Optimal use of intravenous landiolol in acute cardiac care.

INTRODUCTION: B-blockers are regarded as beneficial pharmacologic agents in cardiac care, but their role in the acute setting remains ambiguous. Increasing evidence supports the important role of landiolol in critical care, a highly cardioselective intravenous b-blocker with rapid onset of action and short elimination time. Among its most valuable properties, which may aid to overcome special reservations related to b-blocker therapy in the acute setting, landiolol has a potent negative chronotropic effect while at the same time it exhibits a mild negative inotropic effect. AREAS COVERED: This expert opinion review aims to present basic pharmacologic aspects of landiolol and provide current clinical research focused on its efficacy and safety. EXPERT OPINION: Landiolol is a valuable and safe pharmacologic agent in acute cardiac care. Japanese and European guidelines have incorporated its use for the management of atrial tachyarrhythmia in patients with cardiac dysfunction. Although emerging clinical trials have experimented its use in patients with sustained ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation, acute myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous intervention and in patients with septic cardiomyopathy, more studies are needed in order to establish its value in such cardiac conditions.

HEllenic Registry on Myocarditis SyndromES on behalf of Hellenic Heart Failure Association: The HERMES-HF Registry.

AIMS: Despite the existence of many studies, there are still limited data about the characteristics of myocarditis in Greece. This led to the creation of the Greek Myocarditis Registry aiming to document the different symptoms and treatment of myocarditis, assess possible prognostic factors, and find similarities and differences to what is already published in literature. This paper is a preliminary descriptive analysis of this Registry. METHODS AND RESULTS: We analysed data for the hospitalization period of all patients included in the Registry from December 2015 until November 2017. Statistics are reported as frequency (%) or median and inter-quartile range (IQR) as appropriate. In total, 146 patients were included; 83.3% of the patients reported an infection during the last 3 months. The most common symptom, regardless of the underlying infection, was chest pain (82.2%) followed by dyspnoea (18.5%), while the most common finding in clinical examination was tachycardia (26.7%). Presentation was more frequent in the winter months. ECG findings were not specific, with the repolarization abnormalities being the most frequent (60.3%). Atrial fibrillation was observed in two patients, both of whom presented with a reduced ventricular systolic function. Left ventricular ejection fraction changed significantly during the hospitalization [55% (IQR: 50-60%) on admission vs. 60% (IQR: 55-60%) on discharge, P = 0.0026]. Cardiac magnetic resonance was performed in 88 patients (61%), revealing mainly subepicardial and midcardial involvement of the lateral wall. Late gadolinium enhancement was present in all patients, while oedema was found in 39 of them. Only 11 patients underwent endomyocardial biopsy. Discharge medication consisted mainly of beta-blockers (71.9%) and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (41.8%), while 39.7% of the patients were prescribed both. CONCLUSIONS: This preliminary analysis describes the typical presentation of myocarditis patients in Greece. It is a first step in developing a better prognostic model for the course of the disease, which will be completed after the incorporation of the patients' follow-up data.

Differential effects of inotropes and inodilators on renal function in acute cardiac care.

Pathological interplay between the heart and kidneys is widely encountered in heart failure (HF) and is linked to worse prognosis and quality of life. Inotropes, along with diuretics and vasodilators, are a core medical response to HF but decompensated patients who need inotropic support often present with an acute worsening of renal function. The impact of inotropes on renal function is thus potentially an important influence on the choice of therapy. There is currently relatively little objective data available to guide the selection of inotrope therapy but recent direct observations on the effects of levosimendan and milrinone on glomerular filtration favour levosimendan. Other lines of evidence indicate that in acute decompensated HF levosimendan has an immediate renoprotective effect by increasing renal blood flow through preferential vasodilation of the renal afferent arterioles and increases in glomerular filtration rate: potential for renal medullary ischaemia is avoided by an offsetting increase in renal oxygen delivery. These indications of a putative reno-protective action of levosimendan support the view that this calcium-sensitizing inodilator may be preferable to dobutamine or other adrenergic inotropes in some settings by virtue of its renal effects. Additional large studies will be required, however, to clarify the renal effects of levosimendan in this and other relevant clinical situations, such as cardiac surgery.

Cardiogenic shock in cancer.

Cardiogenic shock (CS) is increasingly recognized in patients with malignancies, while cancer is independently associated with worse prognosis in CS. A number of conditions may lead to CS in cancer, including acute coronary syndromes, cardiomyopathy, takotsubo syndrome, myocarditis, pulmonary embolism, tamponade, and cardiac herniation. In these conditions, CS may be related to cancer itself or to cancer therapy, including surgery, chemotherapy, or radiotherapy. Given the significantly improved overall survival of patients with malignancies, the early recognition and proper management of CS in cancer become increasingly important. In the present paper, we review the available evidence on CS in patients with malignancies and highlight issues related to its management.

Use of levosimendan in acute heart failure.

As a calcium sensitizer and inodilator that augments cardiac contractility without increasing myocardial oxygen demand or exacerbating ischaemia, levosimendan may be well configured to deliver inotropic support in cases of acute heart failure (AHF). Other factors favouring levosimendan in this setting include its extended duration of action due to the formation of an active metabolite and the lack of any attenuation of effect in patients treated with beta-blockers. Effects of levosimendan on systemic haemodynamics include its significant, dose-dependent increases in cardiac output, stroke volume and heart rate, and decreases in right and left ventricular filling and total peripheral resistance. Rapid and sustained reduction in levels of natriuretic peptides is a consistent effect of levosimendan use and potentially favourable effects on other neurohormonal indicators of cardiac distress are also observed. Levosimendan has repeatedly been shown to be effective in relief of symptoms of AHF, notably dyspnoea and fatigue, while mortality data from clinical trials and registries suggest that levosimendan is markedly less likely than catecholaminergic inotropes to worsen prognosis. The vasodilator pharmacology of levosimendan is also pertinent to the drug's use in AHF, in which setting organ under-perfusion is often a key pathology. These considerations suggest that levosimendan may have a more favourable impact on the circumstances of the majority of AHF patients than adrenergic agents that act only or primarily as cardiac stimulants. They also suggest that levosimendan may advantageously be integrated into a comprehensive strategy of early intervention designed and intended to prevent cardiac destabilization worsening to the point where hospitalization is necessary. Levosimendan should be used with caution and with tightened haemodynamic monitoring in patients who have low baseline blood pressure (systolic blood pressure <100 mmHg; diastolic blood pressure <60 mmHg), or who are at risk of a hypotensive episode.

Guía ESC 2016 sobre el diagnóstico y tratamiento de la insuficiencia cardiaca aguda y crónica / No disponible

No disponible

Combining angiotensin II receptor 1 antagonism and neprilysin inhibition for the treatment of heart failure.

Sacubitril/valsartan is a novel, first-in-class drug, which combines a neprilysin inhibitor with an angiotensin receptor blocker. Sacubitril inhibits neprilysin endopeptidase, blocking the catabolism of natriuretic peptides (NP), thereby increasing their bioavailability. Valsartan counterbalances the increase of angiotensin II that results from neprilysin inhibition, exerting also the beneficial effects of angiotensin receptor blockers seen in previous HF trials. PARADIGM-HF trial has proved the superiority of sacubitril/valsartan (LCZ696) over ACE inhibitor enalapril to reduce mortality and morbidity of symptomatic HF patients with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), setting the grounds for the replacement of ACE inhibitors by sacubitril/valsartan in the management of HFrEF. Sacubitril/valsartan is currently being tested in a phase III trial (PARAGON-HF) in patients with HF with preserved EF. PARAGON-HF is also expected to provide further data regarding the long-term safety of sacubitril/valsartan, hopefully to alleviate concerns regarding the effects of neprilysin inhibition on cognitive function.

Acute Heart Failure Syndromes in the Elderly: The European Perspective.

Acute heart failure (AHF) in the elderly is an increasingly common clinical problem associated with high in-hospital, short- and long-term mortality rates worldwide. Elderly patients with AHF have different clinical and pathophysiological profiles compared with younger ones. Prevalent cardiovascular comorbidities in the elderly are arterial hypertension and atrial fibrillation, whereas ischemic heart disease and associated risk factors are more common in younger patients. There is a need for greater dissemination of heart failure guidelines and for involvement of multidisciplinary teams for optimizing treatment and eliminating disparities in care in this vulnerable patient group across both sides of the Atlantic.

Efficacy and safety of the pulsed infusions of levosimendan in outpatients with advanced heart failure (LevoRep) study: a multicentre randomized trial.

AIMS: The aim of this study was to determine whether intermittent ambulatory treatment with levosimendan would improve functional capacity, quality of life, and event-free survival in patients with advanced heart failure. METHODS AND RESULTS: This was a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre, parallel-group trial of pulsed infusions of levosimendan in 120 outpatients with advanced heart failure (EF ≤35%, NYHA class III or IV). The study was conducted at 11 centres in Austria, Greece, and Germany. Levosimendan (0.2 µg/kg/min) or placebo was administered for 6 h at 2-week intervals over 6 weeks, in addition to standard care therapy. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with a ≥20% improvement in the 6 min walk test and a ≥15% score increase on the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire at the end of the 24-week study period. Secondary outcomes included event-free survival after 24 weeks. Analyses were performed on an intention-to-treat basis. The primary endpoint was reached in 19% of patients receiving levosimendan and 15.8% of patients receiving placebo (odds ratio 1.25; 95% confidence interval 0.44-3.59; P = 0.810). Cardiac death (four vs. one), heart transplants (two vs. one), and acute heart failure (14 vs. nine) were more frequent with placebo as compared with levosimendan. The incidence of side effects was comparable between groups. CONCLUSION: Intermittent ambulatory treatment with levosimendan in patients with advanced heart failure did not improve significantly functional capacity or quality of life as compared with placebo. An adequately powered, event-driven trial is warranted to enlarge on our findings. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01065194.

Complex atheromatous plaques in the descending aorta and the risk of stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Proximal aortic plaques, especially in the aortic arch, have already been established as an important cause of stroke and peripheral embolism. However, aortic plaques situated in the descending thoracic aorta have recently been postulated as a potential embolic source in patients with cryptogenic cerebral infarction through retrograde aortic flow. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the potential association of descending aorta atheromatosis with cerebral ischemia. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of all available prospective observational studies reporting the prevalence of complex atheromatous plaques in the descending aorta in patients with stroke and in unselected populations undergoing examination with transesophageal echocardiography. RESULTS: We identified 11 eligible studies including a total of 4000 patients (667 patients with stroke and 3333 unselected individuals; mean age, 65 years; 55% men). On baseline transesophageal echocardiograpic examination, the prevalence of complex atheromatous plaques in the descending aorta was higher (P=0.001) in patients with stroke (25.4%; 95% confidence interval, 14.6-40.4%) compared with unselected individuals (6.1%; 95% confidence interval, 3.4-10%). However, no significant difference (P=0.059) in the prevalence of complex atheromatous plaques in the descending aorta was found between patients with cryptogenic (21.8%; 95% confidence interval, 17.5-26.9%) and unclassified (28.3%; 95% confidence interval, 23.9-33.1%) cerebral infarction. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that the presence of complex plaques in the descending aorta is presumably a marker of generalized atherosclerosis and high vascular risk. The present analyses do not provide any further evidence for a direct causal relationship between descending aorta atherosclerosis and cerebral embolism.

Differences in clinical characteristics, management and short-term outcome between acute heart failure patients chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and those without this co-morbidity.

AIM-METHODS: ALARM-HF was a retrospective, observational registry that included 4,953 patients admitted for acute heart failure (AHF) in six European countries, Turkey, Mexico and Australia. Data about respiratory disorders and related medications were available for 4,616 patients with AHF. RESULTS: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients (n = 1,143, 24.8%) were older and more frequently men (p < 0.001) when compared to non-COPD patients. Despite the equivalent left ventricular ejection fraction (38.6 ± 13.7 vs. 38.2 ± 14.5%, p > 0.05), COPD patients more frequently presented with acutely decompensated heart failure (p < 0.001). Moreover, a worse cardiovascular profile was observed in the COPD group, including more atrial fibrillation/flutter, diabetes, hypertension, obesity, peripheral vascular disease (p < 0.001). Before admission, a higher percentage of COPD patients had experienced infections (25.0 vs. 14.0 %, p < 0.001), and were more likely to receive diuretics (p = 0.006), ACE inhibitors (p = 0.042), nitrates (p = 0.003), and digoxin (p = 0.034). With the exception of ACE inhibitors, those differences maintained at discharge, with concomitant increase in ARBs prescription (p = 0.01). Notably, ß-blockers were less prescribed before admission (21.1 vs. 23.8%, p = 0.055) in COPD patients, and remained underutilized at discharge (p < 0.001). Correcting for baseline differences, all-cause in-hospital mortality did not differ between COPD and non-COPD groups (10.1 vs. 10.9%, p = 0.085). CONCLUSION: A large proportion of AHF patients presented with concomitant COPD, had different clinical characteristics/co-morbidities, and less frequently received evidence-based pharmacological therapy compared to non-COPD patients. However, the in-hospital mortality was not higher in COPD group.