Predictive Value of Bolster Supine X-Ray for the Correction of Segmental Deformity After Thoracolumbar Fusion Surgery.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Assessment of thoracolumbar spine flexibility is crucial for determining which osteotomy to perform (posterior column osteotomy or 3-column osteotomy) to restore sagittal balance. Although preoperative bolster supine X-rays have been used to evaluate spine flexibility, their correlation with postoperative spinopelvic parameters has not been reported. We aimed to evaluate the predictive value of bolster X-ray for correcting sagittal deformities after thoracolumbar fusion surgery. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated patients who underwent bolster supine radiography before posterior thoracolumbar fusion. Demographic data, operative records, and radiographic parameters were also recorded. The segmental Cobb angle, defined as the angle between the upper endplate of the uppermost and lower endplates of the lowest instrumented vertebrae, was compared between bolster and postoperative X-ray to evaluate the correlation between them. The predictive value of bolster X-ray for postoperative deformity correction was measured using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). RESULTS: Forty-two patients were included. The preoperative segmental Cobb angle (-1.4 ± 22.4) was significantly lower than the bolster segmental Cobb angle (23.2 ± 18.7, P < .001) and postoperative segmental Cobb angle (27.9 ± 22.3, P < .001); however, no significant difference was observed between the bolster and postoperative segmental Cobb angles (P = .746). Bolster X-ray showed a very strong correlation with postoperative X-ray (r = 0.950, P < .001) for segmental Cobb angle. Bolster supine X-ray had good-to-excellent reliability for postoperative X-ray with an ICC of 0.913 (95% CI, 0.760-0.962, P < .001) for the segmental Cobb angle. CONCLUSION: Bolster supine X-rays demonstrate good-to-excellent reliability with postoperative X-rays for segmental Cobb angles. These findings offer valuable insights into the selection of appropriate osteotomy techniques for clinical practice.

Is it necessary to use a cervical brace after single- or double-level ACDF?

Although anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is one of the most frequently performed spinal surgeries, there is no consensus regarding the necessity of prescribing a cervical brace after surgery. This study aimed to investigate any difference in radiological and clinical outcomes when wearing or not wearing cervical braces after single- or double-level ACDF. We examined 2 cohorts of patients who underwent single- or double-level ACDF surgery with and without a cervical brace: patients who underwent ACDF between March 2018 and December 2019 received a cervical brace, while patients who underwent ACDF between January 2020 and May 2021 did not. Each patient was evaluated radiologically and functionally using plain X-ray, modified Japanese Orthopedic Association score, and visual analog scale for neck and arm until 12 months after surgery. Fusion rate, subsidence, and postoperative complications were also evaluated. Eighty-three patients were included in the analysis: 38 were braced and 45 were not. The demographic characteristics and baseline outcome measures of both groups were similar. There was no statistically significant difference in any of the clinical measures at baseline. The modified Japanese Orthopedic Association score and visual analog scale for neck and arm were similar in both groups at all time intervals and showed statistically significant improvement when compared with preoperative scores. In addition, fusion rate, subsidence, and postoperative complications were similar in both groups. Our results suggest that the use of cervical braces does not improve the clinical outcomes of individuals undergoing single- or double-level ACDF.

Is It Meaningful and Necessary to Avoid the Seventh Cervical Vertebra in Long Level Cervical Fusion?

AIM: To compare the clinical and radiological results of patients who underwent multilevel posterior cervical fusion (PCF) with different end levels (C6 or C7). MATERIAL AND METHODS: We collected radiographs and clinical results of all subjects who underwent 3 level or more PCF for degenerative disease from May 2012 to December 2020. Based on the location of the end of fusion during surgery, patients were divided into C6 (group 1) and C7 patients (group 2). The clinical and radiological results of both groups were compared over two years. RESULTS: A total of 52 patients met the inclusion criteria of this study (21 in group 1 and 31 in group 2). The clinical results demonstrated a statistically significant difference with respect to a lower neck visual analog scale score in group 1 than in group 2 at the last follow-up (p=0.03). With regard to the radiological results, the C2-C7 sagittal vertical axis showed significantly greater values in group 2 than in group 1 at the final follow-up (p=0.02). For thoracic kyphosis (TK), group 2 had lower TK values than group 1 (p=0.03), and the T9 spinopelvic inclination was significantly greater in group 2 than in group 1 (p=0.01). CONCLUSION: In this study, aggravation of cervical kyphosis and neck pain was observed when C7 was included in multilevel PCF surgery. The inclusion of C7 also affected the thoracolumbar parameters and global spine alignment.

The Perioperative Effects of Preoperative Radiotherapy in Metastatic Spinal Tumor Patients.

OBJECTIVE: Radiotherapy is one of the important treatment options for metastatic spinal tumors but is not the definite intervention in all cases, as there are patients who still require surgical treatment because of severe pain or neurologic events after this treatment. We evaluated the perioperative effects of preoperative radiotherapy in these cases as a future guide for surgeons on critical considerations in this period. METHODS: We included 328 patients in this study who had undergone decompression and fusion surgery for metastatic spinal tumors. Patients who underwent surgery with preoperative radiotherapy were designated as the radiotherapy group (group RT, n = 81), and cases of surgery without preoperative radiotherapy were assigned to the non-radiotherapy group (group nRT, n = 247). We compared the demographic, intraoperative, and postoperative factors between these 2 groups. RESULTS: In terms of intraoperative factors, statistically significant differences were evident in operation time, estimated blood loss, and transfusion (RT vs. nRT: 188.1 ± 80.7 minutes vs. 231.2 ± 106.1 minutes, 607.2 ± 532.7 mL vs. 830.1 ± 1324.7 mL, and 30.9% vs. 43.3%, P < 0.001, P < 0.031, and P < 0.048, respectively). With regard to postoperative factors, the incidence of infection, wound problems, and local recurrence were statistically higher in group RT (RT vs. nRT: 6.2% vs. 0.8%, 12.3% vs. 0.8%, 23.4% vs. 13.7%, P = 0.004, P < 0.001, and P = 0.038, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative radiotherapy has the intraoperative advantages of reducing bleeding and shortening the operating time, but postoperative caution is needed because of the possibility of infection, wound problems, and local recurrence increases.

Does Preoperative Radiation Therapy Performed for Metastatic Spine Cancer at the Cervical Spine Increase Perioperative Complications of Anterior Cervical Surgery?

Background: Radiation therapy (RT) performed before anterior cervical spine surgery (ACSS) may cause fascial plane fibrosis, decreased soft-tissue vascularity, and vertebral body weakness, which could increase the risk of esophageal and major vessel injuries, wound complications, and construct subsidence. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate whether preoperative RT performed for metastatic spine cancer (MSC) at the cervical spine increases perioperative morbidity for ACSS. Methods: Forty-nine patients who underwent ACSS for treatment of MSC at the cervical spine were retrospectively reviewed. All the patients underwent anterior cervical corpectomy via the anterior approach. Patient demographics, surgical factors, operative factors, and complications were recorded. Results of patients who were initially treated with RT before ACSS (RT group) were compared with those who did not receive RT before ACSS (non-RT group). Results: Eighteen patients (36.7%) were included in the RT group, while the remaining 31 (63.3%) were included in the non-RT group. Surgery-related factors, including operation time (p = 0.109), estimated blood loss (p = 0.246), amount of postoperative drainage (p = 0.604), number of levels operated (p = 0.207), and number of patients who underwent combined posterior fusion (p = 0.768), did not significantly differ between the 2 groups. Complication rates, including esophageal injury, dural tear, infection, wound dehiscence, and mechanical failure, did not significantly differ between the RT and non-RT groups. Early subsidence was significantly greater in the non-RT group compared to that in the RT group (p = 0.012). Conclusions: RT performed before surgery for MSC does not increase the risk of wound complication, mechanical failure, or vital structure injury during ACSS. The surgical procedural approach was not complicated by previous RT history. Therefore, surgeons can safely choose the anterior approach when the number of levels or location of MSC favors anterior surgery, and performing a posterior surgery is unnecessary due to a concern that previous RT may increase complication rates of ACSS.

Frailty is not an independent risk factor for worse clinical outcomes in lumbar spinal surgery: a prospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: Recently, many studies revealed that frailty affects unfavorably on postoperative outcomes in lumbar spinal diseases. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between frailty and clinical outcomes while identifying risk factors associated with worse clinical outcomes following lumbar spinal surgery. METHODS: From March 2019 to February 2021, we prospectively enrolled eligible patients with degenerative lumbar spinal diseases requiring surgery. Frailty was assessed preoperatively. To identify the impact of frailty on lumbar spinal diseases, clinical outcomes, which were measured with patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and postoperative complications, were compared according to the frailty. PROs were assessed preoperatively and one year postoperatively. In addition, risk factors for preoperative and postoperative worse clinical outcomes were investigated. RESULTS: PROs were constantly lower in the frail group than in the non-frail group before and after surgery, and the change of PROs between before and after surgery and postoperative complications were not different between the groups. In addition, frailty was a persistent risk factor for postoperative worse clinical outcome before and after surgery in lumbar spinal surgery. CONCLUSION: Frailty persistently affects the clinical outcome negatively before and after surgery in lumbar spinal surgery. However, as the change of the clinical outcome is not different between the frail group and the non-frail group, it is difficult to interpret whether the frail patients are vulnerable to the surgery. In conclusion, frailty is not an independent risk factor for worse clinical outcome in lumbar spinal surgery.

Treatment of conus medullaris arteriovenous malformation: the role of microsurgical treatment.

OBJECTIVE: Conus medullaris arteriovenous malformation (AVM) is rare and challenging to treat. To better define the presentation, prognosis, and optimal treatment of these lesions, the authors present their treatment experiences for conus medullaris AVM. METHODS: Eleven patients with AVM of the conus medullaris were identified between March 2013 and December 2021. Among these patients, 7 who underwent microsurgical treatment were included. Patient data, including age, sex, symptoms at presentation, neurological status, radiological findings, nidus depth (mainly pial lesion vs intramedullary lesion), type of treatment, and recurrence at follow-up, were collected. Postoperative angiography was performed in all patients. Spinal cord function was evaluated using the Frankel grade at the time of admission and 1 year after surgery. RESULTS: All 7 patients presenting with myeloradiculopathy were treated surgically. Four patients (57.1%) underwent endovascular embolization, followed by resection. The other 3 patients underwent microsurgery only. Complete occlusion was confirmed with postoperative angiography in all patients. Of the 3 patients who were nonambulatory before surgery (Frankel grade C), 2 were able to walk after surgery (Frankel grade D) and 1 remained nonambulatory (Frankel grade C) at 1-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the authors' clinical experiences, the results of multimodal treatment for conus medullaris AVM are good, with microsurgical treatment playing an important role. The microsurgical strategy can differ depending on the location of the nidus, and when possible, good results can be expected through microsurgical resection.

Are There Advantages in Cervical Intrafacetal Fusion With Minimal Posterolateral Fusion (PLF) Compared to Conventional PLF in Posterior Cervical Fusion?

OBJECTIVE: We propose that cervical intrafacetal fusion (cIFF) using bone chip insertion into the facetal joint space additional to minimal PLF is a supplementary fusion method to conventional posterolateral fusion (PLF). METHODS: Patients who underwent posterior cervical fixation accompanied by cIFF with minimal PLF or conventional PLF for cervical myelopathy from 2012 to 2023 were investigated retrospectively. Radiological parameters including Cobb angle and C2-7 sagittal vertical axis (SVA) were compared between the 2 groups. In cIFF with minimal PLF group, cIFF location and PLF location were carefully divided, and the fusion rates of each location were analyzed by computed tomography scan. RESULTS: Among enrolled 46 patients, 31 patients were in cIFF group, 15 in PLF group. The postoperative change of Cobb angle in 1-year follow-up in cIFF with minimal PLF group and conventional PLF group were 0.1° ± 4.0° and -9.7° ± 8.4° respectively which was statistically lower in cIFF with minimal PLF group (p = 0.022). Regarding the fusion rate in cIFF with minimal PLF group in postoperative 6 months, the rates was achieved in 267 facets (98.1%) in cIFF location, and 244 facets (89.7%) in PLF location (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Postoperative sagittal alignment was more preserved in cIFF with minimal PLF group compared with conventional PLF group. Additionally, in cIFF with minimal PLF group, the bone fusion rate of cIFF location was higher than PLF location. Considering the concerns of bone chip migration onto the spinal cord and relatively low fusion rate in PLF method, applying cIFF method using minimized PLF might be a beneficial alternative for posterior cervical decompression and fixation.

Quantitative Analysis of the Effect of Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Postoperative Residual Cervical Dumbbell Tumors: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE: Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has been performed for spinal tumors. However, the quantitative effect of SRS on postoperative residual cervical dumbbell tumors remains unknown. This study aimed to quantitatively evaluate the efficacy of SRS for treating postoperative residual cervical dumbbell tumors. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed cases of postoperative residual cervical dumbbell tumors from 1995 to 2020 in 2 tertiary institutions. Residual tumors underwent SRS (SRS group) or were observed with clinical and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) follow-up (observation group). Tumor regrowth rates were compared between the SRS and observation groups. Additionally, risk factors for tumor regrowth were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 28 cervical dumbbell tumors were incompletely resected. Eight patients were in the SRS group, and 20 in the observation group. The mean regrowth rate was not significantly lower (p = 0.784) in the SRS group (0.18 ± 0.29 mm/mo) than in the observation group (0.33 ± 0.40 mm/mo). In the multivariable Cox regression analysis, SRS was not a significant variable (hazard ratio [HR], 0.57; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.18-1.79; p = 0.336). CONCLUSION: SRS did not significantly decrease the tumor regrowth rate in our study. We believe that achieving maximal resection during the initial operation is more important than postoperative adjuvant SRS.

The Efficacy of Cervical Pedicle Screw Is Enhanced When Used With 5.5-mm Rods for Metastatic Cervical Spinal Tumor Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: The cervical spine presents challenges in treating metastatic cervical spinal tumors (MCSTs). Although the efficacy of cervical pedicle screw placement (CPS) has been well established, its use in combination with 5.5-mm rods for MCST has not been reported. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of CPS combined with 5.5-mm rods in treating MCST and compare it with that of CPS combined with traditional 3.5-mm rods. METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed 58 patients with MCST who underwent posterior cervical spinal fusion surgery by a single surgeon between March 2012 and December 2022. Data included demographics, surgical details, imaging results, numerical rating scale score for neck pain, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, and Spine Oncology Study Group Outcomes Questionnaire responses. RESULTS: Preoperative Spinal Instability Neoplastic Scores were significantly higher in the 5.5-mm rod group. Greater kyphotic changes in the index vertebra were observed in the 3.5-mm rod group. Neck pain reduction was significantly better in the 5.5-mm rod group. CONCLUSION: CPS with 5.5-mm rods provides superior biomechanical stability and effectively resists forward bending momentum in posterior MCST fusion surgery. These findings support the use of 5.5-mm rods to enhance surgical outcomes.

Unilateral Pediculectomy and Reduction with Short-Segment Pedicle Screw Fixation for Thoracolumbar Burst Fracture: A Case Series.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of unilateral pediculectomy and reduction with short-segment pedicle screw fixation for thoracolumbar burst fracture. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent a unilateral pediculectomy and reduction with short-segment fixation and interbody fusion for thoracolumbar burst fracture. The unilateral pediculectomy created sufficient space to approach the ventral side of the spinal cord for removing bone fragments and insertion of an interbody cage to correct kyphosis. Lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic incidence (PI) minus LL, and segmental Cobb angle were measured at 3 time points: preoperatively, postoperatively, and final follow-up. Furthermore, sagittal vertical axis (SVA) was measured to assess global sagittal balance at the final follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 10 patients, with a mean age of 39.8 ± 21.0, underwent the surgical procedure. All patients had a thoracolumbar injury classification and severity score > 5. The mean follow-up period was 15.8 ± 13.9 months. The mean postoperative LL (46.0 ± 5.8) was significantly higher (P = 0.008) than the preoperative measurement (32.8 ± 8.2). The mean postoperative PI minus LL (2.2 ± 8.4) was not significantly lower (P = 0.051) than preoperative measurement (15.4 ± 12.6). The mean postoperative segmental Cobb angle (11.4 ± 8.4) was significantly higher (P < 0.001) than the preoperative measurement (-11.6 ± 10.9). At the final follow-up, the mean sagittal vertical axiswas 10.0 ± 28.8 mm. CONCLUSIONS: Unilateral pediculectomy and reduction with short-segment fixation and interbody fusion served as an efficient surgical method for thoracolumbar burst fracture.

Comparison of the Efficacy of an Anchored Cage with Unidirectional and Bidirectional Screw Fixation in Single-Level Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Surgery.

AIM: To compare, and to analyze the clinical and radiological signs between bidirectional and unidirectional screw fixation in single level cervical discectomy and fusion surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the data collected from 90 patients and divided them into the upper or lower spine fixation group (unidirectional) and the normal upper and lower spine fixation group (bidirectional). The patients' demographic data and preoperative and postoperative (24 months) clinical outcomes were collected. Pre- and postoperative (immediately and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months) changes in the segmental angle in the operating field (SA), cervical lordosis, C2-7 sagittal vertical axis, and active disc height (aDH) were evaluated. We also compared the rate of fusion and muscle size change between the groups. RESULTS: The operation time in the bidirectional screw fixation group was significantly longer than that in the unidirectional screw fixation group ( > 6 min; p=0.03). There was no significant difference between the two groups in radiographic parameters before and immediately after surgery. From 3 months postoperatively, the unidirectional group had significantly higher SA and aDH than the bidirectional group (p=0.03). The fusion rate was higher in the bidirectional screw fixation group than in the unidirectional group, but this was not statistically significant (97% vs. 88%, p=0.07). CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that unidirectional screw fixation surgery can be useful as it has been associated with simple surgery, short surgery time, and maintenance of the lordotic curvature of SA and disc height.

Selection of Optimal Lower Instrumented Vertebra for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Surgery.

Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) affects approximately 2% of adolescents across all ethnicities. The objectives of surgery for AIS are to halt curve progression, correct the deformity in 3 dimensions, and preserve as many mobile spinal segments as possible, avoiding junctional complications. Despite ongoing development in algorithms and classification systems for the surgical treatment of AIS, there is still considerable debate about selecting the appropriate fusion level. In this study, we review the literature on fusion selection and present current concepts regarding the lower instrumented vertebra in the selection of the fusion level for AIS surgery.

Proximal Junctional Kyphosis or Failure After Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery - Review of Risk Factors and Its Prevention.

Proximal junction kyphosis (PJK) is a common imaging finding after long-level fusion, and proximal junctional failure (PJF) is an aggravated form of the progressive disease spectrum of PJK. This includes vertebral fracture of upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) or UIV+1, instability between UIV and UIV+1, neurological deterioration requiring surgery. Many studies have reported on PJK and PJF after long segment instrumentation for adult spinal deformity (ASD). In particular, for spine deformity surgeons, risk factors and prevention strategies of PJK and PJF are very important to minimize reoperation. Therefore, this review aims to help reduce the occurrence of PJK and PJF by updating the latest contents of PJK and PJF by 2023, focusing on the risk factors and prevention strategies of PJK and PJF. We conducted a search on multiple database for articles published until February 2023 using the search keywords "proximal junctional kyphosis," "proximal junctional failure," "proximal junctional disease," and "adult spinal deformity." Finally, 103 papers were included in this study. Numerous factors have been suggested as potential risks for the development of PJK and PJF, including a high body mass index, inadequate postoperative sagittal balance and overcorrection, advanced age, pelvic instrumentation, and osteoporosis. Recently, with the increasing elderly population, sarcopenia has been emphasized. The quality and quantity of muscle in the surgical site have been suggested as new risk factor. Therefore, spine surgeon should understand the pathophysiology of PJK and PJF, as well as individual risk factors, in order to develop appropriate prevention strategies for each patient.

Effectiveness of intraoperative table modification for achieving lumbar lordosis in multilevel lumbar fusion surgery: a propensity score-matched study.

BACKGROUND: In multilevel posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) with posterior screw fixation, obtaining sufficient lumbar lordosis (LL) is difficult, especially in patients with osteoporosis. We performed intraoperative table modification (TM) using gravitational dropping of the patient's lumbar spine, to improve restoration of LL. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients who underwent three- or four-level PLIF between 2005 and 2019. One hundred eleven patients were enrolled, with 96 patients receiving non-TM-PLIF and 15 patients receiving TM-PLIF. Radiological parameters, including segmental lordosis (SL), LL, sacral slope (SS), pelvic incidence, and pelvic tilt, were measured. Clinical outcomes were measured using a visual analogue scale (VAS) for the back and leg preoperatively and at the last follow-up. Additionally, the correlation between the bone mineral density (BMD) and the radiological parameters was calculated for TM-PLIF. We performed propensity score matching between the groups to control the baseline difference. RESULTS: We found a statistically better correction between immediate and last follow-up postoperative SL (p = 0.04), as well as between preoperative and last follow-up SL (p < 0.01) in the TM-PLIF group compared to that in the non-TM-PLIF group. VAS for the back and leg were not significantly different between the two groups. Additionally, the efficacy of lordosis correction in the TM-PLIF group showed a statistically significant negative correlation between BMD and the SS change both before and after the surgery (rho = -0.60, p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Whilst further study is required to conclusively establish its efficacy, TM-PLIF (table modification using gravitational dropping) shows potential advantages for restoring and maintaining LL in multilevel lumbar fusion, particularly in cases with low BMD.

Revisiting En Bloc Resection Versus Piecemeal Resection for the Treatment of Giant Cell Tumor of the Spine.

OBJECTIVE: Surgery for spinal giant cell tumors (GCTs) is challenging because these tumors often exhibit a poor clinical course owing to their locally aggressive features. This study aimed to investigate the prognostic factors of GCT recurrence in the spine by focusing on surgical factors. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent surgery for spinal GCTs between January 2005 and December 2016. Using the Kaplan-Meier method, surgical variables were evaluated for disease-free survival (DFS). Since tumor violation may occur at the pedicle during en bloc resection of the spine, it was further analyzed as a separate variable. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression analysis was performed for other clinical and radiographic variables. A total of 28 patients (male:female = 8:20) were included. The mean follow-up period was 90.5 months (range, 15-184 months). RESULTS: Among the 28 patients, gross total resection (GTR) was the most important factor for DFS (P = 0.001). Any form of tumor violation was also correlated with DFS (P = 0.049); however, use of en bloc resection technique did not show a significant DFS gain compared to piecemeal resection (P = 0.218). In the patient group that achieved GTR, the mode of resection was not a significant factor for DFS (P = 0.959). In the multivariate analysis, the extent of resection was the only significant variable that affected DFS (P = 0.016). CONCLUSIONS: Conflicting results on tumor violation from univariate and multivariate analyses suggest that GTR without tumor violation should be the treatment goal for spinal GCTs. However, when tumor violation is unavoidable, it would be important to prioritize GTR over adhering to en bloc resection.

From the Spinopelvic Parameters to Global Alignment and Proportion Scores in Adult Spinal Deformity.

In the last 20 years, sagittal alignment and balance of the spine have become one of the most important issues in the field of spine surgery. Recent studies emphasize that sagittal balance and alignment are more important for health-related quality of life. The understanding of normal and abnormal sagittal alignment of the spine is necessary for the diagnosis and appropriate treatment of adult spinal deformity (ASD), and we will discuss the currently used classification of ASD, the parameters of sagittal alignment that are essential for the diagnosis of spinal deformity, compensatory actions to maintain sagittal balance, and the relationship between sagittal alignment and clinical symptoms. Furthermore, we will also discuss the recently introduced Global Alignment and Proportion scores. The Korean Spinal Deformity Society is publishing a series of review articles on spinal deformities to help spine surgeons better understand spinal deformities.

Total En Bloc Spondylectomy of C7 Vertebrae for Primary Bone Tumors: The Efficacy of Autologous Sternal Structural Grafts.

AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of total en bloc spondylectomy with autologous sternal structural graft, subaxial pedicle screws, and 5.5 mm titanium rods in primary bone tumor surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS: From January 2019 to February 2020, two patients with lower cervical spine (C7) primary bone tumor underwent total en bloc spondylectomy, interbody fusion with sternal structural autograft, and posterior instrumentation using subaxial pedicle screws. The medical records and radiographic findings of the patients were reviewed. RESULTS: C7 total en bloc spondylectomy was successfully performed; the anterior column was reconstructed with an autologous sternal structural graft with posterior instrumentation using subaxial pedicle screws and 5.5 mm titanium rods. After surgery, the VAS scores of neck and radiating arm pain in both patients were relieved considerably. Bony fusion was achieved in all patient by 6 months after surgery. There were no postoperative complications associated with the donor site. CONCLUSION: Structural bone obtained from the sternum is safe and provides a viable alternative to cervical fusion for patients with primary bone tumor. It confers the advantages of autograft fusion without the complications associated with donor site morbidities.