Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the rectum: Correlations between single-section and whole-tumor histogram analyses.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the interobserver and intermethod correlations of histogram metrics of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) parameters acquired by multiple readers using the single-section and whole-tumor volume methods. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four DCE parameters (Ktrans, Kep, Ve , Vp) were evaluated in 45 patients (31 men and 14 women; mean age, 61±11 years [range, 29-83 years]) with locally advanced rectal cancer using pre-chemoradiotherapy (CRT) MRI. Ten histogram metrics were extracted using two methods of lesion selection performed by three radiologists: the whole-tumor volume method for the whole tumor on axial section-by-section images and the single-section method for the entire area of the tumor on one axial image. The interobserver and intermethod correlations were evaluated using the intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). RESULTS: The ICCs showed excellent interobserver and intermethod correlations in most of histogram metrics of the DCE parameters. The ICCs among the three readers were > 0.7 (P<0.001) for all histogram metrics, except for the minimum and maximum. The intermethod correlations for most of the histogram metrics were excellent for each radiologist, regardless of the differences in the radiologists' experience. CONCLUSION: The interobserver and intermethod correlations for most of the histogram metrics of the DCE parameters are excellent in rectal cancer. Therefore, the single-section method may be a potential alternative to the whole-tumor volume method using pre-CRT MRI, despite the fact that the high agreement between the two methods cannot be extrapolated to post-CRT MRI.

Suggested new breakpoints of anti-MERS-CoV antibody ELISA titers: performance analysis of serologic tests.

To provide optimal cut-off values of anti-Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) serologic tests, we evaluated performance of ELISA IgG, ELISA IgA, IFA IgM, and IFA IgG using 138 serum samples of 49 MERS-CoV-infected patients and 219 serum samples of 219 rRT-PCR-negative MERS-CoV-exposed healthcare personnel and patients. The performance analysis was conducted for two different purposes: (1) prediction of neutralization activity in MERS-CoV-infected patients, and (2) epidemiologic surveillance of MERS-CoV infections among MERS-CoV-exposed individuals. To evaluate performance according to serum collection time, we used 'days post onset of illness (dpoi)' and 'days post exposure (dpex)' assessing neutralization activity and infection diagnosis, respectively. Performance of serologic tests improved with delayed sampling time, being maximized after a seroconversion period. In predicting neutralization activity, ELISA IgG tests showed optimal performance using sera collected after 21 dpoi at cut-off values of OD ratio 0.4 (sensitivity 100% and specificity 100%), and ELISA IgA showed optimal performance using sera collected after 14 dpoi at cut-off value of OD ratio 0.2 (sensitivity 85.2% and specificity 100%). In diagnosis of MERS-CoV infection, ELISA IgG exhibited optimal performance using sera collected after 28 dpex, at a cut-off value of OD ratio 0.2 (sensitivity 97.3% and specificity 92.9%). These new breakpoints are markedly lower than previously suggested values (ELISA IgG OD ratio 1.1, sensitivity 34.8% and specificity 100% in the present data set), and the performance data help serologic tests to be practically used in the field of MERS management.

Empirical combination of a ß-lactam to vancomycin may not improve outcomes of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia, compared to vancomycin monotherapy.

To evaluate effect of empirical combination of a ß-lactam to vancomycin and vancomycin monotherapy in Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (MSSA-B), we conducted a retrospective cohort study. Electronic medical records of individuals who were diagnosed with MSSA-B between January 2005 and February 2015 at a tertiary care center were reviewed. Patients were classified into three groups according to empirical antibiotic regimen (BL group, ß-lactam; VAN group, vancomycin; BV group, combination of ß-lactam and vancomycin), and 30-day all-cause mortality of each group was compared. During the study period, 561 patients with MSSA-B were identified. After exclusion of 198 patients (36 with poly-microbial infection, 114 expired within 2 days, and 48 already received parenteral antibiotics) and a matching process, 46 patients for each group were included. Baseline characteristics were similar except for severity and comorbidity scores. The 30-day mortality for all three groups were not significantly different (BL 4.3%, VAN 6.5%, BV 8.7%; P = 0.909). In a multivariate analysis, type of empirical antibiotic regimen was not statistically associated with 30-day all-cause mortality. In comparison with the VAN group, the BV group yielded a HR of 0.579 (95% CI = 0.086-3.890, P = 0.574). Pitt bacteremia score was the only significant factor for mortality. The empirical combination of a ß-lactam to vancomycin was not associated with lower mortality in treating MSSA-B, compared to vancomycin monotherapy.

The effects of varying volumes of crystalloid administration before cesarean delivery on maternal hemodynamics and colloid osmotic pressure.

The value of intravenous crystalloid administration in preventing spinal-induced hypotension in the parturient has recently been questioned. Also, the association between increasing crystalloid volume and decreasing postpartum colloid osmotic pressure (COP) raises concern regarding the risk of maternal and fetal pulmonary edema. To study the dose-response effect of varying amounts of crystalloid volume prior to spinal anesthesia, we measured maternal hemodynamic variables and maternal and fetal COP in three groups of healthy parturients receiving spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean delivery. Fifty-five parturients were randomized in a double-blind fashion to receive one of 10, 20, or 30 mL/kg of crystalloid volumes prior to induction of spinal anesthesia. Measurements included mean arterial blood pressure (MAP), cardiac index (CI), and systemic vascular resistance index (SVRI) recorded using noninvasive thoracic impedance monitoring until delivery. Maternal and neonatal COP were measured. All groups showed declines in MAP and SVRI from baseline at 5 min after spinal anesthesia, but the amount of decline did not differ among groups. Total ephedrine and additional intravenous (i.v.) fluid administered did not differ among groups. The 20- and 30- mL/kg groups showed a larger decline in maternal COP than the 10-mL/kg group; no differences in neonatal COP were seen with varying preload. We conclude that increasing the amount of i.v. crystalloid administered to 30 mL/kg in the healthy parturient does not significantly alter maternal hemodynamics or ephedrine requirements after spinal anesthesia and has no apparent benefit.