Clinical Situations Associated with Inappropriately Large Regurgitant Volumes in the Assessment of Mitral Regurgitation Severity Using the Proximal Flow Convergence Method in Patients with Chordae Rupture.

BACKGROUND: Regurgitant volume (RVol) calculated using the proximal flow convergence method (proximal isovelocity surface area [PISA]) has been accepted as a key quantitative parameter for the diagnosis of and clinical decision-making with regard to severe mitral regurgitation (MR). However, a recent prospective study showed a significant overestimation of RVol by the echocardiographic PISA method compared with the MR volume measured using magnetic resonance imaging. We aimed to evaluate the frequency of overestimation of RVol by the PISA method and the clinical conditions that require a different quantitative method to correct the overestimation. METHODS: We retrospectively enrolled 166 consecutive patients with degenerative MR and chordae rupture, in whom RVol was measured using both the PISA and two-dimensional Doppler volumetric methods. The volumetric method was used to measure total stroke volume using the two-dimensional Simpson biplane method, and forward stroke volume was measured using pulsed Doppler tracing at the left ventricular (LV) outflow tract. RVol by the volumetric method was calculated using total stroke volume - forward stroke volume. Severe MR was defined as an RVol >60 mL. RESULTS: All patients had severe MR based on RVol by the PISA method, but 68 (41.1%) showed RVol by the volumetric method values of <60 mL, resulting in discordant results. The patients with discordant results were characterized by a higher prevalence of female sex, lower body surface area, smaller LV diastolic and systolic dimensions and volumes, smaller left atrial volume, smaller PISA angle, and lower frequency of flail leaflets (39.7% vs 62.2%, P = .004). Multivariate analysis revealed that LV end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) and PISA angle were independent factors, with the best cutoff LVEDV and PISA angle being 173 mL and 103°, respectively. During follow-up (median, 3.4 years; interquartile range, 2.0-4.8 years), mitral valve repair and replacement were performed in 103 and six patients, respectively. The 2-year mitral valve surgery-free survival rate was higher in the discordant group (51.8% ± 0.06% vs 31.2% ± 0.05%, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Even in the patients with documented chordae rupture, the PISA method alone resulted in inappropriate overestimation of MR severity in a significant proportion of patients. Thus, an additive quantitative method is absolutely necessary in patients with a small LVEDV or narrow PISA angle.

Mitral Valve Adaptation to Isolated Annular Dilation: Insights Into the Mechanism of Atrial Functional Mitral Regurgitation.

OBJECTIVES: This study hypothesized that compensatory mitral leaflet area (MLA) adaptation occurs in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) without left ventricular (LV) dysfunction but has limitations that augment mitral regurgitation (MR). The study also explored whether asymmetrical annular dilation is matched by relative leaflet enlargement. BACKGROUND: Functional MR occurs in patients with AF and isolated annular dilation, but the relationship of MLA adaptation with annular area (AA) is unknown. METHODS: Three-dimensional echocardiographic images were acquired from 86 patients with quantified MR: 53 with nonvalvular persistent AF (23 MR+ with moderate or greater MR, 30 MR-) without LV dysfunction or dilation and 33 normal controls. Comprehensive 3-dimensional analysis included total diastolic MLA, adaptation ratios of MLA to annular area and MLA to leaflet closure area, and annular and tenting geometry. RESULTS: Total MLA was 22% larger in patients with AF than in controls, thus paralleling the increased AA. However, as AA increased, adaptive indices (MLA/AA ratio and ratio of MLA to closure area) plateaued, becoming lowest in MR+ patients (ratio of MLA to closure area = 1.63 ± 0.17 controls, 1.60 ± 0.11 MR-, 1.32 ± 0.10 MR+; p < 0.001). MR increased as the ratio of MLA to closure area decreased (R2 = 0.68; p < 0.001). The posterior-to-anterior MLA ratio remained constant, whereas the posterior-to-anterior mitral annulus perimeter increased (1.21 ± 0.16 controls, 1.32 ± 0.20 MR-, 1.46 ± 0.19 MR+; p < 0.001). Multivariate MR determinants were annular area, total MLA to closure area, and posterior-to-anterior perimeter ratios. CONCLUSIONS: MLA adaptively increases in AF with isolated annular dilation and normal LV function. This compensatory enlargement becomes insufficient with greater annular dilation, and the leaflets fail to match asymmetrical annular remodeling, thereby increasing MR. These findings can potentially help optimize therapeutic options and motivate basic studies of adaptive growth processes.

Discrepancy between mitral valve areas measured by two-dimensional planimetry and three-dimensional transoesophageal echocardiography in patients with mitral stenosis.

OBJECTIVE: To compare mitral valve area (MVA) measurements obtained by 2D transthoracic planimetry and 3D transoesophageal echocardiography (TOE) in patients with mitral stenosis (MS), and to determine the causes of discrepancies between the two techniques. DESIGN: Reliability and agreement study. SETTING: Tertiary referral centre. PATIENTS: Eighty-seven patients with MS. METHODS: MVA was determined by transthoracic 2D planimetry and 3D TOE. Clinical and echocardiographic variables were evaluated. The angle (Mα) between the lines of the true mitral valve (MV) tip and the echo beam-to-MV tip was measured at early diastole from the parasternal long-axis view obtained from 2D echocardiography. RESULTS: Although MVA measurements using 2D planimetry and 3D TOE showed good agreement (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.853; p<0.001), 2D planimetry overestimated MVA by 0.19±0.2 cm(2) compared with 3D TOE (p<0.001). Left atrial (LA) dimension obtained from the parasternal long-axis view at end-systole (p=0.012), Mα (p<0.001), and left ventricular ejection fraction (p=0.022) were independent determinants of the MVA difference (MVA by 2D-MVA by 3D TOE; MVA(2D-3D)) according to multiple linear regression analysis. The LA dimensions correlated with Mα (r=0.352, p=0.001). The best cut-off values for predicting significant overestimation by 2D planimetry (MVA(2D-3D)>0.2 cm(2)) were LA dimension ≥49 mm (78% sensitivity, 72% specificity) and Mα≥9.5° (56% sensitivity, 89% specificity). CONCLUSIONS: Because 2D planimetry tends to overestimate MVA, 3D TOE should be considered for accurate MVA assessment, especially in patients with a large LA and large Mα.