Internal carotid artery dissection and pseudoaneurysm formation with resultant ipsilateral hypoglossal nerve palsy.

Craniocervical artery dissection is a potentially disabling condition caused by an intimal tear allowing blood to enter and dissect the media in the cranial direction which can occur spontaneously or as a result of trauma. When the dissection extends toward the adventitia, it can form a protrusion from the weakened vessel wall called a pseudoaneurysm, which may become a nidus for distal thromboembolism or cause mass effect on adjacent structures. Accurate and prompt diagnosis is critical as timely treatment can significantly reduce the risk of complications such as stroke. Here, we present a case of cervical ICA dissection and pseudoaneurysm formation causing mass effect with resultant compressive ipsilateral hypoglossal nerve palsy.

Is Office-Based Surgery Safe? Comparing Outcomes of 183,914 Aesthetic Surgical Procedures Across Different Types of Accredited Facilities.

BACKGROUND: There has been a dramatic rise in office-based surgery. However, due to wide variations in regulatory standards, the safety of office-based aesthetic surgery has been questioned. OBJECTIVES: This study compares complication rates of cosmetic surgery performed at office-based surgical suites (OBSS) to ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs) and hospitals. METHODS: A prospective cohort of patients undergoing cosmetic surgery between 2008 and 2013 were identified from the CosmetAssure database (Birmingham, AL). Patients were grouped by type of accredited facility where the surgery was performed: OBSS, ASC, or hospital. The primary outcome was the incidence of major complication(s) requiring emergency room visit, hospital admission, or reoperation within 30 days postoperatively. Potential risk factors including age, gender, body mass index (BMI), smoking, diabetes, type of procedure, and combined procedures were reviewed. RESULTS: Of the 129,007 patients (183,914 procedures) in the dataset, the majority underwent the procedure at ASCs (57.4%), followed by hospitals (26.7%) and OBSS (15.9%). Patients operated in OBSS were less likely to undergo combined procedures (30.3%) compared to ASCs (31.8%) and hospitals (35.3%, P < .01). Complication rates in OBSS, ASCs, and hospitals were 1.3%, 1.9%, and 2.4%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, there was a lower risk of developing a complication in an OBSS compared to an ASC (RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.59-0.77, P < .01) or a hospital (RR 0.59, 95% CI 0.52-0.68, P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: Accredited OBSS appear to be a safe alternative to ASCs and hospitals for cosmetic procedures. Plastic surgeons should continue to triage their patients carefully based on other significant comorbidities that were not measured in this present study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 3.

Parathyroid nuclear scan. A focused review on the technical and biological factors affecting its outcome.

OBJECTIVE: Technetium Parathyroid Scintigraphy (TS) is the most popular noninvasive localization procedure in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT). Awareness of various factors involved in technetium uptake helps understand the outcome of TS. METHODS: We utilize a case of changing TS scans in a patient to review the literature on the various biological and technical factors involved in technetium uptake by the abnormal parathyroid tissue. A 56 year female was diagnosed with PHPT and osteopenia. An initial scan using (99m)Tc-Tetrofosmin showed no definite areas of abnormal parathyroid tissue. Patient refused surgical exploration, was started on Bisphosponates and subsequently monitored. Five years later she suffered fracture of her right wrist. A repeat TS using (99m)Tc-Sestamibi revealed hypervascular parathyroid lesion in the right lower neck. She underwent successful removal of a right lower parathyroid adenoma. RESULTS: Technical factors like the type of Tc isotope used, imaging techniques and biological factors like biochemical parameters (calcium, vitamin D levels), adenoma size, content of oxyphilic cells, vascularity can affect the outcome of the scan. CONCLUSION: Clinicians should be aware of technical and biological factors that could result in negative scan in parathyroid nuclear scintigraphy.

The phenotype of primary hyperparathyroidism with normal parathyroid hormone levels: how low can parathyroid hormone go?

BACKGROUND: While normocalcemic hyperparathyroidism is well recognized in primary hyperparathyroidism (PHP), less is known about patients with high calcium but normal intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH). We aimed to describe this entity and designated it normohormonal primary hyperparathyroidism (NHPHP). METHODS: From a prospectively maintained database of patients undergoing bilateral parathyroid exploration for PHP, we identified and compared those with preoperative iPTH levels below (NHPHP) and above (typical PHP) normal reference peak (60 pg/mL). RESULTS: NHPHP occurred in 46 of 843 patients (5.5%) undergoing initial parathyroidectomy for PHP. All had hypercalcemia (11.1 mg/dL). Regarding preoperative iPTH, 7 patients (15%) had values <40 pg/mL, 19 (41%) had values <60 pg/mL; and 20 (44%) had intermittent values >60 pg/mL. Unlike patients with elevated iPTH, nearly all NHPHP patients had additional testing delaying the operation. Imaging correctly localized NHPHP parathyroid disease in 80%. At the time of operation, 74% of NHPHP patients had single adenomas. Intraoperatively postmobilization, using the same assay that was used preoperatively, 82% had PTH levels >60 pg/mL (mean, 279 pg/mL). During the follow-up period, iPTH levels remained lower among NHPHP patients (21 pg/mL) compared to 41 pg/mL for patients with preoperative iPTH 60 to 100 pg/mL and 56 pg/mL for patients with preoperative iPTH 100 to 200 pg/mL (P < .0001). CONCLUSION: Lower PTH set points may exist in some patients with otherwise typical PHP features. Although high normal iPTH is inappropriate for hypercalcemia and should suggest PHP, this disorder may occur with iPTH levels as low as 5 pg/mL. Awareness of the unusual phenotype of NHPHP may facilitate earlier diagnosis and surgery.

Appreciation of osteoporosis among men with hyperparathyroidism.

OBJECTIVE: To define the scope of bone disease among men referred for parathyroidectomy and to document bone density screening trends in this high-risk population. METHODS: Clinical data were analyzed from a prospectively maintained database of 1000 patients undergoing parathyroidectomy for sporadic primary hyperparathyroidism at the Cleveland Clinic between 2000 and 2006. Information collected included demographics, reason for referral, body mass index, intraoperative findings, preoperative and postoperative laboratory values (serum calcium, phosphorus, parathyroid hormone, 25-hydroxyvitamin D, and 24-hour urinary calcium excretion), and preoperative and postoperative dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) findings. RESULTS: Of the 1000 patients, 243 (24%) were men. As with women, bone health-related issues were the most common reason for referral (32%). In 2000, only 12% of men had preoperative DXA scans; this rose to 42% by 2005. The frequency of prereferral DXA screening increased throughout the study, but even by 2006, referring physicians did not screen most of their male patients. In 2000, the prevalence of bone disease (osteoporosis or osteopenia) in men was 8%, but with improved screening, this increased to 26%, approaching the 34% rate in women. Preoperative and postoperative levels of calcium, parathyroid hormone, phosphorus, 24-hour urinary calcium, and 25-hydroxyvitamin D were the same among men with and without bone disease. Analysis of postoperative DXA scans revealed that gains in postparathyroidectomy bone density were significantly greater in men than in women at all anatomic testing sites. In men, lowest T scores improved by a mean +/- SEM of +0.35 +/- 0.09 compared with +0.098 +/- 0.035 in women (P = .009). Men were 4 times less likely than women to have continued bone loss after parathyroidectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical and laboratory parameters cannot identify men with hyperparathyroidism who have bone loss, illustrating the need for routine DXA screening. Despite this, DXA remains underused. Improved screening practices will favorably effect men's health.

Laparoscopic versus open ventral hernia repairs: 5 year recurrence rates.

BACKGROUND: Current studies with 2-3 year follow-up favor laparoscopic ventral hernia repair due to lower recurrence rates, fewer wound infections, and shorter hospital stays. There is scant data in the literature for this group of patients regarding longer follow-up. This study compares the actual 5 year recurrence rates of laparoscopic versus open techniques and determines factors that may affect recurrence. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of ventral hernia repairs at a tertiary center between January 1996 and December 2001 was performed. In this era, the method of repair often depended on which surgeon evaluated the patient. All patients were followed for a minimum of 5 years (median 7.5 years). Demographic and clinical parameters were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier analyses and the multivariate Cox proportional hazard model. RESULTS: Of 331 patients, 119 underwent laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (LAP), 106 open hernia repair with mesh (O-M), 86 open suture repair (O-S), and 20 laparoscopic converted to open (LCO). Statistical analyses showed equal parameters among groups except defect sizes (mean +/- standard error on the mean [SEM]): LAP (9.8 +/- 1.2 cm), O-M (11.2 +/- 3.3 cm), LCO (16.6 +/- 5.4 cm) versus O-S (4.6 +/- 1.6 cm) (p < 0.02). Actual recurrence rates at 1 and 5 years were LAP (15% and 29%), O-M (11% and 28%), O-S (10% and 19%), and LCO (35% and 60%). Multivariate analysis identified larger defects to have higher recurrence rates, particularly in the O-S group (p < 0.02). With the exception of the LCO group, surgical technique did not predict recurrence, nor did body mass index, diabetes, smoking, or use of tacks versus sutures. CONCLUSION: This is the first study to compare 5 year actual recurrence rates between laparoscopic and open ventral hernia repairs. Contrary to prior reports, our longer-term data indicates similar recurrence rates, except for higher rates in the laparoscopic converted to open group. Due to the continued recurrences over the period studied, longer-term follow-up is necessary to appreciate the true rate of hernia recurrence.

Factors contributing to negative parathyroid localization: an analysis of 1000 patients.

BACKGROUND: Localizing studies are the key for determining the optimal surgical strategy in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism (HP). Most of the data in the literature are retrospective in nature and from analysis on a per patient basis. This is a prospective study looking at the characteristics of the patient and the gland that determine the likelihood of an abnormal parathyroid to be detected by ultrasonography (US) and sestamibi scan (MIBI). METHODS: This is a prospective analysis of 1000 consecutive patients with HP who underwent parathyroidectomy at a tertiary care center. The study group included HP with single gland disease (63%), double adenoma (15%), as well as hyperplasia (15%), familial HP (2%), and secondary/tertiary HP (6%). All patients underwent surgeon-performed neck US followed by MIBI scan. Univariate logistic regression and multivariate analyses were performed on pre- and intraoperative variables. RESULTS: A total of 1845 abnormal glands were analyzed. Overall, US was superior to MIBI for the detection of abnormal glands in all subgroups. On multivariate analysis, body mass index (BMI), gland size, and gland volume were the statistically significant independent factors predicting detection by both US and MIBI in primary HP. The sensitivity of US was better for single gland disease than for multigland disease in primary HP, but the sensitivity of MIBI was similar in both groups. For a given size, hyperplastic glands in primary HP imaged less well with US and MIBI than in familial or secondary/tertiary HP. CONCLUSION: This prospective study demonstrates that BMI and gland size independently predict accurate detection of abnormal parathyroid glands by US and MIBI in sporadic primary HP. Understanding the factors that affect the accuracy of parathyroid localization tests will allow the surgeon to develop a successful surgical strategy in a given patient.

Survival after radiofrequency ablation of colorectal liver metastases: 10-year experience.

OBJECTIVE: To assess factors affecting long-term survival of patients undergoing radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of colorectal hepatic metastases, with attention to evolving chemotherapy regimens. METHODS: Prospective evaluation of 235 patients with colorectal metastases who were not candidates for resection and/or failed chemotherapy underwent laparoscopic RFA. Preoperative risk factors for survival and pre- and postoperative chemotherapy exposure were analyzed. RESULTS: Two hundred and thirty-four patients underwent 292 RFA sessions from 1997 to 2006, an average of 8 months after initiation of chemotherapy. Twenty-three percent had extrahepatic disease preoperatively. Patients averaged 2.8 lesions, with a dominant diameter of 3.9 cm. Kaplan-Meier actuarial survival was 24 months, with actual 3 and 5 years survival of 20.2% and 18.4%, respectively. Median survival was improved for patients with 3 lesions (27 vs. 17 months, P=0.0018); dominant size<3 versus >3 cm (28 vs. 20 months, P=0.07); chorioembryonic antigen<200 versus >200 ng/mL (26 vs. 16 months, P=0.003). Presence of extrahepatic disease (P=0.34) or type of pre/postoperative chemotherapy (5-FU-leucovorin vs. FOLFOX/FOLFIRI vs. bevacizumab) (P=0.11) did not alter median survival. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is both the largest and longest follow-up of RFA for colorectal metastases. The number and dominant size of metastases, and preoperative chorioembryonic antigen value are strong predictors of survival. Despite classic teaching, extrahepatic disease did not adversely affect survival. In this group of patients who failed chemotherapy, newer treatment regimens (pre- or postoperatively) had no survival benefit. The actual 5-year survival of 18.4% in these patients versus near zero survival for chemotherapy alone argues for a survival benefit of RFA.