ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Previous reports suggest that body composition parameters can be used to predict outcomes for patients with gastrointestinal (GI) cancers. However, evidence for an association with long-term survival is conflicting, with much of the data derived from patients with advanced disease. This study examined the effect of body composition on survival in primary operable GI cancer. METHODS: Patients with resectable adenocarcinoma of the GI tract (esophagus, stomach, colon, rectum) between 2006 and 2014 were identified from a prospective database. Computed tomography (CT) scans were analyzed using a transverse section at L3 to calculate sex-specific body composition indices for skeletal muscle, visceral fat, and subcutaneous fat. Kaplan-Meier and log-rank analysis were used to compare unadjusted survival. Multivariate survival analyses were performed using a proportional hazards model. RESULTS: The study enrolled 447 patients (191 woman and 256 men) with esophagogastric (OG) (n = 108) and colorectal (CR) (n = 339) cancer. Body composition did not predict survival for the OG cancer patients. Among the CR cancer patients, survival was shorter for those with sarcopenia (p = 0.017) or low levels of subcutaneous fat (p = 0.005). Older age (p = 0.046) and neutrophilia (p = 0.013) were associated with sarcopenia in patients with CR. Tumor stage (p = 0.033), neutrophil count (p = 0.011), and hypoalbuminemia (p = 0.023) were associated with sarcopenia in OG cancer patients. In the multivariate analysis, no single measure of body composition was an independent predictor of reduced survival. CONCLUSION: Sarcopenia and reduced subcutaneous adiposity are associated with reduced survival for patients with primary operable CR cancer. However, in this study, no parameter of body composition was an independent prognostic marker when considered with age, tumor stage, and systemic inflammation.
Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Body Composition , Digestive System Surgical Procedures/mortality , Gastrointestinal Neoplasms/pathology , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Adenocarcinoma/diagnostic imaging , Adenocarcinoma/surgery , Aged , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Gastrointestinal Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Gastrointestinal Neoplasms/surgery , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies , Survival RateABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Gastric pouches have the potential to improve nutrition following total gastrectomy, compared with standard reconstruction. However, a consensus view of clinical benefit is not available, at least partly due to a lack of standardization of pouch design or size. This study was undertaken to identify optimal conditions for pouch design. METHODS: A mathematical model was established and a porcine model constructed to evaluate the pressure/volume dynamics of the pouch. A "J" pouch was constructed at anastomotic lengths of 5, 10, 15, and 20 cm. Each pouch was distended with saline and the pressure/volume relationship established. RESULTS: Mathematically, increasing the anastomotic length of the pouch to 15 cm increases the volume significantly; thereafter, there is minimal benefit of increasing the pouch length further. For smaller pouches (5 and 10 cm) a 350-to 400-ml volume (approximate meal volume in the elderly) is never achieved until higher pressures (45 cmH(2)O) are applied. However, in the larger pouches (15 and 20 cm) a 350-to 400-ml volume is readily achieved at basal pressures of 15 cmH(2)O. CONCLUSION: Smaller pouches never achieve adequate volumes at basal pressures; accordingly, it is unlikely that they will lead to any clinical benefit. Further in-vivo studies should therefore be based upon 15-cm pouch designs.
