Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Eur J Emerg Med ; 27(5): 351-356, 2020 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32073415

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Right subclavian vein (SCV) dimensions were evaluated on ultrasound and whether these change when the right upper limb is in a neutral position compared with the 'stop sign' position (shoulder abducted and externally rotated to 90°, elbow flexed to 90°), and when patients were positioned 30° head-up compared with lying supine. METHODS: Images of transverse and longitudinal views of the right SCV in patients ≥18 years, presenting with a range of conditions to a Regional Hospital Emergency Department, were recorded by two physicians in a randomly assigned, nonsequential order and measured blinded. Data were analysed with paired Student's t tests. N = 62. RESULTS: Primary outcome: cross-sectional area (CSA) of the right SCV in transverse images. SECONDARY OUTCOMES: depth of SCV to skin and diameter of SCV on longitudinal images. There was no significant difference in CSA of the SCV in supine patients when the arm was in the stop sign position compared with neutral (mean CSA: 1.20 ± 0.42 and 1.15 ± 0.39 cm, respectively; P = 0.3). In patients positioned 30° head-up, the stop sign position significantly increased CSA from 0.65 ± 0.33 to 1.00 ± 0.38 cm (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Utilizing the stop sign position does not change SVC dimensions when patients are supine, however, may improve dimensions when lying supine is contraindicated.


Subject(s)
Catheterization, Central Venous , Subclavian Vein , Humans , Research Design , Subclavian Vein/diagnostic imaging , Ultrasonography
2.
Crit Care Resusc ; 14(4): 312-5, 2012 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23230881

ABSTRACT

Ensuring effective, safe drug dosing in critically ill patients can be difficult, due to variable and dynamic organ function. An 82-year-old man was admitted to the intensive care unit with severe community-acquired pneumonia, septic shock and progressive organ failure. He required ventilation and continuous renal replacement therapy. He developed seizures which we believe were due to cefepime toxicity. Following the first seizure, we took serial measurements of plasma cefepime levels, and a single measurement of the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cefepime level. The peak plasma cefepime concentration was 73.8 µg/mL (minimum inhibitory concentration of target enterobacteriaceae is 8 µg/mL) and the CSF level was 6.1 µg/mL. The patient had four seizures during the period of high plasma cefepime concentration, but no more episodes once the drug level decreased to non-toxic levels. This case highlights the difficulty in predicting pharmacokinetics in critically ill patients, particularly those receiving renal replacement therapy. We suggest that therapeutic drug monitoring in critically ill patients may be a useful intervention to avoid antibiotic-related toxicities.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Cephalosporins/adverse effects , Drug Monitoring , Hemofiltration , Neurotoxicity Syndromes/prevention & control , Seizures/prevention & control , Aged, 80 and over , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacokinetics , Cefepime , Cephalosporins/pharmacokinetics , Hemofiltration/adverse effects , Hemofiltration/methods , Humans , Male , Metabolic Clearance Rate , Neurotoxicity Syndromes/etiology , Pneumonia/therapy , Seizures/chemically induced , Shock, Septic/therapy
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...