Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Environ Monit Assess ; 187(6): 347, 2015 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25968552

ABSTRACT

In the recent half century, numerous methods have been developed to assess ecological toxicity. However, the presence of solid-particle turbidity sometimes causes such tests to end with questionable results. Many researchers focused on controlling this arbitrary turbidity effect when using the Microtox® solid-phase toxicity system, but there is not yet a standard method. In this study, we examined four solid-phase sample test methods recommended in the Microtox® manual, or proposed from the literature, and compared the existing methods with our proposed method (centrifuged basic solid-phase test, c-BSPT). Four existing methods use the following strategies to control turbid particles: complete separation of liquid and solid using 0.45-µm filtration before contacting solid samples and bacteria, natural settlement, moderate separation of large particles using coarser pore size filtration, and exclusion of light loss in the toxicity calculation caused by turbidity after full disturbance of samples. Our proposed method uses moderate centrifugation to separate out the heavier soil particles from the lighter bacteria after direct contact between them. Among the solid-phase methods tested, in which the bacteria and solid particles were in direct contact (i.e., the three existing methods and the newly proposed one, c-BSPT), no single method could be recommended as optimal for samples over a range of turbidity. Instead, a simple screening strategy for selecting a sample-dependent solid-phase test method was suggested, depending on the turbidity of the solid suspension. The results of this study highlight the importance of considering solid particles, and the necessity for optimal selection of test method to reduce errors in the measurement of solid-phase toxicity.


Subject(s)
Environmental Monitoring/methods , Luminescent Measurements , Toxicity Tests/methods , Water Pollutants/toxicity , Filtration , Light , Soil
2.
J Environ Sci (China) ; 24(4): 589-95, 2012.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22894091

ABSTRACT

The removal of As(III) and As(V) from aqueous solution was investigated using waste cast iron, which is a byproduct of the iron casting process in foundries. Two types of waste cast iron were used in the experiment: grind precipitate dust (GPD) and cast iron shot (CIS). The X-ray diffraction analysis indicated the presence of Feo on GPD and CIS. Batch experiments were performed under different concentrations of As(III) and As(V) and at various initial pH levels. Results showed that waste cast iron was effective in the removal of arsenic. The adsorption isotherm study indicated that the Langmuir isotherm was better than the Freundlich isotherm at describing the experimental result. In the adsorption of both As(IH) and As(V), the adsorption capacity of GPD was greater than CIS, mainly due to the fact that GPD had higher surface area and weight percent of Fe than CIS. Results also indicated the removal of As(III) and As(V) by GPD and CIS was influenced by the initial solution pH, generally decreasing with increasing pH from 3.0 to 10.5. In addition, both GPD and CIS were more effective at the removal of As(III) than As(V) under given experimental conditions. This study demonstrates that waste cast iron has potential as a reactive material to treat wastewater and groundwater containing arsenic.


Subject(s)
Arsenates/isolation & purification , Arsenites/isolation & purification , Iron/chemistry , Waste Products/analysis , Water Pollutants, Chemical/isolation & purification , Adsorption , Chemical Precipitation , Electron Probe Microanalysis , Hydrogen-Ion Concentration , Kinetics , Solutions , Temperature , X-Ray Diffraction
3.
Waste Manag Res ; 24(3): 250-9, 2006 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16784168

ABSTRACT

Geosynthetic liner systems are generally installed in landfill sites to prevent toxic leachate from escaping into the adjoining environment by utilizing their impervious characteristics. Therefore, it is important to protect the geomembrane from being damaged or destroyed during all phases of landfilling, namely landfill construction, waste tipping and landfill closure. This paper presents firstly the observed performance of a geomembrane liner from a landfill site where the geomembrane liner was installed on the slopes of a Korean landfill; and secondly the results of an inclined board laboratory test. Two types of experiments were conducted to identify the protecting effect of the overlaying geosynthetic on the geomembrane liners. At a testing landfill site, the slope consisted of three different sub-inclines and two 2-m-wide intermediate levels. The sub-inclines were each 8 m in vertical height and their angle of inclination was 1: 1.5 (vertical: horizontal). The reported observations were made for a time period of approximately 1 year, until the landfill was filled with wastes to the top of the uppermost slope. In addition, inclined board laboratory tests were carried out. During the inclined board test, a base table is inclined slowly and steadily until the block located on the base table starts to slide, when the tension and displacements of two geosynthetics, namely the geomembrane liner and protecting geotextile, are measured. In conclusion, test results showed that the down-drag force generated by waste accumulation and sliding of upper material was to a large extent dissipated through the elongation of the protecting geosynthetic overlying the geomembrane and thus was not transferred to the geomembrane. Unless the protecting geosynthetic undergoes structural failure, this stress relaxation phenomenon continues to occur so that the magnitude of tensile force to be applied on the geomembrane remains marginal.


Subject(s)
Membranes, Artificial , Geological Phenomena , Geology
4.
J Hazard Mater ; 95(1-2): 65-79, 2002 Nov 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12409239

ABSTRACT

Batch tests and column tests were performed to determine the design factors for permeable reactive barriers (PRBs) against the contaminated groundwater by ammonium and heavy metals. Clinoptilolite, one of the natural zeolites having excellent cation exchange capacity (CEC), was chosen as the reactive material. In the batch tests, the reactivity of clinoptilolite to ammonium, lead, and copper was examined by varying the concentration of cations and the particle size of clinoptilolite. One gram of clinoptilolite showed removal efficiencies of more than 80% against those contaminants in all cases except in very high initial concentrations of ammonium (80 ppm) and copper (40 ppm). The effect of particle size of clinoptilolite was not noticeable. In the column tests, permeability was examined using a flexible-wall permeameter by varying particle sizes of clinoptilolite. When the washed clinoptilolite having the diameter of 0.42-0.85 mm was mixed with Jumunjin sands in 20:80 ratio (w/w), the highest permeability of 2 x 10(-3) to 7 x 10(-4)cm/s was achieved. The reactivity and the strength property of the mixed material were investigated using a fixed-wall column, having eight sampling ports on the wall, and the direct shear test, respectively. Clinoptilolite was found to be a suitable material for PRBs against the contaminated groundwater with ammonium and/or heavy metals.


Subject(s)
Metals, Heavy , Quaternary Ammonium Compounds , Water Pollutants , Zeolites , Chemical Phenomena , Chemistry, Physical , Particle Size , Permeability
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...