ABSTRACT
We compared the antimicrobial resistance and clonal relationships among the community-acquired (CA) and hospital-acquired (HA) methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strains that were isolated from blood cultures in a university hospital over a 4-year period. A total of 131 MRSA isolates, including 28 CA-MRSA and 103 HA-MRSA strains, were identified; antimicrobial susceptibility testing indicated that the CA-MRSA isolates were more susceptible to erythromycin (21% vs 6%; P=0.02), clindamycin (46% vs 12%; P=0.01), ciprofloxacin (43% vs 11%; P=0.01), and gentamicin (43% vs 6%; P=0.01) than were the HA-MRSA isolates. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) typing and antimicrobial resistance profiles separated the 20 CA-MRSA isolates into 14 and 10 different patterns, respectively, and the 53 HA-MRSA isolates were separated into 24 and 7 different patterns, respectively. Twenty-one (40%) of the 53 HA-MRSA isolates belonged to two predominant PFGE types, and most of them showed multi-drug resistant patterns. Four (20%) of the 20 CA-MRSA and 10 (19%) of the 53 HA-MRSA isolates fell into two common PFGE patterns, and each of them showed the same multi-drug resistant pattern. This study suggests that, although the CA-MRSA blood isolates showed diverse PFGE and antimicrobial resistance patterns, some of these isolates may have originated from the HA-MRSA strains.
Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Blood/microbiology , Community-Acquired Infections/microbiology , Cross Infection/microbiology , Methicillin Resistance , Staphylococcus aureus/classification , Staphylococcus aureus/drug effects , Community-Acquired Infections/epidemiology , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Culture Media , Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field , Humans , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Prevalence , Staphylococcal Infections/epidemiology , Staphylococcal Infections/microbiology , Staphylococcus aureus/genetics , Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purificationABSTRACT
Ocular Vibrio vulnificus infections are quite rare, and all previously reported cases have been associated with exposure to seafood and seawater. Here, we report a case of endogenous endophthalmitis caused by V. vulnificus, occurring after the ingestion of raw seafood. This case was not associated with any cutaneous or other severe systemic manifestations.