Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Clin Oral Implants Res ; 18(2): 153-60, 2007 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17348879

ABSTRACT

The texture of an implant's surface can influence the rate and extent of bone fixation as expressed by the amount of linear bone-to-implant contact (BIC). The purpose of this study was to compare the bone density and linear BIC between Osseotite and machined-surface implants placed in bony defects without graft material and covered by a membrane. Thirty 2 mm diameter, 10 mm length custom implants were prepared for this study having a 'split surface,' with one side having the acid-etched surface and the opposite side having a machined surface. Defects were created in the iliac wing of three adult mongrel dogs where a 6-mm-diameter drill was used to generate a 5-mm-deep defect. The implants were inserted into the center of the defect with 5 mm secured into the bone leaving 5 mm free in the defect with a 2 mm gap between the implant and surrounding bone. Expanded polytetrafluroethelyene membranes were placed over the defect sites stabilized with Biotack pins. The healing times were 2, 3, and 5 months. Histologic and histometric analysis showed significantly lower BIC in the defect region as compared with the portion of implant placed into native bone for both implant surfaces in all groups. There was no difference in BIC values at 2- and 5-month periods between the two surfaces in the regenerated area, while BIC values for Osseotite surfaces were significantly higher than the machined surfaces at 3 months' healing time. Changes in bone density, observed between the three groups, affected correspondingly the BIC values in both implant surfaces, the effect being more pronounced in the Osseotite surface.


Subject(s)
Bone Diseases/surgery , Dental Implants , Dental Prosthesis Design , Membranes, Artificial , Osseointegration/physiology , Titanium/chemistry , Acid Etching, Dental , Animals , Bone Density/physiology , Bone Diseases/pathology , Bone Matrix/pathology , Bone Regeneration/physiology , Dogs , Ilium/pathology , Ilium/surgery , Osteoblasts/pathology , Osteoclasts/pathology , Polytetrafluoroethylene/chemistry , Surface Properties , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Wound Healing/physiology
2.
Quintessence Int ; 38(10): E572-6, 2007.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18197315

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To clinically evaluate the jet injection Injex (Rösch AG Medizintechnik) using 2 different anesthetic solutions, and to compare the jet injection and the standard needle injection techniques. METHOD AND MATERIALS: Of the 32 patients in the study, 10 received mepivacaine 3% anesthetic solution by means of the jet injection technique, while the remaining 22 patients received lidocaine 2% with epinephrine 1:80,000 by the same method. The 14 patients in whom pulp anesthesia was achieved were selected for an additional evaluation of the pulp reaction using standard needle injection anesthesia. The differences between the 2 compounds with Injex were statistically evaluated by means of independent-samples t test analysis. The differences between subgroups receiving both jet injection and needle injection anesthesia were evaluated by means of paired t test analysis. RESULTS: The administration of mepivacaine 3% using Injex did not achieve pulp anesthesia in any of the 10 patients, although the soft tissue anesthesia was successful. The administration of lidocaine with epinephrine using Injex resulted in pulp anesthesia in only 14 patients; soft tissue anesthesia was observed in all patients of this group. There was no statistically significant difference between Injex and the needle injection technique in onset of anesthesia. However, the duration of anesthesia was significantly longer for the needle infiltration group than for the Injex injection group. CONCLUSION: The anesthetic solution should be combined with a vasoconstriction agent when the Injex technique is implemented.


Subject(s)
Anesthesia, Dental/methods , Anesthesia, Local/methods , Anesthetics, Local/administration & dosage , Dental Pulp/drug effects , Anesthesia Recovery Period , Anesthesia, Dental/instrumentation , Anesthesia, Local/instrumentation , Double-Blind Method , Epinephrine/administration & dosage , Humans , Injections, Jet , Lidocaine/administration & dosage , Mepivacaine/administration & dosage , Mouth Mucosa/drug effects , Needles , Vasoconstrictor Agents/administration & dosage
3.
Clin Oral Implants Res ; 15(1): 54-61, 2004 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14731177

ABSTRACT

It has been shown that a roughened implant surface results in a higher percentage of bone to implant contact (%BIC) than a machined one. A modified implant surface using a dual thermo-acid etching process (Osseotite) has been introduced and evaluated clinically, mechanically and histologically. The aim of the present study was the histological evaluation of the %BIC between the Osseotite or machined surfaces and the autogenous bone graft. Twenty-two custom-made split-type 10-mm-long implants having two opposing surfaces (Osseotite and machined) were placed between the cranial and caudal dorsal iliac spine at the iliac wing of two adult mongrel dogs. An artificial bone defect was created leaving a 2 mm empty space around the coronal 5 mm of the implants, while the apical 5 mm was stabilized in the existing basal bone. The defects around the implants were filled with particulate autogenous bone graft, covered by an Osseoquest membrane, and left to heal for 5 months. All inserted implants showed a complete integration in the bone tissue. It was found that the resulting %BIC at the Osseotite surface was significantly higher than at the machined one in both regenerated (46.44+/-15.81% vs. 28.59+/-12.04%) and basal bone areas (32.32+/-15.09% vs. 17.25+/-7.40%). The findings of this study imply that the use of autogenous bone graft resulted in significantly higher %BIC values in the regenerated area than in the basal bone area itself, for both implant surfaces.


Subject(s)
Acid Etching, Dental , Bone Transplantation , Dental Implants , Dental Prosthesis Design , Osseointegration , Animals , Dental Implantation, Endosseous , Dental Polishing , Dogs , Ilium/surgery , Implants, Experimental , Male , Surface Properties , Titanium
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...