Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
Cell Tissue Bank ; 19(1): 1-8, 2018 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29071453

ABSTRACT

Surgical use of donor corneal tissue from victims of water submersion (drowning or submersion secondary to death) remains controversial due to limited evidence about the quality of these tissues. To assess the safety of donor corneal tissue from victims of water submersion, an investigation of eye banks' practice patterns and tissue outcomes was conducted. All 79 Eye Bank Association of America accredited eye banks were contacted for a phone interview of practices regarding tissue from victims of water submersion. A retrospective review of corneal tissues from 2014 to 2016 from a large eye bank network was performed to identify all donors submerged in water. Corneal epithelial integrity, endothelial cell density (ECD), rim cultures, and adverse events were analyzed for associations with water submersion characteristics. 49 eye banks (62% response) participated in the survey. 55% of these eye banks had specific, written protocol for tissue eligibility from donors submerged in water. With or without specific protocol, eye banks reported considering water type (84%) and length of time submerged (92%) to determine eligibility. 22% of eye banks reported medical director involvement when eligibility determination was unclear. 79 tissues from 40 donors who were submerged were identified in 2014-2016 eye bank data. No donor tissues had pre-processing corneal infiltrates, positive rim cultures, or adverse events post-keratoplasty. Corneal epithelial integrity and ECD were not associated with water type or length of time submerged. In conclusion, data from a large eye bank network showed no adverse events or outcomes, indicating these tissues may be safe.


Subject(s)
Cornea/cytology , Eye Banks , Tissue Donors , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cause of Death , Child , Corneal Transplantation/adverse effects , Corneal Transplantation/methods , Corneal Transplantation/statistics & numerical data , Drowning , Eye Banks/methods , Eye Banks/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Tissue Donors/statistics & numerical data , Young Adult
2.
Cornea ; 36(4): 419-424, 2017 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28129296

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To ensure optimal care of patients, cornea specialists measure corneal features, including epithelial defects (ED), with slit-lamp calipers. However, caliper measurements are subject to interphysician variability. We examined the extent of variability in ED measurements between cornea specialists and discuss the potential clinical impact. METHODS: A total of 48 variably sized EDs were created in pig eyes. Three cornea specialists measured the maximum vertical and horizontal ED lengths to the nearest 10th of a millimeter using slit-lamp microscopy. An absolute difference in ED measurement between cornea specialists of 0.5 mm was chosen to be the a priori threshold for clinical significance and was evaluated by the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Interrater reliability was assessed by intraclass correlation coefficients. RESULTS: The average absolute difference in the vertical ED length between pairs of examiners ranged from 0.54 to 0.63 mm, and that of the horizontal ED length ranged from 0.44 to 0.46 mm. These differences in ED measurement were not significantly different from 0.5 mm (all P > 0.06). However, pairs of examiners differed in vertical ED length measurements by >0.5 mm in 44% to 52% of EDs and by >1.0 mm in 13% to 17% of EDs. Pairs of examiners differed in horizontal ED length measurements by >0.5 mm in 31% to 40% of EDs and by >1.0 mm in 10% to 15% of EDs. The intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.85 (95% confidence interval, 0.77-0.91) for vertical and 0.84 (95% confidence interval, 0.74-0.90) for horizontal ED measurements. CONCLUSIONS: Cornea specialists showed good reliability in the measured EDs; however, depending on the threshold for clinical significance, a nontrivial percentage of cases have high interexaminer clinical variability.


Subject(s)
Corneal Diseases/diagnosis , Diagnostic Techniques, Ophthalmological/standards , Epithelium, Corneal/pathology , Animals , Disease Models, Animal , Observer Variation , Ophthalmologists/standards , Reproducibility of Results , Swine
3.
PLoS One ; 11(2): e0149450, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26909797

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To evaluate how the monitoring and treatment for diabetic macular edema (DME) has changed in a national sample. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Administrative medical claims data from a large, national U.S. insurer. STUDY POPULATION: Beneficiaries of a U.S. insurance company. OBSERVATION PROCEDURES: All incident cases of DME were found. Those in years 2002/3, 2006 and 2010 were followed for a 2-year observation period and those from 2009, 2010 and 2011 for a 1-year observation period. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Types and frequencies of treatment were tallied and compared over each of the cohorts. RESULTS: Two-year cohorts had 233, 251 and 756 patients in 2002/3, 2006 and 2010 respectively. One-year cohorts had 1002, 1119 and 1382 patients in 2009, 2010 and 2011, respectively. Both percentage of patients receiving therapy and number of treatments given increased across the 2-year cohorts for both focal laser and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) (p<0.001). The highest use of anti-VEGF agents in any of the cohorts was in the 2011 1-year group that only averaged 3.78 injections. Focal laser was used 2.5x as frequently as anti-VEGF injections in the most recent cohorts with only a high of 14.0% of DME patients receiving anti-VEGF therapy in any of the cohorts. CONCLUSION: Regardless of treatment modality (laser or injection) DME patients received vastly fewer treatments than patients in randomized control trials. Despite the proven superior visual outcomes of anti-VEGF agents over focal laser in DME, focal laser was still used more frequently.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Complications/therapy , Macular Edema/therapy , Bevacizumab/therapeutic use , Cohort Studies , Diabetes Complications/epidemiology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Laser Therapy , Macular Edema/epidemiology , Macular Edema/etiology , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , United States , Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A/antagonists & inhibitors , Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A/immunology
5.
BMJ Support Palliat Care ; 2(1): 17-23, 2012 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24653494

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To describe the experience of dying in a US tertiary academic medical centre and to compare this experience with a historical decedent sample. DESIGN: A retrospective, observational, chart audit study of adults (N=159) who died in hospital. SETTING: Component hospitals of the Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center: Mary Hitchcock Memorial Hospital (MHMH), Lebanon, New Hampshire, and the affiliated Veteran's Affairs Medical Center (VAMC), White River Junction, Vermont. PARTICIPANTS: 159 hospitalised adult decedents comprising a random sample of 100 MHMH decedents and a total sample of 59 VAMC decedents. METHODS: The authors compared end-of-life (EOL) care in decedents who had a palliative care consultation (PCC) with those who did not. An exploratory analysis compared the EOL care between the 2008 decedent sample and an historical decedent sample (N=104). RESULTS: 63 of 159 inpatients received a PCC. Decedents receiving a PCC were less likely to die in an intensive care unit, had fewer invasive interventions (eg, intubation, assisted ventilation, dialysis, chemotherapy) and were more likely to have advance directives, do-not-resuscitate orders and comfort measures orders than those who did not receive a PCC. Higher rates of emotional and pastoral care were also noted. Compared with the historical sample, 2008 decedents had a higher rate of invasive interventions, but fewer invasive interventions were noted in the 2008 PCC subsample. CONCLUSIONS: Less invasive EOL care was observed in decedents who received a PCC. Ongoing monitoring of EOL care is critically important for hospital quality improvement programmes.


Subject(s)
Hospitalization , Medical Audit , Quality Improvement , Terminal Care , Academic Medical Centers , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Guideline Adherence , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Referral and Consultation , Retrospective Studies , Tertiary Care Centers , United States
6.
Proc Biol Sci ; 274(1619): 1751-6, 2007 Jul 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17490943

ABSTRACT

We know little about the processes by which we evaluate the opportunity to look at another person. We propose that behavioural economics provides a powerful approach to understanding this basic aspect of social attention. We hypothesized that the decision process culminating in attention to another person follows the same economic principles that govern choices about rewards such as food, drinks and money. Specifically, such rewards are discounted as a function of time, are tradable for other rewards, and reinforce work. Behavioural and neurobiological evidence suggests that looking at other people can also be described as rewarding, but to what extent these economic principles apply to social orienting remains unknown. Here, we show that the opportunity to view pictures of the opposite sex is discounted by delay to viewing, substitutes for money and reinforces work. The reward value of photos of the opposite sex varied with physical attractiveness and was greater in men, suggesting differential utility of acquiring visual information about the opposite sex in men and women. Together, these results demonstrate that choosing whom to look at follows a general set of economic principles, implicating shared neural mechanisms in both social and non-social decision making.


Subject(s)
Attention , Choice Behavior , Decision Making , Models, Economic , Social Desirability , Discrimination, Psychological , Female , Games, Experimental , Humans , Male , Sex Factors , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...