire after TBL implementation (84.6% vs. 73.7%). In qualitative assessment, learners stated that TBLs were informative, helpful in studying for the shelf exam, and viewed them as an opportunity for interactive learning, and thus requested more TBLs. Areas for improvement included reading materials, directions, and organization of sessions. CONCLUSIONS: Student perception of TBL into our surgery clerkship has been both positive and provided feedback for improvement. In addition, our medical school graduates have continued to assess their surgery experience as "good" or "excellent" by a large majority. Concurrently, our NBME scores remain above the national mean. We believe our medical students benefit from a well-organized TBL and its active approach to learning during the surgery clerkship with no loss of fundamental surgery knowledge.

Association of System-Level Factors With Secondary Overtriage in Trauma Patients.

Importance: Studies show that secondary overtriage (SO) contributes significantly to the economic burden of injured patients; thus, the association of SO with use of the trauma system has been examined. However, the association of the underlying trauma system design with such overtriage has yet to be evaluated. Objectives: To evaluate whether the distribution of trauma centers in a statewide trauma system is associated with SO and to identify clinical and demographic factors that may lead to SO. Design, Setting, and Participants: A retrospective cohort study was performed using 2008-2012 data from the Ohio Trauma and Emergency Medical Services registries. All patients taken to level III or nontrauma centers from the scene of the injury with an Injury Severity Score less than 15 and discharged alive were included. Among these patients, those with SO were identified as those who were subsequently transferred to a level I or II trauma center, had no surgical intervention, and were discharged alive within 48 hours of admission. The SO group was analyzed descriptively. Multiple logistic regression was used to identify system-level factors associated with SO. Statistical analysis was performed from August 1, 2017, to January 31, 2018. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the occurrence of SO. Results: Of 34 494 trauma patients able to be matched in the 2 registries, 7881 (22.9%) met the inclusion criteria, of whom 965 (12.2%) had SO. The median age in the SO group was 40 years (interquartile range, 26-55 years), with 299 women and 666 men. After adjusting for age, sex, comorbidities, injury type, and insurance status, the study found that system-level factors (number of level I or II trauma centers in the region [>1]) were significantly associated with SO (adjusted odds ratio, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.64-2.38; P < .001; area under the curve, 0.89). The reasons for choice of destination by emergency medical services (specifically, choosing the closest facility: adjusted odds ratio, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.37-1.98; P < .001) and use of a field trauma triage protocol (adjusted odds ratio, 2.21; 95% CI, 1.70-2.87; P < .001), significantly increased the likelihood of SO. Conclusions and Relevance: This study's findings suggest that the distribution of major trauma centers in the region is significantly associated with SO. Subsequent investigation to identify the optimal number and distribution of trauma centers may therefore be critical. Specific outreach and collaboration of level III trauma centers and nontrauma centers with level I and II trauma centers, along with the use of telemedicine, may provide further guidance to level III trauma centers and nontrauma centers on when to transfer injured patients.