Correlation between electrodiagnostic severity and Boston carpal tunnel questionnaire in surgically treated carpal tunnel syndrome patients.

OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this study were to (1) investigate whether electrodiagnostic (EDX) findings reflect the preoperative symptom severity and functional impairment in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) and (2) evaluate the relationship between EDX findings and the clinical outcomes reported according to the self-administered patient questionnaires. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with idiopathic CTS who underwent carpal tunnel release between May 2016 and July 2018 were included. Carpal tunnel syndrome was clinically diagnosed and confirmed based on the EDX findings. The association between EDX findings, such as motor latency, motor amplitude, sensory latency, sensory amplitude, and severity (mild, moderate, and severe), and the Boston symptom and function scores were analyzed. The change in the Boston symptom and function scores from the preoperative baseline values (visit 1) to those recorded 1 year postoperatively (visit 5) was assessed. The effect of disease severity based on the EDX findings on the change in Boston symptom and function scores by visit was also investigated. RESULTS: The EDX severity, motor latency, motor amplitude, sensory latency, and sensory amplitude were not correlated with the Boston symptom and function scores preoperatively and postoperatively. Electrodiagnostic severity did not affect the improvement in the Boston symptom and function scores recorded at each visit. CONCLUSION: We found no association between the EDX severity and perioperative Boston questionnaire scores, and the degree of improvement in patient symptoms and function did not differ according to the CTS severity based on the EDX findings. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, Prognostic study.

A novel classification of Kienbock's disease based on magnetic resonance imaging.

PURPOSE: We devised a classification system for Kienbock's disease using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Moreover, we compared it with the modified Lichtman classification and evaluated the inter-observer reliability. METHODS: Eighty-eight patients diagnosed with Kienbock's disease were included. All patients were classified using the modified Lichtman and MRI classifications. MRI staging was based on factors including partial marrow oedema, cortical integrity of the lunate, and dorsal subluxation of the scaphoid. The inter-observer reliability was evaluated. We also evaluated the presence of a displaced coronal fracture of the lunate and investigated its association with the presence of a dorsal subluxation of the scaphoid. RESULTS: Seven patients were categorized into stage I, 13 into II, 33 into IIIA, 33 into IIIB, and two into IV using the modified Lichtman classification. Six patients were categorized into stage I, 12 into II, 56 into IIIA, ten into IIIB, and four into IV using the MRI classification. The greatest shift between the stages was observed in stages IIIA and IIIB when the results of the two classification systems were compared. The inter-observer reliability of the MRI classification was greater than that of the modified Lichtman classification. Fifteen cases with a displaced coronal fracture of the lunate were identified, and a dorsal subluxation of the scaphoid was significantly more present in these patients. CONCLUSION: The MRI classification system is more reliable than is the modified Lichtman classification. MRI classification reflects carpal misalignment with higher fidelity and is more appropriate for classification into stages IIIA and IIIB.

Patient expectations and satisfaction in hand surgery: A new assessment approach through a valid and reliable survey questionnaire.

INTRODUCTION: Assessing patient expectations in orthopaedic surgery has gained significant importance over time. However, there have been only a few studies on how to measure such expectations in hand surgery. Against the backdrop, the study was designed to develop a valid and reliable expectations survey for patients undergoing hand surgery and to identify the correlations between preoperative expectations and postoperative satisfaction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a three-phase prospective cohort study. In the first phase of the study (146 patients), patient expectations were assessed while developing a draft questionnaire based on frequency and clinical relevance. In the second phase (154 patients newly included), test-retest reliability was measured to ensure test consistency. The Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) served as a basis for developing the final survey questionnaire. In the third phase, we followed up with patients, who completed the preoperative expectations survey, 3 months after surgery to assess the fulfillment of their expectations. The Pearson correlation method was used to measure the association between preoperative expectations and postoperative satisfaction. RESULTS: In the first phase, 146 patients shared 406 different expectations, which were grouped into nine categories. Then, in the second phase, the final survey was populated by questionnaire items under respective category that have revealed strong test-retest reliability (ICC of 0.91). A significant positive correlation between patient expectations and satisfaction was observed (R = 0.181, p = 0.034). CONCLUSION: The survey was designed to offer a valid and reliable approach for the comprehensive assessment of patient expectations in hand surgery. The survey results show that patients with high expectations tend to be more satisfied with surgical outcomes. It is strongly believed that this approach would serve as a useful tool at a time when patient perspective is taken into account increasingly more in the clinical practice.